logo
Tariffs on meds will make America sick

Tariffs on meds will make America sick

Gulf Today11-05-2025

Eric Feigl-Ding,
Tribune News Service
During the past few weeks, President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariff wars have rattled the stock market, decimated many Americans' retirement funds and promised to send grocery prices soaring — and his administration hasn't even gotten to critical pharmaceutical tariffs yet. But that will likely be the next shoe to drop. Trump exempted pharmaceuticals from his first round of tariffs in early April, but recently declared that he intends to impose 'a major tariff' on imported medicines 'very shortly.' These tariffs, he claims, will prompt pharmaceutical companies to leave countries including China and India and begin 'opening up their plants all over the place.' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a television interview in mid-April that these tariffs are coming in the 'next month or two.'
What will this mean for Americans? The majority of brand name drugs used in the United States are imported. Even generic drugs often rely on ingredients and direct imports from China, including pain relievers and cardiovascular drugs used by millions. The United States was already facing a drug shortage crisis before Trump's tariff announcement — now, his policies will drive up not only the cost of medicines, but also other health care items such as X-ray machines and medical instruments. Already, Americans already pay two to three times more for prescription drugs than other developed countries. More than half of US adults say they're worried about being able to afford their medications. Now compound that by skyrocketing costs of basic drug ingredients and increased costs of finished pills. Trump cannot just stomp his feet and make domestic pharmaceutical manufacturers suddenly open dozens of new manufacturing plants. Opening a single new manufacturing facility and making sure it is able to meet high quality standards for pharmaceutical production can cost up to $2 billion and take five to 10 years. And pharma companies won't make that investment unless it is cost-effective and furthers their own profits — which will definitely pass on even higher drug costs to consumers.
Trump's proposed drug tariffs also threaten the nation's pandemic preparedness. Key active pharmaceutical ingredients for COVID-19 treatments such as remdesivir, key influenza drugs such as oseltamivir and other respiratory virus therapies depend heavily on Chinese and Indian production. Tariffs will force pharmaceutical companies to slash inventories or seek costly alternatives. With only 53% of US generic drug ingredients produced domestically, we will face imminent shortages if we tariff drug ingredients. With shortages in supply will come higher costs, and higher costs will lead to people skipping doses or forgoing critical medicines altogether — which will ultimately lead to more emergency care costs from heart attacks and strokes that would otherwise have been prevented.
While we face this pointless standoff between Trump and other countries, entire industries and people's lives are on the line. Think about the patients who will die if their medicine costs go up by 50% or even 100%. How many of us can absorb that expense, especially for seniors living on a fixed income? What if you have a chronic condition and face these added taxes monthly? Weekly? Daily? What if your retirement savings already took a hit in the Trump market chaos, and you're bracing for the costs of groceries and daily living expenses to rise as well? China currently manufactures Stanley tumblers for $1 a piece and Nike shoes for $10 — they sell for $50 and $150, respectively. Now translate these margins to raw ingredients and finished pill manufacturing costs if the US were to domestically produce all Chinese-made medicines. Plus, not forget the added toxic pollution from drug factories that the US consumer avoids as well from manufacturing abroad. Altogether, American patients benefit from global trade.
Trump's tariffs punish US patients, revealing a cold calculus where corporate profit trumps human lives. Prior to Trump's return to office, the United States was well on its way to lowering prescription drug costs. The Inflation Reduction Act allowed Medicare to finally negotiate for lower drug prices. But Trump's tariffs will send prices soaring, and cause critical shortages of life saving medicines that treat diabetes, heart disease, cancers and more. The people who can least afford it will suffer, and some will not survive.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India Abstaining During Voting On UN Resolution For Ceasefire In Gaza Is The Lowest Point Of Diplomacy
India Abstaining During Voting On UN Resolution For Ceasefire In Gaza Is The Lowest Point Of Diplomacy

Arabian Post

time3 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

India Abstaining During Voting On UN Resolution For Ceasefire In Gaza Is The Lowest Point Of Diplomacy

By Nitya Chakraborty On Thursday June 12, Indian diplomacy under the Prime Minister Narendra Modi reached its lowest ebb when India abstained in the United Nations General Assembly from a vote on a resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. The 193 member UN general assembly passed the resolution overwhelmingly with 149 countries in favour, 12 against and 19 countries including India, once the real leader of the global South. India did not support this resolution at a time when Israel is engaged in genocide in Gaza and other areas of Palestine killing even the hungry and sick people who were going for food and medicines to the aid centres. Even the G-7 members excepting the U.S. have strongly spoken against the latest killings by Israel and they all excepting USA voted for the resolution. But India did not, it abstained. The 19 countries who abstained included apart from India, countries like Albania, Cameroon, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Malawi, Panama, South Sudan and Togo. These countries are not significant players in UN. All the leading members of the Global South including BRICS and SCO voted in favour of the resolution. USA and Israel, as usual, voted against the resolution. The Indian abstention from voting in such a critical situation when Israel is in its most aggressive form even without listening to the U.S. President Donald Trump, has triggered a big distrust among the leading members of the developing countries as also the two big powers Russia and China. The next summit of BRICS will be taking place in July this year in Brazil. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be attending that. Israel's action including its attacks against Iran on June 13 will also be on the agenda. How Can Indian Prime Minister face the other members of the BRICS at the summit on the issue of Israel and Gaza? In the explanation of vote on the resolution titled 'Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations', India's permanent representative to the UN, ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said the resolution comes against the backdrop of worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza.. He then said India is deeply concerned at the deepening humanitarian crisis and condemns the loss of civilian lives but a joint effort should be directed towards bringing the two sides closer. So, India would abstain from the resolution. What an argument under the new normal Modi doctrine? Everyone knows what is the latest attitude of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to any bilateral talks? The immediate need is to save the lives of Gaza people and organize humanitarian aid for sick and hungry. The ceasefire is imperative for that. 149 countries out of the total of 193 members supported the resolution on the basis of this understanding. They wanted to stop the killings with immediate effect. The resolution demanded that Israel, the 'occupying power', immediately end the blockade, open all border crossings and ensure that aid reaches the Palestinian civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip immediately and at scale, in line with its obligations under peace international law and humanitarian principles. It seems that the Narendra Modi government has objection to the term 'occupying power' given to Israel. Even France, Britain are agreeing to this resolution, why not India? The resolution demanded that the parties fully, unconditionally and without delay implement all the provisions of Security Council resolution of June 2024, including an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, the return of the remains of hostages who have been killed, the exchange of Palestinian prisoners, the return of Palestinian civilians to their homes and neighbourhoods in the Gaza Strip and the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip. The UNGA vote came after the 15-nation Security Council failed to adopt a similar resolution last week after the sole veto by permanent member the United States. For the active members like South Africa and Brazil, there was no other way but to organize a fresh resolution for voting in the UN general assembly where the resolution is decided by voting and no veto power is allowed. On Thursday, the draft resolution was moved by Spain which is a member of the European Union. Prime Minister Sanchez belongs to the socialist part of the coalition and Deputy Prime Minister is Yolanda Diaz, a prominent leader of the Communist Party of Spain.. Spain could organize most members of the European Union in favour of the Resolution. The latest Israeli attack on Iran on Friday and the possibility of the war spreading with serious implications for the Middle East as also global peace poses another challenge to the Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The PM has cultivated special relations with Israel while Iran is very crucial from India's geopolitical strategy. It will be another big challenge to PM's diplomatic acumen. (IPA Service)

Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack
Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack

The US quietly delivered hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before its unprecedented attack on Iran on Friday, Middle East Eye can reveal. The US sent around 300 Hellfire missiles to Israel on Tuesday in a large-scale stock-up of supplies before its attack, and as the Trump administration was saying it was ready to continue engaging Iran in nuclear talks. The transfer of such a large quantity of Hellfires suggests that the Trump administration was well-informed of Israel's plans to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran, two US officials told MEE on the condition of anonymity. The US's delivery of Hellfires or other large quantities of weapons in the lead up to Friday's attack has not been previously reported. The US military helped shoot down Iranian missiles that were headed towards Israel, two US officials told Reuters on Friday. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Hellfires are laser-guided air-to-ground missiles. They would not be useful for Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, but for precision strikes. Israel's military used more than 100 aircraft in its attack on Friday, which used precision tracking to target senior military officials, nuclear scientists, and command centres. 'There is a time and place for Hellfires. They were useful to Israel,' one senior US defence official told MEE. Israel killed scores of senior Iranian officials and nuclear scientists on Friday. Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran Read More » The dead include: the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Major General Hossein Salami; Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran's armed forces; and Ali Shamkhani, a close aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Trump administration knew about Israel's attack plans for months. MEE revealed earlier this month that the CIA was briefed in April and May on Israeli plans to unilaterally attack Iran's nuclear sites. Israel's Target Systems Analysis and battle plan for cyberattacks combined with precision strikes without any direct US involvement 'impressed' the administration. But Trump's behaviour in recent months gave observers, and potentially the Iranians, the impression that he would continue to resist Netanyahu's very public lobbying to go along with strikes. Axios reported on Friday, citing two Israeli officials, that the Trump administration was only 'pretending' to resist Israel's attack plans, but privately did not resist them. Trump has since framed his approach as saying that he gave Iran a 60-day window to agree to a new nuclear agreement with his administration before launching strikes. Israeli media reported the 60-day deadline in March 2025. The Trump administration began talks with Iran on 12 April 2025, and the Israeli attack took place exactly 61 days later. The talks in recent weeks hit a wall over the US's insistence that Iran agree not to enrich any uranium, while Tehran said that preserving its right to a low level of enrichment was a red line. Throughout the negotiations, the Trump administration continued a steady supply of arms and weapons to Israel in recent months, two US officials told MEE. The US did not have to provide public notification of the transfer because it was already approved as part of a $7.4bn arms deal that included bombs, missiles, and related equipment that Congress was notified of in February 2025.

Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran
Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran

After Israel pummelled Iran in an unprecedented attack and the Islamic Republic launched a barrage of missiles targeting Tel Aviv, US President Donald Trump has portrayed himself as above the fray. 'I gave them 60 days and they didn't meet it,' Trump told The New York Post on Friday. 'Today's 61, you know. Today's day 61.' Trump was referencing Israeli media reports from March 2025 that said he had sent Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei a letter laying out a two-month window to agree to a new nuclear deal, or face an attack. The US and Iran held their first round of nuclear talks on 12 April. For two months, Trump used the threat of Israeli strikes as a form of leverage against Iran, as his administration tried to impose an agreement on it that would strip it of all ability to enrich uranium. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters On Friday, Trump answered the question that had been gnawing at diplomats, analysts and even intelligence officials: whether the president of the United States would give the green light to an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear programme. 'Israel struck for many reasons - fear Iran's program might soon enter a zone of immunity; [a] risk ready Israeli prime minister for whom striking Iran was a lifelong mission. But the key was Trump's willingness to green light the attacks - or at least not to say no,' Aaron David Miller, a former State Department Middle East negotiator, wrote on X. CIA briefed on unilateral Israeli attack plans It's clear Trump knew about Israel's plans for some time. Middle East Eye revealed earlier this month that the CIA was briefed in April and May on Israeli plans to unilaterally attack Iran's nuclear sites. Israel's Target Systems Analysis and battle plan for cyberattacks combined with precision strikes without any direct US involvement 'impressed' the administration. But Trump's behaviour in recent months gave observers, and potentially the Iranians, the impression that he would continue to resist Netanyahu's very public lobbying to go along with strikes. Israel's attacks on Iran amount to crime of aggression, legal scholars say Read More » Trump surprised Netanyahu in April when he announced at a White House meeting that he would begin direct talks with Iran on curbing its nuclear programme. In early May, he brushed aside his hawkish national security advisor, Mike Waltz, and then snubbed Netanyahu on a visit to the Middle East. For good measure, Trump even cut a unilateral ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen that left out Israel. On the eve of the Israeli attack, Trump said he did not believe it was 'imminent' but was 'something that could very well happen'. His own Middle East envoy and top negotiator, Steve Witkoff, was set to meet his Iranian counterparts on Sunday in Oman for a sixth round of nuclear talks. The Iranians say they will not attend the talks, but Trump continues to call for a negotiated deal, under the scimitar of Israeli fire. Israel's 'trump card' He warned on Friday of 'even more brutal' attacks to follow and threatened Tehran to 'make a deal…before there is nothing left'. Experts say that despite Trump's call for more negotiations, Netanyahu has effectively torpedoed the diplomatic route. 'Trump's talk of a return to a nuclear deal is likely to be untenable now' - David Schenker, Washington Institute for Near East Policy 'Trump's talk of a return to a nuclear deal is likely to be untenable now,' David Schenker, a former senior official in Trump's first administration and expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told MEE. While Trump has left little doubt that he knew about the strikes, he has been more circumspect on whether they were his preferred outcome. The US is Israel's closest ally and top military backer, but US officials familiar with Israel's plans say the US had little leverage to prevent an Israeli attack, short of the type of full-scale public censure that no US president has ever issued against Israel, like halting all arms sales. 'If Israel faces what it deems an existential crisis, it could, in theory, threaten to use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran,' a former senior Trump administration official told MEE. Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons, but has never publicly acknowledged it. 'Israel can't be compared to Ukraine,' the official added, referring to the other US ally Trump has tried to rein in at war with Russia. Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons after the fall of the Soviet Union. Besides weaponry, one of the US's greatest forms of leverage with its partners is its mastery of intelligence collection, particularly through satellites and intercepting and analysing communications. But Israel has spent decades penetrating the Islamic Republic of Iran and is not dependent on US intelligence there, experts say. 'Look what we saw in Lebanon. Israel has had two primary target sets over the last two decades. One was Hezbollah and the other was Iran,' Schenker told MEE, emphasising how Israel eliminated Hezbollah's senior leadership in 2024 and left the group in disarray. Does Trump trust Israel? Although Trump has tried to frame the Israeli attack as complementing his hard-nosed diplomacy, one Gulf official told MEE they believed the White House was deeply wary of its ally. 'The administration does not view Israel as trustworthy,' the official said. Prem Kumar, who was a senior director for the Middle East and North Africa under the Obama administration, told MEE that Netanyahu had 'sidelined' Trump. What is stopping Israel from bombing Iran's nuclear sites? Read More » 'My sense is that Trump is not pleased with how this ended up. He is trying to use the idea of resuscitating the talks to save face. The idea that the Iranians would resume negotiations is ludicrous. Trump looks weak,' added Kumar, now a Middle East expert at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group advisory. Regardless of whether Trump gave Israel a green light or tacit approval to attack Iran, experts say that he is now tethered to Israel's military campaign. Asked by Reuters on Friday whether he would support the US's closest Middle East ally, he replied: 'We've been very close to Israel," he said. "We're their number one ally by far." "We'll see what happens," he added. The US came to Israel's defence in April and October 2024 when Iran and Israel exchanged direct fire. Tehran choreographed its attack heavily in April and somewhat in October, experts said. The best Trump can hope for is that Israel replicates its success with its takedown of Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2024. The worst outcome is that he brings the US into the very type of Middle East "forever war" he was elected not to.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store