Far-right Israeli politicians and settlers discuss luxury ‘Gaza riviera' plan
The scheme, titled 'The master plan for settlement in the Gaza Strip', envisions the construction of 850,000 housing units, construction of hi-tech 'smart cities' that trade cryptocurrency and a metro system that runs across the territory. It took its inspiration from an idea shared by the US president, Donald Trump, in February, where he pledged to turn Gaza into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'.
'The right of the people of Israel to settle, develop and preserve this land is not just a historical right – it is a national and security obligation,' the text of the plan said, boasting of economic benefits that it would bring to Israel.
The plan, seen by the Guardian, would require Gaza's existing population of about 2 million to be emptied out. Legal experts warn that forcible displacement on such a grand scale would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing.
'This is a plan for ethnic cleansing. Under international law, this would amount to a crime against humanity because deportation is a war crime when committed on a small scale and a crime against humanity when it is committed on a massive scale,' said Michael Sfard, one of Israel's leading human rights lawyers.
The plan was discussed on Tuesday in the Knesset during a conference called 'The Riviera in Gaza: From Vision to Reality'. Among the speakers was the minister of finance, Bezalel Smotrich, and the settler activist Daniella Weiss. The conference drew criticism from other politicians, including Gilad Kariv from the Democrats party, who accused Smotrich of calling for war crimes to be committed.
Weiss told the Guardian over the phone: 'Gazans will not remain there. They will go to other countries. Supporters of Hamas we will fight. But those who want to live a normal life, they will have to leave Gaza because of the 7 October attack.' Palestinians would be relocated to Egypt and other unspecified 'African countries', she added.
Weiss said that she had a list of 1,000 Israeli families who had signed up already to live on land in Gaza, once Palestinian residents were pushed away. 'My plan is to make [Gaza] paradise, to make it Singapore,' she said.
Weiss represents a small, but increasingly influential group of radical settlers within Israel who seek to illegally occupy the Gaza Strip. Their calls to create Israeli settlements have grown stronger after the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attack which killed about 1,200 people and the Israeli war in Gaza which has killed more than 60,000 so far.
The war in Gaza has levelled much of the strip and destroyed basic civilian infrastructure and most cities. The Gaza riviera plan would build luxury resorts on the ruins of Gaza, once Israel stopped bombing it.
Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has denied any plans to resettle residents of Gaza, though his defence minister, Israel Katz, has suggested transferring residents into a so-called 'humanitarian city' in southern Gaza. Legal experts have called the plan a blueprint for crimes against humanity and the Israeli military itself pushed back on the idea, which it said would be a security nightmare.
Trump has also floated the idea of expelling the population of Gaza, suggesting at one point that neighbouring Jordan take in those displaced. Trump suggested that the US could assume control over Gaza to 'develop' the strip – which drew the ire of rights organisations across the world.
As the conference was held, Gaza's starvation crisis continued to worsen. At least 113 people have died of hunger in Gaza, 45 of whom died over the last four days, health authorities said. Aid organisations have blamed Israel's virtual blockade of aid into the strip for the growing levels of extreme hunger.
Human rights experts said the suggestion of displacing Gaza's residents inside and outside the territory should not be viewed in isolation. Rather, this is part and parcel of a displacement policy.
'When an occupying power creates a coercive environment by, for instance, withholding food, and that coercive environment leaves no choice to the civilian population but to move, then this can amount to the war crime of forced displacement,' said Janina Dill, the co-director of the Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's $400 million 'flying palace' gift from Qatar moves forward after 'bribe' backlash
The Pentagon and the Qatari government are close to finalizing the deal that will turn a $400 million 'flying palace' into President Donald Trump 's next Air Force One. CNN reported Monday on the language used in the agreement between Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his Qatari counterpart, which could still be tweaked ahead of a formal announcement. The transfer of the lavish Boeing 747-8 is being labeled an 'unconditional donation.' 'This donation is made in good faith and in the spirit of cooperation and mutual support between the parties,' the document said. 'Nothing in this MoU is, or shall be interpreted or construed as, an offer, promise, or acceptance of any form of bribery, undue influence, or corrupt practice.' Democrats - and even some Republicans - raised objections when the White House announced in May that the Qataris would be gifting the plane to the Americans, so that Trump could get a new Air Force One before the end of his second term. Eyebrows were further raised when it was announced that the plane would follow Trump to his presidential library after his term was done. Trump took time in mid-February to tour the Qatari aircraft, which was parked at the West Palm Beach airport, several miles down the road from Mar-a-Lago. Ahead of his trip to the Middle East in mid-May, which included a stop in Doha, Qatar, the framework for the deal became public. After the trip, the Americans officially accepted the gift. The initial agreement was signed by Hegseth and Qatar's deputy prime minister and minister of state for defense affairs, Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani on July 7. It's unclear when the final agreement will be signed off on. A Pentagon spokesperson told the Daily Mail on Monday, 'We have nothing to share on this.' The plane is currently sitting in San Antonio, Texas. The aircraft comes to the Defense Department 'as is,' meaning U.S. taxpayers will be paying for the upgrades needed to turn the 'flying palace' into a flying Situation Room. Hegseth has tried to keep the pricetag of the project quiet. During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing in June, the Pentagon chief irritated Democratic Sen. Jack Reed by testifying that the timeline and the price of the project needed to remain classified. Hegseth justified the secrecy by saying it would 'ensure the safety and the security of the president of the United States.' The Department of Justice also hasn't released the memo, penned by Attorney General Pam Bondi, that outlines the legal justification allowing the Trump administration to accept the gift from the Qatari government. On Monday, the government transparency group, the Freedom of Press Foundation filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to get access to that document. Bondi's memo reportedly argues that the Qatari donation is legally sound as long as the plane goes to Trump's presidential library at the end of his term. Trump is expected to build a presidential library in Florida, after changing his residency from his native New York to the Sunshine State in 2019. Early in his first term, the president negotiated the price of two new Boeing planes that would be used as Air Force Ones, but the project has been hampered by delays and cost overruns. Trump also designed a color scheme to mimic the one on his 'Trump Force One' private plane. When President Joe Biden came into office, he chose to maintain the traditional Kennedy-era color scheme on the new Air Force Ones. The president told the Daily Mail in February that 'no matter what' his new Air Force One would have his preferred color scheme.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Reconsider Gaza family case, court tells Foreign Office
A Palestinian family who are trying to get the UK government to help them flee Gaza have won a critical ruling in their legal Monday, the High Court said that the foreign secretary had to "think again" about whether officials could help get the family ruling said the family of six were at "constant risk of injury or death" living in a tent in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza. They first applied to come to the UK, where they have a British relative, in January 2024. A government spokesman said it was considering the judgment carefully. The case sparked headlines in February when it became the centre of a misunderstood row at Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs).Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer clashed over mistaken and muddled claims that the family had exploited a scheme for Ukrainian their case was in fact dealt with on its own merits and not under the rules for resettling Ukrainians. The father, known only as "BEL", and his two young adult children had been fired at by Israeli forces at an aid distribution link to the UK is through the father's brother, referred to in court as "BSJ". He legally settled in the UK after Hamas came to power in Gaza in 2007 and became a British court heard that Hamas had so discriminated against the family, who had worked for its political opponents, that it had killed a the October 2023 war began, BSJ began asking if his brother and his family could come to the Home Office granted the family permission to come to the UK in January this year, telling them they must first pass biometric checks at the British consulate in the Foreign Office has refused to ask Israel to let the family leave Gaza because it only does so in exceptional cases involving couples or a parent and child separated by the against the government, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the law did not require the government to assist the family to reach the UK, the foreign secretary should look again, considering the legally exceptional nature of the Barratt, the family's lawyer, said: "We hope that the Foreign Office will consider the judgment carefully and act quickly to reconsider their approach to this case and the policy more widely so that our clients and others in a similar position can be assisted to leave Gaza." Back in February, the family's case became a political row when Badenoch said during PMQs that it had been "completely wrong" for a judge to grant Palestinians the right to live in the UK after they originally applied through a scheme designed for fired back that the government would close the loophole. "It should be Parliament that makes the rules on immigration," he said at the time. But the publicly-available appeal judgment shows the family were not given permission to arrive under the scheme for Ukrainian they had initially used that immigration form, in error, they won their case under general human rights considerations which allow families from all backgrounds to make an exceptional request for Lady Chief Justice, Dame Sue Carr, later said the way both leaders had presented the case in Parliament had been "unacceptable", given their duty to respect the role of judges in upholding the law.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
France calls on EU to pressure Israel to move on Palestinian two-state solution
France has called on the European Union to pressure Israel to agree to a two-state solution with the Palestinians, the latest escalation from France as it seeks an end to the deadly Gaza war days after pledging to recognise Palestine as a state. Jean-Noel Barrot, the French foreign minister, told reporters at the United Nations that while there is international consensus that the time for a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now, world powers need to back up their words with actions. Advertisement 'The European Commission, on behalf of the EU, has to express its expectations and show the means that we can incentivise the Israeli government to hear this appeal,' he said. Mr Barrot spoke on the first day of a high-level UN meeting on a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is being co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. The unoccupied US delegation seat at the United Nations General Assembly on Monday (Richard Drew/AP) The conference, which was postponed from June and downgraded to the ministerial level, is taking place in New York as international condemnation of Israel's handling of the war in Gaza reaches a fever pitch. Both Israel and its closest ally, the United States, refused to participate in the meeting, which Mr Barrot said is being attended by representatives of 125 countries, including 50 ministers. Advertisement The aim of the conference, Mr Barrot said, is 'to reverse the trend of what is happening in the region – mainly the erasure of the two-state solution, which has been for a long time the only solution that can bring peace and security in the region.' He urged the European Commission to call on Israel to lift a financial blockade on two billion euros he says the Israeli government owes the Palestinian Authority; stop settlement building in the West Bank, which threatens the territorial integrity of a future Palestinian state; and end the 'militarised' food delivery system in Gaza by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has resulted in hundreds of killings. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. Ahead of the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise Palestine as a state at the annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly in September. The bold but mostly symbolic move is aimed at adding diplomatic pressure on Israel. Advertisement France is now the biggest Western power and the only member of the Group of Seven major industrialised nations to recognise the state of Palestine, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same. More than 140 countries recognise a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe. At the conference opening, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called for all countries who have not yet recognised Palestine as a state to do so 'without delay'. 'The path to peace begins by recognising the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction,' he said. Advertisement The other issue being discussed at the conference is normalisation between Israel and the Arab states in the region. Prince Faisal bin Farhan, the Saudi foreign minister, stressed that normalisation of relations with Israel 'can only come through the establishment of a Palestinian state'. With global anger rising over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, US President Donald Trump on Monday called for increasing aid to Palestinians, a rare glimpse of daylight between him and Mr Netanyahu, who has said there is no starvation. Both Mr Barrot and Mr Farhan said on Monday that the US is an essential actor in the region and that it was the president in January who secured the only ceasefire in the 21-month war. 'I am firmly in the belief that Trump's engagement can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' Mr Farhan said. Advertisement
