Could Trump tariffs become BRIC-building blocks? McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida - U.S. President Donald Trump has the so-called 'BRIC' group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing "anti-American" policies.
Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire.
The White House said on Wednesday that it will impose an additional 25% tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50%, among the highest rate faced by any U.S. trading partner.
Brazil also faces 50% tariffs on many of its U.S.-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a "witch hunt" against his ally, Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022.
This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favor. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the European Union.
But hitting these 'BRICS' economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had.
THE 50% CLUB
The original BRIC nations - Brazil, Russia, India and China - held their first summit in 2009, eight years after former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the acronym for this group of emerging economies he said would challenge the G7 group of rich countries in the future.
South Africa became the 'S' in BRICS two years later, and the club now comprises 11 countries including Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as a further nine 'partner' countries including Malaysia, Nigeria, and Thailand.
It was always a disparate group - geographically, economically, culturally, and politically - meaning its cohesiveness has always been questionable. Its relations have sometimes been rocky, particularly among its largest members.
That's why it was so notable when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday announced that he will visit China for the first time in over seven years. This could be a sign that rising tensions with Washington are helping to thaw frosty ties between New Delhi and Beijing.
Also on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters that he plans to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to Trump's tariffs.
"I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation ... so we can make a decision," Lula said. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have ten countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies.
UNITED FRONT
While nothing unites like a common enemy, the differences between the BRICS countries could limit how solid that front can actually be.
Stephen Jen, CEO and co-CIO of Eurizon SLJ Asset Management in London, posits that trade links between the five core BRICS nations - never mind the historical, political and cultural ties - are weak.
Only 14% of their trade is with each other. Russia and Brazil may have higher levels of intra-BRICS trade, but only 9% of China's exports are BRICS-bound, significantly less than the 19% that goes to emerging Asia and 15% destined for the U.S. And in economic, political and military terms, China matters far more than the others on the global stage.
"BRICS is more of an alliance on paper, not in reality," Jen says.
But there are signs that intra-BRICS trade is strengthening. China-Russia trade was a record $244.8 billion last year, and China and India are the biggest two buyers of Russian oil. China is Brazil's largest trading partner, accounting for 28% of Brazil's exports and 24% of its imports. Roughly 70% of China's soybean imports are from Brazil.
TENUOUS ALLIANCE
Trump's tariffs could push BRICS countries closer together in the near term, in areas such as trade, investment, and currency usage. They may feel it's in their economic interests and, for some, in their political interests, to present a united front.
How long that front can hold is anyone's guess. These countries, particularly India, may resist moving further under China's influence, and Russia's pariah status could limit further integration beyond commodity imports.
In the meantime, however, Trump's tariff salvos are BRICS-bound. How these emerging economies respond could be an indication of whether we may truly be seeing a reshuffling of global alliances.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump's gold tariffs accelerate Bitcoin's rise to record highs
Bitcoin is fast approaching uncharted territory, with prices surging as US President Donald Trump's steep tariffs on imported gold bars jolt traditional safe-haven markets and redirect capital into the world's largest cryptocurrency. A potent mix of macroeconomic shifts, institutional inflows, and policy reforms is propelling Bitcoin to the forefront of global finance, redefining its role as 'digital gold.' Early Monday, Bitcoin jumped more than 3.3 per cent to $122,150, according to TradingView, inching closer to its all-time high of $123,000 set earlier this summer. The rally followed Trump's decision to impose a 39 per cent tariff on imported gold — a move that disrupted bullion markets and sparked a flight of capital into digital assets immune to border taxes, storage limitations, and sudden regulatory changes. The gold tariff shock came alongside Trump's announcement of a 90-day extension on the pause for tariffs against Chinese goods, delaying a previous August 12 deadline. The reprieve briefly boosted risk sentiment in broader markets, but for Bitcoin, the more decisive factor was the blow to gold's appeal as a crisis hedge. Analysts say the shift is clear. 'For years, gold has held the mantle of crisis hedge,' said Nigel Green, CEO of global financial advisory group deVere. 'But when tariffs raise the cost of a physical asset, Bitcoin's frictionless nature — immune to taxes, borders, and policy whims—becomes exponentially more compelling. Trump's gold tariffs didn't just shift investor behaviour, they turbocharged Bitcoin's evolution into digital gold.' Institutional flows tell the story. In July alone, $14.9 billion poured into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) globally, with a record $12.8 billion heading into US spot funds. The scale of this investment underscores a growing conviction that Bitcoin is not just a speculative trade, but a strategic portfolio allocation in an era of political and economic volatility. 'Institutional capital doesn't move lightly,' Green noted. 'When a macro shock changes the economics of traditional havens like gold, digital alternatives suddenly look like necessities. Bitcoin is benefitting from both clarity in US policy and a growing recognition among institutions that value can—and should—exist outside the constraints of legacy systems.' Trump's policies are also actively supporting this shift. A recent executive order now allows cryptocurrencies in 401(k) retirement plans — a potential gateway to as much as $9 trillion in retirement assets. While this development was not the sole catalyst for Monday's surge, market participants say it strengthens the narrative of Bitcoin as a legitimate, long-term store of value. Henrik Andersson, chief investment officer at Apollo Crypto, said the breakout was 'overdue' after a month-long consolidation between $115,000 and $120,000. 'We have seen positive ETF flows, more treasury companies buying Bitcoin, and a number of positive developments coming out of the White House,' he said. 'In our view, it was just a matter of time before it would break up.' Beyond executive action, recent bipartisan legislation — the Genius Act and the Clarity Act — has further reassured investors by cementing the regulated status of cryptocurrencies in the US. This policy stability, coupled with geopolitical tensions and gold market disruptions, is fuelling a broad-based rally across digital assets. According to CoinMarketCap, total cryptocurrency market capitalisation rose nearly 2 per cent in the past 24 hours to $4.02 trillion, with trading volumes climbing almost 6 per cent to $176.88 billion. Ethereum, Solana, Tron, Dogecoin, and Hyperliquid gained up to 6 per cent, while smaller tokens like Pump(dot)fun, Lido DAO, and Ethena rallied between 10 and 16 per cent. The price momentum is also attracting longer-term investors, with some rebalancing portfolios away from physical assets vulnerable to political interference. 'If gold—once untouchable—is now vulnerable to regulatory shifts, digital alternatives are not just attractive, they're increasingly inevitable,' said Green. 'Trump's tariffs have helped rewrite the hierarchy of store-of-value assets.' Market strategists warn that the coming weeks could be pivotal. Bitcoin's ability to decisively clear the $123,000 threshold may set the tone for its next growth phase. Crypto analyst Altcoin Sherpa outlined two likely short-term scenarios: a gradual pullback to form a stronger base, or a sharp liquidity test near $120,000 influenced by Treasury movements and broader economic indicators. All eyes are now on mid-August US inflation data, with consumer and producer price reports expected to shape the Federal Reserve's September rate decision. A rate cut—currently seen as increasingly likely—could further weaken the dollar and provide another tailwind for Bitcoin. For now, Bitcoin's rally is being framed as more than a speculative spike. It is, in the eyes of many market participants, a structural reallocation of capital in response to the changing economics of safety and trust in the financial system.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
‘I felt useless and needed to do something': UK MP on letter to triggering Palestine recognition move
A call from a friend in Gaza to an influential Labour MP was instrumental in Britain's historic move towards recognising the Palestinian state, she has told The National. Just days before the UK government announced its first steps in recognising the state, Sarah Champion received a phone call from a friend who told the politician that after months of struggling to find food in Gaza 'my family are just waiting to die', and everyone they knew felt the same. 'To lose hope is a horrific thing, I felt useless and knew I needed to do something to try and restore it,' Ms Champion told The National. The next steps she took were to have a decisive impact on Britain recognising Palestine as a sovereign nation and influencing President Donald Trump's view that starvation was genuine in Gaza. Had to act quickly The call taken by Ms Champion, chairwoman of Parliament's international development committee, was on Wednesday, July 23. The situation in Gaza was visibly deteriorating, with pictures of starving children shared on social media. There was a growing consensus to rein in Israel's actions, she felt, including its plans to further annex occupied West Bank territories. With parliament heading into summer recess Ms Champion had to act quickly if she was to maximise pressure on the government. She knew that very senior cabinet members − including the Foreign Secretary David Lammy − were dismayed by Israel's dismissal of their concerns and had been quietly lobbying Prime Minister Keir Starmer for Palestine recognition. If she could garner enough cross-bench parliamentary support then that could provide the impetus for a major political step. Message blitz Ms Champion and her team went to work sending WhatsApp messages and emails to fellow MPs to sign a letter that called on Mr Starmer to recognise Palestine. 'I was amazed how many we got, and in such a short space of time – just 30 hours – but I think it is a clear representation of the strength of feeling in Parliament in support of the Palestinian plight,' she said. The following night, France suddenly announced it would recognise Palestine, and by 5pm on the Friday she had amassed a record number of 221 signatures from MPs representing nine different parties. 'UK recognition would have a significant impact due to our historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council, so we urge you to take this step,' the MPs said. Key to the gathering of signatures was the respect held by fellow MPs from all parties for Ms Champion, who has been consistently outspoken on the plight of Palestinians. With this in mind, Mr Starmer knew he had to respond quickly and while he did not immediately agree, he did use new language condemning Israel's 'disproportionate military escalation in Gaza' that was 'indefensible'. 'Set the agenda' However, with US President Donald Trump landing in Scotland just a few hours later, now was not the time to initiate a political earthquake. But having the American leader in Britain was useful as he would be meeting Mr Starmer on the Monday, by which time after continued weekend reports of the grim situation in Gaza, 255 MPs had now signed the letter. The letter, according to Ms Champion, had 'set the agenda for journalists when Trump came to the UK', and this made the President more aware of the dire situation. In the press conference with Mr Starmer, Mr Trump stated 'that's real starvation stuff, I see it, and you can't fake that,' adding 'we have to get the kids fed'. The letter had been 'a significant factor in his comments around believing starvation was occurring in Gaza', claims Ms Champion. Indication of urgency More important was the letter's impact on the British government's decision on July 29, just after Mr Trump left Scotland, to set out its steps towards recognition. 'The letter gave them an indication of the urgency, and I am glad they listened,' Ms Champion said. While Britain's move was met with fury from Israel, she argued that it sent a 'clear signal' that the UK believed 'Palestine is a viable state and needs to be treated as such; with all the protections and rights afforded to other nations'. 'To have a two-state solution, you have to have two states,' she added. 'And the Israeli cabinet needs to understand the status quo is neither acceptable nor going to continue.' Israel also needed to secure a ceasefire and work for a lasting peace that 'enables both countries to feel safe and respected', added the MP for Rotherham, in northern England. Britain, unless Israel meets certain conditions will now be joined by France, Canada, Australia and Malta at the UN General Assembly next month in recognising Palestine, taking the total of countries that do so to 152.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Cash held by US companies halved since 2021 amid high interest rates, data shows
Cash allocations by U.S. corporations have halved since 2021 as elevated interest rates prompt a shift to higher-yielding treasury bills, data from Clearwater Analytics showed on Tuesday. Median allocations to cash - which includes hard currency, money market funds and 90-day treasury bills - dropped to 20% at the end of July from 40% in 2021, according to a report encompassing around 800 of the investment management software maker's U.S. corporate clients with a combined $1.3 trillion in assets. This marks the lowest level in Clearwater's system in at least eight years. Excluding very short-term treasury bills, median allocations to U.S. treasuries surged from 3% to 20% over the same period. Chief financial officers are trying to secure higher yields before the U.S. Federal Reserve resumes interest rate cuts, a prospect bolstered by the July jobs report, while also balancing the need for liquidity. A lot of the companies are holding these bonds to maturity, Matthew Vegari, Clearwater's head of research, told Reuters. Short-dated T-bills are quickest to adjust to rate changes, pushing companies toward longer durations for higher yields. "Corporations are still adding duration because they know the duration risk is minimal, because the likelihood that the Fed hikes is much lower than the likelihood that the Fed cuts," Vegari said. Weighted by time to maturity, median portfolio durations rose to 0.61 years at the end of July, from 0.45 years at the start of 2021. The higher-for-longer interest rate environment is "a headwind for those who need to borrow, and it's a tailwind for those who have the cash on their balance sheets and just want to get passive income that is completely risk-free," Vegari added.
