Gary Lineker insists he was 'right' to compare Suella Braverman's migrant crackdown to Nazi Germany - and calls for BBC to reinstate Hamas-linked documentary
Gary Lineker has insisted he was 'right' to criticise Suella Braverman and compare the then Conservative government's policy on asylum seekers arriving in small boats with 1930s Nazi Germany.
The 64-year-old has said his bosses at the BBC were 'silly' for taking him off air during yet another impartiality crisis of his own making, insisting it was a 'ridiculous overreaction'.
Doubling down on his views in a series of incendiary tweets from 2023 that led to his suspension, he told Amol Rajan: 'I don't regret saying them publicly, because I was right - what I said, it was accurate.
'Why shouldn't I have an opinion on things? I'm a b***dy footballer who's turned into a sports presenter', he added.
In an interview to be broadcast on BBC Two on Tuesday night, Mr Lineker launched a number of extraordinary attacks on the corporation, where he is the highest paid star taking home £1.35million-a-year.
He said he believes he was forced out of Match of the Day and accused the corporation of having 'capitulated' when it pulled a controversial documentary on Gaza from iPlayer after complaints it had links to Hamas.
He told Rajan he would '100 per cent' support its re-release, calling it 'incredibly moving'.
In March 2023 Lineker was suspended and taken off air when he shared a video of Mrs Braverman outlining the Illegal Migration Bill aimed at stopping the flow of people crossing the Channel by preventing them claiming asylum.
He called the Tory policy 'beyond awful', 'immeasurably cruel' and 'not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s' in posts to his 8.7million Twitter followers.
Lineker also denied there was a 'huge influx' of migrants into the UK.
Lineker's inflammatory tweet from 2023 compared ministers' language over migration to 'Germany in the 30s'
His suspension sparked a walkout by Match of the Day co-stars including Ian Wright and Alan Shearer.
He said his BBC bosses should 'have ignored it, and it would have been fine', and called the corporation 'silly' for its 'overreaction' in taking him off air.
But he added: 'I wouldn't do it again because of all the kerfuffle that followed, and I love the BBC, and I didn't like the damage that it did to the BBC... But do I regret it and do I think it was the wrong thing to do? No'.
He went on: 'It was a ridiculous overreaction that was just a reply to someone that was being very rude. And I wasn't particularly rude back'.
Lineker said he 'wasn't that bothered' to be told via a news alert, and not the BBC, that he would not be allowed back on Match of the Day for a period.
He also said he 'cried' when fellow players-turned-pundits refused to go on air.
Asked about the rules, Lineker questioned why he had to be 'impartial', saying he was a 'freelancer', and the rules were for 'people in news and current affairs - they have subsequently changed'.
He added that this 'left me, who always gave these honest opinions about things', having to be impartial which, he said, 'didn't make any sense', and called it a freedom of speech issue.
'I think this is the mistake... the BBC tries to appease the people that hate the BBC, the people that always go on about the licence fee, attack the BBC. They worry way too much about that, rather than worry about the people that love the BBC, which is the vast majority,' he said.
Lineker ruled himself out of a career in politics, saying he has 'never had a view', before laughing.
'I think I'll probably focus more on the podcast world, because it's such a fun business and it's just been so incredible,' he added.
Earlier this year, Lineker condemned the withdrawal of the documentary Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture.
He said the BBC had 'capitulated', adding that he does not see Abdullah as an issue, and maintaining that the corporation should not have admitted to 'a number of serious failings in their commissioning and editorial processes'.
Lineker said he would '100%' support the documentary being shown again.
'I think you let people make their own minds up. We're adults. We're allowed to see things like that. It's incredibly moving'.
He added: 'I think [the BBC] just capitulated to lobbying that they get a lot'.
The footballer turned broadcaster launched a number of attacks on the BBC in a wide-ranging interview with Rajan.
Lineker said he believes the corporation forced him out of Match of the Day after 26 years.
Mr Lineker apparently even offered to take a pay cut to stay on Match of the Day. But today he said he had 'a sense' he was being shown the door.
Amol Rajan asked him why he would leave the BBC's flagship football show after 26 years, having replaced former anchor Des Lynam in 1999.
'Well, perhaps they want me to leave. There was the sense of that', Lineker said, adding: 'I think it was their preference that I didn't do Match of the Day for one more year, so they could bring in new people'.
Sky Sports' Kelly Cates and BBC regulars Mark Chapman and Gabby Logan will all share the role from August.
Mr Lineker is just weeks away from his final Match of the Day on a Saturday night.
He has told Mr Rajan that he will use his free weekends to travel more and concentrate on his podcast business, Goalhanger.
He will leave the BBC completely at the end of the 2026 World Cup.
It came amid reports that Lineker does not see eye-to-eye with the BBC's new director of sport, Alex Kay-Jelski
'I always wanted one more contract, and I was umm-ing and ahh-ing about whether to do three years [more],' Lineker said.
'In the end, I think there was a feeling that, because it was a new rights period, it was a chance to change the programme.
'I think it was their preference that I didn't do Match of the Day for one more year, so they could bring in new people. So it's slightly unusual that I would do the FA Cup and the World Cup, but to be honest, it's a scenario that suits me perfectly.'
The BBC declined to comment on his claims. A spokesman pointed to comments made previously when he was described as a 'world-class presenter'.
Mr Lineker held talks over his future last Autumn.
But the BBC did not offer him a contract that he wanted in a move that will save them a fortune.
The footballer turned pundit, 64, has been the regular host of the show since 1999 but he will end his 25-year stint on the Saturday night programme at the end of this season.
Lineker, a lightning rod for criticism over impartiality in recent years will leave the corporation altogether in two years' time after the 2026 World Cup in Canada, Mexico and the United States, as first reported by MailOnline in October.
Former Director General Greg Dyke said that that Lineker's penchant for giving personal views will have been 'in the mind' of the BBC when they decided to go for the team of new hosts.
'In the end, people watch Match Of The Day for the football', he said.
Lineker and his new boss BBC's director of sport, Alex Kay-Jelski, held talks but no contract was offered
A BBC source insisted that Mr Lineker is 'happy' and 'everyone is pleased' that he will leave MotD in May and the BBC two years later.
But added that is an open secret that Mr Kay-Jelski is 'not exactly close' with the former England striker and is keen to slash spending and give the show a facelift without him.
Lineker has branched out in recent years by co-founding the production company Goalhanger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
17 minutes ago
- Leader Live
New House of Lords front door that cost almost £10 million does not work
The project has been described as 'a complete white elephant and a disaster'. Peers heard a member of parliamentary staff had to be permanently stationed at the door to press a button to open it. It also emerged that the price tag of the project spiralled by nearly 60% from the original estimate of £6.1 million. Leader of the Lords Baroness Smith of Basildon said it was 'completely unacceptable' to have a door that did not work properly, and she shared the frustrations, upset 'and every other adjective' members wished to use. There was also a question over whether it would ever be fully operational, she suggested. The bill for what has been described at Westminster as 'one of the most expensive front doors in the world' was made public after peers raised concerns that their requests for the cost of the scheme had been repeatedly stonewalled by the authorities on security grounds. They also said they had warned from the start that the design would not work. Members of the Lords vented their annoyance as they heard plans for commercial procurement in Parliament to be transferred into a new joint department of both Houses. While welcoming the administrative changes, Tory former Cabinet minister Lord Forsyth of Drumlean pressed Lady Smith, who sits on the House of Lords Commission, over the cost of the new front door at the Peers' Entrance. He said: 'Very senior members of this House and members of the commission have been told repeatedly that they cannot know the cost of the front door, because if they knew the cost of the front door that would enable terrorists to work out what the security is surrounding it. 'I suspect that the costs of the front door make it one of the most expensive front doors in the world, and it is a front door that does not work. 'Various Members from all sides of the House protested right at the beginning that this design would not work, as it would result in people having to queue outside to get in and they would therefore be more vulnerable. 'We were told that no, it had been carefully designed and the system had been looked at, but we now discover that we need somebody permanently there to press the button to open the door. 'The other evening someone in a wheelchair was unable to access the House. It is a complete white elephant and a disaster.' The Conservative peer added: 'I do not wish to be unkind to any of the staff who serve this House or to underestimate the difficulties of dealing with a historic building of this kind, but it is simply not acceptable that public money should be spent in this way with such disastrous consequences, with no-one being held to account and no knowledge of the associated costs.' Tory former minister Lord Robathan said: 'If this were in the private sector, I am afraid that people would be sacked.' Lady Smith said: 'On the door itself, there are two issues, cost and operability. 'It is completely unacceptable that we have a door that does not operate as it should.' On the cost she said there was 'wildly exaggerated and incorrect information', adding: 'It is important that we are secure, so the costs of the door are very high. It is not just the security issue but also the heritage issue. 'The initial estimate was £6.1 million for the door. That increased because it was the request of members that it should remain open during the duration of the works when the House was sitting. 'The fact that it could not be closed off to get on with the work meant the cost increased – plus some other issues around heritage were discovered. The total cost has been £9.6 million.' She added: 'That is high, but what is more serious is that, having spent that money, the door does not work. 'That is a huge frustration to everybody. 'One of the reasons that it is not the same as other security pods on the estate is that it has to be fully accessible for those who have mobility issues and wish to use mobility aids or wheelchairs. 'The information I have is that the work that has been ongoing to address the problems has not cost the House any more beyond that. 'However, there is a window where a decision has to be taken on whether or not it will ever be fully operational and serve the needs of this House. 'I share the frustrations, the upset and every other adjective members may wish to use.' Lady Smith told peers: 'When we spend that much money on something that does not work, the key thing is that it is resolved, and that is what I am focused on.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Woke-obsessed BBC would rather hand itself in to cops than air Clarkson's Farm – and that's why terrestrial TV is dying
APPROACHING four hours into the new Clarkson's Farm and not one animal had kicked or butted Jeremy in the nuts. A glaring sin of omission as far as most viewers were probably concerned. 5 Clarkson's Farm remains the best thing on TV and one of those incredibly rare shows that can make you smile just through the simple act of pressing 'play' Credit: Prime Video 5 BBC tried to copy Clarkson's Farm with shows like Kelvin's Big Farming Adventure, but has not come close to recreating the magic Credit: ITV Because, in terms of livestock, I think a bull was the only creature who hadn't poleaxed Clarkson during...
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Fresh ageism row for the BBC after four axed senior journalists lodge discrimination claims
FOUR senior journalists have lodged complaints with the BBC in a fresh ageism row. Their separate — but coordinated — discrimination claims come as the broadcaster merges its home and foreign newsdesks. 2 Bosses hope slashing 130 jobs will help save £700million. But the four, said to have worked in warzones and the aftermath of terror attacks, fear they have been earmarked for compulsory redundancy. Their move follows a group of BBC News presenters going to an employment tribunal over ageism allegations. Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera, and Annita McVeigh settled their three-year dispute in March, with the terms not disclosed. The latest cases involve employees aged over 50 and thought to have more than 100 years of experience between them. Sources said they believe the process of applying for the new jobs concentrates only on their work over the past two years — and so is weighted towards younger candidates. Marks were also said to be deducted if applicants failed to mention keywords such as 'digital' or 'live page'. It is reported one of the individuals is a representative of the National Union of Journalists, which has hit out at the compulsory redundancies. Last night, the BBC said: 'Restructuring in BBC News is taking place according to established BBC policies. 'We conduct all processes in a thorough and fair manner, and we are committed to supporting our staff throughout, including through comprehensive redeployment assistance.' 2
