Thinking of Buying Tesla Stock? Here Are 2 Red Flags to Watch
Tesla's heavy reliance on Elon Musk adds significant leadership risk.
Increasing competition from established automakers and Chinese EV makers is pressuring Tesla's dominance.
Investors need to be comfortable with Tesla's high valuation.
These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires ›
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has long been the front runner in the electric vehicle (EV) revolution in the U.S. Its innovation, brand strength, and rapid growth have made it a favorite among investors.
Yet, despite its impressive track record, there are two big risks that investors should carefully consider before buying Tesla stock today.
1. The Elon Musk factor
Elon Musk 's leadership is often cited as Tesla's greatest strength -- and, paradoxically, one of its most significant vulnerabilities. Musk's vision and hands-on approach have driven Tesla's technological breakthroughs and ambitious expansion. However, this heavy reliance on a single individual introduces what investors refer to as "key man risk."
If Musk were to step back from daily operations or shift his focus to other projects, Tesla might face challenges in maintaining its momentum. Though Tesla's management team has grown stronger, few executives command the same vision, drive, and public attention as Musk.
Recently, Musk's increasing involvement in political activities has raised concerns about potential distractions or reputational risks for Tesla. While the company has remained operationally strong, these developments underscore the uncertainty around its future leadership continuity. While Tesla's success lies not only with Musk but also with his team, which has executed well on his vision -- no one can build a trillion-dollar company alone -- there is still no clear successor (or a viable management team) . The silver lining here is that the Tesla board has become more serious about finding one in recent months, largely due to the CEO's active involvement in politics.
For investors, this means that Tesla's fortunes remain closely tied to Musk's presence and decisions -- a factor that adds a layer of risk to the investment.
2. Intensifying competition
Tesla might have been an early mover in the EV industry, but its dominance is no longer guaranteed. The industry landscape is rapidly evolving, with legacy automakers and new entrants accelerating their electric ambitions.
Companies like Ford and General Motors are aggressively expanding their EV lineups. For instance, Ford plans to introduce a $30,000 midsize truck by 2027. That price is significantly lower than the average for an EV, and Ford is investing $5 billion in its EV production to make it happen. GM, on the other hand, is working hard on next-generation battery technologies to improve range, charging performance, and cost.
Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers such as BYD are growing their international footprints, particularly in Europe, where Tesla experienced a nearly 27% sales declinein July 2025. BYD's battery technology, government support, and competitive pricing make it a formidable challenger.
In addition, a host of EV start-ups are innovating in battery tech, autonomous driving, and new business models, further intensifying competition. While Tesla is not sitting still -- it is working on becoming the lowest-cost producer by cutting prices to grow sales volume and achieve economies of scale -- there is no guarantee that it can maintain its market share over time.
In short, it's no longer the only player in town.
What does this mean for investors?
Tesla's story remains compelling: It's a pioneer with a powerful brand, innovative products, and potential optionality with some of its long shot bets (robotaxi, humanoid robots, etc). But the key man risk surrounding Musk and the escalating competitive landscape are real concerns that investors can't ignore.
If Tesla continues to innovate more rapidly than its rivals, the company could sustain its growth trajectory. However, any leadership changes or slips in market position could hurt the business and its share price.
While these two risks don't necessarily call for the sale of the stock, they do mean that investors should think carefully before buying the stock today. Tesla stock trades at a significant premium valuation to other carmakers. For perspective, Tesla has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 12.9, compared to GM's 0.3.
Unless you're comfortable with the risks and the high valuation, buying the stock today may not be a prudent decision.
Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $467,985!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $44,015!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $668,155!*
Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join Stock Advisor, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
See the 3 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Lucid's Much-Hyped Gravity Electric SUV Already Failing?
Key Points Registration data can be used as a proxy for Gravity's sales. In six months of production, the Gravity only recorded nine registrations. Lucid has solved its supplier issues and can now accelerate production more quickly. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Everything was setting up perfectly for Lucid Group(NASDAQ: LCID) and its investors. The young electric vehicle (EV) maker, which claims to manufacture the world's most advanced EVs, has recorded six consecutive quarters of record-breaking deliveries and moved past bottlenecks, delays, and disappointments from the past. It was gearing up to hand the baton to its newly launched, and highly anticipated, Gravity electric SUV which was meant to drive deliveries significantly higher in the near term. The bad news? Recent data shows there could be a significant red flag for Gravity sales, but let's dig in before sounding the alarm. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » What's going on? While the Gravity has been in production for months now, registrations of the Gravity remained in single digits through June. More specifically, data from S&P Global Mobility showed the Gravity accumulated only nine U.S. registrations by June 30, while the company's Air sedan totaled 4,780. The latter was actually up a robust 52% year over year. Right off the bat, investors' eyes should widen. Six months of production and only nine registrations? Before we start throwing red flags all over the place, there are a couple of things to consider. First off, it's worth noting the difference between sales and registrations. Registrations are simply used as a proxy to gauge sales when automakers don't break out sales for individual models or regions. But there is a lag time between when a vehicle is sold and when it is registered, so we could be simply witnessing the last bit of data before the flood of registrations comes in. Second, we also have to consider that Lucid acknowledged that most of the initial production models would be used for employees, demonstration drives, and showrooms rather than being sold to individual consumers. Furthermore, we should recognize that even though the Gravity has been in production for six months, even Lucid acknowledges it's not where it wants to be with production, suggesting it could be longer until production ramps up for a noticeable uptick in deliveries and registrations. "This is something I've said before, and I say it again, we're not where we want to be with the Gravity at this time of the year. We actually wanted to be ahead, making significant ... progress every day," Lucid CEO Marc Winterhoff said in an interview with Yahoo Finance shortly after Q2 earnings. The slower-than-desired production ramp-up is significant enough for Lucid to cut its 2025 production outlook to a range of 18,000 to 20,000 vehicles, down from the 20,000 previously targeted. It shouldn't come as a total shock as newly implemented tariffs and trade policy have caused supply chain disruptions, among other headaches, and the automaker specifically said that lack of magnets from China caused much of the damage. The good news As of now, Lucid has managed to solve most of its supplier issues. Lucid is much more confident in its ability to ramp production during the second half of this year, going as far to say that the Gravity would generate the majority of its deliveries. That's a big statement given that there have been only nine registrations through June. Make no mistake, this is a gigantic development for Lucid and its investors. If the Gravity were to flop, long before its next wave of vehicles can come save the day, it would put the company in a dire position. We have to remember that with a far lower price tag compared to the Air sedan, even if it still starts around $96,000 with shipping, it's expected to open the doors to a new consumer for Lucid, and the Gravity could have an addressable market of up to six times that of the Air sedan. The Gravity achieving its desired level of production and deliveries will be critical for Lucid and its investors in the near term, and is absolutely something to keep an eye on. While nine registrations through June is scary to think about, it's not time to raise a red flag yet because of the factors previously mentioned. But the Gravity needs to start selling well -- and fast. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Shareholder Alert: The Ademi Firm Investigates Whether Soho House & Co Inc. Is Obtaining a Fair Price for Its Public Shareholders
The Ademi Firm is investigating SoHo House (NYSE: SHCO) for possible breaches of fiduciary duty and other violations of law in its going-private transaction . Click here to learn how to join our investigation and obtain additional information or contact us at gademi@ or toll-free: 866-264-3995. There is no cost or obligation to you. Shareholders of SoHo House will receive $9.00 per share in cash implying a total enterprise value of approximately $2.7 billion. Executive Chairman Ron Burkle and Yucaipa Companies will roll their controlling equity interests and retain majority control of the business. SoHo House insiders will receive substantial benefits as part of change of control arrangements. The transaction agreement unreasonably limits competing transactions for SoHo House by imposing a significant penalty if SoHo House accepts a competing bid. We are investigating the conduct of the SoHo House board of directors, and whether they are fulfilling their fiduciary duties to all shareholders. We specialize in shareholder litigation involving buyouts, mergers, and individual shareholder rights. For more information, please feel free to call us. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
HYLQ Announces Closing of First Tranche of Private Placement
Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - August 18, 2025) - HYLQ Strategy Corp. (CSE: HYLQ) (formerly, Tony G Co-Investment Holdings Ltd.) (the " Company" or " HYLQ Strategy") is pleased to announce that, further to its press release of July 23, 2025, the Company has closed the initial tranche of its non-brokered private placement financing through the issuance of 3,337,353 units (the " Units") at a price of $1.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of $5,006,029.50 (the " Offering"). Each Unit was comprised of one common share of the Company (each, a " Common Share") and one whole Common Share purchase warrant (each, a " Warrant") of the Company. Each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Common Share at a price of $1.75 per Common Share for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance, provided, however, that should the closing price at which the Common Shares trade on the Canadian Securities Exchange (or any such other stock exchange in Canada as the Common Shares may trade at the applicable time) exceed $3.50 for ninety (90) consecutive trading days at any time following the date that is four months and one day after the date of issuance, the Company may accelerate the Warrant term (the " Reduced Warrant Term") such that the Warrants shall expire on the date which is 30 business days following the date a press release is issued by the Company announcing the Reduced Warrant Term. In connection with the closing of the Offering, the Company paid certain eligible persons a cash commission in the amount of $74,976 and issued an aggregate of 49,984 broker warrants (each, a " Broker Warrant") equal to 6% of the number of securities issued pursuant to the Offering. Each Broker Warrant is exercisable at $1.75 for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of issuance, provided, however, that should the closing price at which the Common Shares trade on the Canadian Securities Exchange (or any such other stock exchange in Canada as the Common Shares may trade at the applicable time) exceed $3.50 for ninety (90) consecutive trading days at any time following the date that is four months and one day after the date of issuance, the Company may accelerate the Broker Warrant term (the " Reduced Broker Warrant Term") such that the Broker Warrants shall expire on the date which is 30 business days following the date a press release is issued by the Company announcing the Reduced Broker Warrant Term. Gross proceeds raised from the Offering will be used to purchase $HYPE (Hyperliquid tokens) for HYLQ's treasury, investments in the Hyperliquid ecosystem and general working capital purposes. All securities issued in connection with the Offering will be subject to a hold period of four months plus a day from the date of issuance and the resale rules of applicable securities legislation. The Offering constituted a related party transaction within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 - Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (" MI 61-101") as insiders of the Company subscribed for an aggregate of 1,300,078 Common Shares. The Company is relying on the exemptions from the valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 contained in sections 5.5(b) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101, as the Company is not listed on a specified market and the fair market value of the participation in the Offering by insiders does not exceed 25% of the market capitalization of the Company in accordance with MI 61-101. The Company did not file a material change report in respect of the related party transaction at least 21 days before the closing of the of the Offering, which the Company deems reasonable in the circumstances in order to complete the Offering in an expeditious manner. Prior to the completion of Offering, Mr. Antanas Guoga beneficially owned or controlled an aggregate of 1,431,825 Common Shares and 321,500 stock options, representing approximately 10.85% of the Company's issued and outstanding Common Shares on an undiluted basis and approximately 12.97% on a partially diluted basis. Following the completion of the Offering, Mr. Guoga beneficially owns and controls, an aggregate of 2,727,589 Common Shares, 1,295,764 Warrants and 321,500 stock options, representing approximately 16.50% of the Company's issued and outstanding Common Shares on an undiluted basis and 23.94% on a partially diluted basis. Depending on market and other conditions, or as future circumstances may dictate, Mr. Guoga may from time to time increase or decrease his holdings of Common Shares or other securities of the Company. A copy of the early warning report will be available on the Company's issuer profile on SEDAR+ at This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the " U.S. Securities Act") or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons as defined under applicable United States securities laws unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. For more information, please contact: Matt Zahab Chief Executive Officer Tel: (647) 365-2867 Email: contact@ This news release contains certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "may", "will", "would", "potential", "proposed" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. These statements are only predictions. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is provided, and is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. For a description of the risks and uncertainties facing the Company and its business and affairs, readers should refer to the Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change, unless required by law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
