Bill to increase access to public records in R.I. will die in committee — again
Advertisement
'Categorically, it is going to take someone at the top saying, 'Here is how we can get it done,' ' DiPalma said. 'It's OK to say 'no.' But you need to come to the table with suggestions on how to make it better — unless you believe it's perfect.'
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
DiPalma, seen as a potential lieutenant governor candidate in 2026, said he will seek to have the bill heard earlier in next year's legislative session. 'I am not stopping,' he said. 'This is just cueing me to work harder.'
DiPalma said he feels sorry for 'all the people who are impacted by this — those seeking information — and also for the cities and towns and others that asked us to address 'vexatious' records requests. That is falling on deaf ears.'
Advertisement
McKee spokesperson Laura Hart said, 'Transparency is in the public's interest — that's not in dispute — but the state must balance transparency with privacy rights and costs to the taxpayer. State and municipal experts who do this work every day have brought up numerous privacy concerns.'
Among other issues, she said, 'Disclosing the names of preferred license plate owners violates the Driver's Privacy Protection Act. Disclosing subpoenas prematurely could negatively impact investigations,' and 'Narrowing the exceptions for doctor/patient communications could put health care privacy at risk.'
Hart said the public records law was designed with the ability to charge fees to cover the costs of document collection, review, and redactions 'and to discourage overly broad requests that take staff time and taxpayer dollars to complete.'
'Requiring public records officer, instead of the courts, to determine fee waivers based on 'public interest' or when there is a 'denial' will add significant risk and expense, both in staff time and in unnecessary litigation, all financed by taxpayer dollars," Hart said.
Steven Brown, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, said the McKee administration 'bombarded' legislators with objections to the bill.
'We just have to keep at it,' Brown said. 'At some point, I am hopeful the legislature will recognize that reform is absolutely essential, notwithstanding bogus objections from the executive branch.'
John M. Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, said, 'It's sad that the legislature just doesn't find it a priority to advance transparency in government. That's the single bill that would do the most, of the thousands of bills before them, to advance open government in Rhode Island at a time when people don't have a lot of trust in government.'
Advertisement
Advocates need to continue to link the legislation to people's everyday lives, Marion said. 'We also need to convince every legislator that this is really a bread-and-butter issue for them,' he said. 'This is about how government runs and how people can find out how government runs.'
Justin Silverman, executive director of the New England First Amendment Coalition, said, 'Government decisions affect the life of every Rhode Islander. From the Washington Bridge to local law enforcement, these are issues that matter to everyone. This APRA bill would allow us to better understand the decisions government makes and how our tax dollars are being spent. The bill will get passed one way or another, this year or next. Transparency and accountability are far too important to give up on.'
This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday,
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Whitmer told Trump in private that Michigan auto jobs depend on a tariff change of course
WASHINGTON (AP) — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer met privately in the Oval Office with President Donald Trump to make a case he did not want to hear: the automotive industry he said he wants to save were being hurt by his tariffs. The Democrat came with a slide deck to make her points in a visual presentation. Just getting the meeting last Tuesday with the Republican president was an achievement for someone viewed as a contender for her party's White House nomination in 2028. Whitmer's strategy for dealing with Trump highlights the conundrum for her and other Democratic leaders as they try to protect the interests of their states while voicing their opposition to his agenda. It's a dynamic that Whitmer has navigated much differently from many other Democratic governors. The fact that Whitmer had 'an opening to make direct appeals' in private to Trump was unique in this political moment, said Matt Grossman, a Michigan State University politics professor. It was her third meeting with Trump at the White House since he took office in January. This one, however, was far less public than the time in April when Whitmer was unwittingly part of an impromptu news conference that embarrassed her so much she covered her face with a folder. On Tuesday, she told the president that the economic damage from the tariffs could be severe in Michigan, a state that helped deliver him the White House in 2024. Whitmer also brought up federal support for recovery efforts after an ice storm and sought to delay changes to Medicaid. Trump offered no specific commitments, according to people familiar with the private conversation who were not authorized to discuss it publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity to describe it. Whitmer is hardly the only one sounding the warning of the potentially damaging consequences, including factory job losses, lower profits and coming price increases, of the import taxes that Trump has said will be the economic salvation for American manufacturing. White House spokesman Kush Desai that no other president 'has taken a greater interest in restoring American auto industry dominance than President Trump." Trade frameworks negotiated by the administration would open up the Japanese, Korean and European markets for vehicles made on assembly lines in Michigan, Desai said. But the outreach Trump has preferred tends to be splashy presentations by tech CEOs. In the Oval Office on Wednesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook gave the president a customized glass plaque with a gold base as Cook promised $600 billion in investments. Trump claims to have brought in $17 trillion in investment commitments, although none of those numbers has surfaced yet in economic data. Under his series of executive orders and trade frameworks, U.S. automakers face import taxes of 50% on steel and aluminum, 30% on parts from China and a top rate of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico not covered under an existing 2020 trade agreement. That puts America's automakers and parts suppliers at a disadvantage against German, Japanese and South Korean vehicles that only face a 15% import tax negotiated by Trump last month. On top of that, Trump this past week threatened a 100% tariff on computer chips, which are an integral part of cars and trucks, though he would exclude companies that produce chips domestically from the tax. Whitmer's two earlier meetings with Trump resulted in gains for Michigan. But the tariffs represent a significantly broader request of a president who has imposed them even more aggressively in the face of criticism. Materials in the presentation brought Whitmer to the meeting and obtained by The Associated Press noted how trade with Canada and Mexico has driven $23.2 billion in investment to Michigan since 2020. General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis operate 50 factories across the state, while more than 4,000 facilities support the auto parts supply chain. Altogether, the sector supports nearly 600,000 manufacturing jobs, forming the backbone of Michigan's economy. Whitmer outlined the main points of the materials to Trump and left copies with his team. To Grossman, the Michigan State professor, a key question is whether voters who expected to be helped by tariffs would react if Trump's import taxes failed to deliver the promised economic growth. 'Everyone's aware that Michigan is a critical swing state and the auto industry has outsized influence, not just directly, but symbolically,' Grossman said. AP VoteCast found that Trump won Michigan in 2024 largely because two-thirds of its voters described the economic conditions as being poor or 'not so good.' Roughly 70% of the voters in the state who felt negatively about the economy backed the Republican. The state was essentially split over whether tariffs were a positive, with Trump getting 76% of those voters who viewed them favorably. The heads of General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have repeatedly warned the administration that the tariffs would cut company profits and undermine their global competitiveness. Their efforts have resulted in little more than a temporary, monthlong pause intended to give companies time to adjust. The reprieve did little to blunt the financial fallout. In the second quarter alone, Ford reported $800 million in tariff-related costs, while GM said the import taxes cost it $1.1 billion. Those expenses could make it harder to reinvest in new domestic factories, a goal Trump has championed. 'We expect tariffs to be a net headwind of about $2 billion this year, and we'll continue to monitor the developments closely and engage with policymakers to ensure U.S. autoworkers and customers are not disadvantaged by policy change,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said on his company's earning call. Smaller suppliers have felt the strain, too. Detroit Axle, a family-run auto parts distributor, has been one of the more vocal companies in Michigan about the impact of the tariffs. The company initially announced it might have to shut down a warehouse and lay off more than 100 workers, but later said it would be able to keep the facility open, at least for now. 'Right now it's a market of who is able to survive, it's not a matter of who can thrive,' said Mike Musheinesh, owner of Detroit Axle.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Cuomo supporters push dual-resident Hamptonites to move voter registration to NYC and defeat Mamdani
New Yorkers with second homes in the ritzy Hamptons are being urged to save the Big Apple from Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani — by switching their voter registration from Long Island to the five boroughs, insiders told The Post. Andrew Cuomo's surrogates are hoping to convince well-heeled moderates they can impact the mayoral race, where Mamdani is the frontrunner. 'I've been trying to get this message out since the primary,' said Steven M. Cohen, chairman of Fix the City, a pro-Cuomo political action committee, who said he has spoken to dozens of people — 'some very high profile' — who claimed they're 'definitely changing their registration. 3 At least one Hamptons resident is taking Cohen up on his idea and trying to change their voter registration to cast a ballot against Mamdani, calling the Democratic socialist an 'antisemite.' Michael Nigro/Pacific Press/Shutterstock 'You don't win elections because you did one thing right, but by doing one hundred things right, a thousand things right,' Cohen insisted, conceding the movement is part of a broader strategy to boost voter engagement. 'This might be a few thousand votes, but elections have been won and lost on less than a few thousand votes.' The 'longer term play' is about getting people with homes in NYC to 'participate in the political process' – and it's totally kosher, asserted Cohen, who added it's relatively easy to switch voter registration without tax implications as long as it's a 'legitimate, bona fide' pad. The push is the reverse of the groundswell movement in 2024, when city folks flipped their voting to the East End in order to vote in a tight race for Suffolk County's 1st Congressional District between Democrat John Avlon and Republican incumbent Nick LaLota. Democrats who made the registration switch were crushed when LaLota took the key House congressional seat with 217,461 votes to former CNN analyst Avlon's 172,700 votes. 3 Cohen is urging eligible Hamptons residents to get involved in the New York City election. Obtained by the New York Post The target is Hamptonites 'who have deep ties in NYC,' like business owners and restaurateurs with dual locations 'who have an interest in what's going on,' claimed the longtime politico. 'I'm trying to switch,' said Mitchel Agoos, an 87-year-old East Hampton and NYC resident who called Mamdani an 'antisemite.' 'He's a disaster — I want to vote in this election,' added the longtime elder who has voted in Suffolk for decades and is a Curtis Sliwa supporter. 'I'd feel great to vote against him,' he said, adding, 'Anybody but that SOB. …It's a mitzvah to try to defeat him.' So far, Cohen said he's encouraged by the interest after people get past the 'initial skepticism' over questions about tax implications. 'There are no tax implications at all — that's part of the message,' insisted Cohen, adding that the state Board of Elections is only concerned that no one votes in two different places. 3 Pro-Cuomo support Steven Cohen is urging Hamptons residents who also live in New York City to switch their voter registration to cast a ballot in the mayor's race. Iris Zimmerman/INSTARimages But not everyone's convinced. Hamptons metals magnate and longtime Republican donor, Andy Sabin, told The Post he would 'be crazy' to switch voter registration despite wanting to crush Mamdani. 'You open up a can of worms to audits and everything else — you'd be crazy to do it.' Changing one's voting address is relatively easy, noted election lawyer, Jerry Goldfeder. 'They just have to send a change of address to the Board of Elections. It's just a matter of sending in a new, legitimate registration form,' he said. The Cuomo campaign declined to comment.
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Some Democrats want new leadership. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden says he has what it takes to resist Trump
WASCO, Ore. (AP) — Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden is in his fifth decade in Congress and showing no inclination to step aside even as pressure builds on aging Democratic officeholders to give way to a new generation. He says he plans to seek another term in 2028, when he will be 79 years old. He has traveled to all 36 Oregon counties every year he has been in the Senate and intends to keep doing so. After a recent town hall in Wasco in conservative Sherman County, Wyden said questions about age are 'fair game for debate' but that he is still up to the job and the fight against Republican President Donald Trump's policies. 'I believe you ought to be held accountable,' he told The Associated Press in an interview. 'But I think that the Founding Fathers wanted a results-oriented, commonsense approach to government, and that's what I'm trying to do. And I've got the energy.' Calls for a new generation of leaders Many Democrats have lingering anguish about Joe Biden's decision to seek a second White House term despite persistent concerns about whether he was up to the job at age 81. He dropped out in July 2024 and Trump went on to defeat then-Vice President Kamala Harris. 'I've consistently called for all elected officials over the age of 70 to make this their final term — to step down with dignity and make room for the next generation of leaders," said Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, a group that supports progressive young candidates. Many Democrats feel Biden stepped withdrew too late and cost the party the presidency. Multiple Democratic senators have announced this year that they won't seek reelection, including 80-year-old Dick Durbin of Illinois. Durbin's career in Congress began in 1983, two years after Wyden joined the House. Litman said she hopes another Democrat emerges to challenge Wyden. 'I think competitive primaries in particular are how we as a party decide what we believe,' she said. 'Every Oregonian counts' Wyden continues to travel across his state engaging with voters of all political stripes. The Wasco town hall was the 23rd he has held this year, and the 1,125th town hall of his career. Some 20 people gathered at a former grade school nestled among wheat fields and wind turbines. 'Every Oregonian counts, no matter where they live,' Wyden told them. As other Democrats grapple over strategy, the senator says the old-school town hall tradition has become a key communication tool in an era of deepening division. 'I believe the town meetings are more important now than ever, because they allow for an opportunity in a community to chip away at some of the polarization and the mistrust,' he told the AP. That stands in contrast to congressional Republicans, who in recent months have largely avoided town hall meetings, where they often face protesters. The National Republican Campaign Committee recently encouraged GOP lawmakers to promote the new tax breaks and spending cuts law, but in smaller settings they can control. A civil exchange Some 75% of Sherman County's voters cast ballots for Trump last November, and Wyden hasn't carried the county of about 2,000 people since 2004. Yet the small town hall gathering stood out for its civility, compared with the raucous crowds faced recently by other members of Congress, both Democrats and Republicans. Meeting with a small group of Democrats, Republicans and independents in Wasco, Wyden talked at length about health care, trade and democracy. While some pressed Wyden, they waited to be called on and thanked him for coming. Charlie Hogue, 71, asked a question that went to the heart of Democratic concerns that leaders aren't pushing back hard enough against Trump. 'I thought we had checks and balances in this country, and I'm beginning to lose hope because the current administration ignores court orders,' he said. 'So are the Democrats planning to just message for the next elections … or do you have a plan?' Wyden cited examples of how he had challenged Trump: a recent trip to Canada, where the senator spoke with the prime minister about trade, and discussions with Oregon wheat farmers about tariffs. T.L. Fassbender, 76, wondered why it seems that Democrats support immigrants who entered the country illegally. Wyden responded that he believed the immigration system was 'broken' and noted that a bipartisan border bill collapsed in the Senate last year after then-candidate Trump came out against it. In the ensuing exchange, Fassbender said he didn't think Wyden had answered his question, so the senator tried again. 'If somebody has committed a crime, for example, I don't think that should be something that is protected as part of legislation,' Wyden said. 'What's been going on, unfortunately, is we have some government agencies coming and swooping up people who've done nothing wrong.' When immigration came up again later, Wyden noted that his parents were fleeing Nazi Germany when they came to the United States. 'I believe that legal immigration makes our country better and stronger,' he said. Pursuing the Epstein records Recently, Wyden has emerged as a leading Democratic voice in pressing for more information on the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case. He isn't new to the effort, which has become a political crisis for Trump. The president's supporters are angry that his administration didn't keep promises to release records from the investigation into the wealthy financier's exploitation of underage girls for sex. The Justice Department and FBI recently said there was no Epstein 'client list,' walking back a notion that the administration had previously promoted. As the top Democrat on the powerful Senate Finance Committee, Wyden had been pressing for Epstein's financial records long before the scandal resurfaced. 'We spent three years following the money,' he told the AP after the Wasco town hall. 'And we're going to stay at it until the facts come out.' 'The old saying is, 'most of life is just showing up,'' he said. 'But it's especially important in government because there is a sense that this is rigged.'
