logo
Ken Rogoff on How Crypto Is Infiltrating the Dollar's Hegemony

Ken Rogoff on How Crypto Is Infiltrating the Dollar's Hegemony

Mint24-05-2025

(Bloomberg) -- From the International Monetary Fund to the Federal Reserve, Kenneth Rogoff has spent years inside the institutions that helped shape the dollar-led global economic order.
Now, he warns that the dollar's dominance can no longer be taken for granted.
In his new book, Our Dollar, Your Problem, the Harvard economist argues that the rise of China, geopolitical tensions and the growing influence of cryptocurrencies are chipping away at the greenback's global standing.
In an interview with Bloomberg News, Rogoff spoke about why digital currencies, once dismissed as a fad, are here to stay.
The conversation has been edited for brevity and clarity.
Q: Why did you include a chapter on cryptocurrencies?
A: We're thinking about the future, not just the past. So the book is a sweeping history of the rise of the dollar post-World War II, including how it managed to reach such a high level and how its competitors fell by the wayside. But it's not simply that the dollar became first, but became more dominant than any other currency has ever been. And I see it as in decline — it's fraying at the edges where, of course, the renminbi is breaking free of the dollar, the euro is going to have a larger footprint — that's been going on for a decade.
But there's also crypto, because one of the dollar's main markets is the world underground economy. And there, the government does not control things.
One of the first questions many people ask is can crypto replace dollars? Crypto can't replace the dollar. But that's in the legal economy where the government has a lot of leverage. But in the underground economy, by definition, it has much less leverage.
Q: What is the underground economy?
A: It depends on the country. The lion's share is tax evasion. Tax evasion is massive all over the world. The average in the advanced economies is between 15-20%. The United States is one of the lowest — lower than 15%. But in most advanced economies, particularly in Europe, it's much higher. And in developing economies, it's a third of GDP. There's sort of a gray area between what's illegal and what's tax evasion, sometimes they overlap. But a lot of it is what some people might call the gray market, the shadow economy. You don't pay taxes on your nanny, people sometimes pay their painter in cash, their trainer in cash. There are people who pay for apartments in cash. Of course, there's also arms dealing, human trafficking, drugs, etc. But illegal activity's very important, but it's quantitatively much smaller than tax evasion.
Q: You argue in your book that Bitcoin has already cut into the dollar's dominance.
A: Yes, although crypto has not made significant inroads into the legal economy, it is increasingly used in the global underground economy – consisting of criminal activity but mainly tax and regulatory evasion – where cash, especially US dollars, had been king. The notion that there is no 'fundamental value proposition' in transactions use is just wrong. There are also many countries using crypto to evade US financial sanctions.
Q: What are the implications of this?
A: The underground global economy is perhaps 20% of global GDP — per my own research and per a World Bank literature survey. This is a big market where the dollar has been particularly dominant.
Q: How does crypto cutting into the dollar's dominance raise interest rates for all of us?
A: A lower demand for dollars in the global underground economy raises US interest rates, though it is only one of many factors today pushing up rates. The United States' 'exorbitant privilege' — thanks to being by far the most important reserve currency – affects all our interest rates, not just the Treasury bill rate, including mortgages, car loans, student loans, etc.
Q: And the second implication is national security?
A: In general, a loss of market share of the dollar makes it more difficult for US authorities to monitor financial flows for information that helps preserve national security.
Dollar dominance also allows us to impose sanctions. To the extent there is simply a substitution of crypto for paper dollars that were already nearly impossible to trace, there is no new issue. To the extent crypto allows new ways to cloak transactions that had previously gone through normal financial channels, the national security implications of the information loss are much more significant. This challenge is all the more difficult for US regulators to reign in, given that large parts of the rest of the world resent what they see as excessive US control over the financial system, one of the main reasons that we are likely to see continuing diversification away from dollar markets toward other transactions vehicles, something Our Dollar, Your Problem discusses at length.
Q: And will crypto's dominance continue to grow?
A: Absolutely. Crypto's going to continue taking over the global underground economy on transactions.
There are people who think that crypto is going to go to the moon, but there plenty of people — Paul Krugman, Nouriel Roubini, Jamie Dimon, Warren Buffett — who said pretty recently that they think crypto is just a scam. In the crypto chapter, I explain why that's completely wrong. Because if the underground economy is 20% of global GDP that makes it — depending on the value of the dollar — a $20-to-$25 trillion economy. And if you're providing the means of exchange, that's a value proposition. Crypto has value. It's used for transactions. There's a big piece of the economy, which even if crypto's heavily regulated, the government is going to have difficulty controlling. So it's not worthless. There's a lot at stake there.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India needs new goals as the global order resets
India needs new goals as the global order resets

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

India needs new goals as the global order resets

It was May 12, 1947, a day characterised by hectic parleys in hushed tones in the corridors of power in London; newly elected Prime Minister Clement Atlee was meeting military commanders at his official residence at 10, Downing Street. Along with all three chiefs of services, the legendary World War II hero, Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, was also present, as were some foreign policy experts. They were there to discuss India's independence and its eventual partition. These men thought that India as a nation had socialistic impulses. If it were to be given independence in the undivided form, chances were that the storm of Communism that began in Moscow may end up on the shores of the Indian Ocean. They considered it a mortal threat to British interests. They wanted to create a buffer State between the Soviet Union and India, which could do their bidding in the region. Pakistan was created on August 14, 1947, and became a Western puppet. India, meanwhile, took the path of non-alignment on August 15, 1947. However, 78 years later, the generals responsible for the partition of India stand defeated. Pakistan has slithered away from the Western chokehold and is now firmly in the grip of China. The Soviet Union is history, but its remnant, Russia, with the biggest nuclear stockpile in the world, is now Beijing's friend. All three nations are nuclear powers. Another undeclared nuclear power, North Korea, is a part of this axis. The world looks at the quartet with a lot of concern. US President Donald Trump has done his bit to aggravate the global unease. His tariff tantrums have blurred the line between friends and foes. In the age of changing equations and global reset, what should India do? India can't remain smug that Pakistan is repeating a historical mistake. Earlier, as a pawn of the West, it destroyed its economy, and now, as China's poker chip, it's digging another grave for itself. Superpowers are solely concerned about their interests. The father of modern US foreign policy, Henry Kissinger, once said, 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.' The context may have been different, but it chillingly puts the relationship between a superpower and a weak nation in perspective. This is where India needs to tread cautiously. The enemy is now firmly ensconced in China's lap, with whom we have a long-standing border dispute. Russia, too, is toeing Beijing's line and is in no position to help us as it did in 1971. Europe is in a crisis. It leaves us with just the US, whose friendship is fatal. What are the options left for us? The road ahead may be difficult, but not impossible. India is now one of largest economies in the world. We have the biggest pool of graduates in the world. Indian graduates from IITs, IIMs, and AIIMS are making their mark globally. The time has come for India to stop being an exporter of trained manpower and become a net importer of global talent. Google data suggests that since Trump's policies came into force, there has been a 25% drop in searches for US universities. Today, many of the best educational institutions in the world are in China. The US used to lead the tally not long ago. India will have to improve its education and update its internal infrastructure so that it can attract talented students from developing countries. China is trying to do the same, but our social setup will be far more effective and attractive for global citizens. We need to upgrade our higher education infrastructure, a second Green Revolution to become one of the three top producers of food grains. As far as military hardware is concerned, the weapon traders are politics-agnostic. They'll remain available, though that's not enough. India must expedite military hardware production. The indigenous missiles were effective in the recent clashes with Pakistan. It also exposed the limitations of Western aircraft and equipment. India needs to become an exporter rather than an importer of military hardware. A beginning has been made, but it's not enough. We shouldn't work on a war footing when we are faced with a war. To create a great nation, we should remain alert against any slack and legacy mindset during peacetime. China did the same and is now itching to reach the top. Pakistan took a completely different path, and the results are evident. Treading a middle path, we have achieved a lot, but it's time to sprint towards a steep hill. For this, we'll have to marshal all our resources and willpower. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims

(Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds are facing pushback in California as their bets tied to insurance claims stemming from the Los Angeles wildfires are attacked as unethical. The transactions in focus are tied to so-called subrogation claims, which hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers have been buying from insurers over the past few months. Subrogation kicks in if a third party such as a utility is suspected of being responsible for losses covered by insurers. Hedge funds buying these claims from insurers are now under attack from the California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the California Wildfire Fund. It has described such transactions as 'opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,' and says it's planning to take on 'hedge funds and other speculators' that it claims 'are actively seeking to profit from California's devastating wildfire catastrophes.' In practice, that means the authority will try to block the payout of what it says could end up being 'billions of dollars' to the investors that bought the claims, according to materials prepared ahead of a meeting that took place last month with the California Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund. To that end, it plans to engage California's state legislature, according to a transcript of comments made during the meeting and seen by Bloomberg. A spokesperson for the authority declined to comment. Bradley Max, a director at Cherokee Acquisition, a New York-based investment bank that trades and invests in subrogation claims, says the development has 'put a chill on bidding,' which is already visible in pricing. Subrogation rights tied to the Eaton Fire that ripped through Southern California in January were trading as high as 50 cents on the dollar at one point, but have now dropped 'at least a few points lower,' Max said. Still, even though the political development has led to lower prices on the subrogation claims, it hasn't held back transactions, he said. Cherokee said in April it had brokered deals linked to the Los Angeles fires for 'larger, more sophisticated distressed debt hedge funds.' And by April 15, investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. had executed 10 transactions tied to the Eaton and Palisades fires totaling over $1 billion worth of recovery rights, Ronald Ryder, co-head of special assets at Oppenheimer, told the California Earthquake Authority. That includes over $125 million in claims traded in just one day, Ryder wrote. A spokesperson for Oppenheimer declined to comment. Cherokee didn't name the hedge funds for which it brokered deals. In an email to the California Earthquake Authority, Ryder said that as catastrophic weather events become 'more prevalent,' insurers are increasingly resorting to 'recovery subrogation in the secondary market to fortify the balance sheet.' There's a growing consensus that insurers can't cover the rising costs of weather-related catastrophes alone, especially as climate change fuels more extreme events. For that reason, the industry is looking for ways to shift part of its financial risk over to capital markets, with alternative asset managers often the only investor class willing to step in. Efforts to prevent investors from profiting from the subrogation claims they've bought represent 'a politically motivated attempt to not pay legitimate obligations,' Max at Cherokee said. They're 'trying to beat up deep-pocketed hedge funds, despite the ethical and legal implications,' he said. Recovery of subrogation claims is costly and can take years to play out, which is why insurers have started selling them in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The hedge funds buying them are betting that the recovery sum at the end of the process will exceed the amount they paid the insurer to buy the claim. The market for investing in subrogation claims is characterized by over-the-counter deals with little to no transparency. Subrogation deals had a seminal moment more than half a decade ago, when faulty power lines and equipment failures at California utility PG&E Corp. were blamed for wildfires in the state. Back then, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased claims against PG&E worth $6.8 billion. Bloomberg has previously reported that Baupost may have generated an estimated $1 billion of profits. The California Wildfire Fund, which is administered by the state's Earthquake Authority and overseen by the California Catastrophe Response Council, was set up in 2019 to help reimburse claims arising from wildfires caused by utility companies. If hedge funds prevail in their subrogation claims, some of the money could end up coming from the California Wildfire Fund. The fund, which sits on about $13 billion in liquid assets, is partly capitalized by three utilities — San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E. While the cause of the January fires remains under investigation, it's already clear that the Eaton Fire started inside the service territory of Edison and therefore leaves the fund potentially exposed, the authority said. With current estimates for insured losses as high as $45 billion, the January Southern California wildfires are expected to be the costliest in US history, according to the California Earthquake Authority. The Earthquake Authority and Catastrophe Response Council are now reviewing claims and administration procedures as they take the matter to the state legislature. More stories like this are available on

A Luxury Travel Bubble Is Swelling
A Luxury Travel Bubble Is Swelling

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

A Luxury Travel Bubble Is Swelling

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- When you go on vacation, do you ever treat yourself to an upgraded airline seat? Or book the (admittedly cheapest) room at a five-star hotel? Maybe splurge on a spa day or celebratory Michelin-starred meal? If any of this sounds familiar, you may be what the travel industry calls an 'aspirational' luxury traveler. And much to the industry's potential dismay, you're also inflating an economic bubble that may be about to burst. According to McKinsey, the aspirational set, defined as those with between $100,000 and $1 million in net worth, now accounts for 35% of the global luxury travel market. In 2023, they spent $84 billion on high-end vacations, a figure expected to grow to $107 billion by 2028. That purchasing power has helped turn luxury travel from a glamorous niche into a major profit center, sparking a race among airlines, hotels, cruise lines, tour companies and the rest to cater to and capture this market segment. But what happens when economic uncertainty suddenly brings aspirations back down to earth? Consider the reasons why so many people with money — but not true $10,000-a-night-suite money — started spending so much on fancy getaways. One is the boom that kicked off with post-Covid 'revenge travel' and was going strong until recently; even as prices climbed, Americans have increased their travel spending every year since the 2020 bust, according to the US Travel Association. There's also a demographic element: Millennials, the generation that popularized the idea of investing on experiences over things, are entering their peak spending years. Perhaps less considered is a cultural shift that's normalized the idea that all travel should be luxurious. You see it in pop culture (who wouldn't check into the White Lotus, body count or no?) but nowhere is the luxury obsession more pronounced than on social media. The travel industry has discovered the marketing power of influencers, gifting them private jet outings and luxe villas that they then flaunt all over our timelines, sending an unmissable message that anyone bunking at a meh chain hotel or stuck in the back half of the plane is a loser. It's gotten to the point that there was even a movement on TikTok to 'normalize' flying coach. As the luxury category has swelled to encompass both the uber-rich and aspirational splurgers, travel companies have been quick to invest. Post-pandemic, the pipeline of new luxury and upscale lodging has been expanding at a faster rate than that of more affordable hotels. At the very tip-top of that range, the number of hotels charging an average daily rate of $1,000 or more has more than tripled since 2019. Even Airbnb is looking to go upscale — in May it debuted a new service that lets users book a personal trainer, masseuse or chef for in-rental pampering. Meanwhile, US airlines, including United and Delta, have been increasing the share of planes given over to 'premium' seating. Some have also introduced a class of service that falls between business and economy plus (i.e., extra-legroom coach seats). The cheapie airlines, too, have had their heads turned by the appeal of luxury options: Southwest has adopted extra legroom seats, while JetBlue and Frontier are planning to add first class. But wider seats, posher rooms and even the odd hot stone massage may not be enough to woo travelers spooked by a potential downturn and America's increasing hostility to the rest of the world. To hear the industry tell it, the falloff in the sector's latest earnings is little to worry about. In March, Delta cut its profit and revenue forecast but later reported that, 'We are not yet seeing any cracks in premium.' For its part, United said it would trim domestic routes due to weak demand — even as it noted that new premium cabin bookings were up over last year. It's not crazy to think the ultra-rich may keep booking even if, as many are expecting, the economy slows, inflation returns and the stock market falls into a funk. (Though the recent cratering of luxury retail suggests that's not a sure thing.) Unlike the multi-millionaire crowd, though, aspirational luxury travelers aren't in a position to ignore the status of their bank and 401(k) accounts. Many of them might understandably choose to trade-down to (for shame!) economy class seats or the kind of hotel that offers a free breakfast buffet. The industry has never been particularly good about thinking beyond the moment. When Covid hit, the airlines hacked schedules to the bone — only to be caught off guard when demand came roaring back, and then to find themselves cutting prices last year when they couldn't fill all the new flights. Meanwhile, the development process for hotels can take years; by the time a new property opens its doors, the environment that inspired its construction is long gone (the glut of supply that came online during the 2008 recession is probably the most painful such example). This would be a smart time for travel companies to take a look back at that checkered history and reconsider just how big they want to bet on luxury carrying them through what could be a bumpy couple of years. For vacationers, a slowing economy could be a reminder that, while creature comforts are wonderful, at its heart, travel is more about people and places than perks. And the companies that find ways to deliver value and keep those experiences accessible are likely to be the ones that come out ahead. Elsewhere in Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Kristen Bellstrom is a Bloomberg Opinion senior editor. She previously worked as a managing editor for Barron's. She has also worked as an editor and writer for Fortune, The Broadsheet, Money and SmartMoney. More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store