logo
President once accepted the demand of this actor by breaking his protocol, the actor was....

President once accepted the demand of this actor by breaking his protocol, the actor was....

India.com18-06-2025
This actor has worked in many Hindi films, he was sometimes liked by the audience for his serious role and sometimes he was also seen in a funny role. Whatever the character, this actor never failed to entertained the fans every time, he made a place in the hearts of the audience. He has been the face of many great Hindi films, has also been honoured with many big awards for his excellent acting. Let us tell you which talented actor we are talking about.
The actor in question is none other than Saurabh Shukla. For the unversed, Saurabh has been awarded the National Award for his excellent work. The President then gave him the award. However, during this time, Saurabh made a mistake. In fact, despite knowing everything, he broke the President's protocol. This was revealed by Saurabh himself in one of his interviews. Let's know what the matter is? Saurabh won the National Award for this film
Saurabh Shukla has been working in Bollywood for many decades. He has been seen working with several top actors. The 2013 film 'Jolly LLB' is considered one of his best films. The audience liked his work very much. For this, the actor received a National Award for Best Supporting Actor in 2014. When Saurabh Shukla broke the President's protocol
This award was given to Saurabh Shukla by the then President Pranab Mukherjee. However, Saurabh had made a big mistake then. Recently, in an interview given to YouTube channel Digital Commentary, he said about this anecdote, 'I already knew about the President's protocol. According to the protocol, one is not allowed to touch the President while receiving the award. One has to greet him with folded hands.'
Saurabh further said, 'I went on stage to receive the award and greeted him.' During this, Pranab Mukherjee praised Jolly LLB and Saurabh's acting. The former President told Saurabh, 'I watched Jolly LLB twice because of you.' On this, Saurabh immediately said, 'Then shake hands on this.' The President's protocol was broken by shaking hands.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prof Ganeswar Mishra's contribution to regional literature unique: Writers
Prof Ganeswar Mishra's contribution to regional literature unique: Writers

New Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Prof Ganeswar Mishra's contribution to regional literature unique: Writers

BHUBANESWAR: Academician and litterateur Professor Ganeswar Mishra's writings stood out in the genre of regional novels in eastern India and were unique, opined speakers at a memorial function to mark his 10th death anniversary here on Saturday. The function was hosted by Sateertha, a socio-cultural organisation founded by Ganeswar Mishra. Speaking on the occasion, Prof Basant Kumar Panda drew parallels between Mishra's novel 'Samudrika' (1964) and Bengali novelist Tarasankara Bandyopadhaya's 'Hansuli Banker Upakatha' (1947) and Hindi writer Phaniswar Nath Renu's 'Maila Anchal' (1954). He highlighted the importance of these three works in the genre of regional novels in India. He pointed out that 'Samudrika' is possibly the only novel based on the Nolias in Puri and highlighted its uniqueness in Odia literature. Renowned litterateur Dash Benhur observed that Mishra, besides being a novelist and short story writer, had a pioneering role as a feature writer, which is perhaps the most read genre nowadays. Well-known writer Chirashree Indrasingh reminisced about Mishra's life and works and said efforts should be made to popularise his writings among the younger generation. On the occasion, two books, a dramatic adaptation of Mishra's novel 'Sakalara Muhan' by playwright Dayanidhi Tripathy and 'Yah Dil Ki Suno', a translation of his select short stories in Hindi by Udayan Supakar, were released. Poet Saroj Bal and Dr Biraj Mohan Dash were present.

Born into poverty, this actor was dubbed Hema Malini's lookalike; worked with A-listers before dying mysteriously at 33
Born into poverty, this actor was dubbed Hema Malini's lookalike; worked with A-listers before dying mysteriously at 33

Indian Express

time38 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Born into poverty, this actor was dubbed Hema Malini's lookalike; worked with A-listers before dying mysteriously at 33

In the late 1950s, a girl named Ruksana was born in Mumbai's Mahim area to a poor family. Her humble beginnings did not deter her dreams, and by the time she stepped into the world of cinema, she had already begun shaping a career that, while not leading her to superstardom, would leave a mark on audiences. From then on, she appeared in several big productions, including Lawaris (1981), Ek Duje Ke Liye (1981), Khuddar (1982), and Razia Sultan (1983). On screen, she became a familiar presence in ensemble casts, portraying characters that added depth to the story even if they weren't at the centre of it. Ruksana's resemblance to the reigning 'Dream Girl' of Bollywood, Hema Malini, became a talking point. Industry insiders and audiences alike noted the similarity in their facial features, and it was this comparison that led her to adopt the screen name Madhu Malini. The name stuck, and under it, she continued her steady run in Hindi cinema. One of her most remembered roles came in Avatar (1983), where she played an evil daughter-in-law. The performance was widely noticed, further cementing her place as a versatile supporting actor. Yet, despite back-to-back critically acclaimed performances, she found herself typecast in secondary roles, unable to break into the league of lead heroines in Hindi films. While Bollywood didn't offer her the starring roles she might have hoped for, she found success in regional cinema. She acted in Punjabi, Malayalam, Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, and Gujarati films, expanding her repertoire and earning recognition beyond the Hindi film industry. The 1970s and 80s saw her working consistently, and though she never reached the pinnacle of stardom, she maintained a presence on screen. In 1983, she fulfilled her wish of playing a lead role in the Punjabi film Ambri. However, her life came to a tragic and mysterious end in the late 1980s. She was found dead in her apartment under unexplained circumstances. With no major breakthroughs in the investigation, the case was eventually closed. She was only 33 years old.

Shoojit Sircar defends National Award jury amid row over The Kerala Story, Shah Rukh: 'Jury should have the final word'
Shoojit Sircar defends National Award jury amid row over The Kerala Story, Shah Rukh: 'Jury should have the final word'

Hindustan Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Shoojit Sircar defends National Award jury amid row over The Kerala Story, Shah Rukh: 'Jury should have the final word'

Filmmaker Shoojit Sircar is donning a new hat these days, that of a judge. For the second year in a row, the acclaimed director is on the jury of the Indian Film Festival of Melbourne (IFFM), selecting the Best Short Films at the festival. Ahead of the 2025 IFFM, Shoojit speaks to Hindustan Times about the experience and the difficulty of judging art. Shoojit Sircar is serving as a jury member at the IFFM 2025. On the difficulty of judging cinema Shoojit says he does not like judging cinema, but made an exception for the IFFM. "IFFM is very dear to me. The organisers are dear friends and this particular festival is almost like a family affair. This is my fifth or sixth visit there. I normally don't participate in juries and being a judge. But for this, I made an exception," he tells us. But the filmmaker agrees that judging something as subjective as cinema is 'very difficult'. He explains how he goes about it. "Before we start, we tell everyone that there are certain elements that they should take into consideration. There are technicalities where you can really possibly judge the craft. Then, you should celebrate the film that really makes a difference. And then, the voice and vision of the director are very important. You look at films that bring a lot of social change and have a long-lasting impact. Of course, there are technicalities to look into it, in terms of cinematography, editing, direction, actors, everything." On the National Award row Recently, when the National Film Awards were announced, many across the country expressed surprise at Shah Rukh Khan winning Best Actor and The Kerala Story being adjudged the Best Film. Shoojit re-emphasises the subjective nature of art when asked about the row. "I feel that there is no point debating this from the outside," he says, adding, "You leave it to the jury. We might agree to disagree on many things, but finally, what matters is, who is the jury there. Because that jury is going to be your final word, and you leave it to their sensibility. You can't question what award they have given. I think we would rather question that before they start. Who is the jury? What are their sensibilities?" Taking a leaf out of his own book, the filmmaker concludes with an anecdote: "When Sardar Udham's panorama selection (for the 2021 International Film Festival of India) didn't happen, I was asked the same things. I will say what I said then: 'Whatever the jury has decided, I have to accept it'." The 2025 edition of the Indian Film Festival of Melbourne begins August 14 and continues till August 24.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store