logo
Andrew Bolt says it was the voters who were wrong as Sky News commentators grieve Dutton election loss

Andrew Bolt says it was the voters who were wrong as Sky News commentators grieve Dutton election loss

The Guardian03-05-2025

It was a result that Andrew Bolt was not expecting and could not countenance.
By 9.46pm the rightwing commentator had penned a piece on the Herald Sun blaming the Australian electorate for the Coalition loss.
'No, the voters aren't always right. This time they were wrong,' Bolt wrote.
The reason for the loss? It was because the Liberal party 'refused to fight the 'culture wars''.
A little over a hour earlier on Sky News Australia, he had recognised it was all over for the Liberal leader that he had dubbed Scary Guy. He was unsentimental about the loss.
Peter Dutton was comprehensively beaten by Anthony Albanese, Bolt said, because everyone agreed the prime minister looked like a 'nice easy going guy' compared with Dutton.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
But that's where Bolt's praise for the Labor leader ended. It was incomprehensible, he said, that a government that 'left Australians poorer, more divided, more uncertain', could have been re-elected.
'Well, it did because Anthony Albanese didn't look threatening,' he said.
'If Peter Dutton does lose in Dickson, they've got a leadership crisis. Because there is no person one can say 'that man is a leader, or that woman is a leader'.'
By the time Dutton's gracious concession speech was over at 9.39pm, Sky News was calling the election result a 'blood bath' and recriminations were flying between Sky's commentators and their political guests.
Like Bolt, the Sky political editor, Andrew Clennell, pinned the loss on the leader. 'People don't like Peter Dutton,' Clennell said matter of factly as he recounted what happened when he went door knocking. 'You know, it's just one of those unfortunate things.'
For Chris Uhlmann, a former ABC and Nine political editor who has embraced his conservative side over on Sky News, the Coalition's primary vote is down to a 'horrific' 30% and the party is facing 'an existential crisis'.
'Where does this party go?' he asked. 'This is a party that will tear itself apart while it tries to work out how it articulates itself to appeal to enough people in Australia to be able to form a government in future.'
But shadow minister Sarah Henderson was not conceding defeat. 'It's looking pretty challenging,' she said. 'There's no doubt about that … but there is some green shoots. I like to stay positive. And I want to say that in Solomon, in the Northern Territory, there looks like a very strong swing to the Country Liberal Lisa Bayliss.'
While everyone expressed their surprise at the magnitude of the loss, Clennell suggested the election drubbing was far from a shock to many senior Liberals as Sky producers had struggled to get them on air tonight.
'I just want to take you through how big this is,' Clennell said. The pre-polls can come back, but is Albo about to win a landslide?
'I don't think there's any doubt that Albanese has got an increased majority, not just a majority.'
Sky's election analyst Tom Connell called it not long after 8pm: 'This contest is effectively over. Albanese will be prime minister of Australia.'
For much of the night Sky After Dark host Sharri Markson, stationed at Coalition headquarters, was hanging on to the pre-poll results as a path to redemption, predicting that when those results came in the gap between the parties in some seats would narrow.
But it was also Markson who recently predicted the national opinion polls were inaccurate and the Coalition's private polling was positive: 'the polls you're reading in the news are wrong when it comes to this federal election'.
Peta Credlin, a former chief of staff to Tony Abbott, said it was disgraceful that Dutton had been 'demonised' as he was a decent guy. But she came alive when suggesting her side of politics should fight more culture wars. 'I'd argue we didn't do enough of a culture war,' Credlin said.
She went on to suggest the Liberals make a 'simple statement' about the rights of biological women, and when she was shouted down by the panel she fired up.
'Again, gentlemen, if you would forgive me, but I'm sick of being mansplained about what biological women feel about biological female rights. We do care about it.'
Former Labor minister Graham Richardson, who hasn't lost his talent for the one-liner, said the Liberals have got to ask themselves where do we go now?
'We've tried Dutton - what else have we got? Well not much because if Angus Taylor is the answer, it's a stupid question.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

At a time of global political upheaval, can Albanese really resist calls to be more ambitious?
At a time of global political upheaval, can Albanese really resist calls to be more ambitious?

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

At a time of global political upheaval, can Albanese really resist calls to be more ambitious?

In his National Press Club address on Tuesday the prime minister laid down an existential challenge to those who cheered the loudest on election night when Peter Dutton and his miserable crew were confined to the dustbin of history. In making the case that trust in government is underpinned by economic stability and keeping election promises, the PM is saying the quiet bit out loud: his government will push back on calls to 'show more ambition' in the wake of its thumping win. Setting markers on what he perceives to be the limit to his mandate is, on one level, a legitimate interpretation of the election and a credible template for embedding Labor government for the next decade. In my post-election column, I argued even this limited mandate is ambitious and wide-ranging: building renewables, new homes and health infrastructure; consolidating the care economy; mediating AI and regulating big tech. But at a time of rolling and intensifying crises in geopolitics, technology, climate and inequality, is it enough to say this is the limit of the government's work? More profoundly, how can a government determined to occupy the centre ground be shepherded to more ambition? The new government's approval of the long-term expansion of gas on the North-West Shelf, its neglect of the Uluru statement from the heart and the repercussions of our defence relationship with an unhinged US are causing legitimate angst. It would be understandable and natural to respond to these positions with anger and dissent but in this new environment the traditional political pressure points are not so readily available. Those who dreamed of progressive minority government have been sent to the sidelines. The Greens may have a Senate veto power but this will need to be exercised judiciously lest it become a proxy for frustrating the aforementioned mandate. Add the fact that the Labor left now holds not just the leadership but a majority of cabinet positions, and the institutional mechanisms for prosecuting more progressive policy appear limited. This operating environment lays down real challenges for progressive groups that normally lead the charge, the not-for-profits, member organisations and unions whose leaders are convening in Old Parliament House this week to survey the political landscape. Business-as-usual campaigning driven by anger, passion and the demands of funders for quick wins risks marginalising progressives to the fringes of the national debate. To adapt to these new conditions, progressive groups need to confront the situation as dispassionately as the prime minister. First, they need tocome to terms with what the election was really about: a vote for stability against the chaos of Dutton, not a contest between visions of radical change but a contrast of tone and approach. Second, they should look for opportunities to campaign alongside government where there is common ground and common purpose. The rollout of renewable energy in regional Australia is a case in point: that agenda ran the real risk of being sidelined by a lack of community social licence, which was wrongly taken as a given as advocates moved on to the next fight before fully banking the one in from of them. Third, they need to identify the issues that are beyond the current mandate and build long-term strategies to extend the government's ambitions. To be clear, this does not mean putting the planet, poverty or peace on the backburner. But at the beginning of a cycle where the government has such a strong majority, this ambition needs to be earned not simply demanded. The final lesson is that the vast majority of voters are motivated by their own material needs, not a broader ideological or moral imperative. Building ambition around this reality is critical in securing common cause. It is important that the Albanese government learns the right lessons from its victory, starting with recognising that despite the arithmetic thumping, Labor's primary vote was lower than Mark Latham's 2004 disaster. It is now easy to forget how fraught the situation was before the final run home, when there was still a real chance that the government would make history as the first one-term government in a century. For too much of its first term it drifted from crisis to crisis, too reactive to the white noise of the Murdoch press and too ready to pick a fight with the Greens as a proof point of its centrist bona fides. It also left it late to build a coherent story about why it was there and what it was trying to achieve. Apart from defending things like Medicare and opposing things like nuclear power, there is still a confusion about what the government is actually there to do. Finally, while the government has the power to pass laws and allocate spending, it cannot do everything. Through the first term its tendency to hoard power left it exposed and isolated. Working more collaboratively with civil society through sharing its mission and embracing friction will only make it more resilient. Ultimately the prime minister is right: his government, like all governments, exists as an expression of the trust of the people. Rewarding that trust by building a shared consensus to tackle our cascading crises is the only credible pathway to securing the lasting change that the moment demands. Peter Lewis is the executive director of Essential, a progressive strategic communications and research company that undertook research for Labor in the last election and conducts qualitative research for Guardian Australia. He is also the host of Per Capita's Burning Platforms podcast

Moment LA cops shoot reporter on live TV while Brit photographer is hospitalised by rubber bullet during street anarchy
Moment LA cops shoot reporter on live TV while Brit photographer is hospitalised by rubber bullet during street anarchy

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

Moment LA cops shoot reporter on live TV while Brit photographer is hospitalised by rubber bullet during street anarchy

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the moment a TV journalist was shot live on air as she reported on the violent immigration riots in Los Angeles. Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi was covering the protests for Nine News when she was blasted at close range by a rubber bullet, collapsing in agony mid-broadcast. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Lauren Tomasi was reporting live from the streets of LA amid the violent protests in the city 2 The Australian reporter was shot with a rubber bullet by riot police live on air Credit: X 'The LAPD are moving in on horseback and firing rubber bullets at protesters,' Tomasi told viewers, as loud bangs echoed across Downtown LA. Suddenly, a police officer swung his weapon towards her, and a cloud of smoke erupted near the correspondent. Caught on camera, Tomasi doubled over in pain, live on air. 'You just f***ing shot a reporter!' a furious protester screamed at police, as others rushed to help the injured Aussie. Despite the shocking moment, Tomasi managed to yell back, 'I'm good, I'm good.' Her network later confirmed she was 'left sore but otherwise unharmed' by the impact — but the image of a journalist being targeted has already sparked outrage. It comes after a British photojournalist was rushed to hospital for emergency surgery when a 'sponge bullet' tore through his thigh during the same night of violence. Nick Stern, 60, from Hertford, said he had made himself clearly visible as a member of the press when he was shot while photographing a standoff between protesters and riot cops. 'I felt this horrific shooting pain impacting my leg. I felt down immediately and felt this large lump … protesters came to help and I was just saying, 'Sit me down, sit me down'… then I blacked out,' he told The Times. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store