Public Protector commits to helping Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission protect rights ‘in its own country'
The Office of the Public Protector says it has no record of a complaint by the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC) regarding the denial of Zimbabwean nationals' access to healthcare services in South Africa.
Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka was responding to ZHRC Chairperson Jessie Majome's comments in an interview with Newzroom Afrika, where she claimed a meeting was held to discuss the issue with the Public Protector.
'The conversation with Advocate Gcaleka was to show our mutual interest in having our countries beneficially resolve the issue of the conflicts that are arising when Zimbabwean nationals approach South African hospitals to seek services,' said Majome.
'This conversation is not a new conversation. In September 2024, the public protector very graciously hosted my commission for a benchmarking and learning visit. We came to learn how the public protector conducts its mandate and overcomes difficulties it encounters, so that we can grow and improve our function.
ALSO READ: 'I stand by my words': Limpopo Health MEC says SADC countries must pay for their citizens
'In that visit, Gcaleka and I had a conversation that started about the problem of Zimbabweans seeking help. We agreed that we want to come together and devise ways of coming up with lasting solutions to ensure all enjoy their rights.'
'No such discussion'
In a statement on Tuesday, Gcaleka said her office did not host her Zimbabwean counterpart last year. However, no recent meeting had taken place to discuss healthcare services in the country.
'Rather, the discussions were about, among other things, the state of the health care systems in both countries. Accordingly, the PPSA also referred to its own investigation into the state of the healthcare system in South Africa as a guide for the ZHRC to investigate the same in its own country,' said Gcaleka.
WATCH: 'You are killing my health system' – Limpopo Health MEC lectures foreign patient
'We are therefore surprised by reports in the media about discussions, which purportedly occurred recently, and were centred around matters relating to Zimbabwean nationals being denied access to health-care services in South Africa; neither do we have record of a complaint of that kind.'
South Africa and Zimbabwe partnership
Gcaleka said the meeting her office held with her Zimbabwean counterpart covered issues commonly shared between the two institutions, including corruption and challenges relating to service delivery in the two countries, such as healthcare systems.
'Consequently, and on the request of the ZHRC, on 14 October, the public protector of South Africa shared documents with the ZHRC that would assist in strengthening the ZHRC's institutional capacity to investigate malfeasance in its own country. At no point did the discussions then, or recently, focus on the denial of Zimbabwean nationals' access to health-care services in South Africa.'
However, the public protector committed to assisting the ZHRC to strengthen its impact to better serve the people of Zimbabwe, 'in line with international standards followed by institutions of its kind, which are to uphold the rule of law, protect human rights and enforce good governance in its own country'.
READ NEXT: 'Hands off Dr Phophi Ramathuba'- Premier in hot seat over comments to Zimbabwean patient
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Health advocates push for harm reduction in smoking alternatives
Safer smoking alternatives were high on the agenda at a women's wellness event where Gauteng MPL and former health MEC Dr Bandile Masuku called for deeper engagement on harm reduction. Speaking at The Wellness Collective, a gathering focused on shifting South Africa from selling harm to promoting wellness, Masuku on Tuesday pointed to the example of a pregnant woman who smokes but cannot quit entirely. 'So, it's just a matter that maybe scientists must take a more serious approach on the alternatives on addiction itself,' he said. Parliament is continuing public hearings on the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill. Independent scientists and medical practitioners have already told the portfolio committee on health that harm reduction is grounded in science and offers safer alternatives to smoking. Tobacco harm reduction advocate Buhle Binta, who also serves as head of scientific engagement for Sub-Saharan Africa at tobacco company Philip Morris International, spoke to the collective about the importance of alternatives such as e-cigarettes in health discussions. 'The importance of harm reduction is that people who smoke have started for various reasons: behavioural reasons, peer pressure, stress management, or whatever it is but at the end of the day, the reality is they are smoking now and we always, as a company, say that you should quit. Quit if you can but for someone who cannot quit or makes the choice not to quit, we cannot stigmatise them and this is where harm reduction comes in,' she said. Dr Vivian Manyeki, a public health physician and epidemiologist at Kenyatta National Hospital, the largest referral hospital in East and Central Africa, would like to see a future in which Africa leads with its own context-driven health policies, shaped by lived experiences, local expertise and innovation. 'We've stopped using frameworks that work in another country and we've brought ours, we've made ours, and we've incorporated all those groups we are saying we want to go to the table. We are using new artificial intelligence technologies. We are using the new styles. We are using evidence-based approaches, and we are taking experiences and master stories to build the frameworks for the policies. 'I'd like to see a future where we don't have to remind people what harm reduction is. We don't have to define it. Let it be something that people know. They know that wearing a safety belt is a harm reduction practice. Using a condom is a harm reduction practice. I want a future where we tell people it is OK to use these products as part of harm reduction strategies,' she said. Medical practitioner and consultant Dr Esthras Moloko appealed to delegates to seize Women's Month by 'living by example'. 'By blending compassion with science, inclusion with transparency, urgency with innovation, we can unlock healthier futures for every South African woman and man and their families. From sunscreens to seat belts, innovations to reduce harm caused by certain behaviours and activities must be woven into our everyday lives.' Moloko said inclusive, transparent and timely regulation could unlock the full potential of harm reduction, not only for tobacco addiction, but also for challenges such as sugar overconsumption, alcohol misuse, and more. 'Regulation is one of the tools that we must use against co-incurring and non-co-incurring diseases. By embedding these inclusive, transparent and timely regulation principles, and applying them across multiple domains of addictions and addictive behaviours, government, business, and various centres can deliver significant health gains.' 'They can protect the vulnerable populations and uphold the spirit of those who, like the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, call for harm reduction. So join me today and every day in building a culture of health and wellness where no harm is left behind, no harm is unavoidable, and every life is finite,' he said.
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Hot flashes and hard truths: Halle Berry's menopause misdiagnosis ignites health revolution
Actress Halle Berry opens up about menopause. Image: Instagram / halleberry Health is a deeply personal experience impacted by a variety of biological processes that women face throughout their lives. However, although milestones such as first steps and puberty are frequently regarded as simple, the path to menopause is plagued with unanticipated twists, particularly during perimenopause. This critical shift, characterised by changing hormone levels, is rarely defined in the precise terms required, resulting in a troubling difference in how women's health issues are recognised and treated. While misdiagnosis can affect anyone, research shows that women are disproportionately impacted. This disparity raises urgent questions about the underlying causes: Are we witnessing the effects of medical gaslighting, a lack of research in sex and gender medicine, and a society still grappling with outdated views of women's health? The World Health Organisation (WHO) has acknowledged the global gap in women's health education and research. In a recent health equity report, the WHO stated that "gender biases in medical research and clinical training contribute directly to misdiagnosis and under-treatment in women." Perimenopause is the period leading up to menopause, where hormones, particularly estrogen and progesterone, fluctuate wildly. It typically begins in a woman's 40s but can start as early as her mid-30s. Symptoms can include: Hot flashes. Fatigue. Brain fog. Irregular periods. Anxiety. Joint pain. However, because these symptoms can mimic other conditions, doctors often misattribute them to unrelated illnesses. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers lack adequate education on this subject, leaving countless women misdiagnosed with conditions like ADHD, fibromyalgia, anxiety, and even long Covid instead of recognising the hormonal changes at play. Dr Mary Claire Haver, author of "The Pause Life", highlights this issue, noting that the absence of menopause training in medical education pushes healthcare professionals to rely on vague diagnoses that fail to address the real issue. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers lack adequate education on this subject, leaving countless women misdiagnosed with conditions like ADHD, fibromyalgia, anxiety, and even long Covid instead of recognising the hormonal changes at play. Image: Tima Miroshnichenko /pexels A UK medical negligence firm, Higgs LLP, surveyed over 500 women and found that up to 1 in 3 women may experience a misdiagnosis before their actual menopause symptoms are recognised. Many had to go through two to five medical appointments before being correctly diagnosed. This delay means unnecessary treatments, emotional distress, and years of living without the right support. South African women aren't immune to this. Very few doctors in our public and even private healthcare systems are trained to look for hormonal changes as the root cause of many midlife complaints in women. Treating symptoms rather than understanding the cause. Whether it's due to outdated medical training, internalised bias, or the centuries-old trope of female 'hysteria,' women are often told their symptoms are psychological rather than physiological. One shining example of this struggle is Halle Berry, the Oscar-winning actress who has become a powerful voice for women experiencing menopause. When she boldly declared, 'I'm in menopause!' on Capitol Hill, she wasn't merely making a statement; she was kicking open the door to a conversation that has long been kept under wraps. Berry's journey began with a misdiagnosis that left her frustrated and misunderstood. She recalls being incorrectly diagnosed with herpes during her own perimenopausal journey, a turning point that ignited her passion for advocacy. Berry has transformed her experience into a mission to raise awareness about menopause. Her platform, Respin, originally a wellness website, has evolved into a comprehensive healthcare initiative focused on menopause. 'For too long, society has put women in boxes. For someone like me to speak about going through menopause, which has been so stigmatised," Berry told "Forbes", "If I can say, 'Hey, it's sexy to arrive at this time of our life. It's actually a privilege to age'.' Through Respin, Berry provides a vital resource for women navigating menopause. The platform offers telehealth consultations with menopause-trained physicians, community support, and personalised lifestyle plans.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Kopanang Africa: Migrants are not the cause of South Africa's healthcare crisis
A member of the March and March movement checks the identity document and appointment cards at the entrance of the Addington Hospital in KwaZulu-Natal Image: Leon Lestrade/Independent Newspapers Anti-xenophobia movement, Kopanang Africa, says the violent skirmishes witnessed outside numerous healthcare facilities in South Africa are an attempt to divert attention to hijack legitimate frustrations among communities including high unemployment and poor service delivery. 'We view the violent exclusion of foreign nationals from healthcare facilities as a grave violation of South Africa's constitutional and human rights framework. Operation Dudula's vigilante actions — blocking access to clinics, demanding identity documents, and intimidating patients — directly contravene Section 27 of the Constitution, which guarantees healthcare access to everyone within our borders, irrespective of nationality,' Mike Ndlovu, spokesperson Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia (Kopanang Africa also known as KAAX) told IOL. KAAX is a South African civil society collective committed to fighting xenophobia and promoting social justice. 'Recent incidents include forced denials of care to pregnant women, chronic patients, and children in Johannesburg clinics, coupled with psychological warfare through deportation threats. They also violate International human rights law, including the African Charter and ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), which prohibit discrimination based on nationality,' said Ndlovu. IOL asked Ndlovu to clarify his organisation's sentiments, given the context of clinics and hospitals struggling to cater to the massive crowds requiring assistance. The influx of foreign nationals into South Africa is often blamed for the bulging crowds of patients at healthcare facilities. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Kopanang Africa said migrants are being used as a scapegoat in the healthcare crisis. Image: Kopanang Africa website Ndlovu responded: 'These vigilantes exploit legitimate public frustration like a 32% unemployment rate, over-strained services, and their narrative dangerously distorts reality. Data reveals that foreign nationals constitute only four percent of public hospital admissions according to 2029 data, primarily for obstetric and emergency care, not the exaggerated burden claimed by anti-migrant groups. 'Migrants contribute nine percent to GDP (gross domestic product) despite being 6.7 percent of the population, countering the 'job theft' myth. The real systemic threats include a R50 billion shortfall in public health funding, 45,000 nurse vacancies, and rampant corruption, for example, Gauteng Health's R1.2 billion loss to irregular contracts in 2022–2023,' he said. Furthermore, Ndlovu pointed out that the 2025 PEPFAR funding cuts on the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief funding cuts have slashed 17% of South Africa's HIV budget, causing over 8,000 healthcare worker retrenchments and clinic closures—crises unrelated to migration. 'Blaming migrants diverts attention from decades of state neglect and global aid failures,' he said. Commenting on the declining relations between sections of the South Africa community and migrants who have flooded into the country, owing to its buoyant economy and opportunities, Ndlovu said the reasons for the meltdown are diverse. 'South Africa's xenophobic violence stems from unhealed colonial fractures. KAAX advances reconciliation through legal and grassroots strategies. We are challenging Section 41 of the Immigration Act, which enables warrantless searches and racial profiling of migrants, perpetuating the toxic conflation of nationality with criminality,' said Ndlovu. 'Concurrently, we support economic solidarity. Migrant-owned businesses employ two South Africans per enterprise on average, creating interdependencies that defy xenophobic tropes . We demand implementation of the dormant 2019 National Action Plan to Combat Xenophobia — a policy ignored by the state.' Asked about the South African government's response to the skirmishes, Ndlovu said more could have been done by the authorities. 'We condemn the South African government's response to healthcare xenophobia as legally contradictory, operationally inadequate, and institutionally complicit. The government's statement verbally condemned vigilante blockades and affirmed healthcare rights under Section 27 of the Constitution; this response came only after weeks of unchecked violence and failed to address the core problem,' said Ndlovu. 'Operationally, despite promising police interventions and 'zero tolerance' for lawlessness , no arrests of Operation Dudula leaders have been documented since the statement's release.' He argued that the government's inaction reflects state complicity. 'Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber's "Operation New Broom" focuses exclusively on migrant arrests. KAAX concludes the government's response is a performative gesture that perpetuates apartheid-era exclusion by scapegoating migrants for systemic crises instead of prosecuting vigilantes and corrupt officials,' said Ndlovu. Dr Leon Schreiber, South Africa's Minister of Home Affairs Image: Ayanda Ndamane Independent Newspapers Last month, the government issued a statement, saying it has "noted with serious concern" the reported incidents where certain groups and communities have blocked foreign nationals from accessing healthcare services at public facilities. "While the government understands the genuine frustrations of many citizens regarding the pressures on public services, including overburdened clinics and exhausted healthcare workers, members of the public are urged to raise such concerns through lawful and appropriate channels. Taking the law into one's own hands is unacceptable and undermines the values enshrined in our democratic Constitution," said Nomonde Mnukwa, acting government spokesperson. "Such actions stand in direct violation of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, which affirms the foundational values of human dignity, equality, and the advancement of human rights and freedoms. Section 27(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, clearly provides that: 'Everyone has the right to have access to healthcare services'. This right is not subject to an individual's nationality or immigration status." She said denying individuals healthcare based on their origin is a violation of South Africa's laws and values as a nation. Additionally, Mnukwa said South Africa is a signatory to several regional and international agreements that aim to ensure access to healthcare for its citizens and, in some cases, for individuals within its borders. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
