
Iran missile strikes: Father's anger exposes divide in Israeli society
"They sang about what happened to my family," says Kasem, softly, surrounded by relatives at a vigil.The video - which shows Israelis singing a common anti-Arab chant often sung by ultranationalist Jews - has been widely condemned in Israel, with President Isaac Herzog calling it "appalling and disgraceful".But there are more reasons that Kasem and the wider community in Tamra are angry about what happened.Here - as is the case with many Arab-majority communities in Israel - there are no public bomb shelters for its 38,000 residents.For comparison, the nearby Jewish-majority town Karmiel, population 55,000, has 126 public shelters.Residents of Tamra have long raised the alarm over the disparity. Situated in Israel's north, about 10km (6 miles) east of the city of Haifa and 25km (16 miles) south of the border with Lebanon, the town has been vulnerable to rockets fired by the Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah. In October 2024, a rocket fired by the group seriously injured one woman. Across Israel, about a quarter of the population have no access to a proper shelter. But in non-Jewish local authorities the figure is almost half, according to a 2018 report by Israel's State Comptroller, the most recent data available. "For many decades, Arab local authorities have received lower state funding across various areas, including emergency preparedness," says Lital Piller of the Israel Democracy Institute, a think tank.Where shelters do exist, she says, "they are few, poorly maintained, and often not suited for prolonged stays".The BBC has approached Israel's Ministry of Defense for comment. Israeli Arabs - many of whom prefer to be called Palestinian citizens of Israel - make up a fifth of the country's population. By law, they have equal rights with Jewish citizens, but they routinely complain of state discrimination and being treated as second-class citizens. Following the Gulf War of 1990-91, when Iraqi missiles hit Tel Aviv and Haifa, the Israeli government mandated that all new residential buildings must contain a reinforced safe room, or Mamad, as they are known.
But Arab communities often face tough planning restrictions, which leads to unregulated construction and homes being built without them, activists say.About 40% of Tamra's homes have their own safe room, local authorities say, leaving the majority of residents having to run to neighbours' homes to share. In many cases, due to the short warning period, this is not possible."The gaps are enormous," says Ilan Amit, of the Arab-Jewish Center for Empowerment, Equality, and Cooperation (Ajeec), which works to build shelters in Arab communities. "I live in Jerusalem. Every building has a bomb shelter. Every neighbourhood has a public bomb shelter."As dark falls in Tamra, residents' phones light up simultaneously with a screeching alert: "You must stay near a protected area."Sirens soon follow, and residents - fresh from the trauma of Saturday's strike - panic. Mothers gather their children and people run up the street shouting. Several families cram into the safe room of one house. Some cry, some smile, others twitch nervously. One man closes his eyes and prays. Boom after boom is heard overhead.The shelter issue is even more pronounced in Israel's Arab bedouin communities - many of which live in villages in the Negev Desert that are not recognised by the Israeli government, so do not have shelters built for them. The only victim of the April 2024 escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran was a young girl from one such community who was seriously injured and spent a year in hospital after fragments from an Iranian missile struck her head.Lack of shelters is also a prevalent issue in some of Israel's poorer Jewish communities in areas like the south of Tel Aviv.
A new survey conducted by Hebrew University found that 82.7% of Jewish Israelis support the attack on Iran - but 67.9% of Arab Israelis oppose it. Further to that, 69.2% of Arab Israelis reported feelings of fear over the strikes - with 25.1% expressing despair."Arab society feels neglected and left behind," says Amit. "There are huge gaps in education and employment. There are huge gaps in shelters, in the existence of shelters."Adel Khatib, a municipal official from Tamra, says: "In the days since this happened, you can feel the anger.""We don't get the basic needs," says Khatib. "Most of the Arab communities, they don't have community centres or buildings for culture, activities."According to official Israeli statistics, in 2023, 42.4% of the Arab population lived below the poverty line - more than double the proportion in Israel's general population.There have been attempts in recent years to close these gaps. In 2021, Israel's previous government brought in a five-year development plan for Arab society. "We were in the middle of a huge leap in social economic development, narrowing gaps in education, higher education, and employment," says Amit.But Israel's current right-wing governing coalition, the most hardline in its history, has slowly reduced funding for that plan - redirecting the money elsewhere.Some of these cuts came as the government adjusted budgets to fight the ongoing war in Gaza, which began in response to the Hamas-led cross-border attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
"This government has been simply putting, you know, sticks in the wheels of this five-year plan, not making it possible to implement broad parts of it," Amit adds."For the past year and a half, Arab society found itself between a rock and a hard place in the sense that on one hand, they're suffering from the policies of the current government, and on the other hand, they're seeing their brothers and sisters in Gaza and in the West Bank suffering because of the war," he says. Outside the ruins of the family home, Mohamed Osman, 16, a neighbour, says: "Everyone is angry and sad."Speaking of Shada, 20, he says: "She studied her entire life. She wanted to be the best. Her father is a lawyer, and she wanted to be like him. All of those dreams, just disappeared."They were the best picture of a happy family…When I imagine them, I imagine the pieces of them that I saw."At a vigil ahead of the funeral, dozens of community members gather, greeting one another with handshakes, sharing coffee and tea, and mourning quietly."The bombs do not choose between Arabs or Jews," says Kasem. "We must end this war. We must end it now."Photographs by Tom Bennett
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Has Trump just become the very model of a modern liberal leader?
Giving an all-important green light to Keir Starmer for the UK to recognise Palestine… rejecting Netanyahu's claim that there is no food crisis in Gaza by saying there is 'real starvation'…giving Russia a '10 to 12 days' ultimatum over Ukraine… Was this the week that Donald J Trump became the kind of leader that liberals dream of? One day we may know the full story of this remarkable transformation – and, while there are many caveats, doubts and, very likely, disappointments to follow, we should at least cherish such unexpected developments as this. 'We have to get the kids fed' is as simple and powerful an instruction as we could possibly hope to get from the leader of the free world. No moral equivocation there, no 'both sides' – and no room for delay, is not a coincidence that, grudgingly and still inadequately, Israel is allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, and, as a result, lives will be saved. Trump isn't asinine enough to pretend that there is no starvation in the Gaza Strip, and, loyal as he may be, neither is he so beholden to his friend BiBi that he is going to be taken in by the most audacious and shameful attempt at gaslighting to that effect in the history of the State of Israel. We can maybe see what is happening here, both with Israel and with Russia, where Trump's patience with Vladimir Putin, another strong man he wished to build a partnership with, has also been exhausted. First, there is that decision where Trump decides he wants to build that rapport with a counterpart. Usually, this is a strong guy – Putin, Netanyahu, even Kim Jong-un in the first term. Let's not forget that he has even tried to get on terms with the ayatollahs in (oil-rich) Iran, much to Israeli alarm. Starmer, unusually, is someone Trump should despise, but instead declares that he just can't stop praising and liking the guy. It surpasses human understanding. Second, there's usually some sort of distant private deal on the side, maybe real estate or raw materials, maybe with US interests as well as family ones mixed in. Hence his partial rapprochement with Zelensky, built on rare earths. Notice also how Trump used to fantasise about building a golf course on the North Korean coast, or the bizarre plan to turn Gaza into a beach resort. When he basically told the world he had given up on Putin's sincerity, Trump could surely have wept about how Russia could be such a rich country… if only Putin had allowed Trump to get involved in the economy, he didn't quite add. Netanyahu, who was taken by surprise by the US-administered Gaza resort idea, may not be proving as useful in this enterprise as Trump first assumed he would – but that is certainly a more confusing picture. You may recall that in that unusually candid interview Trump recently gave to the BBC's Gary O'Donoghue, the president admitted that he trusts 'almost nobody', but that he wasn't yet 'done' with Putin. Well, now he is because, as Trump himself says, they are these nice, long, respectful conversations in which Trump listens sympathetically to Putin's case and Russia's wartime sacrifices – and then the Russians bomb a nursing home in Kyiv or something. The truth is that Trump has at times seemed too inclined to trust people he shouldn't, and all too ready to make enemies of natural allies – Justin Trudeau in Canada, Ishiba Shigeru in Japan – but when he finally works out that he's been played along, he will act accordingly. Hence the abandonment of Putin and the distancing of Netanyahu, whose policies, which Trump indulged, have destroyed Trump's plan for a lucrative new economic zone in the Middle East from the Gulf to the Mediterranean, based on his Abraham Accords programme. There is now no chance of Saudi Arabia normalising relations with Israel, greatly to Trump's annoyance. Last, Trump may not be the one-dimensional monster he is satirised as, though he's no one's idea of a hero. Prompted by First Lady Melania Trump, he seems to have been, at last, genuinely moved by the savagery that Putin has inflicted on Ukrainian civilians; and the same compassion about the starving children in Gaza seems to be impelling him to act with an unusual moral intensity. He can be driven by the humanitarian impulse in the same way anyone can. Of course, we need not get carried away. The United States is boycotting the UN two-state solution conference on the future of Palestine. The plan for a Gaza beach resort is still, apparently, Trump administration policy, with the prospect that the Palestinians will be driven from their homes; reports suggest the Americans have been looking for places where refugees could be resettled, which would be near enough to a forced displacement as to be a crime against humanity. Trump is not going to switch sides again and have America support the restoration of full Ukrainian sovereignty – and the Trump White House will continue to deny climate change, and launch trade wars as it fancies. Yet these last few days have seen some extremely welcome signs that Trump is capable of doing some good every now and again. Trump says he's stopped wars between India and Pakistan, Rwanda and the DRC, and Cambodia and Thailand. Exaggerated or not, the United States is playing the right sort of role. If it is now pursuing ceasefires in Ukraine and Gaza, in each case a peace that passeth all understanding, we should just take the wins – even if it means Trump takes the Nobel Peace Prize.


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
More than 60,000 people killed in Gaza during Israel offensive, Hamas-run health ministry says
More than 60,000 people have been killed as a result of Israel's military campaign in Gaza since October 2023, the Hamas-run health ministry said on Monday that the death toll had reached at least 60,034, with 145,870 others injured. At least 112 people were killed in the 24 hours before late Tuesday morning, with 22 people killed while trying to get aid, the ministry saidIsrael launched its offensive in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. The latest figures come as UN-backed global food security experts warn that the worst-case scenario of famine is "currently playing out" in the Gaza Strip. While Israel continues to insist it is not responsible for the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and does not impose restrictions on aid entering Gaza, those claims are not accepted by its close allies in Europe, or the United Nations and other agencies active in Sunday, Israel, which controls all entry of goods into Gaza, began what it said would be daily 10-hour "tactical pauses" to allow for humanitarian aid delivery, and announced the establishment of "designated secure routes" for aid has also allowed aid drops by foreign countries to resume, despite humanitarian agencies warning that the method was ineffective and dangerous.


Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
In the name of Palestine, Ireland is sacrificing its own interests
The past few weeks have seen the worst deterioration in Irish-US relations for many decades. What is widely seen as Ireland's extreme anti-Israel obsession collided with the realities of American business and geopolitical interests. It was the war in Gaza that changed everything. The Irish political elite, which for complicated historical reasons was never very sympathetic to the Jewish state, became hyper supportive of the Palestinian cause. President Higgins, the grand old man of the Irish Left – cast in the mould of a Jeremy Corbyn – led the offensive. Nearing the end of his second seven-year presidential term, Michael D, as he is widely known, is hugely popular in Ireland. Within days of the Hamas October 7 massacre, EU president Ursula von der Leyen visited Israel to show solidarity with the victims and express support for Israel in the wake of the unprovoked attack. Speaking in Rome a few days later, President Higgins called Ms von der Leyen's actions 'reckless' and said she 'wasn't speaking for Ireland.' President Higgins continued, we cannot 'ignore the long-neglected source of much of this conflict, which is the Palestinian issue.' This was interpreted by some Jews as offering a ham-fisted and very misguided justification for the Hamas invasion of ten days earlier. Under the Irish Constitution, the presidency is primarily a ceremonial institution. Like the King, Irish presidents are meant to be above politics with no role in setting policy. In his multiple statements on Israel, Gaza, and Palestine, President Higgins has comprehensively undermined this constitutional boundary. Other senior politicians have been equally vociferous. Tánaiste (deputy prime minister) Simon Harris boasted: 'We are the first government in the European Union to say what Israel is doing is genocide.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has also claimed repeatedly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. As relations between Ireland and Israel continued to deteriorate, last December Israel closed its embassy in Dublin because 'of the extreme anti-Israel policies of the Irish government.' It was against this toxic background that the Occupied Territories Bill (OTB), a piece of legislation that had lain dormant for years, was suddenly revived. The proposed legislation seeks to ban trade between Ireland and the Israeli occupied territories. Last year, Ireland exported goods to the value of €73.6bn to the US – larger than those of the UK (€64.5bn). Total US corporate investment in Ireland comes to almost half a trillion dollars – greater than the combined US investment in the EU's four largest economies, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. US firms account for 70 per cent of Ireland's annual corporate tax revenue, and for one in six private sector jobs. These astonishing statistics show how Ireland's current and future prosperity is fundamentally dependent on America. Incredibly, the Irish government now seems willing to put the nation's economic wellbeing at risk, ostensibly because of imports from the occupied territories of mainly avocados, dates, and olives – with an annual value of just €136,000. The considerable economic myopia of the OTB is matched only by its political naïveté. Its definition of occupied territories even includes areas that America recognises as being fully under Israeli sovereignty. Take Jerusalem. The bill compounds its US political problems by describing the area of Jerusalem where the American embassy is located as an illegal 'Settlement'. Recently, there have been many dire warnings of the potentially severe consequences of passing the OTB. Jim Risch, the Chair of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, did not pull any punches. Ireland, he said, is 'on a hateful, anti-Semitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering. If this legislation is implemented, America will have to reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties.' Two weeks ago, an Irish Times poll suggested that the Irish public is becoming increasingly concerned about the bill's potential negative consequences. Displaying classic signs of buyer's remorse, almost half of those polled were in favour of either not passing it, or wanted further clarification on its economic implications. There are signs too that the government is catching up with the changing public mood. In a let-this-chalice-pass-from-me moment, a government minister said that the whole issue of the boycott 'should be dealt with at EU level. Frankly that would be the best solution.' Indeed, as that would get the government off the hook on which it had impaled itself. It was a belated recognition that Ireland may have gone too far out on a limb on this issue. With the Dail in summer recess, the government has some breathing space to assess its options before the OTB comes up for legislative review in the autumn.