Sugar cartelisation case hearing rescheduled on mills' request
The hearings, initially fixed for August 4-7, will now take place from September 22-25, 2025.
Over 70 sugar mills requested postponement of hearing, the CCP said in a press release. The adjournment was sought on grounds that over 50 mills have filed appeals against the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) order in the Supreme Court, while others cited unavailability of legal representatives due to the Supreme Court's summer recess.
While the CCP had scheduled day-to-day hearings in line with the directions of the CAT, it has allowed a one-time postponement in the interest of fairness and to ensure due opportunity for all parties to present their case.
The commission will not entertain further delays, and in case of non-appearance or repeated adjournment requests, ex-parte proceedings may be initiated.
Notices issued to sugar mills for rehearing in cartelisation case
The proceedings pertain to show cause notices issued in November 2020 to PSMA and its member mills for alleged cartelisation and anti-competitive conduct. Hearing notices were most recently issued on July 9 in compliance with CAT's May 21 order, which directed the commission to rehear the matter before a member or chairperson not part of the original bench.
Rs44bn penalty on sugar mills: CAT remands case to CCP for rehearing
It may be recalled that in 2021, the CCP had imposed a penalty of Rs44 billion on PSMA and its member mills for cartelisation. The order was later set aside by the tribunal, which held that the casting vote exercised by the then chairperson in a 2-2 deadlock was not permissible under the Competition Act, 2010 in quasi-judicial proceedings.
CCP 'unearths' sugar cartel
CCP 'unearthed' a cartel in the sugar industry through an extensive enquiry in October 2020, which concluded that the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) has been acting as a front runner for cartelisation in the sugar industry since 2010.
The CCP's enquiry report concluded, while determining the causes behind the sugar shortage/crisis and price hike, that the sugar mills were using the PSMA platform to take a collective decision to use exports as a means of sustaining or controlling prices or 'keeping it stable'.
The enquiry has concluded that the hike in sugar prices appears to be the direct result of misreporting in sugar stock positions (of which PSMA was aware of) that led to a decision to delay sugar imports.
The enquiry report observed that the decision not to import in a timely manner caused a rise in sugar prices between, July to September 2020 by Rs11.6 per kg.
Report accuses sugar millers of acting like cartel
The CCP has the evidence that indicates that in 2019 only, the domestic price of sugar hiked by Rs18/kg due to the commodity's export, while the sugar barons made an additional gain of Rs40 billion in revenue in addition to payment of Rs29.22 billion as subsidy to them.
The enquiry report said that evidence gathered during raids on the premises of the PSMA and the JDW Sugar Mills seems to suggest these anti-competitive activities have continued since 2010.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Home appliance companies pay Rs90mn fine for engaging in anti-competitive conduct: CCP
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has received a total amount of Rs90 million from two electronic home appliance brands, paid against the penalties imposed for engaging in anti-competitive conduct. The penalties were imposed after the CCP concluded that both companies had violated competition law by restricting their dealers from selling products below specified prices, offering discounts, or providing package deals — practices that limited price competition in the market, the CCP said in a press release. Household appliances sector: Tribunal upholds CCP's order against price fixing Although the companies challenged the CCP's order before the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT), the tribunal upheld the commission's findings and directed the companies to deposit the penalty amount within 30 days. 'The CCP reiterates its warning to all undertakings to refrain from price-fixing practices, including setting minimum or maximum resale prices and placing restrictions on discounts or promotional offers. Such conduct constitutes a serious infringement of the Competition Act, 2010, and undermines free market competition,' the CCP said.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
PTCL fails to address CCP concerns over Telenor merger
Listen to article Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) has failed to adequately respond to key questions raised by the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), a mandatory prerequisite before it can secure regulatory approval for its planned merger with Telenor Pakistan. During a public hearing conducted on Tuesday conducted by CCP, PTCL's management was unable to provide clarity on various financial, regulatory, and strategic aspects of the proposed transaction, including a dubious $1 billion investment plan. Sources told The Express Tribune that the CCP raised three core concerns during the session. The first question related to the proposed business plan worth $1 billion. PTCL and its subsidiary Ufone are both currently operating at a loss, while Telenor's financial condition also remains weak. The CCP raised a fundamental question, given that PTCL had arranged a loan to acquire Telenor in the first place, how is it planning to arrange financing worth $1 billion after the merger takes place? Further doubts were cast over the absence of any investment timeline in PTCL's proposed business plan. This omission raised serious concerns over the plan's feasibility and credibility. PTCL claims that Ufone will expand its network and tower infrastructure after the merger, but the CCP pointed out that a larger network alone does not guarantee profitability. It further questioned what PTCL intends to do with the acquired towers and whether it was considering selling them, use them to raise capital, or integrate them operationally. In addition, regulatory accounting issues also came under scrutiny. The CCP said that PTCL must submit the consolidated regulatory accounts for both Ufone and Telenor to the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) post-acquisition. PTCL failed to offer satisfactory answers during the hearing and has requested more time to prepare a comprehensive response. According to a CCP statement, the hearing was part of proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Competition Act, 2010. PTCL's senior management appeared before the CCP bench and presented a detailed overview of its claimed efficiencies, regulatory filings, and proposed structure for acquiring 100% shareholding in Telenor Pakistan (Private) Limited and Orion Towers (Private) Limited. The CCP bench, comprising of CCP Chairman Dr Kabir Ahmed Sidhu, Member Salman Amin, and Member Abdul Rashid Sheikh, posed several probing questions to assess the merger's broader implications on competition and consumer welfare. PTCL has long been providing cross-subsidies to Ufone, but the government now seeks to scrutinise Ufone's accounts before approving the proposed merger plan. Ufone's financial losses were absorbed by PTCL, which in turn prevented the parent company from distributing dividends to its shareholders. Despite this, Ufone's management and board of directors continued to enjoy full perks and privileges. Although government nominees have held seats on Ufone's board, they have never questioned the persistent losses. The country's anti-trust watchdog has also asked PTCL to submit Ufone's financial accounts. While Ufone did comply, the submitted records were reportedly too complex to evaluate effectively.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Sweet profits, sour costs
EDITORIAL: You don't need to be a forensic economist to see through the sugar sector's game. Prices don't climb this high without a plan. And this one's been refined over decades — export surplus sugar, engineer a local shortage, drive up prices, and cash in all over again. That's not free-market economics. That's policy-enabled profiteering. The state, once again, finds itself chasing shadows of accountability after the damage is done. Now, as sugar touches Rs 200 per kilo, a parliamentary committee is finally considering what should've been obvious years ago: a tax on windfall profits of sugar millers. Just like the banking sector, where unexpected interest rate-driven gains were rightly taxed, the sugar industry too must be held to account. Because this isn't just a matter of market fluctuations; it's a carefully timed cycle that rewards the few while punishing the many. The sugar sector has always enjoyed a unique kind of immunity. Every time prices spiral, every time there's a crisis, the same groups are involved — and they're never far from political power. That's why the old quip goes: sugar is always in government, no matter who wins the election. And with the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) acting as a shadow ministry, it's hardly a secret that policy has long been shaped to protect producers, not consumers. Just look at the facts. The government had an agreement in place: a fixed ex-mill price with a modest monthly increment. But several mills refused to honour it. At the same time, insiders inflated carry costs based on outdated interest rates, exaggerated holding burdens, and lobbied aggressively for exports. With global prices running Rs30–40/kg higher and no sales tax on exports, the incentive to sell abroad was too strong to resist; even if it meant throwing the local market under the bus. That export window, predictably, triggered domestic scarcity. Now the government is floating import tenders at inflated rates, while millers walk away with their margins intact. It's a textbook case of regulatory failure — or worse, regulatory capture. This is why the windfall tax must go ahead. Not as a populist gesture, but as a structural correction. It must serve as a warning to all rent-seeking industries that exploit weak oversight and political connections. Taxing supernormal profits won't solve everything, but it's a start. It creates space for accountability, and helps plug some of the fiscal leakage caused by elite capture. The sugar lobby has long argued that the industry supports agriculture, generates employment, and contributes to GDP. All true. But that doesn't grant it the right to sabotage the market. If anything, the public cost of its manipulations, in inflation, lost productivity, and consumer distress, far outweigh the private benefits it generates. The proposed inquiry into beneficiaries of the latest price spike, and the consideration of a multi-party probe into export dynamics, must be welcomed — and more importantly, protected from political interference. The trend of overstated surplus, underreported stock, and manipulated price floors cannot continue unchecked. Pakistan doesn't need a war on sugar. It needs fair play. If the sector is to remain viable, it must compete, not collude. If millers want access to subsidies, export permissions, and policy support, they must accept regulatory scrutiny, market transparency, and tax fairness. There's still time to correct course. The state is required to assert itself, not just as a responder to crisis, but as a steward of equitable growth. Let the sweet profits flow, but not at the cost of souring the social contract. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
