logo
Former Rolling Stone Mick Taylor claims the Met has his stolen guitar

Former Rolling Stone Mick Taylor claims the Met has his stolen guitar

Euronews7 days ago
It's the sort of story that could only come from the chaotic swirl of 1970s rock 'n' roll excess.
Former Rolling Stones guitarist Mick Taylor reckons the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is currently displaying his guitar – a 1959 Gibson Les Paul he says vanished in a haze of hard-living while the band recorded 'Exile on Main St.' in France.
The guitar in question is no ordinary instrument. Nicknamed the 'Keithburst' thanks to early ownership by Keith Richards, it's a star in its own right. Richards famously played it during the Stones' 1964 debut on The Ed Sullivan Show. It's also been in the hands of Eric Clapton and Jimmy Page.
But Taylor, who replaced Brian Jones in the Stones in 1969, says it ended up with him after Richards gifted it in 1967 – and that it was later stolen.
'Mick did tell me that the guitar solo that he became quite famous for, on 'Can't You Hear Me Knocking,' was with the Les Paul that got stolen,' said Jeff Allen, Taylor's manager and publicist for decades. 'He told me he got it as a present from Keith.'
Taylor left the Stones in 1974 but returned to the stage with them nearly 40 years later, reuniting for the band's 50th anniversary tour in 2012-2013.
So when Taylor spotted the distinctive 'starburst' finish on a guitar featured in the Met's May announcement of a blockbuster donation, he did a double-take.
The guitar was part of a 500-instrument haul given to the Met by billionaire investor and collector Dirk Ziff – who bought the Les Paul in 2016 after it failed to sell at a Christie's auction in 2004. Ziff had previously loaned it to the museum in 2019 for its 'Play It Loud: Instruments of Rock & Roll' exhibition.
The museum, however, isn't entertaining claims of a rock 'n' roll robbery.
'This guitar has a long and well-documented history of ownership,' said museum spokesperson Ann Bailis, who pointed to provenance records showing the guitar went from Richards to record producer Adrian Miller in 1971. Miller died in 2006.
Since then, the guitar has changed hands several times and made two public appearances – most recently as part of Ziff's high-profile donation, which the Met calls 'a landmark gift of more than 500 of the finest guitars from the golden age of American guitar making.'
Taylor's camp isn't convinced. Marlies Damming, his partner and business manager, says the Met should allow independent scrutiny of the instrument.
'An independent guitar expert should be able to ascertain the guitar's provenance one way or the other,' she said in a statement.
Whether the 'Keithburst' is the long-lost guitar Taylor remembers – or simply another well-loved Les Paul from a golden era of guitar-making – may now depend on whether anyone is willing to open the case.
The Met says it hasn't yet been contacted directly by Taylor or his team. Until then, the guitar remains firmly in place.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Rolling Stone Mick Taylor claims the Met has his stolen guitar
Former Rolling Stone Mick Taylor claims the Met has his stolen guitar

Euronews

time7 days ago

  • Euronews

Former Rolling Stone Mick Taylor claims the Met has his stolen guitar

It's the sort of story that could only come from the chaotic swirl of 1970s rock 'n' roll excess. Former Rolling Stones guitarist Mick Taylor reckons the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is currently displaying his guitar – a 1959 Gibson Les Paul he says vanished in a haze of hard-living while the band recorded 'Exile on Main St.' in France. The guitar in question is no ordinary instrument. Nicknamed the 'Keithburst' thanks to early ownership by Keith Richards, it's a star in its own right. Richards famously played it during the Stones' 1964 debut on The Ed Sullivan Show. It's also been in the hands of Eric Clapton and Jimmy Page. But Taylor, who replaced Brian Jones in the Stones in 1969, says it ended up with him after Richards gifted it in 1967 – and that it was later stolen. 'Mick did tell me that the guitar solo that he became quite famous for, on 'Can't You Hear Me Knocking,' was with the Les Paul that got stolen,' said Jeff Allen, Taylor's manager and publicist for decades. 'He told me he got it as a present from Keith.' Taylor left the Stones in 1974 but returned to the stage with them nearly 40 years later, reuniting for the band's 50th anniversary tour in 2012-2013. So when Taylor spotted the distinctive 'starburst' finish on a guitar featured in the Met's May announcement of a blockbuster donation, he did a double-take. The guitar was part of a 500-instrument haul given to the Met by billionaire investor and collector Dirk Ziff – who bought the Les Paul in 2016 after it failed to sell at a Christie's auction in 2004. Ziff had previously loaned it to the museum in 2019 for its 'Play It Loud: Instruments of Rock & Roll' exhibition. The museum, however, isn't entertaining claims of a rock 'n' roll robbery. 'This guitar has a long and well-documented history of ownership,' said museum spokesperson Ann Bailis, who pointed to provenance records showing the guitar went from Richards to record producer Adrian Miller in 1971. Miller died in 2006. Since then, the guitar has changed hands several times and made two public appearances – most recently as part of Ziff's high-profile donation, which the Met calls 'a landmark gift of more than 500 of the finest guitars from the golden age of American guitar making.' Taylor's camp isn't convinced. Marlies Damming, his partner and business manager, says the Met should allow independent scrutiny of the instrument. 'An independent guitar expert should be able to ascertain the guitar's provenance one way or the other,' she said in a statement. Whether the 'Keithburst' is the long-lost guitar Taylor remembers – or simply another well-loved Les Paul from a golden era of guitar-making – may now depend on whether anyone is willing to open the case. The Met says it hasn't yet been contacted directly by Taylor or his team. Until then, the guitar remains firmly in place.

No Time To Cast: What do you make of Amazon's James Bond shortlist?
No Time To Cast: What do you make of Amazon's James Bond shortlist?

Euronews

time01-07-2025

  • Euronews

No Time To Cast: What do you make of Amazon's James Bond shortlist?

Following the news earlier this year that longtime stewards of the James Bond franchise Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson ceded creative control to Amazon Studios, Bond fans were treated to more positive news last week: the identity of the director of Bond 26. Oscar-nominated filmmaker Denis Villeneuve will be responsible for ushering the 007 series into a new era. When the announcement was made, we gave our verdict on the choice, and we couldn't be more excited. Now that things are speeding up regarding production, the next big reveal is the identity of the actor who will succeed Daniel Craig and take up the coveted mantle of James Bond. The rumour mill keeps spinning, and everyone from Idris Elba, Tom Hardy, Michael Fassbender, Tom Hiddleston and Henry Cavill has been put forward as the next Martini swigging secret agent. Last year, we reported that Aaron Taylor-Johnson had apparently screen tested to be the next 007 and that he'd been offered the top job – a rumour only galvanized by Taylor-Johnson recently becoming the new Omega brand ambassador. Une publication partagée par OMEGA (@omega) However, all these names could be old news now that Amazon's MGM Studio's shortlist for the new Bond has been unveiled. While there has been no official casting announcement yet, Variety reports that three names have emerged as frontrunners: Jacob Elordi, Harris Dickinson and Tom Holland are reportedly 'at the top of [the studio's] list.' These names make sense considering Amazon is clearly aiming for a British male who's under-30, which means three things: Bond 26 will wipe the slate clean and serve as an origin story for the iconic spy. Barbara Broccoli may be out but Amazon are following her rule that James Bond is a role that shouldn't be gender-swapped. Fan favourites like Hardy, 47; Fassbender, 48; and Cavill, 42, are off the table. Shame, even if we're not upset about Cavill, as he'd be far too obvious for Bond. Plus, he's been Superman... Give someone else a shot at cinematic glory. As for Taylor-Johnson, 35, he could also be out of luck. Let's run through the recently released frontrunners: Jacob Elordi Age: 28 Height: 1,96m Seen in: Euphoria, Saltburn, Priscilla - and soon to be in Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein. Bond material: He may not be British, but it wouldn't be the first time an Australian actor has played Bond, after George Lazenby put on the tux for his solo adventure On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Not sure that's the benchmark we should be aiming for, but there's precedent. Verdict: A fine actor; tall; dark; handsome; but there's nothing particularly inventive about this pick. Casting him would feel like a trendy choice rather than an inspired one. Harris Dickinson Age: 29 Height: 1,88m Seen in:Triangle of Sadness, The Iron Claw, Babygirl - and soon to be playing John Lennon in Sam Mendes' Beatles biopic(s). Bond material: Dickinson is probably the most interesting of the three favourites. He's a great actor and has plenty of range. Plus, he has experience in the action genre, having starred in The King's Man (2021). Verdict: Out of the three, he's the one we'd be most intrigued about... But again, nothing that shakes our Martinis. Tom Holland Age: 29 Height: 1,69m Seen in: The Spider-Man franchise; the wider MCU; Uncharted; The Impossible; The Devil All The Time - and soon to be in Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey. Bond material: Holland has proven he's a solid leading man. However, while Brit has plenty of range, his youthful looks don't really fit the brooding 007. Of the three, Bond fans have reacted to Holland with the most scepticism - and we concur. (Check out some of the reactions below.) Verdict: Charismatic; the shortest of the three; maybe a bit too cute and not rugged enough for Bond; he's already Spider-Man – give it to someone who hasn't already had their big break. All in all, it's hard to get too excited about this shortlist. Beyond our surprise that Timothée Chalamet's name isn't on the list, considering his ubiquity and working relationship with Villeneuve on the Dune films, these three picks feel like safe, casting-by-algorithm – as if Amazon bods gathered in a room to share their primary concern: streaming metrics. Surely fans deserve better than that... Where's the edge, the surprise factor? Where's Paul Mescal, Damson Idris or even Riz Ahmed? Older actors, granted, but significantly more inspired options. Plus, a common denominator with previous Bond castings was that the actor wasn't an obvious pick. Take Daniel Craig, who was apparently 'too blond for Bond' and whose casting as 007 provoked a great amount of online bile. And look how that turned out: Casino Royale, one of the most critically acclaimed Bond films in the series. So, considering this is only a reported shortlist, let's not give up hope too quickly. Villeneuve's track record proves that the Canadian master behind Sicario, Prisoners, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049 and the Dune films can make something cerebral, dark and ambitious – and the casting needs to reflect that. Considering he's also exec producing alongside his partner Tanya Lapointe, chances are he'll have some say on casting, and surely that means the final choice for the next James Bond won't be as disappointing as this reported shortlist. Currently there is no official release date or title for the next Bond movie - Amazon is reportedly looking at a release late 2027 or 2028.

What are the 20 most controversial album covers of all time?
What are the 20 most controversial album covers of all time?

Euronews

time18-06-2025

  • Euronews

What are the 20 most controversial album covers of all time?

Content warning: This article contains images which some readers may find offensive. If you're a music lover and enjoy a bit of drama, you must have heard that controversy is brewing over the artwork of Sabrina Carpenter's upcoming album 'Man's Best Friend'. The suggestive – but hardly sexually explicit - cover features the buzzy 'Espresso' hitmaker on her knees in front of a faceless man who is pulling her hair back. And the release of the image has caused much debate. Many argue that Carpenter's MO has always been pop-horniness, and that she has every right to express herself and her sexuality – in this case what some may perceive as a submissive kink - in any way she sees fit and crucially, without being policed or harassed; others see this image as degrading, regressive and promoting traditional gender roles. At the end of the day, it's her album cover and can't we just let her be? Some hyper-conservative and hyper-progressive corners of the internet clearly disagree, and the reactions have been intense – which is hardly surprising, considering sexuality has always rubbed some people up the wrong way. Plus, scandal is hardly new for musicians, as artists have sparked outrage with their album covers for decades, leading some to be censored or even banned. From nudity to the open courting of outrage via political statements (and sometimes, downright poor taste), here are 20 provocative covers that rocked the music world and faced the most backlash. We proceed chronologically. A post shared by Euronews Culture (@euronewsculture) While hardly controversial compared to some of the other covers in this list, that's a downright unfortunate title to go with this image. And isn't the one on the right an uncanny dead ringer for a young Stephen Fry? Unsettling. It's not one of the Fab Four's most famous albums, but certainly their most notorious. Photographer Robert Whitaker took a snap of the band in white butcher's coats, surrounded by raw meat and dismembered baby dolls. Paul McCartney claimed it was a comment against the Vietnam War. US retailers were shocked and refused to stock the album, leading to it being withdrawn and reissued with a more vanilla alternative. Today, the 'Butcher cover' is available in pirated form. Those lucky enough to own an original pressing have an expensive and coveted piece of music history. The cover for the avant-garde 'Two Virgins' captures John Lennon and Yoko Ono completely naked. It sparked outrage, leading distributors to clandestinely sell the album wrapped in brown paper bags. At the end of the 1960s, Eric Clapton and Ginger Baker founded a supergroup with Steve Winwood and Ric Grech. They released only one album together, and to mark the occasion, they enlisted photographer Bob Seidemann. His image features a young topless girl holding a model spaceship. The image was considered deeply problematic and was promptly banned and replaced with a more classic shot of the band members. The Stones have had several album cover controversies over the years, including 'Beggar's Banquet''s artwork which featured a graffiti covered bathroom wall. However, it's the band's ninth studio album, designed by Andy Warhol, matched with its inuendo-heavy title, which rubbed censors up the wrong way. It features a suggestive denim-clad crotch and the original pressing of the LP also had a working fly which unzipped to reveal white underwear. The cover was famously banned in Spain, which was under the fascist rule of General Franco at the time. Photographer Eric Boman's shot of Constanze Karoli and Eveline Grunwald led many US outlets to censor the image, feeling uncomfortable with the sight of scantily clad models. Thankfully, most European distributors weren't irked by the sight of lingerie. There's misguided and then there's what was going on in the minds of German rockers Scorpions in 1976. The album titled 'Virgin Killer' depicts a naked 10-year-old girl with broken glass covering her genitalia. The controversy led to a bump in sales, but it remains to this day one of the most censored album covers in music history. NB: Euronews Culture has decided to blur the image since this album cover has been deemed by many as child pornography. Sex Pistols' only studio album caused plenty of pearl clutching when it was released in 1977. A record shop owner in Nottingham, UK, was arrested for displaying the records. This led to an obscenity-related court case, as he was charged for contravening the Indecent Advertisement Act 1889. The charges were eventually dropped. All because of the word 'bollocks'. All it took was a female-led punk outfit appearing topless and covered in mud for everyone to collectively lose their minds. Considering the sheer amount of topless men on album covers, the only words that come to mind are: deal with it. With an album title like that, it was pretty obvious that the (cheeky) cover image would cause some outrage. There are no words. It's one of the most famous album covers in the world but the artwork for Nirvana's grunge masterpiece proved divisive at the time of its release. It features a photo taken by Kirk Weddle of a four-month-old nude baby named Spencer Elden. Kurt Cobain refused for it to be censored, but did state that he would agree to a sticker covering the penis, reading: 'If you're offended by this, you must be a closet pedophile.' It didn't come to that. However, several decades later, Elden attempted to sue Nirvana for violating US federal child pornography protections with the image, arguing that it resulted in 'lifelong damages'. The suit was eventually dismissed. Rap pioneer Ice Cube was no stranger to controversy, what with the headline-grabbing lyrics of N.W.A's 'Fuck Tha Police.' But with 'Death Certificate', he sparked further outrage with the image of a corpse identified as Uncle Sam. The famous rap-metal band's debut album depicts the infamous self-immolation of Vietnamese monk Thích Quảng Đức in 1963, protesting the persecution of Buddhists by South Vietnam's US-backed government. The graphic image caused outrage. Not displeased with the situation, frontman Zach de la Rocha famously burned a US flag at Woodstock '99. The question remains: Could anyone really be surprised with a name like Rage Against The Machine? Heavy metal has always been a genre that has courted controversy, and there are numerous album covers that have shocked over the years. For their 1994 album, titled 'Youthanasia', Megadeth wanted to comment on the fact that society was euthanizing the young. The visual depiction of this ended up being a woman hanging babies by their feet on her washing line. A bit on-the-nose, but it was enough to get everyone freaking out. Marilyn Manson has always pushed the envelope when it comes to taste, and the controversial rocker did just that in 2000 for the album 'Holy Wood (In The Shadow Of The Valley Of Death)'. The disturbing cover depicts Manson as a crucified Christ, which led US stores to ban it completely. Considering that the controversial shock rocker's intended purpose was to critique censorship and that the previous albums 'Mechanical Animals' and 'Portrait Of An American Family' also sparked moral panic, the reaction to the artwork must have delighted him. European fans of New York rockers The Strokes were treated with the original cover of their stunning debut album, featuring a leather gloved hand on a naked hip. The US were quick to call foul, however, disapproving of the suggestive nature of the image. The band had to swap the gorgeous shot by Colin Lane – who spontaneously took a picture of his then-girlfriend after she came out of the shower. The replacement? A psychedelic but far less impactful depiction of subatomic particle tracks. In 2001, US hip-hop group The Coup, composed of Boots Riley and DJ Pam the Funktress, wanted to make a statement about destroying capitalism. Their idea: pose in front of the World Trade Center on fire. The image was conceived prior to 9/11 and the eerie timing of the album's November release meant that they had to replace the image with a martini glass on fire. Probably for the best. The cover for Ted Nugent's album was pulled before it hit shelves - and considering the misogynist credentials of this particular image, it might have been for the best. The sleeve for 'My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy' saw a painting of a naked Kanye West being straddled by a winged female monster with sharp teeth. The controversial rapper refused for the image be pulled, but the record label reached a compromise by pixelating the image in some territories. Sabrina Carpenter's 'Man's Best Friend' is released on 29 August. He's one of the most bankable stars in Hollywood history, considered one of the last great Movie Stars and has defied death for more than three decades in the Mission: Impossible franchise... And yet, Tom Cruise has yet to win an Oscar – despite four nominations. Now, that Golden Baldie dearth is about to be rectified as the 62-year-old actor will finally receive an Academy Award this year. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced that Cruise will get an Honorary Oscar in November to celebrate his entire career, praising Cruise for his dedication to his craft, including performing all his own stunts, and helping the film industry recover following the COVID-19 period. Indeed, Cruise – who can currently be seen in Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning - famously played a large part in kick-starting the box office during the pandemic when Top Gun: Maverick opened in late spring 2022. The sequel to the 1986 adventure went on to gross $1.5bn worldwide. Cruise previously earned lead actor Oscar nominations for Born On The Fourth Of July and Jerry Maguire, a supporting actor nod for Magnolia, and a best picture nomination as a producer on Top Gun: Maverick. The leading man is one of four honourees, alongside choreographer and actress Debbie Allen (Fame, Ragtime, Jo Jo Dancer, Your Life Is Calling), pioneering Black production designer Wynn Thomas (Do The Right Thing, Malcolm X, A Beautiful Mind), and country singer - and complete legend - Dolly Parton. 'This year's Governors Awards will celebrate four legendary individuals whose extraordinary careers and commitment to our filmmaking community continue to leave a lasting impact,' said Janet Yang, Academy President. 'The Academy's Board of Governors is honored to recognize these brilliant artists. Debbie Allen is a trailblazing choreographer and actor, whose work has captivated generations and crossed genres. Tom Cruise's incredible commitment to our filmmaking community, to the theatrical experience, and to the stunts community has inspired us all. Beloved performer Dolly Parton exemplifies the spirit of the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award through her unwavering dedication to charitable efforts. And production designer Wynn Thomas has brought some of the most enduring films to life through a visionary eye and mastery of his craft.' The Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award is also an Oscar statuette and is presented to Hollywood figures renowned for 'promoting human welfare and contributing to rectifying inequities'. Parton's charitable and philanthropic work include the Dollywood Foundation, founded in 1988. The institution champions the education of children in her home state of Tennessee. As for her literacy initiative, Dolly Parton's Imagination Library, it has distributed more than 285 million books globally since 1995. Besides her music career, Parton has starred in films like 9 to 5 and Steel Magnolias, and earned two original song Oscar nominations for '9 to 5', and 'Travelin' Thru from Transamerica' from the film Transamerica. The four honorees will be presented with their Honorary Oscars at the Governors Awards ceremony on 16 November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store