Tesla sued over Model S crash that killed three in New Jersey
Tesla was sued on Monday by the estates of three people killed last September when their 2024 Model S equipped with Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features crashed on New Jersey's Garden State Parkway.
The wrongful death lawsuit filed in the federal court in Camden, New Jersey, attributed the deaths of David Dryerman, 54; his wife Michele, 54; and their daughter Brooke, 17, to the car's 'defective and unreasonably dangerous design.'
Brooke's older brother, Max Dryerman, was not in the car, and is also a plaintiff. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
Tesla, led by billionaire Elon Musk, did not immediately respond to requests for comment after market hours. The plaintiffs' lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Musk's company, based in Austin, Texas, has long faced questions about the safety of its self-driving technology.
Tesla has said its features are meant for 'fully attentive' drivers with their hands on the steering wheel, and that the features do not now make its vehicles autonomous.
Under pressure from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Tesla agreed in December 2023 to recall more than 2 million vehicles in the United States to add safeguards to its Autopilot advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS).
According to published reports, the Dryermans were returning from a music festival on September 14, 2024, when their Model S ran off the road in Woodbridge Township, New Jersey, hitting a sign, guardrail and concrete bridge support.
The complaint said the car's defective design caused it to stray from its lane of travel and fail to apply emergency braking, resulting in the crash.
It also said Tesla failed to warn David Dryerman, who was driving, that his Model S was unsafe, citing Musk's statement in 2016 that Autopilot was 'probably better' than human drivers.
The Dryermans were wearing seat belts, according to the complaint.
'Thousands of Tesla drivers have relied on Tesla's ADAS technology as though it were capable of safe, fully autonomous self-driving with minor software updates when in fact it is incapable of safely handling a variety of routine roadway scenarios without driver input,' the complaint said.
The case is Dryerman et al v Tesla Inc, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey, No. 25-11997.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler and Matthew Lewis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Tesla Just Achieved a Big Milestone With Its Robotaxi Launch. But There's Another Potential Speed Bump Fast Approaching.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) and its CEO Elon Musk recently achieved a big milestone -- they launched the company's first self-driving robotaxis for paying customers in Austin, Texas. It's an initiative that Musk first discussed in 2016. While it looks more like a soft launch, it's still a big step for Tesla, which plans to launch a fully autonomous robotaxi fleet. Many investors think that could be a massive new business for the company that will justify Tesla's monster valuation. Still, Tesla has a lot going on right now. Remember, the company's core business is still electric vehicles (EVs), and that business is facing a critical event in just a few weeks' time. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Q2 EV Deliveries to soon be announced Tesla is expected to announce its second-quarter EV delivery figures in the first week of July. As many investors likely recall, first-quarter deliveries came in at roughly 337,000, its lowest quarterly number in over two years. Many investors have been concerned that Musk's close ties to President Donald Trump and his period of leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have alienated a significant portion of Tesla's potential customer base. While Musk has stepped down from his work with DOGE to refocus on his businesses, data thus far on Tesla's sales in the second quarter has been less than encouraging. Monthly sales data from Europe showed that Tesla's sales once again faltered in April in countries including the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal, Sweden, and France. Other data suggests that its sales in China have struggled in the second quarter as well. Aside from politics and brand image, Tesla may also be struggling there as a result of increasing competition from competitors like BYD, which has grabbed a dominant market share in China. BYD's EVs are cheaper and its newest tech can charge faster than Tesla's. These factors, in my opinion, will pose a bigger problem for Tesla than its brand or political issues, which are likely to fade over time. Wall Street analysts are modeling for second-quarter deliveries of roughly 400,000, which would be an improvement from the first quarter, but a 10% year-over-year decline. However, some analysts don't expect investors to care much if Tesla misses estimates. "The Tesla narrative has increasingly turned to AV/Robotaxi, with investors likely more focused on the planned June 22 Robotaxi launch and Tesla's path to scaling AV than on 2Q deliveries/overall fundamentals," wrote Barclays analyst Dan Levy in a recent research note. Levy is modeling for 375,000 Tesla EV deliveries in the second quarter. Other analysts are more concerned. In early June, Wells Fargo analyst Colin Langan posted a research note suggesting Tesla's deliveries in the second quarter were down 21% year-over-year on a quarter-to-date basis. Langan has a sell rating on the stock and a price target that implies a downside of more than 60%. It's also worth noting that Tesla has become a battleground stock, with some analysts extremely negative and others like Wedbush's Dan Ives very bullish. Will anyone care if Tesla disappoints? At this point, there have been many negative headlines about Tesla's EV deliveries in the second quarter, but the stock is up close to 24% quarter to date as of June 20. As Levy mentioned, most Tesla shareholders at this point appear to be focused on future initiatives like robotaxis and Optimus humanoid robots. If Tesla does underperform on EV deliveries, I think it could suggest that the core EV business has a real problem and is being undermined by more than just Musk's politics, which would present a fundamental problem for the EV business. The stock may not fall much, but then investors will be heavily dependent on the performance of the robotaxi fleet, and reliant upon the Optimus robot business to scale up quickly as well. With Tesla trading at 168 times forward earnings, that bet is only becoming riskier for investors. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See the 3 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The Best Artificial Intelligence ETF to Invest $100 In Right Now
Artificial intelligence (AI) stocks have skyrocketed over the past couple of years as it became more evident that this top technology could revolutionize everything from how a warehouse operates to how scientists discover drugs. The market is set to reach into the trillions of dollars a few years from now, and certain AI companies already have started to reap the rewards -- those selling AI tools and those applying AI to become more efficient or reach new goals. For example, chip designer Nvidia 's revenue has soared in the double digits quarter after quarter, and e-commerce and cloud company Amazon has generated billions in revenue thanks to its AI investments. You may want to get in on this exciting AI story, but it's very difficult to choose just one or two potential winners. The good news is: You don't have to. If you buy shares of an AI exchange-traded fund, you can invest in the best of the bunch with one simple purchase. And the top one to buy right now with $100 is a recently created ETF -- one that's built around the research of one of today's most highly regarded technology analysts. Let's check it out. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » A note about ETFs Before diving in, though, a quick note about ETFs. They trade daily on the market just like stocks so even if you haven't invested in them before, it's easy to get started. The only big difference between buying a stock and an ETF is these funds come with fees, expressed as expense ratios. If the expense ratio is less than 1%, you're good to go -- fees won't eat into your returns. This particular fund I'm about to discuss has an expense ratio of 0.75%, so it fits our criteria. And one more point about index funds: They allow you to instantly diversify, which is particularly important in an area involving a newish technology. This limits risk because if one stock declines, others are around to compensate. Now, let's turn to this new fund that offers you the opportunity to immediately and easily invest in 30 fantastic AI players. Wedbush launched the Dan Ives Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (NYSEMKT: IVES) early this month, building it around the research of top Wedbush tech analyst, Dan Ives. You may be familiar with Ives as he speaks regularly across traditional and social media about a variety of tech stocks -- including AI players. Ives is bullish on the industry and many of its leaders and has constructed an analysis to identify companies that may gain throughout the AI spending cycle. Wedbush has chosen these players for the ETF. They span areas from the building of infrastructure to the actual application of AI to real-world problems -- allowing investors to benefit from each phase of growth. The fund includes chip designers, cloud service providers, software companies, internet players, and more. AI's biggest names AI giants such as Microsoft, Nvidia, and Broadcom hold the three top spots in the Ives fund, with weightings of about 5% or more, so you'll get exposure to the biggest AI names when you invest here. But, importantly, Ives' research offers you access to other companies that may not have been the first on your radar screen, such as ServiceNow -- a cloud platform for automated workflow management -- and Oklo, a nuclear energy company powering data centers. The Ives fund is the best bet right now because it offers you the opportunity to benefit from Dan Ives' extensive research and invest in companies positioned to win in this high-growth industry. And you can easily scoop up a few shares of this fund with $100 since it trades for about $25 right now. Of course, you still could and should look for and invest in individual stocks that are well positioned to win in this AI revolution -- but, to get broad and balanced exposure to the industry, an ETF is a great asset to add to your holdings. And the Ives fund, built on years of research and expertise, is a fantastic one to buy and hold to potentially win from this game-changing growth story. Should you invest $1,000 in Wedbush Series Trust - Dan Ives Wedbush Ai Revolution ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Wedbush Series Trust - Dan Ives Wedbush Ai Revolution ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Wedbush Series Trust - Dan Ives Wedbush Ai Revolution ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and ServiceNow. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: BigBear.ai vs. C3.ai
Nations are rushing to embrace artificial intelligence (AI), and for good reason. As Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang explained, "Countries around the world are recognizing AI as essential infrastructure -- just like electricity and the internet." The Trump administration has signaled that the U.S. intends to lead the world in AI. Two businesses helping the government achieve this goal are (NYSE: BBAI) and (NYSE: AI). Both companies have delivered AI solutions to the likes of the U.S. Army and Department of Defense. But if you had to choose between the two, which stock is the better AI investment for the long haul? Here's a look at each business to answer that question. pros and cons delivers various AI solutions that focus on national security and infrastructure. For example, it provides facial recognition software to many airports to screen passengers for security risks, and it's helping the U.S. Navy construct submarines with its AI-enhanced shipbuilding software. business delivered $34.8 million in the first quarter, a 5% year-over-year increase. It also benefited from the exercise of 2024 warrants to the tune of $64.7 million in gross proceeds. The company experienced leadership changes this year. Its CFO departed in June, and it gained a new CEO, Kevin McAleenan, in January. McAleenan served as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security during the first Trump administration, so his experience could prove beneficial to government business. That said, the company faces some challenges. is not profitable. Its Q1 net loss totaled $62 million, as some of its operating expenses increased year over year. also possesses substantial debt. Its Q1 total liabilities of $198.5 million included long-term debt of $100.6 million, and that was after the amount was reduced by $58 million through voluntary conversions of its 2029 convertible notes. Q1 assets totaled $396.3 million. Diving into offers ready-made and custom AI solutions. Government customers include the U.S. Air Force, the Marine Corps, and the National Science Foundation. It also boasts a sizable non-government business with clients such as ExxonMobil and Dow. The company leverages partnerships to expand its sales reach. Partners closed 193 agreements in 2025 fiscal year, ended April 30. This represented 68% year-over-year growth and 73% of total agreements. As a result, sales rose 25% year over year to $389.1 million in fiscal 2025. The company anticipates that its 2026 fiscal year will kick off with at least $100 million in Q1 sales, which would represent 15% year-over-year growth compared to the prior year's $87.2 million. Like is not profitable. It ended the 2025 fiscal year with a net loss of $288.7 million. However, its balance sheet was healthy. Fiscal Q4 assets totaled $1 billion, while total liabilities were $187.6 million. Choosing between and Although both companies saw sales growth to start the year, the rest of 2025 could be a different story. The U.S. government is cutting budgets. The budget cuts could be damaging to business. The company stated: "The majority of our revenue is derived from federal government contracts." The picture is different with Its federal government bookings represented 26% of the total for its 2025 fiscal year. Consequently, while budget cuts could hurt their effect on its business would be less than their effects on diversified revenue is a plus over but in deciding which is the better investment, another factor to look at is share price valuation. This can be determined with a review of each company's price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue. Data by YCharts. As the chart shows, both businesses possess P/S multiples that are far more reasonable now compared to their peaks over the past year. For comparison, AI leader Nvidia's P/S ratio is 24 as of June 18, which indicates that and shares are attractively priced. That said, P/S ratio remains higher than it was a year ago, while is lower. This suggests that stock is a good value, while its AI rival isn't the bargain it was in 2024. When stacked against compelling valuation, superior sales growth, and strong balance sheet make it the better artificial intelligence investment for the long term. Should you invest $1,000 in right now? Before you buy stock in consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
