Killer space rocks
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
It was from a football field–size asteroid designated 2024 YR4. Detected in December by a telescope in Chile, the space rock was flagged for its size—it's 130 to 300 feet long, big enough to wipe out a city—and a trajectory that put it on track to possibly hit Earth on Dec. 22, 2032. NASA initially put the chance of an impact at 1.2 percent. The odds soon jumped to 3.1 percent, or 1 in 32, a record high for an asteroid of its size. But after closer study of the asteroid's orbit, the threat of a hit was downgraded to a negligible 0.004 percent. While humanity's plans for the 2032 holidays are safe, the scare highlighted a threat that scientists say urgently needs more focus: the millions of giant rocks that are hurtling through space, some of which may be on collision courses with our planet. 'Take it as a warning shot across our bow,' said astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson. 'These things are out there.'
NASA's Center for Near Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) tracks more than 37,000 asteroids whose trajectories approach Earth's orbit. Most are the size of a car or smaller and pose no risk, because they will burn up in our atmosphere. On the opposite end of the spectrum are 'planet killers': asteroids a kilometer or more across that could potentially wipe out civilization. About 900 have been identified. In between are a range of potential threats. A 160-foot-wide asteroid could destroy a major metropolitan area; those are thought to strike once every 1,000 years. A 500-foot- wide space rock could inflict mass casualties across a state or a small country; those arrive every 20,000 years. Of course, 'these numbers are very approximate,' said planetary geologist Gordon Osinski, 'and they don't really help us figure out when the next one might happen.'
On Feb. 15, 2013, a roughly 60-foot-wide asteroid entered the atmosphere and exploded 19 miles above the Russian city of Chelyabinsk. It set off a blinding flash and a shock wave that damaged more than 7,000 buildings over 200 square miles, and injured more than 1,600 people, many of them hit by shattered glass. The light from the blast was like 'the end of the world,' said Valentina Nikolayeva, a teacher. In 1908, a 130-foot-wide asteroid or comet—the latter is an icy ball of dust and rock—exploded 6 miles above a remote stretch of Siberia, releasing 185 times more energy than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Some 800 square miles of forest were leveled in the so-called Tunguska event. Still, that space rock was a pebble compared with the one that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. There's no current fear of anything of that magnitude hitting Earth, but other Tunguska-size threats are out there.
Possibly. But first we have to see them coming. In 2005, Congress directed NASA to find and track, by 2020, 90 percent of near-Earth objects—asteroids or comets that come within 30 million miles of our planet's orbit— 460 feet or larger. Right now 'we're at something like 45 percent,' said CNEOS director Paul Chodas. NASA has built a network of telescopes, including the one in Chile that detected 2024 YR4, to identify threats. An infrared space telescope, NEO Surveyor, that will further boost detection is scheduled for launch in 2027. When a new object is found, information is shared with a global web of space agencies and observatories that go to work determining its shape, size, and orbital path. If one is judged to be headed for Earth, the next task is to try to alter its path—something NASA recently proved feasible.
In 2022, it launched the golf cart–size Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) spacecraft, which slammed into Dimorphos, a 530- foot asteroid, at 14,000 miles per hour. The collision successfully altered the projectile's orbit. Researchers are also studying the use of a 'gravitational tractor,' a spacecraft that would orbit alongside an asteroid, exerting gravitational pull that would gradually alter the rock's course. All these efforts require years of advance planning and may not be effective against a giant asteroid. If a space rock is too large for deflection—or due to hit with relatively short notice— humanity would need to use a nuclear bomb to deflect or vaporize it. A 2021 study showed that a 1-megaton nuke launched at least two months before impact could annihilate a 330-foot asteroid. But setting off a nuke in space is no small matter. It 'could be very awkward geopolitically,' said Robin George Andrews, author of How to Kill an Asteroid. It's just one example of how asteroid response requires a globally coordinated effort.
We're making progress. The Chelyabinsk explosion led to the creation of NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office, designed in part to link efforts with other groups such as the U.N.-sponsored International Asteroid Warning Network. And last year for the first time, international representatives attended NASA's biennial Planetary Defense Interagency Tabletop Exercise, which gamed out the discovery of a massive asteroid with a 72 percent chance of impacting Earth in 2038. Scientists say this cooperation is a step in the right direction, but that many questions remain around a potential global asteroid defense. What's the best approach? Who would be in charge? 'Asteroid impacts are one of the few natural disasters that we actually have the means to both foresee and prevent,' said NASA aerospace engineer Brent Barbee. We must be 'as prepared as possible.'
Some 66 million years ago, an asteroid at least 6 miles wide slammed into Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. Digging a crater 125 miles wide, it triggered earthquakes and tsunamis, and firestorms that may have spanned the globe. Gas, soot, and dust blanketed the planet, blotting out the sun and sending global temperatures plummeting. That extinction event wiped out 75 percent of life on Earth—including the dinosaurs. But some experts believe the impact would have been far less calamitous if the rock had landed elsewhere. A 2017 study concluded that the asteroid struck a spot unusually rich in organic sediment, which worsened the blackout effect. The dinosaurs might have survived if not for that happenstance, the researchers believe, and the rise of the mammals—including humans— might never have occurred. 'This is maybe a lucky coincidence that everything came into place like it is today,' said geochemist Mario Fischer-Gödde.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NASA Langley workforce slashed by 40% in Trump budget plan
NASA Langley Research Center will lose funding for several projects and cut its workforce by 672 civil servants under the Trump administration's proposal to slash about $163 billion in federal spending next fiscal year. The White House budget proposal is a starting point, and ultimately Congress must approve it. But the technical supplement to the proposed budget released on Friday includes new details about how the administration would seek to reduce federal spending levels. NASA's budget would be slashed by roughly a quarter — from $24.8 billion down to $18.8 billion — and would lay off nearly a third of its workforce — more than 5,500 people across its 10 staffed centers. The technical supplement said centers will use cross-mission retraining opportunities and offer buyouts to meet the staffing requests. For NASA Langley, that includes a staffing cut from 1,730 people to 1,058. NASA Langley spokesperson Brittny McGraw said Langley doesn't have any additional context for how the cuts would work. 'At this point, there are no decisions that have been made going forward about what things could look like,' McGraw said. Another major shift proposed for Langley would be in its Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities. NASA currently operates 12 wind tunnels and propulsion test facilities, seven of which reside at Langley. The proposed budget would replace an 84-year-old vertical spin tunnel with a new flight dynamics research facility at Langley. However, there's a catch. The proposed budget slashes Aerosciences funding by more than $40 million and will put up to five unspecified wind tunnels in 'stand by' mode with minimal maintenance. Aerosciences isn't the only program being hit with cuts to meet the budget request. NASA's science programs across the board are set to be gutted to meet the new goals. Science funding is seeing its funding cut from $7.3 billion to $3.9 billion. That includes: Earth Science research funding cut by $240 million. Earth systematic missions, which study the planet's biology, having its budget more than halved. The Sentinel-6 project, which studies sea levels, cut from roughly $51 million to $8 million. The GRACE-Continuity project, which tracks glaciers and water movement, cut from more than $132 million to roughly $42 million Aperture Radar, which provides detailed imaging of Earth, chopped to roughly a third of its budget. That's bad news for a research center with a significant science directorate, according to U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott. Scott, the Democratic Congress member who represents the Hampton area where Langley sits, said Langley is an integral part of NASA's scientific research to understand the planet, and cutting its funding will have real consequences. The White House seeks sharp spending cuts in Trump's 2026 budget plan Say cheese: Cameras built at NASA Langley are landing on moon's surface Sunday NASA and Jefferson Lab fuel inventions and the regional economy, leaders say Youngkin says current Jefferson Lab management contract will be extended during rebid process 'Much of this work is being done in Hampton Roads at NASA Langley,' Scott said in a statement. 'The cuts to NASA's funding and staff proposed by the Trump Administration will put the United States behind in our pursuit to advance science and protect our communities from threats like climate change and sea level rise.' Sen. Tim Kaine, Virginia Democrat, added in a statement the loss of jobs will have a particularly devastating impact on the Hampton Roads community. 'These proposed cuts, if the House and Senate pass them, would destroy NASA as we know it, and have a devastating impact on the region's community and economy,' Kaine said. Those proposed cuts are a 'full-out assault on science,' according to Sen. Mark Warner, who said Wednesday that NASA Langley has been an integral part of building a culture of scientific innovation in Hampton Roads and the country. Now, Warner said that culture is in jeopardy. 'That trickles through the economy, especially when we're talking about this many folks laid off at NASA Langley, that has been our premier aerospace research facility in the country,' the Virginia Democrat said. 'Many of those future scientists, you can make a lot more money working at a tech company, but they come and work for NASA because of the mission. Well, that mission is being undermined. That's going to hurt Hampton Roads' ability to be a research community.' Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037,
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple is finally doing something about its confusing OS naming conventions
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. According to recent reports from an Apple Insider, Cupertino plans to consolidate its software stack under a single branding strategy, starting after WWDC later this month. Though the company refused to comment on rumors, Bloomberg spoke with Apple insiders who confirmed that iOS, macOS, iPadOS, watchOS, tvOS, and visionOS will all see their disparate version names brought under a single umbrella. Like Microsoft, which named its Windows versions after the year they were released throughout the '90s and early '00s, Apple's new plan is to add the upcoming year to the end of each operating system. For example, while we currently have iOS 18 and watchOS 12 due to the respective distance in their original launch dates, they'll now be called iOS 26 and watchOS 26, respectively. This move also mirrors what Samsung did with its Galaxy phones starting in 2020, moving straight from the Galaxy S10 to the S20 that year. However, unlike Samsung, Apple will be naming for the year ahead. See also: WWDC 2025 preview: iOS 26, Apple's video game plans, Apple Intelligence, Mac Pro M4 Ultra The Bloomberberg report observes that iOS 26 will be launched in 2025, similar to how car manufacturers have operated their branding model for decades. The name changes aren't all we should expect from Cook and Co. this year, though. Early rumors suggest Apple also plans to renovate many aspects of iPad OS, bringing a more 'Mac-like' experience that includes improvements to productivity, app window management, and multitasking. Of course, a modern tech conference wouldn't be complete without an AI update. In that arena, reports say Apple could open up its AI models to third-party developers to take advantage of Apple Intelligence on supported devices. The company also reportedly has plans to launch a new 'AI-based battery management feature' to increase battery life for iPhones, whatever that's supposed to mean. Stay tuned for all the latest on June 9, when Apple leaders will take the stage at its annual developer conference. WWDC 2025 preview: iOS 26, Apple's video game plans, Apple Intelligence, Mac Pro M4 Ultra I found 5 iPad deals that save you up to $200 on a new Apple tablet Legendary Apple designer has been tasked with the impossible — what is OpenAI and Jony Ive's next move?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A 1mm fan inside your laptop's hard drive? Here's how the micro xMEMS fan works
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A fan so small and silent that it fits inside your laptop's SSD. It's an idea that might sound somewhat farfetched, but xMEMS Labs, known for making solid-state speakers for earbuds, has managed to pull it off with its µCooling chip. This isn't your typical thermal management solution. Originally built for data center applications, xMEMS has now expanded the technology to support active thermal management for laptops. Effectively keeping SSDs cool from the inside out, µCooling is a microscopic air pump that lives right on top of the drive, blowing cool air over the parts that tend to overheat. It's small, silent, and smart. And yes, it works. Let's say you're installing a massive game or exporting a big video project. If your laptop suddenly slows to a crawl halfway through, it might not be your CPU or RAM to blame. It could well be your SSD getting too hot. Today's SSDs use a fast connection called PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express), which lets them move data at lightning speeds of up to 7,000MB per second. But with that speed comes a lot of heat, and if the drive gets too hot, it slows itself down to avoid damage. This is a frustrating phenomenon called thermal throttling, and laptop manufacturers are constantly looking for workarounds to it. While most laptops rely on system fans or metal heat spreaders to cool their SSDs, that doesn't cut it anymore, especially in slim devices where airflow is limited. That's where µCooling could make a real difference. µCooling ('micro-cooling') is a solid-state fan-on-a-chip that uses piezoelectric membranes — super-thin layers that vibrate at ultrasonic speeds — to move air. It's like a microscopic air pump, sealed in a chip no bigger than a fingernail. At just 1 millimeter thick, µCooling is small enough to fit on an SSD without changing its size or design. It doesn't spin, make noise, or wear out like traditional fans. But it still pushes air over the SSD's hottest components, the controller and flash memory, where heat builds up. According to xMEMS, µCooling can reduce SSD temperatures by 18–20% and reduce heat build-up resistance by 30%. That could mean dropping a drive from 80°C down to 64°C, or the difference between throttling and full speed. It also means your storage runs cooler for longer, even under heavy workloads. For everyday laptop users, this translates to: Faster game installs and file transfers. Fewer slowdowns when multitasking. Longer sustained performance in ultrabooks or fanless laptops. Less heat bleeding into other components, such as the battery or CPU. And because µCooling only uses around 30 milliwatts of power, it won't sap your battery life. Plus, it's completely silent: The membranes vibrate above 20 kHz, which is beyond the range of human hearing. If this sounds familiar, you might be thinking of Frore Systems' AirJet, another solid-state cooling tech that's also currently making headlines. AirJet is more powerful (capable of cooling processors and other hot components), but it's also way bigger and typically added on top of CPUs. µCooling, by contrast, is purpose-built for SSDs. It's smaller, lighter, and designed to be embedded directly on the drive itself. It may not move as much air as AirJet, but it's far easier to integrate into thin laptops, especially those with a premium space. xMEMS is already working with SSD manufacturers, with full production slated for early 2026. While no laptops have officially launched with µCooling yet, it might only be a matter of time before this tiny tech shows up in next-gen gaming notebooks and ultra-thin laptops. So if your next laptop loads games faster, stays cooler, and runs whisper-quiet, you might have the world's smallest fan to thank. Nvidia's 120W APU leak could mark the beginning of the end for laptop GPUs "We don't circulate this much": Google co-founder reveals shocking AI hack Apple is finally doing something about its confusing OS naming conventions