What effect have Israeli strikes had on Houthi Red Sea attacks?
Fuel shipments at ports controlled by the Iran-backed group have continued despite disruption to pipelines, with the Houthis finding alternative means of getting supplies ashore, analysis shows.
Israel launched its most recent attacks overnight on July 6. Air strikes targeted the Red Sea ports of Hodeidah, Ras Isa and Al Salif, the Ras Kanatib power station and the cargo ship Galaxy Leader − which was hijacked by the Houthis in 2023 and Israel claims was being used to monitor international shipping.
Israel has hit key Houthi-controlled ports numerous times
Since the start of the Israel-Gaza war, the Houthis have regularly attacked shipping in the Red Sea and fired missiles and drones at Israel. The rebels say they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians.
Here, The National looks at what Israel has targeted and the impact − or lack of impact − of strikes on Houthi infrastructure.
Hodeidah – the Houthis largest port
Hodeidah, the Houthis' main gateway to the Red Sea, has been struck multiple times since July 2024. Imagery from July 4, 2025, reveals heavy crater damage, undoubtedly affecting and limiting fuel operations.
Impact on As Salif, Ras Isa and Ras Kanatib after Israeli strikes on July 7th, 2025
Below is a series of satellite images showing before and after damage to two ports and a power station along the coast of Houthi-controlled Hodeidah on the Red Sea. All three locations have been key to Houthi refuelling and stockpiles.
As Salif port: Strikes along the full length of the pier. Despite damage, cargo vessels remain docked.
Ras Isa terminal: Strikes targeted fuel terminals and the hijacked Galaxy Leader, which is docked at the port.
Ras Kanatib power station: New damage is visible on what appear to be the main generator units.
Ships keep docking, fuel keeps flowing
Visual time-lapse satellite data from July 2024 to July 2025 shows that fuel shipments to Houthi-held ports have not stopped. Ships continue to dock, and alternative offloading methods are being used to bypass damaged infrastructure.
'Big shipments have been affected significantly. But the Houthis adapt − they use alternate docks or just a simple pipe and a tanker to move oil,' said Baraa Shabani, a senior fellow with the London-based Royal United Services Institute think tank.
Offshore fuel transfers
Some Houthi-affiliated tankers, such as Valente and VLCC Yemen, are seen transferring fuel offshore, a strategy that allows them to bypass ports altogether. Satellite images show ships anchored in the sea, side-by-side near Hodeidah.
"Israel's military goals look very ambiguous, It's not clear what they are trying to achieve through these strikes"
Baraa Shaiban ,
Rusi
While the strikes have targeted port infrastructure, most of the Houthis' weaponry and power bases remain inland, untouched. Analysts have questioned the long-term strategic value of Israel's approach.
'Israel's military goals look very ambiguous, It's not clear what they are trying to achieve through these strikes,' said Mr Shabani.
'If the aim is to eliminate the Houthis threat now, of course,Houthis' they haven't been successful. The Houthis will continue attacking, attacking Israel.
'But if the aim is just to send a message that they can, hit them. As a form of deterrence, then you can say yes, they've, signalled that multiple times. For the Houthis, the main fear is if they lose terrain, if they lose land, and that's not happening at the moment.
Symbolic and disruptive
Despite sustained bombing campaigns, the Houthis continue to launch missiles and attack vessels in the Red Sea.
Two ships have been sunk in Houthi attacks in the past week or so – the Magic Seas on July 6 and the Eternity C on July 9. While all 22 people on the Magic Seas were rescued, four of the 25 crew on the Eternity C are presumed dead, with another 11 unaccounted for.
As images show continued fuel movement and maritime adaptability, the Houthis' resilience raises questions about the effectiveness of Israel's air campaign. While symbolic and disruptive, the strikes have not yet significantly altered the rebel group's operational capabilities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran says military helicopter confronted US warship near territorial waters
Iranian troops on Wednesday warned a US destroyer to stay out of territorial waters in the Gulf of Oman, state television reported, but the US has claimed the confrontation was 'safe and professional'. The exchange in the Gulf of Oman between the two rivals comes a month after the US carried out strikes against three key Iranian nuclear sites during the 12-day war between Israel and the Islamic republic. Iranian state media published videos of the incident, taken from a helicopter dispatched to confront the USS Fitzgerald guided missile destroyer. In the video, a destroyer is seen from what seems to be a helicopter window as the pilot calls on the vessel to 'change course' and avoid approaching Iranian territorial waters. The destroyer reportedly responded by threatening to target the helicopter if it did not leave, semi-official Tasnim news agency said, but 'the Iranian pilot … reiterated the warning to stay away from Iranian waters', forcing the US vessel to 'give in' and alter its course. Iranian media described the incident as a tense exchange. But, a US defence official disputed the account. 'This interaction had no impact to USS Fitzgerald's mission and any reports claiming otherwise are falsehoods and attempts by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to spread misinformation,' the official told Reuters. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, identified the aircraft as an Iranian SH-3 'Sea King' helicopter and said the interaction took place entirely in international waters. Tension has been high since the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites which President Donald Trump hailed and claimed had 'obliterated' Tehran's capabilities. But media reports quoting US intelligence reports have suggested the campaign was only partially successful, setting Iran's nuclear programme back only by a few months. Washington and Tehran were engaged in indirect nuclear negotiations which were derailed by Israel's attack. Mr Trump has called on Iran to return to the table but Tehran has been hesitant to resume talks with the US. However, discussions are set to take place between Iran and European powers in Istanbul on Friday.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Ali Larijani: Iran's former speaker who is making a quiet comeback
As Iran picks itself up following last month's war with Israel, the country's leadership is trying to find a diplomatic way out of the current predicament over its nuclear programme. It has resumed engaging with other parties to the 2015 nuclear agreement (outside of the US). These include the three European powers – France, Germany and the UK – as well as China and Russia. The Europeans have threatened to use the so-called 'snapback' mechanism in the 2015 deal to re-impose UN sanctions on Iran. As it seeks to avoid such an outcome before the deadline expires next month, Tehran must also recalibrate its relations with Moscow – especially as their military co-operation in the Ukraine war has led to criticism in Europe. Ali Larijani, a former Iranian parliamentary speaker and currently an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, surprised many by travelling on Sunday to Moscow, where he met Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to the Kremlin, the unannounced talks were focused on 'the escalated situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme'. Much speculation now abounds on the probable message Mr Larijani took to Mr Putin and how this might affect Iran's posture vis-a-vis Russia. The choice of Mr Larijani for such a sensitive trip is noteworthy since he doesn't hold an official position in government, although Iran's foreign ministry said he was in Moscow on behalf of President Masoud Pezeshkian – and that the ministry helped organise the trip. As an appointee of Mr Khamenei and a stalwart in the establishment, Mr Larijani carries enough diplomatic and political heft to have warranted a meeting with the Russian leadership. He has been in similar situations before, having visited China as the sitting speaker in 2019, in the company of then-foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. Even after leaving office, he continued to help steer Tehran's relations with Beijing. However, his Moscow trip signals something more than a diplomatic process. It appears to mark a political comeback for Mr Larijani, who is playing an increasingly prominent role in Iranian politics these days. With his country in flux, and as the question of 'after Mr Khamenei, who?' becomes ever more pertinent, the former speaker could be harbouring lofty ambitions. Although the Islamic Republic was founded by an anti-monarchical revolution, it has a political aristocracy of its own – and this includes the Larijani family. Son of a prominent cleric, Mr Larijani has held several influential positions in government. Before he became speaker in 2008, he was a national security adviser and before that the head of the state broadcaster. He and his four brothers – all accomplished in their own ways – are part of a powerful conservative family with marital ties to other key families within the political class. Mr Lairjani's father-in-law is the late Morteza Motahhari, a well-known cleric and a key figure in the 1979 revolution. Despite having powerful links, the Larijani family was on the sidelines for many years. Mr Larijani always had impeccable conservative credentials. He was the bete noire of the reformist movement during his tenure at the state broadcaster, primarily over the state TV's constant negative coverage of then-president Mohmmad Khatami, who was a reformist. Yet not long after, the Larijanis found themselves in choppy political waters. Mr Khatami's successor, the hardline Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, came down heavily on the family, accusing its members of corruption, thereby making a significant dent in their image. Mr Larijani thereafter allied himself to the centrist president Hassan Rouhani, attracting even greater ire from hardliners and getting disqualified from running for the presidency on two occasions. His brother Sadeq, a former head of the judiciary, lost re-election to the influential Assembly of Experts last year. But as the pendulum of power once again swings inside the Islamic Republic, hardliners find themselves on the back foot as Mr Larijani and his brothers gradually return to the limelight. When Israeli missiles were raining down on Lebanon last November, Mr Larijani visited Beirut to meet then-prime minister Najib Mikati and Speaker of the Parliament Nabih Berri. The trip received plenty of attention and since then, his profile has continued to grow. He frequently posts on social media, and he gets more air time on TV. In May, he made a well-publicised visit to the Tehran Book Fair. When foreign dignitaries visit Iran, they often make it a point to meet him. During last month's 12-day war, Mr Larijani decried Israel's attacks while urging forbearance on the part of the Iranian government. In doing so, he projected an image of someone with a steady hand and plenty of experience, wisdom and foresight – qualities that are in short supply within the establishment right now. The former speaker hasn't hidden his political ambitions. As mentioned earlier, he sought to run for president twice. Having backed several centrist candidates in last year's parliamentary election, he has positioned himself as a pragmatist. His resume includes not only many years in government but also extensive military experience, having served in key positions within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. He is statesman-like and has a sense of humour, which would make him personable to many voters. The question then is whether he will receive the green light to run for high office one day. Recent developments suggest this might already be in the works.
The National
12 hours ago
- The National
Iran agrees to UN nuclear watchdog visit and signals conditional openness to US talks
Iran has agreed to host a technical team from the UN's nuclear watchdog to discuss future co-operation, its Deputy Foreign Minister said on Wednesday, while cautiously signalling openness to renewed talks with the US. The development comes after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this month ended co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and said it could only be restored if the agency addressed Iranian concerns over its perceived bias. Kazem Gharibabadi, who is also Iran's lead nuclear negotiator, said the IAEA team would arrive in Tehran within two to three weeks to negotiate a 'new modality' for continued engagement. 'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the [nuclear] sites,' Mr Gharibabadi told reporters in New York. 'Why are they insisting to send inspectors there if those facilities have been obliterated? There shouldn't be any request to go there, unless they are seeking to see how effective the attacks were.' Iran's nuclear facilities were severely damaged last month in US strikes. The Deputy Foreign Minister said Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation was still assessing the extent of the damage but offered no further details. The planned IAEA visit comes amid heightened mistrust between Tehran and the agency. Despite expressing 'dissatisfaction' with the IAEA's recent conduct, Mr Gharibabadi described the upcoming visit as a goodwill gesture. 'I hope that it would be welcomed and they would value such co-operation and good faith,' he said. He described scheduled talks on Friday in Istanbul with the E3 – Britain, France, and Germany – as 'very important', noting that the European countries had approached Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in a bid to 'manage the situation' and de-escalate tensions. The three European powers, along with China and Russia, remain signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which offered Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme. The US withdrew from the deal in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have very constructive and good relations with China and Russia … we have always co-ordinated our positions when it comes to the nuclear issue, the negotiations, even the aggression and also now the snapback,' Mr Gharibabadi noted. The E3 have warned they may move to trigger the 'snapback' mechanism under the nuclear deal, which would reinstate all previous UN sanctions on Iran if negotiations with the US do not resume or fail to yield results by the end of August. The snapback option would remain valid until October 18, when the Security Council resolution underpinning the deal is set to expire. 'On Friday, we will discuss on this issue with the Europeans to see that how we should prevent a snapback and how we should prevent more complicating the situation,' Mr Gharibabadi said. 'Possibly, they may come to the table ... with new ideas, we are open to that. We will listen to them to see what are their ideas in this regard, to see that how we can agree to prevent complicating more the situation.' While not ruling out renewed negotiations with Washington, Mr Gharibabadi emphasised that any future talks must come with clear guarantees, including assurances that Iran would not be targeted militarily during the negotiation process and that any eventual agreement would be reciprocal. 'The calls for negotiations have never stopped, even one or two days after the Israeli aggression, and even after the armed attack of the United States on our peaceful nuclear facilities, we have received requests and calls for negotiations,' he said. He added that even following the announcement of a 'so-called' ceasefire, Tehran continues to receive overtures for renewed talks. 'We have not rejected them, but there are some issues around the negotiations,' he said. Mr Gharibabadi said a lack of consistency from Washington was a key obstacle in the five rounds of indirect talks already held with US officials. 'One of the problems we had was the continuous change in the American position. Unfortunately, we would come to a common understanding at the negotiating table, and then 24 hours later we would hear a completely different position, either through the media or directly from US officials,' he said. 'Iran is not against diplomacy and the resumption of negotiations,' he continued.
