Israeli strike on Gaza refugee camp kills 14 Palestinians
The Shifa and al-Ahli hospitals confirmed the toll from the strike in the built-up Jabaliya refugee camp, saying five women and seven children were among those killed.
There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military.
Israel claims it only targets militants and tries to avoid harming civilians, blaming civilian deaths on Hamas because the militant group is entrenched in populated areas.
READ MORE: Nigel Farage denies Gaza genocide – and backs weapons exports to Israel
Since the Hamas attacks of October 7, Israel has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children. The military siege and offensive has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of the population.
Israel has said it will maintain control of Gaza indefinitely and facilitate what it refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of its population.
Palestinians and most of the international community have rejected the resettlement plans, viewing them as forcible expulsion.
It comes after at least 31 people were killed on Sunday as they went to receive aid from an Israeli-backed foundation in Gaza.
More than 170 people were also wounded as large crowds tried to access food in the site in the southern city of Rafah.
Witnesses said Israeli forces fired towards the crowds just before about 1100 yards from an aid site run by an Israeli-backed foundation.
READ MORE: 'You're not welcome': Nigel Farage visit to Scotland met by anti-racism protesters
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a new aid organisation backed by Israel and the US, has seen its distribution of aid marred by chaos, and multiple witnesses have said Israeli troops fired on crowds near the delivery sites.
Before Sunday, at least six people had been killed and more than 50 wounded, according to local health officials.
The foundation claims that the private security contractors guarding its sites did not fire on the crowds, while the Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
15 minutes ago
- The National
Neal Ascherson: Gazans paying the price for Israel's military failure
The lesson of the past three years in Gaza is that Israel's war there has been a gross military failure. In reality, Israel's army is incompetent and disorganised. The weakness is in tactics, training and morale, and it's the people of Gaza who are paying for it. The IDF, staggering under the weight of every kind of sub-nuclear weaponry and intelligence on land, air or sea, has been unable to crush a far smaller urban guerrilla force apparently using only small arms, booby-traps and a few rocket launchers. READ MORE: Palestinian jazz singer to share rich heritage through music at Scottish festival This is partly because the Israelis use the old American tactics of the Second World War: don't enter a built-up area which might contain enemies, but first bomb it to rubble. The drawback is that this creates a perfect landscape for snipers hiding in the ruins, which is what has happened in Gaza. As the war in Iraq has shown, this is the kind of fighting that advancing soldiers most dread. House-to-house combat in undestroyed streets is less dangerous, but it's a grim routine which requires prolonged training. And the available evidence suggests that the basic training of Israeli recruits is astonishingly poor and erratic. Soldiers who commit atrocities are usually frightened soldiers. They are also burned-out soldiers, no longer reliable, who should at once be taken out of action before they do more damage. Some of the IDF's crimes against civilians have an element of revenge: it's wrong to underestimate the trauma left by Hamas's insane orgy of murder in October 2023. More often, it seems, the killings have been the reaction of ill-trained and scared men, possibly after suffering a comrade casualty, whose officers and unit commanders have totally failed to lead and reassure them. To explain is not, of course, to excuse. But old-fashioned 'discipline', the traditional remedy for fear, is hard to impose on young men from a proudly self-assertive society of many sects and origins. None of those qualifications apply to the men and women carrying out the indiscriminate bombardment of Gaza from the air, the daily slaughter of innocent families, at no risk to themselves. They are parties to a deliberate crime against humanity. READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn to table Chilcot-style Gaza inquiry bill in the Commons But the IDF on the ground in Gaza is illustrating a great change in the attitude of 'Western' countries toward warfare. This is the intense and growing reluctance of soldiers and commanders to take casualties and risk lives. These days, a pimply youth blowing a whistle and ordering a trenchful over the top into the machine guns would only get one answer: Gonnae no dae that! But is this proof of a slow spread of compassion and humanity? Or does it only mean that mass killing is now conducted by remote-control drones or by button-pushers in another continent? Perhaps Gaza can show us.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Has Nigel Farage just snatched defeat from the jaws of victory?
You can take the lad out of England but you can't really take the English nationalist out of the lad. Has that become the issue in the Hamilton Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election when the polling stations open? It is the increasingly prevalent view of Nigel Farage's opponents following his demand for what he called a 'review' – although I'm sure he really meant the abolition – of the Barnett formula, which has been used for more than fifty years to calculate how much the UK's nations and regions should receive from the Treasury. It is but the latest of the signs, say SNP, Labour and Tories, that Mr Farage knows nothing about Scotland. The cash Barnett produces for Scotland has become a running sore in relations between many in England and Scotland in recent years as the gap in funding between the two has grown and grown. Official figures now show that Scots now get an average £2400 more per person than those in England – a record amount. But to successive Labour, Tory and coalition UK governments, the Barnett largesse is regarded as the 'Union dividend' which helps Scotland remain a key part of the United Kingdom. Ditching what is seen as this 'Barnett bounty' for Scotland – due to reach £50 billion this year – would, say Reform's critics, be a boost for the SNP and its perpetual demand for independence. David Mundell, the former Conservative Scottish Secretary, said: 'This proves that Reform isn't a Unionist Party, instead it's a populist party that wouldn't stand up for the Union.' The Reform UK leader's view is that the system, devised by Labour's Treasury Chief Secretary in the 1970s, was out of date and should be scrapped, throwing a massive hand grenade into the already bad tempered campaign for Thursday's by-election in Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall. Most Scottish politicians have insisted that the difference in average spending north and south of the border, thanks to Barnett, was justified because of poor health standards in Scotland and a widely scattered population, often in remote regions, including island communities. Mr Farage's view, shared by many in English voters, is that the money paid to Scotland through Barnett formula should be replaced by the devolved Scottish government being able to raise more of its own revenue through increased growth … and presumably higher taxes. But with the cash provided by the UK Treasury through Barnett, the so-called block grant, due to reach £50 billion this year he said that Scotland needed a 'thriving economy', instead of one heading in the wrong direction. Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay said the Farage demand would 'take a wrecking ball' to Scotland's public services and bring misery to Scottish families, workers and businesses. The main plank – indeed its only plank – of Labour's campaign is to bank heavily on the voters taking an active personal dislike to Mr Farage. They constantly place a heavy emphasis on how little he knows about Scotland while ordinary voters 'see right through him', according to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. That and his alleged views on race which his critics say will count against him and which Mr Farage denies. Mr Sarwar also described his Reform counterpart as a 'chief clown', while 'crashing his own campaign' was the view of another leading Labour strategist over Mr Farage's idea of ending Barnett as it would have serious repercussions for Scottish public services, such as education and the NHS. But this doesn't seem to have bothered Nigel Farage overmuch, as he captured two more defectors this week – one councillor each from Labour and Conservatives. The battle on Thursday is shaping up to be a straight fight between the SNP and Reform, with Labour struggling to stay in the race while hoping that the voters in Hamilton record their lack of fellow feeling – and then some – for the leader of Reform UK.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cleverly has delivered a direct challenge to Badenoch on net zero
On the eve of a Holyrood by-election, and with the Tories in fourth in a recent Westminster opinion poll, Kemi Badenoch would dearly love to avoid talk of policy divides within her party or chatter about leadership challenges. Sir James Cleverly has delivered both. The former home secretary will drive a wedge between himself and the Conservative Party leader on Wednesday night by directly challenging her approach to net zero, which will be met with jubilation by Labour, the SNP, and especially Reform UK. Conservatives who have not already switched their allegiance to Nigel Farage's party might be tempted to do so through sheer exasperation with the latest evidence of infighting. Sir James, who was convinced he was on course to become Tory leader last year, before an apparent tactical voting mishap by his supporters ended his chances, has chosen to speak out hours before the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, a poll that will provide a snapshot of just how much the Tories are struggling. Mr Farage has said he is 'confident' his candidate will finish third or higher, which would mean the Tories - who have finished third in the last three elections for the seat - being relegated to fourth place or even lower. That would put even more pressure on Mrs Badenoch, who is already struggling to convince some of her MPs that she should stay in the job after a terrible set of local election results last month and a series of defections by local councillors since then. As the Conservatives scrap for every vote on Thursday, Sir James's disloyalty - for that is how it will be seen in Mrs Badenoch's office - can only harm the cause. Sir James, who returned to the backbenches when Mrs Badenoch became leader and has never ruled out another leadership bid, has chosen to present an alternative vision for the Conservatives' green agenda in an apparent attempt to appeal to the moderate wing of the party. Rather than backing his leader's decision to drop support for the UK reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2050, he will say that: 'Conservative environmentalism doesn't mean a choice between growth and sustainability.' Contrast that with Mrs Badenoch's view that: 'Anyone who has done any serious analysis knows [net zero] can't be achieved without a serious drop in our living standards or by bankrupting us.' Although Sir James will not mention Mrs Badenoch by name, or refer directly to her net-zero policy, his message - that she has got it wrong - could not be clearer. In case anyone doubted his motives, he will make the speech at the Conservative Environment Network, which has described Mrs Badenoch's net-zero policy as a 'mistake'. On one level, Sir James has drawn attention to the deep divide between Mrs Badenoch and environmental hand-wringers in her party, who include Boris Johnson, former COP26 president Lord Sharma and Baroness May, who as prime minister adopted the net zero 2050 target. More broadly, Sir James is presenting an alternative strategy for beating Reform UK: moving to the centre rather than trying to outflank Mr Farage. Moderates believe Mrs Badenoch has been forced to drop support for the net-zero target in order to keep up with Mr Farage, who has called net zero 'lunacy'. There is plenty of evidence that she is being dragged further to the Right on other matters to see off the threat of Reform. Critics believe the Tories can't out-Farage Mr Farage and that the only way to differentiate the Conservatives from Reform is to occupy the centre ground from which elections have traditionally been won in the past. In highlighting a difference over policy, Sir James has presented a separate view on the future direction of the Conservative Party and who should lead it. The odds on Mrs Badenoch uniting her party before the next general election may just have lengthened a little more.
