Better communication urged over Shropshire Council complaints
In his complaint, the man said it was "hopeless" to get through to one of the options on the line, with the 10 minutes he was waiting added to his telephone bill.The council was "quick to take money from people" but reluctant to provide services "that [meet] the needs of this town", he added.
A total of 2,386 complaints were made by people about the authority during 2024-25.In the report, the council said 952 investigations were carried out as a result of the complaints.Other examples it provided include complaints relating to children's services, revenues and benefits, waste management and housing.Of the actions taken in response that were recorded, 56% were to provide an apology, 16% included giving extra information or explanation and 11% were actions linked to arranging employee training or guidance.The report set out a number of areas to focus on for the year ahead in terms of how the council applied its complaints procedures and gets and responds to customer feedback.They included staff training and focusing on the quality of their responses and response times."Complainants often highlight disappointment that they were not contacted, were not communicated with enough or information was not shared effectively," the report said."More effective communication at an earlier stage can lead to a better understanding of the issues or the processes council staff work to - and prevent the development of a formal complaint."
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nigel Farage says he ‘can't apologise' for lack of MP vetting in general election
Nigel Farage has told Reform UK councillors 'how we behave matters' and says he 'can't apologise' for the 2024 election vetting process because he was not involved in it. On Monday morning, Mr Farage arrived to overcast drizzle at Kent County Council (KCC) in Maidstone, to be greeted by expectant councillors from the Reform-led authority. The visit comes after news that Reform MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock James McMurdock has resigned the party whip amid allegations that he took out government loans during the Covid pandemic for businesses with no employees. Mr Farage was keen to distance himself from the absence of Reform candidate vetting processes for the 2024 general election, and said he 'can't apologise' for it. He said: 'I came in, I inherited this situation where hundreds of candidates who stood in the last general election had not gone through a vetting process. 'I said on July 5, the day after the election last year, that we would now professionalise. 'We put 1,630 candidates into the field on May 1, more than any other party with very, very few rows or arguments – so the vetting process worked for this year, I can't apologise for what happened before.' The Reform leader did not answer when asked whether the allegations faced by Mr McMurdock were an embarrassment for his party. 'Let's find out the truth, I know as much about this right now as you do.' said Mr Farage. He added that he would be heading to Westminster later on Monday to find out more about the situation. Addressing KCC Reform councillors on the steps inside County Hall, he outlined his expectations for them. Mr Farage said: 'Behaving with integrity is a responsibility upon all of you, although that doesn't mean you all have to become stuffed shirts or anything like that. 'You are holders of public office you are responsible and how we behave matters.' Later, he told the PA news agency: 'Yes I think, I think that when you become elected at any level you have a responsibility, 'I'm not asking for stuffed shirts, I'm not asking for boring people. I'm just saying think, think to all of these people here who were basically in 'civvy street' in political terms before May 1, just think before you act.'
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trial date set for Palestine protest organisers accused of public order offences
A trial date has been set for two pro-Palestinian protest organisers charged with committing public order offences at a demonstration. Benjamin Jamal, 61, of Kingston upon Thames, and Christopher Nineham, 63, of Bow, are both accused over the protest held in central London on January 18, which saw 77 people arrested in total. The Metropolitan Police alleged that some protesters tried to breach conditions imposed on the protest by marching out of Whitehall. Jamal, who is the director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), is facing offences including inciting people to fail to comply with protest conditions. Nineham is vice chair of the Stop the War Coalition. Both defendants appeared in the dock and spoke only to confirm their names and dates of birth during a hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Monday. District Judge Minhas granted the defendants unconditional bail and fixed a trial date of February 23 next year at the same court, with a time estimate of six days. The judge said Jamal and Nineham would be allowed to give evidence during the trial. Ten other people were charged by police for offences relating to the same demonstration, which also saw former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and MP John McDonnell voluntarily interviewed by the force. Owen Greenhall, defending Jamal, told the court that Jamal and Nineham's trial had been identified as 'the lead trial' of all the related cases, with the others pushed back as a result. The judge said: 'Each case will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' A group of pro-Palestinian supporters gathered outside the court chanting and waving flags ahead of the hearing. Several counter-protesters also appeared carrying Israeli flags and holding signs that read 'Defend protest for all', and were subsequently blocked off from the larger crowd by police officers. Speaking on stage outside the court before the hearing, Nineham said the defendants were 'very, very confident that in the end, we will get justice.' He said: 'The proscriptions, the arrests, the mounting campaign against the movement are clearly designed to intimidate us and to divide us, and they have, of course, attacked our marches and our protests from the very start of this campaign. 'Once again, we are here to say that we stand united and we stand defiant, and I think it's important to recognise that the attempts to shut the movement down are backfiring.' In a statement shared ahead of the hearing, the PSC said the charges should never have been brought against Jamal and Nineham and were 'a political attack designed to suppress solidarity with the Palestinian people'. 'It is outrageous that Chris and Ben, their families and friends will be left with this threat of criminal charges hanging over them, possibly for many more months,' the statement added.
Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Building societies step up protest against Reeves's cash ISA reforms
Building society chiefs will this week intensify their protests against the chancellor's plans to cut cash ISA limits by warning that it will push up borrowing costs for homeowners and businesses. Sky News has obtained the draft of a letter being circulated by the Building Societies Association (BSA) among its members which will demand that Rachel Reeves abandons a proposed move to slash savers' annual cash ISA allowance from the existing £20,000 threshold. The draft letter, which is expected to be published this week, warns the chancellor that her decision would deter savers, disrupt Labour's housebuilding ambitions and potentially present an obstacle to economic growth by triggering higher funding costs. "Cash ISAs are a cornerstone of personal savings for millions across the UK, helping people from all walks of life to build financial resilience and achieve their savings goals," the draft letter said. "Beyond their personal benefits, Cash ISAs play a vital role in the broader economy. "The funds deposited in these accounts support lending, helping to keep mortgages and loans affordable and accessible. "Cutting Cash ISA limits would make this funding more scarce which would have the knock-on effect of making loans to households and businesses more expensive and harder to come by. "This would undermine efforts to stimulate economic growth, including the Government's commitment to delivering 1.5 million new homes. "Cutting the Cash ISA limit would send a discouraging message to savers, who are sensibly trying to plan for the future and undermine a product that has stood the test of time." The chancellor is reportedly preparing to announce a review of cash ISA limits as part of her Mansion House speech next week. While individual building society bosses have come out publicly to express their opposition to the move, the BSA letter is likely to be viewed with concern by Treasury officials. The Nationwide is by far Britain's biggest building society, with the likes of the Coventry, Yorkshire and Skipton also ranking among the sector's largest players. In the draft letter, which is likely to be signed by dozens of building society bosses, the BSA said the chancellor's proposals "would make the whole ISA regime more complex and make it harder for people to transfer money between cash and investments". "Restricting Cash ISAs won't encourage people to invest, as it won't suddenly change their appetite to take on risk," it said. "We know that barriers to investing are primarily behavioural, therefore building confidence and awareness are far more important." The BSA called on Ms Reeves to back "a long-term consumer awareness and information campaign to educate people about the benefits of investing, alongside maintaining strong support for saving". "We therefore urge you to affirm your support for Cash ISAs by maintaining the current £20,000 limit. "Preserving this threshold will enable households to continue building financial security while supporting broader economic stability and growth." The BSA declined to comment on Monday on the leaked letter, although one source said the final version was subject to revision.
