India ditches Russia for Africa's largest oil producer in major supply shake-up
Indian state refineries are increasingly sourcing crude oil from Nigeria amidst global trading shifts.
By late 2025, over two million barrels of Nigerian oil are set to arrive in India.
India's shift from Russian to alternative sources is influenced by political pressures, notably from the US.
More than two million barrels of Nigerian oil are projected to arrive in India between September and October 2025, as political pressure from the US forces the South Asian country to reduce its imports from Russia.
According to industry insiders, the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) recently purchased one million barrels of Nigerian Agbami oil for September delivery through a tender awarded to the global trading firm Trafigura.
The move is part of a larger buying frenzy by Indian refiners, which have obtained millions of barrels from non-Russian sources in recent weeks.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), India's second-largest state refiner, also made spot purchases while negotiating for September deliveries, as seen in the Punch.
The South Asian market purchased one million barrels of Angola's Girassol, one million barrels of US Mars, three million barrels of Abu Dhabi Murban, and two million barrels of Nigerian crude for delivery in September and October.
This shift comes after Indian state refiners ceased purchases of Russian crude in late July, citing a delay advocated by US President Donald Trump.
Since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, India has been one of the few big purchasers of cheap Russian oil, taking advantage of reduced costs while escaping the Western boycott.
This policy kept Indian refiners mostly out of the spot market for other suppliers, until recently.
Nigeria's acquisitions signal an increase in sales to Asia, a sector long dominated by Middle Eastern oil producers.
Nigerian crude grades, recognized for their low sulfur content, are ideal for India's refineries, which generate vast amounts of gasoline and diesel for domestic and export markets.
However, the development comes with a twist, which industry analysts refer to as oil trade irony.
Even though Nigeria sells millions of barrels of petroleum to India, the Dangote Oil Refinery, Africa's largest refinery, located within Nigeria, is increasingly purchasing crude from the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
CPI report reveals inflation held steady in July as tariffs threatened wider impact
Inflation held steady in July as President Donald Trump's sweeping import tariffs took a widening toll on U.S. consumer prices. An underlying inflation measure accelerated more than expected. Prices overall increased 2.7% from a year earlier, similar to June, according to the Labor Department's consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs. On a monthly basis, costs increased 0.2% after rising 0.3% the previous month. What is the meaning of core inflation? But core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy items and is watched closely by the Federal Reserve because it better reflects longer-term trends, increased 0.3% after rising 0.2% in June. That nudged the annual increase from 2.9% to 3.1%. Do tariffs increase inflation? Inflation has been pulled by conflicting forces this year. On the one hand, services prices that soared following the COVID-19 pandemic have climbed more modestly or drifted lower. Rent hikes, for example, have softened. Wage increases have slowed as pandemic-related labor shortages eased. And Americans grappling with higher inflation have reined in their spending on travel and recreational activities, lowering airfares and hotel rates. Absent the tariffs, yearly inflation likely would already be at the Fed's 2% goal, economists have said. But the tariffs, which had minimal effects on consumer prices through the first five months of 2025, began delivering a bigger blow in June and forecasters expect a growing impact on the cost of goods over the next few months. Duties already in effect for weeks or months include a 30% tax on Chinese imports, 50% on steel and aluminum and 25% on foreign cars. The average U.S. tariff rate has jumped from less than 3% in January to 15% to 20%. Retailers and manufacturers have cushioned the hit to consumers by stocking up on inventory before the fees took effect and absorbing some cost increases themselves, among other strategies. But economists say those tactics largely have played out. Meanwhile, the White House has reached deals with trading partners such as Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and UK that set tariffs at 10% to 20%. On Aug. 7, Trump imposed levies of 10% to 50% on dozens of countries that didn't reach agreements with the U.S. In other words, the most far-reaching charges are looming. By year's end, Barclays expects overall inflation to reach 3.4% while the core reading hits 3.7%.
Fast Company
12 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump signs executive order to extend trade truce with China for another 90 days
President Donald Trump extended a trade truce with China for another 90 days Monday, at least delaying once again a dangerous showdown between the world's two biggest economies. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that he signed the executive order for the extension, and that 'all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same.' Beijing at the same time also announced the extension of the tariff pause, according to the Ministry of Commerce. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. Had that happened the U.S. could have ratcheted up taxes on Chinese imports from an already high 30%, and Beijing could have responded by raising retaliatory levies on U.S. exports to China. The pause buys time for the two countries to work out some of their differences, perhaps clearing the way for a summit later this year between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and it has been welcomed by the U.S. companies doing business with China. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said the extension is 'critical' to give the two governments time to negotiate a trade agreement that U.S. businesses hope would improve their market access in China and provide the certainty needed for companies to make medium- and long-term plans. 'Securing an agreement on fentanyl that leads to a reduction in U.S. tariffs and a rollback of China's retaliatory measures is acutely needed to restart U.S. agriculture and energy exports,' Stein said. China said Tuesday it would extend relief to American companies who were placed on an export control list and an unreliable entities list. After Trump initially announced tariffs in April, China restricted exports of dual-use goods to some American companies, while banning others from trading or investing in China. The Ministry of Commerce said it would stop those restrictions for some companies, while giving others another 90-day extension. Reaching a pact with China remains unfinished business for Trump, who has already upended the global trading system by slapping double-digit taxes — tariffs — on almost every country on earth. The European Union, Japan and other trading partners agreed to lopsided trade deals with Trump, accepting once unthinkably U.S. high tariffs (15% on Japanese and EU imports, for instance) to ward off something worse. Trump's trade policies have turned the United States from one of the most open economies in the world into a protectionist fortress. The average U.S. tariff has gone from around 2.5% at the start of the year to 18.6%, highest since 1933, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. But China tested the limits of a U.S. trade policy built around using tariffs as a cudgel to beat concessions out of trading partners. Beijing had a cudgel of its own: cutting off or slowing access to its rare earths minerals and magnets – used in everything from electric vehicles to jet engines. In June, the two countries reached an agreement to ease tensions. The United States said it would pull back export restrictions on computer chip technology and ethane, a feedstock in petrochemical production. And China agreed to make it easier for U.S. firms to get access to rare earths. 'The U.S. has realized it does not have the upper hand,' said Claire Reade, senior counsel at Arnold & Porter and former assistant U.S. trade representative for China affairs. In May, the U.S. and China had averted an economic catastrophe by reducing massive tariffs they'd slapped on each other's products, which had reached as high as 145% against China and 125% against the U.S. Those triple-digit tariffs threatened to effectively end trade between the United States and China and caused a frightening sell-off in financial markets. In a May meeting in Geneva they agreed to back off and keep talking: America's tariffs went back down to a still-high 30% and China's to 10%. Having demonstrated their ability to hurt each other, they've been talking ever since. 'By overestimating the ability of steep tariffs to induce economic concessions from China, the Trump administration has not only underscored the limits of unilateral U.S. leverage, but also given Beijing grounds for believing that it can indefinitely enjoy the upper hand in subsequent talks with Washington by threatening to curtail rare earth exports,' said Ali Wyne, a specialist in U.S.-China relations at the International Crisis Group. 'The administration's desire for a trade détente stems from the self-inflicted consequences of its earlier hubris.' It's unclear whether Washington and Beijing can reach a grand bargain over America's biggest grievances. Among these are lax Chinese protection of intellectual property rights and Beijing's subsidies and other industrial policies that, the Americans say, give Chinese firms an unfair advantage in world markets and have contributed to a massive U.S. trade deficit with China of $262 billion last year. Reade doesn't expect much beyond limited agreements such as the Chinese saying they will buy more American soybeans and promising to do more to stop the flow of chemicals used to make fentanyl and to allow the continued flow of rare-earth magnets. But the tougher issues will likely linger, and 'the trade war will continue grinding ahead for years into the future,' said Jeff Moon, a former U.S. diplomat and trade official who now runs the China Moon Strategies consultancy.
Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russia Reports Ukraine Military War Breakthrough Before Trump-Putin Meeting
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian forces are pushing hard in Ukraine's Donetsk region in the hope a breakthrough that can provide leverage in the summit between President Donald Trump and Kremlin Leader Vladimir Putin, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) has said. Ukrainian sources reported sabotage and reconnaissance groups were infiltrating near Dobropillia which is northwest of Pokrovsk, the Donetsk hub that is key to Moscow capturing the whole of the region. The ISW said that Moscow is likely focusing on advances to coincide with Friday's U.S.-Russia summit in Alaska as a Newsweek map shows the front line's state of play. Newsweek has contacted the Russian Defense Ministry for comment. An image from June 19, 2025, shows Kyiv's troops in Pokrovsk, in Ukraine's Donetsk region. An image from June 19, 2025, shows Kyiv's troops in Pokrovsk, in Ukraine's Donetsk It Matters Anticipation is building ahead of Friday's summit and whether Putin will try to pressure his U.S. counterpart into accepting Moscow's control over partially occupied areas in exchange for a ceasefire, as has been reported. The ISW analysis suggests that Putin wants to leverage tactical pushes to seek U.S. concessions as he tries to frame the full capture of Ukraine's regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson oblasts as inevitable. What To Know The ISW assessed that Russian forces had likely recently seized settlements southeast and east of Dobropillia, as the think tank noted a claim by the Russian Ministry of Defense that Moscow's forces had seized Fedorivka, which is northeast of Pokrovsk. The think tank said it was premature to call the Russian advances an operational-level breakthrough, but Moscow would like to see it develop into one in the coming days. Russian forces used a similar tactical penetration in April 2024, and the coming days in the Pokrovsk area will be critical for Ukraine's ability to prevent accelerated Moscow gains north and northwest of the city, the ISW said. Geopolitical analyst Joni Askola said in an X, formerly Twitter, thread Tuesday that Russia's breach near Dobropillia was "timed for pressure," as Moscow attacked in multiple directions and was willing to take risks and losses to gain leverage before Friday's talks. Askola said that Ukraine faces command issues, low infantry numbers, poor coordination, limited resources—and a habit of delaying bad news. This breach is still small compared to past actual breakthroughs, but in today's war, it is big enough to matter and Ukraine has sent units, including from the 1st Azov Corps, to contain it, Askola added. The First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine said on Facebook that it had taken up defensive positions on the Pokrovsk front a few days ago as Russian troops advanced in small groups toward Dobropillia, bypassing the first line of Ukrainian positions. What People Are Saying The Institute for the Study of War said on Monday: "It is premature to call the Russian advances in the Dobropillia area an operational-level breakthrough, though Russian forces very likely seek to mature their tactical advances into an operational-level breakthrough in the coming days." Ukraine's First Corps Azov posted on social media: "The situation remains difficult and dynamic. The enemy, trying to advance on this front, is suffering significant losses in personnel and equipment." Geopolitical analyst Joni Askola wrote on X: "Russia's breach near Dobropillia—real, risky, and timed for pressure. It's not a collapse, but it's not nothing. It's important to neither under nor overestimate it." Askola added; "It's not too late—but it must be stopped before it grows." What Happens Next A statement by European leaders on Tuesday said borders cannot be changed by force, showing backing for Kyiv by its allies that any land swap for a ceasefire cannot be considered in Friday's summit, as has been previously reported. However the statement, which was notably not signed by Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban, expressed support for Trump's efforts to end the war, but insisted "meaningful negotiations" could only begin with a ceasefire or a significant reduction in hostilities, and diplomatic pressure on the U.S. will likely continue in the coming days.
