
State Economists Nudge Oregon's Economic Forecast Down
Oregon's economy could be characterized by sluggish growth and higher unemployment for the coming years, according to the state's
Although the state will take in record revenue in the 2025-2027 biennium—up 12 percent from the 2023-25 biennium—it will be significantly less than had been predicted just three months ago.
The state is still expected to have billions more to spend in the next two-year budget than it did for the current one.
The ending balance for the current biennium has been revised downward by $162.3 million, and projected General Fund revenue for the 2025-27 biennium has decreased by $337 million, according to the Office of Economic Analysis.
The 2023-25 decrease is primarily due to decreases in personal and corporate income taxes, the report says.
'It is not a recession; let me be abundantly clear about that,' said the state's chief economist Carl Riccadonna, speaking to lawmakers on May 14. 'Nonetheless, it is the type of slow growth that will allow the unemployment rate to drift higher.'
Related Stories
9/1/2022
8/8/2023
Oregon's unemployment rate for April currently sits at 4.7 percent, while the national average rests at 4.2 percent.
Riccadonna put the odds of recession at 25 percent.
The report's authors repeatedly express uncertainty about their findings.
'The Office of Economic Analysis has diminished confidence in the central forecast as a result of pending policy decisions which are expected to have substantial economic consequences for growth, employment, inflation and financial markets—all of which are critical variables driving the compilation of our revenue forecast.'
Democratic lawmakers were quick to blame Trump policies for a possible downturn, specifically citing tariffs.
Republicans emphasized that the state will still collect record revenue and pointed to Democratic policies for any economic downturn.
'A double-digit increase in Oregon's budget is real growth which legislators must spend wisely to fund the core functions of our state,' wrote House Republican Leader Christine Drazan in a statement.
'This increase could have been greater if it weren't for Oregon's highest in the nation taxes, aggressive regulatory environment, and public policy choices that harmed our economic engine,' she added.
Democrats have had a 'trifecta,' in the state since 1992.
The Democratic Party currently controls the offices of governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and both chambers of the state Legislature.
Call it Chaos
'While the Trump Administration spreads uncertainty in our economy and our social safety net, I refuse to let Oregon be knocked off of our game,'
'We know the problems we need to solve here at home regardless of the chaos coming out of Washington, D.C.'
She went on to identify those problems as homelessness, a housing shortage, a dearth of medical care, underperforming schools, and cost-of-living increases in the state.
In this year's budget request, Kotek had pressed for more than $800 million to bolster housing and homelessness, $246 million for the state's behavioral health system, and $200 million for education.
She said she is ready to 'make hard budget choices and address our challenges head on, despite the dampening of economic growth.'
Democratic Senate President Rob Wagner joined the governor in calling out the president's policies.
'Oregon's economy is greatly reliant on our international trading partners, and it is clear the tariffs and chaos from the federal administration is making it harder for businesses to plan and slowing economic growth,' Wagner wrote. 'With this forecast, we are starting to see real impacts to businesses, workers, and state revenues.'
But the report's authors also acknowledge that the forecast was written 'in the midst of bilateral trade negotiations,' which it said 'showed signs of promise.'
Attorney General Dan Rayfield said the economic forecast reinforces the need for the multi-state lawsuit against the Trump Administration tariffs.
'These tariffs are not just policy missteps—they're doing real damage to the state, Oregon families, workers, and small businesses,' Rayfield wrote.
'Tariffs were imposed without proper oversight or consideration for the long-term harm they would cause. That's why we filed this lawsuit—to push back against federal overreach and protect the stability of Oregon's economy.'
To date, Rayfield has participated in more than 16 lawsuits against the Trump Administration.
Blaming the Trifecta
Republicans said the sky isn't falling, and that Democratic policies have hurt Oregon's economy.
'Democrats have taxed, regulated, and micromanaged this state into decline—and now they want to point the finger at Washington,' wrote Republican Rep. Dwayne Yunker in a statement to the media. 'The real problem is right here in Salem.'
A number of
'If we want to see our state budgets grow, we shouldn't raise taxes, we should cut them,' noted Leader Drazan.
The real issue isn't revenue, added Senate Republican Leader Daniel Bonham. 'It's the stagnant economy created by years of Democrat policies,' he wrote.
Bonham cited 'Oregon's anti-business climate, high taxes, and housing restrictions—especially over the last six years with the hidden sales tax and Portland's layered income-based taxes,' which he said are 'strangling opportunity.'
'Key industries like manufacturing and construction are shedding jobs, while government and subsidized sectors continue to grow. Business and wealth are fleeing Portland, and the damage is spreading statewide,' he added.
While Democrats point fingers at tariffs and federal uncertainty, he said 'Oregon's economic decline began long ago.'
Business Environment
Oregon ranked 48th out of 50 states for 'Business Friendliness' in 'CNBC's
In a study across nearly every industry in the state, the University of Oregon's (UO's) Institute for Policy Research and Engagement
More than two-thirds of those either expanded their presence outside of Oregon or packed up and moved. Many said that they were already considering relocation prior to being courted.
'Survey data indicate the state has lost thousands of potential jobs and billions of potential private investments in the past five years and is poised to lose even more in the next five years,' the report states.
A concerning number of businesses indicated they were choosing to expand outside of Oregon due to 'an unfavorable business climate.'
'Oregon's businesses have mixed perceptions about Oregon's business environment. While some view the state as a good place to do business, others cite high taxes, regulatory challenges, and social issues like homelessness and crime as significant drawbacks. This is particularly true with manufacturing and tech firms,' the UO report added.
Between June 2023 and June 2024, Oregon ranked 45th in manufacturing growth,
It also ranks among the bottom 10 states for job growth in other sectors, including construction and professional and business services.
OBI identified specific issues that state policymakers could
'These include the scarcity of developable land, the state's tax environment and the expense of living here.'
Strengthening Oregon's manufacturing sector would generate big dividends, according to OBI.
'A 10 percent increase in Oregon's manufacturing output would add $7 billion to the state's gross domestic product, support nearly 51,000 new jobs and generate an additional $4.2 billion in personal income.
'This would produce more than $850 million in new state and local revenue,' the report stated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend
President Trump set to attend UFC 316 in New Jersey this weekend Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump attends UFC 309 at Madison Square Garden President-elect Donald Trump walked into Madison Square Garden alongside UFC CEO Dana White, Elon Musk and Kid Rock for UFC 309. As his feud with tech billionaire and former MAGA darling Elon Musk exploded into public view this week, the White House says President Donald Trump is planning to attend a UFC event in New Jersey this weekend. The event, UFC 316, is slated for Saturday, June 7 at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The president is scheduled to depart the White House for his golf club in New Jersey Friday afternoon, according to his official schedule, and return to the White House Sunday night. Musk has been high-profile guest for some of Trump's previous visits to the octagon, but the pair had a public falling-out this week after Musk's departure from the Trump administration. 'Siri, play Bad Blood': Internet reacts to Elon Musk and Trump 'breakup' The Trump-Musk fight took off this week when Musk called for Republicans to kill the House-passed tax bill that is a signature part of the second-term president's legislative agenda, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Two days later, Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on June 5 that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk and suggested their 'great relationship' was over. In response, Musk took to social media shortly afterward to blast the president, saying Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would have fared worse in elections in both chambers of the U.S. Congress were it not for his efforts on the 2024 campaign trail, where he poured a quarter of a million dollars into Trump's campaign. The tussle escalated in a back-and-forth between the two men, with Trump suggested going after Musk's companies and their federal contracts, and Musk alleging that Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The pair's most recent fight appearance was in April, when Trump and Musk sat ringside at UFC 314 in Miami. The president has long attended UFC events, as CEO Dana White was a prominent supporter of Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign. When is UFC 316? UFC 316, which is headlined by Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili, is set to take place at 10 p.m. ET/7 p.m. PT at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. The main card is available for pay-per-view on ESPN. More: Sean O'Malley vs. Merab Dvalishvili 2 predictions; full card, odds, picks for UFC 316 Contributing: Riley Beggin, Sudiksha Kochi and Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk lost $34 billion in net worth as Tesla stock tanked amid Trump online war
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, lost $34 billion in net worth on Thursday after his company's stock plummeted in response to the online fight he got in with President Donald Trump. Over the last week, some Tesla stock investors had begun pulling their investments as Musk insulted Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and made a swift exit from his 'special government employee' position. But, investors acted much more quickly while witnessing the two men engage in a back-and-forth on their respective social media platforms. Trump claimed he asked 'crazy' Musk to leave his administration. Musk took credit for Trump's election win. Trump threatened to pull Musk's government contracts. Musk accused Trump of being named in the 'Epstein files.' Down the stock went, ending the day at a 14 percent loss – equating to a $34 billion valuation for Musk. While many claim to have anticipated the online feud, it's a long way away from Musk jumping for joy onstage at Trump's rallies or the duo's Oval Office press conferences. The cracks started to appear in their relationship after the tech mogul refused to stand by and praise Trump's spending bill, which he has characterized as disastrous for the government. Musk's Thursday loss is part of the 33 percent decline Tesla's stock has seen since Inauguration Day. Although the stock had significant gains after the election, much of that has been wiped out by growing criticisms of Musk's role in the government, DOGE, and now his exit. Musk is still the world's richest man, but a $34 billion drop in net worth is still notable given it's the second-largest loss of the 500 wealthiest people on the planet recorded by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. 'The only bigger one: his own wipeout in November 2021,' Bloomberg reported. But the tech entrepreneur still has plenty of other endeavors to drive his wealth, including SpaceX, one of the world's most valuable private startups, according to Bloomberg, Neuralink and xAI. As the dust settles from the powerful individuals' fight, it's still unclear what path forward Musk and his subsidiaries will take now that Trump has bashed Tesla's climate-conscious mission and threatened to revoke Musk's critical government contracts. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data