India says no foreign pressure to stop conflict with Pakistan
On Monday, Singh reiterated that it was "completely incorrect and baseless to say that the military action was stopped because of pressure"."India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved," he told the Lok Sabha, the lower house of parliament.He also claimed the decision was taken after a request from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO), who "pleaded for relief"."It was only after this that the Indian Armed Forces decided to pause operations," he added. Islamabad has not commented on Singh's claims. The escalation in May was the worst military confrontation between India and Pakistan in decades, with dozens of people killed in the four-day fighting, before Trump announced a ceasefire between them.Singh said the purpose of India's military action was "to destroy the terror nurseries raised by Pakistan over the years".He said over 100 "terrorists, their trainers, handlers and associates" were killed in coordinated strikes on nine "terror infrastructure targets" in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered-Kashmir in an operation that lasted 22 minutes."The objective was to provide justice to the families who lost their loved ones in the Pahalgam terror attack," he said.During the proceedings, opposition leaders questioned the government about Islamabad's claim that it shot down five Indian fighter jets and a drone during the conflict.Singh denied this and said India's defence systems had intercepted all incoming projectiles and missiles, adding that no Indian military establishment suffered any damage.He also said the Indian armed forces could resume military action if there was any further "misadventure" from the Pakistan side. Earlier in the day, the Indian army said that it had killed "three terrorists" in a gun battle in Indian-administered Kashmir.Indian TV channels claimed the three were suspected to be behind the April attack - but officials have not confirmed this.Indian investigators have previously said all three militants involved in the deadly attack were Pakistani nationals from the UN-proscribed militant group Lashkar-e-TaibaFollow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
a minute ago
- Economist
Treasure map: Trump finds gold in redistricting
President Donald Trump told Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional maps to create five new safe Republican districts. He's trying to protect his majority in the House, but he's set off a scramble in Democratic run states to do the same. Charlotte Howard hosts with James Bennet and Dan Rosenheck.
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
How the war over US congressional redistricting could play out, state by state
Aug 8 (Reuters) - A Republican plan to redraw congressional lines in Texas at U.S. President Donald Trump's urging threatens to launch an all-out national redistricting war, with both Republican and Democratic states considering whether to redraw their own maps. The outcome could determine whether Republicans maintain control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans currently hold a narrow 219-212 majority, with four vacancies. While redistricting must occur every 10 years to incorporate U.S. Census data, redrawing maps in the middle of the decade has historically been exceedingly rare. Republicans, who control more state governments than Democrats, appear poised to pick up a half-dozen seats or more. The practice of gerrymandering – drawing district lines to benefit one party over another – has contributed to a decline in the number of competitive House seats. Only about three dozen districts out of 435 are seen as competitive by nonpartisan analysts as of August. Here is how the process could unfold in Republican-controlled and Democratic-controlled states. TEXAS Republican legislators have unveiled a map aimed at flipping five Democratic seats. More than 50 Democratic lawmakers left the state in early August, denying the state House of Representatives a quorum and preventing a vote on the map, at least for now. Governor Greg Abbott has threatened the absent Democrats with arrest and removal from office, though legal experts have questioned whether those threats can be carried out. Republicans already control 25 of the state's 38 seats under a Republican-drawn map from 2021. An unusual state law requires the Republican-dominated legislature to pass a new map for 2026, because the previous one, drawn in 2021, was approved with no Democratic votes. Republicans, who already control 10 of the state's 15 seats, could target two or even three Democrats with a new map. Republican Florida House Speaker Daniel Perez has called for a select committee to work on congressional redistricting, and Republican Governor Ron DeSantis has signaled he would support the effort. A new map could target two or three Democrats. Republicans already control 20 of the state's 28 seats, thanks to an aggressive map DeSantis pushed through the legislature in 2021 that flipped four Democratic seats in 2022. One possible legal hurdle is a constitutional amendment, approved by voters in 2010, that bars the legislature from drawing districts purely for partisan gain. The Florida Supreme Court, which upheld DeSantis' 2021 map, is entirely Republican-appointed, and four of the seven justices were nominated by DeSantis. The White House has pressured Indiana Republicans to consider redistricting. Republicans control seven of the state's nine congressional seats and could easily target one Democratic incumbent. Republican Governor Mike Kehoe and Republican lawmakers have expressed openness to drawing a new map that would likely target Democratic U.S. Representative Emanuel Cleaver's Kansas City-based seat. Flipping his district would give Republicans control of six of the state's seven seats. CALIFORNIA Governor Gavin Newsom has vowed to pursue a new congressional map if Texas Republicans follow through on their redistricting plan. Democratic legislators are already considering a map that would seek to flip five Republican seats while shoring up vulnerable Democratic incumbents. Democrats currently control 43 of the state's 52 districts. A new map would require Democrats to pull off a complicated legal two-step. California uses an independent commission to draw congressional lines. Newsom has said he would call for a special election in November asking voters to give lawmakers the power to draw maps until the commission takes over again following the 2030 U.S. Census. There are no statewide elections in California this year, which could make turnout a wild card. Democratic Governor JB Pritzker has suggested his party would consider redrawing its congressional districts in response to Texas. But Illinois already has what is considered one of the most gerrymandered maps in the country, with Democrats controlling 14 of the state's 17 seats. Flipping even one Republican seat could prove challenging. The Democratic majority leader of the state House, David Moon, has introduced legislation to re-open congressional redistricting if any other state – such as Texas – does so. Democrats already control seven of the state's eight districts, so any new map could at best flip a single seat. Redistricting could also face legal hurdles: the party attempted to install an 8-0 map in 2022, but a state judge struck it down as unconstitutionally gerrymandered. Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul has vowed to pursue redistricting if Texas approves a new map, but legal constraints likely make that impossible until 2028. Voters would have to approve a constitutional amendment to permit mid-decade redistricting, and under state law such an amendment cannot be put on the ballot before 2027. Democrats hold 19 of the state's 26 seats after a more aggressive gerrymander in 2022 was blocked by the courts.
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Sheinbaum rejects US ‘invasion' after Trump orders military to target Mexico cartels
Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has rejected the idea that the US might invade Mexico after news reports suggested Donald Trump had authorized the use of military force targeting drug cartels deemed terrorist organizations in Latin American countries. 'The United States is not going to come to Mexico with their military,' she said during a daily news conference on Friday. 'We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. It's off the table, absolutely off the table.' The Mexican president said her government had been informed of the executive order but insisted that 'it had nothing to do with the participation of any military or any institution on our territory. There is no risk that they will invade our territory.' News of Trump's secret directive to the Pentagon was first reported by the New York Times, which cited people familiar with the matter, and noted that the order 'provides an official basis for the possibility of direct military operations at sea and on foreign soil against cartels'. The secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the move would enable the US government to use the military to target trafficking organizations. 'It allows us to now target what they're operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, whatever … to target these groups if we have an opportunity to do it,' Rubio said. 'We have to start treating them as armed terrorist organizations, not simply drug dealing organizations.' Trump has made going after Latin American drug trafficking organizations a top priority of his administration: in February, the state department designated seven organized crime groups as foreign terrorist organizations, including five powerful cartels in Mexico. At the time, the White House claimed these groups constituted 'a national security threat beyond that posed by traditional organized crime' with activities including 'infiltration into foreign governments across the Western Hemisphere.' It is unclear how much impact that designation has had, as US agencies already have a range of tools to target transnational organised crime groups by restricting their members' abilities to travel or do business. But the designation would widen the range of potential targets for prosecution to include anyone who provides 'material support' to the cartels. The Trump administration has also deployed thousands of active-duty combat troops, as well as drones and spy planes to the southwest US border in order to crack down on the northward flow of drugs, particularly fentanyl, as well as staunch the flow of immigrants. If confirmed, this latest order would represent a profound and unprecedented escalation of tactics by the US government in Latin America, potentially opening the door for unilateral American military assaults across the region. Last month, the US treasury department announced it was designating the so-called Cartel de los Soles, or Cartel of the Suns, as a global terrorist group, claiming the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, was the head of the organization. US prosecutors describe the Cartel of the Suns as a government-run drug-trafficking group, but analysts in the region say that it is more of a network of trafficking organizations groups protected by elements within the Venezuelan state. On Thursday, the state department and justice department announced that the US was offering a $50m reward for information leading to Maduro's arrest, claiming he has been a leader of the group 'for over a decade' as it has trafficked drugs into the US.
