
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon guilty of gross negligence manslaughter over baby's death
Date: 14:48 BST
Title: 'Reckless actions driven by selfish desire to keep baby no matter the cost'
Content: We can now bring you a statement from Samantha Yelland, London's senior crown prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service.
"It is shocking that parents could subject their newborn baby to such obvious risks and today a jury has convicted Constance Marten and Mark Gordon for their crimes – after the prosecution brought fresh evidence to prove their guilt," she says.
Yelland adds that their "reckless actions were driven by a selfish desire to keep their baby no matter the cost – resulting in her tragic death".
These defendants did everything they could to evade the authorities – from avoiding the use of their bank cards to the point that they were starving, ditching their phones to avoid being traced and travelling hundreds of miles daily from place to place to dodge the police."
Update:
Date: 14:45 BST
Title: Marten and Gordon 'have shown little remorse'
Content: The head of the Crown Prosecution Service has issued a statement accusing Marten and Gordon of seeking to disrupt their own trial.
Chief prosecutor Jaswant Narwal said they "have shown little remorse for their actions, using different antics to frustrate and delay court proceedings".
She continues: "These were challenging trials. No child should have had its life cut short in this preventable way.
"I hope these convictions provide a sense of justice and comfort to all those affected by this tragic case."
Update:
Date: 14:40 BST
Title: What did jurors learn about Marten during the retrial?
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
The jury heard that Constance Marten comes from a wealthy
family.
But she said she "never really had a strong connection
with them".
Asked if she would describe her background as privileged,
Marten said "financially yes, emotionally not at all".
She was privately educated and went to boarding school at
the age of around 8.
At Leeds University she said she did a degree in Arabic and
Middle Eastern history.
She told jurors that "ironically" one of things
she wanted to do was journalism. She worked at Al Jazeera for a time.
She also worked in coffee shops and as a nanny in
Switzerland.
She said since she was little she had always wanted to have
big family and would have loved to live on farm.
"At least seven children would be my dream."
Update:
Date: 14:34 BST
Title: Guilty of gross negligence manslaughter - what does this mean?
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
For the jury to have found the pair guilty of gross negligence manslaughter, it means that the couple's behaviour was so exceptionally bad and fell below the standard of reasonably competent parents of a new born baby.
Before jurors began deliberations they were told by the judge that to find them guilty of gross negligence manslaughter is a "very high bar which the prosecution must cross".
Prosecutors said that Marten and Gordon exposed Victoria to the cold, damp and windy conditions with wholly inadequate clothing.
And that a child who became hypothermic in such circumstances must have done so through a breach of the duty of care.
Or that Victoria died by smothering or suffocation, a reason for that was the cold and damp conditions in a small, thin tent or being zipped up in Marten's jacket.
Update:
Date: 14:30 BST
Title: Marten speaks from the dock
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
Constance Marten has just said "it's a scam" from the dock.
Update:
Date: 14:29 BST
Title: Child cruelty conviction from first trial now reportable
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
We can now report that Marten and Gordon were convicted of child cruelty at their first trial in 2024.
Until now there had been an order preventing the media from reporting that verdict.
The jury in the first trial found that the couple had wilfully neglected baby Victoria in a manner likely to cause her unnecessary suffering or injury to health.
The prosecution's case on that was that Marten and Gordon had made a conscious decision not to protect Victoria or keep her safe and it was clear their actions were deliberate.
Update:
Date: 14:26 BST
Title: An extraordinary case
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
Marten and Gordon's case was highly unusual.
From the couple's disruptive and unpredictable behaviour, to Marten's accusations in the witness box about her aristocratic family, private detectives, and social services.
The judge accused them of trying to "sabotage" and "derail" their retrial.
"I have sat as a full time Judge now for thirteen years and I have never had that sort of attitude shown to me by anybody," His Honour Judge Mark Lucraft KC said about Marten one day.
The couple dominated and deflected, demanded and distracted.
They caused endless delays by not turning up.
Barristers were sacked. Others withdrew.
Marten got through an extraordinary number - 14 since their first hearing at the Old Bailey.
They disrespected the judge, were rude to some of the dock officers and would often chat during proceedings.
But there were poignant moments during their case too.
CCTV footage played on screens around the courtroom of baby Victoria - tiny and delicate in a teddy bear onesie – being placed in a pram by her parents, was a reminder of why we were all there.
Update:
Date: 14:23 BST
Title: Judge to schedule sentencing for future date
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
Judge tells jury he won't set a date for sentence today, but will do at a future date.
He tells the jury they are welcome to come back for that if they wish.
As the jury leaves the courtroom, Marten looks ahead, showing no reaction.
Update:
Date: 14:22 BST
Title: Marten and Gordon react as guilty verdicts read
Content: Levi JouavelReporting from court
Constance Marten sighs and shakes her head whilst verdicts are read out.
Mark Gordon had little reaction but is sitting with his eyes closed and his head resting back against the wall.
Update:
Date: 14:19 BST
Title: Marten and Gordon both guilty
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
Mark Gordon and Constance Marten are both guilty of gross negligence manslaughter.
Update:
Date: 14:19 BST
Title: Marten and Gordon asked to stand
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
The defendants are asked to stand.
Constance Marten remains seated, as does Gordon.
Update:
Date: 14:18 BST
Title: Jury entering the courtroom
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
The jury are being brought into the court now. Stay with us for updates.
Update:
Date: 14:15 BST
Title: Marten and Gordon in dock
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from court
The judge has entered court.
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon are in the dock.
Update:
Date: 14:15 BST
Title: What are Marten and Gordon accused of?
Content: Helena WilkinsonReporting from the Old Bailey
While we wait for the verdicts, a reminder that Constance Marten and Mark Gordon face two counts which they both deny.
They relate to their newborn baby, Victoria, and are:
Update:
Date: 14:15 BST
Title: What this case is about
Content: Constance Marten, 38, and Mark Gordon, 51, both deny manslaughter by gross negligence over the death of their child, Victoria.
Victoria's decomposed body was found in a shopping bag in a Brighton allotment shed in March 2023, two months after they went on the run. She had died in a tent in the South Downs in January 2023.
They also deny causing or allowing the death of a child.
At a previous trial, Marten and Gordon were found guilty of concealing Victoria's birth and perverting the course of justice by not reporting her death.
But the jury could not come to a verdict on the outstanding charges and this retrial began in March.
Update:
Date: 14:12 BST
Title: Verdict expected in retrial over death of newborn baby
Content: The jury in the case of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon are returning to the courtroom at the Old Bailey, as we await a verdict.
The two defendants are accused of manslaughter by gross negligence, and causing or allowing the death of a child. They deny both charges.
The couple's baby girl was found dead in a shopping bag covered in rubbish, in a shed on a Brighton allotment in 2023.
Our correspondents are in court and we'll bring you the latest as it happens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jenrick urges Farage to sack right-hand man Zia Yusuf over antisemitic post row
Nigel Farage is facing calls to sack his right-hand man Zia Yusuf after the senior Reform UK figure said that a member of his team "accidentally pressed like" on an antisemitic post which attacked the wife of Tory MP Robert Jenrick. The former Reform chairman, who now heads the party's Doge unit, has apologised for the incident, which comes after an anonymous X user posted a video that appeared to show Mr Yusuf liking a tweet which said: 'Reminder that Jenrick is a traitorous Zogbot with a Jewish wife and family. I'm sure it's unrelated that he imported infinite brown savages to rape our women and children.' Zogbot is a derogatory term for a Zionist. The anonymous account that shared the screen recording of Mr Yusuf's interaction with the post described it as 'absolutely horrifying antisemitism.' Since last summer, likes on X have been privatised, so that only the liker and the poster can see them, rather than a wider audience. In response, Mr Jenrick said he 'called bull****' and pointed out that Mr Yusuf had been calling him a 'traitor' for the previous 48 hours over the Afghan data breach in what had become an ugly spat. The shadow justice minister claimed 'the mask has slipped' and urged Reform to sever ties with Mr Yusuf. After critics of the former Reform UK chairman picked up the criticism to demand he is sacked by Mr Farage, he responded with an apology. In his statement he said: 'One of the team who post to my X account accidentally pressed like on an awful antisemitic tweet earlier today. I apologise for this.' He added: 'The post also refers to 'brown savages', and is equally racist against me. Clearly it was not intentional. 'The amount of antisemitism and racism on this platform is spiralling out of control, and I hope that changes soon.' But responding, Mr Jenrick claimed he did not believe Mr Yusuf's explanation. In a post directed at Mr Yusuf he said: 'I call bull****. You've spent the last 48 hours calling me a 'traitor' for not drawing attention to a leaked spreadsheet with our special forces and MI6 officers' names on. 'But we're meant to believe this tweet attacking me as a traitor for having a Jewish wife and family was liked 'accidentally' by 'one of the team.' You must think we're all thick. 'No. The mask has slipped. Likes are private. You thought nobody would ever know. Unfortunately for you, the racist account who posted the tweet and could see the likes exposed you. Reform should give you the boot.' Mr Yusuf has been a controversial figure in Reform after he helped fund their general election campaign before being brought in as chairman to modernise the party. He was blamed by supporters of Rupert Lowe for the Great Yarmouth MP being ousted from Reform but had the full backing of Mr Farage. Mr Yusuf then temporarily resigned from the party after having a spat with Reform's recently elected Runcorn MP Sarah Pochin after she asked a question in PMQs calling for the burqa to be banned. He returned 24 hours later but was replaced as chairman by longterm Farage ally Dr David Bull and instead agreed to head their Doge unit, modelled on the one Elon Musk created for Donald Trump, which aims to find savings and cut costs in the councils Reform won control of last May.


The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
The Epping ‘protests' make me ashamed to admit I'm from Essex
I spent a long time being too embarrassed to admit I was from Essex. When I went to university, I used to tell people I was from 'north-east London', rather than admit to the county of my birth. It feels silly to admit it, now, but I felt distinctly haunted by the typical 'Essex girl' tropes, even at 18. When I met my then-boyfriend's family in Bristol, I still remember that the first thing his dad said was to tease me by asking if I'd driven down the M4 in a clapped out Ford Fiesta. White stilettos, orange fake tan and reality TV show The Only Way Is Essex (or 'TOWIE', to those in the know – and of course I went to school with half of the cast); we've long been the butt of the nation's jokes, both on and off screen. Our unofficial royals are Gemma Collins and Joey Essex. Need I say more? Thankfully, I grew out of that childish shame that leads you to reject where you come from – when people ask me where I'm from, I say 'Essex' again. Except that right now, I'm seriously considering going back in the closet. That's because when I woke to news that 'protests' had broken out in Epping – the place I used to go 'out out' as a teen, the place I still meet old schoolfriends in for lunch, the place my relatives still live in – I felt deeply, deeply ashamed. Even more so when footage showed hordes of people clashing with police outside a hotel believed to be housing asylum seekers. Essex Police said missiles were thrown at officers and the hotel, police vans and vehicles smashed, the high street brought to a standstill and one officer injured, while eight officers in total were assaulted – in what the force described as 'extreme hostility from a large number of individuals'. Assistant Chief Constable Stuart Hooper described it as 'selfish criminal behaviour' perpetuated by 'a mindless minority who don't give a damn about the hardworking, good people of Epping'. He added: 'Help us get them, because the people of Essex are proud people and these streets are ours.' He's right. To my mind, these 'protests' showcase the very worst of Essex. The worst of Britain, full-stop. Depressingly, it's not even an isolated incident. The first pathetic 'protest' was reportedly planned in advance and took place on Sunday night, followed by further disruption on Thursday. The excuse? A 38-year-old resident there was accused, last week, of sexual assault. Now, I have no idea about the alleged sexual assault case involving Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, who appeared at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court earlier in the day. I don't know the details, or the outcome. Neither do these 'protesters'. But what I do know is that their behaviour helps no-one – least of all the alleged victim. And what almost amuses me (except that it's... not funny) is that I wrote only yesterday about the number of sexual assaults and incidents of harassment myself and my friends have experienced on the Tube – from being followed by 'burping, farting men' to catcalls, groping and obscene gestures. But what if I also repeat the sad fact that in almost every incident of male to female violence on public transport, not a single person steps in to help us – or to report it happening? How do people explain themselves for this utter failure to call out harassment when it's actually happening right in front of them – to anyone, by anyone? I took an unsavoury trawl through a local Facebook group, to see how people were reacting to the protests, but the ignorance was shocking. Some attempted to excuse the behaviour in the name of 'protecting kids'; while many blamed the government. Thankfully, there were also voices pointing out that thuggery isn't welcome in the area. 'So people not from Epping have gone to Epping to cause trouble', one said. Another called it 'disgusting, attacking the police' – and one long-term resident said this is 'not the Epping l used to know and come from – this is NOT a protest, it's DISGRACEFUL behaviour.' Hear, hear. This is not the Essex I know, believe in – or want to be associated with. If anyone asks, I'm from north-east London, again...


The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A compilation of terrorists, by Blake Morrison
If Laura Murton is guilty of terrorism for holding a Palestine flag (Armed police threatened to arrest Kent protester, 17 July), she's in good company. The Greenpeace ship crew arrested for piracy. The Commies on a blacklist for McCarthy. An 80-year-old who caused a 'public nuisance'. The Tiananmen Square guy standing up to tanks. Five eco-freaks blocking a motorway. Two Swedish women glued to a Monet. Women campaigning to close a Migrant Removal Centre. Bostonians throwing tea-chests in the harbour. Wheelchair-users fighting cuts against Medicaid. Nelson Mandela battling apartheid. Anti-Putinites spoiling papers at the ballot. A mass of trespassers on Kinder Scout. John Lennon returning his gong to the Queen. Martin Luther King and I have a dream. The gay man removed from an LGBT parade. Crowds in Minneapolis when George Floyd died. The anti-oil lobby with its slogan Just Stop. Weevils on trial for ruining a barley crop. Gandhi on his salt march, Rosa Parks in her bus. Emily Davison below the King's horse. Jamal Khashoggi, Martin Luther, Wat Tyler, Ned Ludd, Alexei Navalny, Alan Turing, Joan of Arc, Robin Hood. The naked woman sharing an apple with her mate. The deity who put it out there to eat. The tree surgeon who scaled Big Ben. Three men spraying paint at Brize Norton. Hundreds of Gazans at a food MorrisonLondon