logo
Israel strikes Syria's military headquarters as the regime clashes with Druze civilians

Israel strikes Syria's military headquarters as the regime clashes with Druze civilians

Fox News16-07-2025
Print Close
By Rachel Wolf
Published July 16, 2025
Israel announced on Wednesday that its forces struck near the entrance of the Syrian Defense Ministry's headquarters in Damascus.
"The IDF continues to monitor developments and the regime's actions against Druze civilians in southern Syria. In accordance with directives from the political echelon, the IDF is striking in the area and remains prepared for various scenarios," the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) wrote on X.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also put out a statement saying that his country's forces were "acting to save our Druze brothers and eliminate the regime's gangs" and warning Druze in Israel not to go into Syria.
"I have one request of you: You are citizens of Israel. Do not cross the border," Netanyahu said on Wednesday. "You are endangering your lives; you could be killed, you could be kidnapped, and you are harming the IDF's efforts. Therefore, I ask you, return to your homes, let the IDF do its work."
WHY SYRIA PLAYS A KEY ROLE IN TRUMP'S PLANS FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE
The southern Syrian city of Sweida has become a flashpoint in recent days as the country's leaders clash with armed Druze groups. Syria's Defense Ministry claimed its forces acted after militias in Sweida violated a ceasefire agreement reached on Tuesday.
Syria's Defense Ministry reportedly said in a statement that its forces were continuing to fire in Sweida "while adhering to rules of engagement," including preventing harm, according to the Associated Press.
Israel has threatened to increase its involvement in Syria and vowed to protect the Druze religious minority, which began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam, the Associated Press reported. Most of the world's Druze population lives in Syria, with the rest predominantly in Israel and Lebanon.
"And I raise the question: What else needs to happen for the international community to make its voice heard? What else needs to happen? What are we still waiting for?," Israel's Minister of Foreign Affairs Gideon Sa'ar said on Wednesday. "Our interests in Syria are known, limited and clear. First of all, to maintain the status quo in the southern Syrian region, which is also close to our border. And to prevent the development of threats against Israel in this area. The second thing - to prevent harm to the Druze community, with which we have a bold and strong relationship - with the Druze citizens here in Israel."
TRUMP'S PUSH FOR ISRAEL-SYRIA PEACE GETS MAJOR BACKING AS ACTIVIST BRINGS MESSAGE TO JERUSALEM
The Druze are a prominent minority in Israel, where members of the community hold key military positions. In 2015, Col. Ghassan Alian, who is Druze, became the first non-Jewish commander of the Golani Brigade. Additionally, unlike other minorities in Israel, Druze males are not exempt from conscripted military service.
"Israel is committed to preventing harm to the Druze in Syria due to the deep brotherhood alliance with our Druze citizens in Israel, and their familial and historical connection to the Druze in Syria – and we are acting to prevent the Syrian regime from harming them, and to ensure the demilitarization of the area adjacent to our border with Syria," a joint statement by Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz read.
The latest unrest in Syria began with kidnappings and attacks between the Sunni Bedouin tribes and Druze armed factions in the southern part of the country, according to the Associated Press. Syrian regime forces operating to restore order have also clashed with the Druze and have reportedly been carrying out extrajudicial killings and looting and burning civilian homes.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
In March, Syria's al Qaeda-linked regime killed members of the Alawite and Christian communities. Former Syrian President Bashar Assad, whose regime was toppled in December by Ahmed al-Sharaa and his group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham — a U.S.-designated terror organization, is a member of the Alawite community. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/world/israel-strikes-syrias-military-headquarters-regime-clashes-druze-civilians
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stanford paper sues Trump administration over deportation fears
Stanford paper sues Trump administration over deportation fears

Chicago Tribune

time15 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Stanford paper sues Trump administration over deportation fears

Stanford University's independent student newspaper sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, citing fears of deportation for noncitizen reporters at the Stanford Daily. Two of the Stanford Daily's writers, who are international students, say that they have refrained from reporting on campus protests, vigils and other events related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza out of fears that their visas would be revoked. The students, who are not identified, say that creates a chilling effect on their free speech rights. 'Writers present on student visas are declining assignments related to the conflict in the Middle East, worried that even reporting on the conflict will endanger their lawful immigration status,' according to the lawsuit, filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression in federal court in San Jose, California. The Departments of State and Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to requests to comment. The lawsuit challenges a section of immigration law that the government has said allows it to deport noncitizens if the Secretary of State determines them to pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy. That's the same law that the government is using as it attempts to deport several students who participated in pro-Palestinian protests on US campuses, including Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration are trying to turn the inalienable human right of free speech into a privilege contingent upon the whims of a federal bureaucrat, triggering deportation proceedings against noncitizens residing lawfully in this country for their protected political speech regarding American and Israeli foreign policy,' the complaint argues. The case is Stanford Daily v. Rubio, Case No. 25-cv-06618, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose). More stories like this are available on

‘Even in the ghetto we ate something': Holocaust survivors say Gaza hostages endure a ‘second Shoah'
‘Even in the ghetto we ate something': Holocaust survivors say Gaza hostages endure a ‘second Shoah'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Even in the ghetto we ate something': Holocaust survivors say Gaza hostages endure a ‘second Shoah'

The comments follow the release of multiple Hamas videos showing emaciated hostages. Holocaust survivors interviewed by Israeli outlets on Sunday said the skeletal appearance of Israeli hostages shown in new Hamas videos is akin to what they themselves experienced in Nazi camps, warning that the captives are living through 'a second Holocaust' and demanding immediate government action. Eighty-four-year-old Dina Dega, who survived several concentration camps, toldWalla that the image of 24-year-old hostage Evyatar David 'skin and bones … is exactly what we looked like in the camps... only he is alone and no one comes.' She called the government's inaction 'a second Shoah on Israeli soil.' Miriam Shapiro, 90, said she can no longer stand in the weekly demonstrations at Tel Aviv's Hostages Square but her 'heart is there.' 'My whole family perished in Auschwitz. I will not allow anyone else in this country to be left alone,' she told the site. For 88-year-old Hannah Raanan, the latest footage was unbearable: 'Even in the ghetto we managed to eat something. The hostages look worse.' She accused the government of 'betrayal' and added that the Hamas guards 'are fat from the humanitarian aid while our children collapse.' The Walla report also carried the voice of an unnamed survivor who said, 'The hungry child in the forest still lives inside me. Every hollow face brings her back.' 'Silence is a moral stain' Speaking separately to Ynet, Naftali Fürst, 93, who survived Auschwitz and Buchenwald, said the hollow faces of David and fellow hostage Rom Braslavski 'take me back eighty years.' 'We got a slice of bread and thin soup—sometimes we ate grass. I know the humiliation,' he said, urging Israelis to 'raise our voices—silence is a moral stain.' Dvora Weinstein, who fled burning Serbian villages as a child, said she 'could hardly breathe' on seeing the video: 'For me October 7 was a second Shoah. Our war is just, but the suffering must stop—bring them home before it's too late.' Revital Yakin Krakovsky of the International March of the Living added that the images are a 'direct trigger' for survivors: 'Hunger is hunger, terror is terror, and Jew-hatred has not changed.' Israel believes about 20 hostages are still alive in Gaza nearly 22 months after the October 7 massacres. Families say the latest video proves Hamas is using food deprivation as psychological torture. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told relatives on Sunday that negotiations 'continue relentlessly,' while the Foreign Ministry again demanded Red Cross access. Survivors, however, say time is running out. 'We are living proof life can be rebuilt after the inferno,' Shapiro said, 'but healing, for them and for us, starts only when every hostage is home.'

Stanford newspaper challenges legal basis for student deportations
Stanford newspaper challenges legal basis for student deportations

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Stanford newspaper challenges legal basis for student deportations

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The lawsuit says that the newspaper, which is open to all students and has more than 150 members, according to the complaint, has weathered resignations and withdrawn stories by noncitizens who were concerned that publishing content about Israel or the conditions in the Gaza Strip could leave them vulnerable to deportation. Advertisement The climate of fear the lawsuit cites at Stanford follows a spate of arrests earlier this year, when the Trump administration began targeting prominent student activists in March, including Mahmoud Khalil and Rumeysa Ozturk, over their activism in speaking out against the Israeli government and the mounting death toll in Gaza. Advertisement 'They are going after lawfully present noncitizens for bedrock speech, like authoring an op-ed and going to protest,' said Conor Fitzpatrick, the supervising senior attorney at the foundation. 'And unless you have a blue passport with an eagle on it that says United States of America, they think they can throw you out of the country for it.' In those and other cases, immigration agents arrested the students after Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked the provision, deeming the students a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests. In each case, Rubio personally signed off on the decision to revoke a student visa or render a lawful permanent resident deportable after determining that those interests were at stake. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration are trying to turn the inalienable human right of free speech into a privilege contingent upon the whims of a federal bureaucrat, triggering deportation proceedings against noncitizens residing lawfully in this country for their protected political speech regarding American and Israeli foreign policy,' the lawsuit says. The new lawsuit mirrored many elements of a case brought by another group, the American Association of University Professors, which is seeking to block the Trump administration from pursuing what it describes as a policy of 'ideological deportations' -- using the law to target activists based on their shared criticism of Israel and its conduct in the war. That case was argued before a federal judge during a two-week trial in Boston in July, and he is expected to decide this month whether to block the deportations on First Amendment grounds. The case raised similar concerns about chilled speech on college campuses, with testimony from faculty at several universities about how dramatically noncitizen academics had withdrawn from public life. Advertisement But lawyers in that case explicitly stopped short of arguing that using the foreign policy provision to target student demonstrators was unconstitutional, sidestepping a risky gambit in court over whether Rubio had abused the authority. That caution came as William G. Young, the judge in the case, expressed skepticism throughout the trial about whether he could rule against Rubio or others in the Trump administration given that they were exercising powers given to them by Congress. 'It seems to me we have a new administration who has, you know, absolutely the primary authority over the foreign policy of the United States,' Young said during closing arguments last month. But other judges have already contemplated the same questions the new lawsuit raises, concluding that using the foreign policy provision in the student activist cases was vague and probably violated the First Amendment. In the case involving Khalil, Judge Michael E. Farbiarz of the U.S. District Court in New Jersey wrote that using the foreign policy provision to detain him was probably unconstitutional, even though that did not factor into his decisions to order Khalil's release in June. Since the Supreme Court limited federal judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions in June, any ruling in the case would likely apply only to the plaintiffs at Stanford. But the lawsuit aims to set a legal precedent that the organization hopes could be used more broadly. (STORY CAN END HERE. OPTIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWS.) Fitzpatrick, the foundation lawyer, said there were narrow but conceivable situations in which the use of the foreign policy law would be appropriate, such as if pro-Kremlin Ukrainian politicians who fled the country after Russia's invasion sought refuge in the United States and continued to work to undermine Kyiv from abroad. Advertisement 'That has an arguable constitutional basis,' he said. 'What does not have an arguable constitutional basis is someone going up to a podium, whether it's at a city council meeting or a local park, at a protest, voicing an opinion that would be completely protected if you or I said it, and the secretary of state saying, 'We don't like the ideas you're spreading -- get out.' 'That's un-American,' he said. This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store