logo
Brussels demands UK builds border posts it does not need

Brussels demands UK builds border posts it does not need

Telegraph11-07-2025
Britain has spent £400 million on border posts that will not be needed because of Sir Keir Starmer's reset deal with the EU.
Post-Brexit checkpoints will be rendered largely obsolete because the Prime Minister has agreed to align the UK with EU plant and animal health (SPS) rules.
However, the EU insists that work must continue on four incomplete Northern Irish border control posts.
It says they must be operational before it will finalise the reset deal, even though SPS alignment will make most controls unnecessary.
The Government has calculated that the boost in trade from the reset deal will far exceed the money wasted on the Northern Irish posts.
More than 100 border control posts for SPS checks were built after Brexit, including 41 major sites such as in Sevington in Kent, Dover, Holyhead and Liverpool.
Some £200 million of public money was spent, with a further £120 million invested by ports, which now want millions in compensation.
Work on the four major border control posts in Northern Ireland is on track to meet a government deadline of July.
The Government has committed a maximum of £192.3 million for those facilities, of which £71 million had been spent by February this year.
Northern Ireland continues to follow hundreds of EU rules in order to avoid a hard border with Ireland, including the SPS regulations to which Britain will now adhere.
During the Brexit negotiations, Leo Varadkar, the Irish Taoiseach at the time, warned that a hard border would threaten a return to violence in Northern Ireland.
Checks on British animals and goods entering Northern Ireland were introduced in a new Irish Sea border under the Windsor Framework, negotiated by Rishi Sunak in 2023.
The four SPS posts at Belfast, Larne, Warrenpoint and Foyle were a binding treaty commitment made in 2019 but not fulfilled by previous governments.
Sir Keir promised to complete them in a document of common understanding agreed before the UK-EU summit at which his reset deal was announced.
EU diplomatic sources said ensuring the posts in Northern Ireland were finished regardless of the reset was a red line for the bloc, after Boris Johnson and Liz Truss both threatened to renege on the 2019 treaty when each was prime minister. This badly damaged EU capitals' trust in the UK.
A diplomat told The Telegraph: 'The Commission will keep the UK to full, faithful and timely implementation of the Windsor Framework. It's a point of principle to the Commission and they have member states' backing.'
A European Commission spokesman said: 'The existing agreements remain the corner-stone of our bilateral relationship.'
But he added: 'The EU has not made reference to any preconditions in relation to possible future agreements with the UK.'
Labour believes there will be no reset deal, unless the Northern Irish posts are completed, and that the benefits far outweigh the wasted costs.
It argues the reset deal will add nearly £9 billion to the UK economy by 2040, reduce Irish sea border checks and make it easier to sell shellfish and fish to the EU.
A government spokesman said: 'Our new SPS Agreement, once agreed and implemented, will cut paperwork and checks for goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.
'In order to secure that agreement, it is vital that we implement the existing arrangements for the Windsor Framework and we will continue to work closely with businesses to support them in doing so.'
In a sign of its confidence that the deal will be done, the Government decided to waive new controls on EU imports of fruit and vegetables that were due to come in on July 2.
However, EU sources said there was no quid pro quo with Brussels for a more flexible approach to the SPS posts in Northern Ireland.
The extent to which the posts will be rendered obsolete will depend on the final SPS deal.
There were already some checks on British animals arriving in Northern Ireland before Brexit, and these will continue.
The posts are extremely controversial with unionist politicians who see them as a symbol of a treaty they believe loosens the region's ties with the rest of the UK and makes a united Ireland more likely.
Despite alignment meaning Britain and Northern Ireland will once again follow the same EU SPS rules, unionists say there are still hundreds of European laws the region adheres to that the rest of the UK does not.
DUP peer Lord Dodds said: 'Brussels is also insisting on 'Not for EU' labelling being extended from July 1 on all fruit, vegetables, fish, meat and dairy products entering Northern Ireland even though the reset deal may do away their need.
'Their approach to the UK is one of maximum confrontation whereas the Starmer displays abject acquiescence. The EU insistence on border posts is because trade within the UK between GB and Northern Ireland is under their control.'
On the British mainland, some border control posts are already being mothballed or put up for sale.
The Sevington Inland Border Facility in Ashford, Kent, was built in 2021 to carry out checks on up to 1,300 lorries a day arriving from the Continent at a cost of about £154 million.
The Government is reportedly in discussions with Eurotunnel and the Port of Dover to buy or repurpose the facility.
Last month, the Welsh Government said a £51-million border control post would sit empty until the outcome of UK-EU negotiations was certain. Two other sites in Wales have been scrapped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Labour made any progress at all on irregular migration?
Has Labour made any progress at all on irregular migration?

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Has Labour made any progress at all on irregular migration?

T he number of people crossing the English Channel to claim asylum in small boats has reached a record high. More than ever – some 25,000 – have made the journey since the beginning of the year, and, if this continues, we will see the highest annual total since records began in 2018. A year ago, Labour pledged to 'smash the gangs' and to 'turn the page and restore order to the asylum system so that it operates swiftly, firmly, and fairly'. There has been some progress, but it's fair to say that many feel impatient. Is it really that many? Yes and no. The 25,000 or so who've arrived on the south coast so far this year mean that the number is up by 51 per cent on this point in 2024 (16,842) and 73 per cent higher than at the same point in 2023 (14,732). So the country is well on course to exceed the figure of 37,000 who arrived by these irregular means last year, and the 46,000 in 2021, the prior record. On the other hand, it is far lower than the number of migrants arriving on a visa, entirely lawfully – some 431,000 net (938,000 gross, both figures including students) – and has to be set in the context of the UK's total population of 69 million. The number of irregular migrants last year was equal to the population of Guildford. On balance, it is still the case that migration of all kinds into the UK has been running at historically high levels for some years. Why so high? In terms of the big picture, on total migration, it is simply that the UK suffers from chronic labour and skills shortages – there aren't sufficient young people to replace retirees, so that means there are not enough workers. In addition, there are not enough with the right skills and in locations where demand is high, while those who do have the skills required are not always willing to do the jobs that are available at current wage rates. In the case of asylum seekers, the recent run of calm weather has certainly pushed the flows higher, and there is no shortage of civil wars and collapsing societies that are pushing them towards the UK. The stories about the Afghan refugees that made headlines in July are an extreme example of a wider phenomenon. There are lots of perfectly genuine refugees, in other words, as well as those who just want a better life. Has the government smashed the gangs? Evidently not, and certainly not to the extent required to stop the boats, but the authorities have been given the 'counterterrorism-style powers' and resources that Keir Starmer promised them. At best, it will take time. What about the returns policy? The one-in, one-out deal with France would reduce irregular migration, but it would have no net impact on the overall numbers. It's also relatively small – initially 50 a week, as opposed to the 898 who arrived last Wednesday alone. What happened to 'safe and secure routes'? This idea was quietly dropped by Labour in the months before the election because it wouldn't actually get the numbers down, which is what it's all supposed to be about. Clearing the backlog? Again, it will take time. There were a large number of unprocessed asylum seekers who were due to be deported to Rwanda and were being kept in limbo in hotels, and the number still arriving is such that it's like trying to empty a bath while the taps are running. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, says she has taken on more people to process claims, and some have been returned, either by force (8,590 in the year to March) or voluntarily (26,388 in the same period). International obligations and domestic law, as well as humanitarian considerations, require that all claims be assessed, and again, it will necessarily take time if so many have been left unchecked for so long. Even summary deportation is problematic, and this can also take time if the country of origin refuses entry and there are no third countries available to accept someone. Why don't we use the Royal Navy to tow them back to France? It's not what the navy is for, but also the risk to life is great, and the number of small boats would make the task impossible. British warships or Border Force vessels cannot enter French sovereign waters without permission, and the French government would retaliate. The Royal Australian Navy did take migrants into international waters, but this isn't applicable in the narrow English Channel, so that's not practical either. Why use hotels? Simply because there's nowhere else to put them, and accommodating them in tents in fields, as suggested by the Reform mayor of Lincolnshire, Andrea Jenkyns, would cause even more problems. Hotels are unpopular for understandable reasons, but so is paying to rent private houses, especially as homes of multiple occupation, or using much-needed social housing. Cooper has also promised to end the use of hotels, with the one in Epping that's been the subject of protests now an 'urgent priority'. What do the public think? Concern about immigration of all kinds has been growing, and when the small-boat figures go up, or when there are high-profile incidents involving migrant hotels, as now, the salience of the issue trends to increase in the opinion polls. The most obvious sign of dissatisfaction is the rise in support for Reform UK, even though its solutions – leaving the European Convention on Human Rights, 'sending them back to France', 'turning them back' or sending them to some unnamed third country – haven't necessarily been fully thought through. Indeed, they could make matters worse by encouraging the small boats to make undetected landings rather than surrendering to Border Force and making a claim. This increases the likelihood that these refugees would then end up in the hands of gang masters in the illegal economy, and living in slums, adding to crime. And if the boats were ever stopped, there are other routes, such as overstaying a visa. After all, the small boats only became the preferred method after the Channel authorities made the ports and lorries secure, and then the pandemic – plus Brexit – also made smuggling in vehicles, previously a popular tactic, almost impossible. What no party fully admits is that irregular migration is such an intractable problem that if it were as easy to solve it as is so often claimed, it would by now be a thing of the past. The solution would probably involve using every possible policy lever tried so far, and also introducing identity cards to prevent illegal working – a far bigger 'pull factor' than the welfare system. Another idea would be to allow the immigrants to relieve Britain's labour shortage, which includes unskilled work, thus boosting economic growth and tax revenues. Why not?

Scotland's flagship indie beer festival returns to Glasgow with hundreds of beers to try
Scotland's flagship indie beer festival returns to Glasgow with hundreds of beers to try

Daily Record

timea minute ago

  • Daily Record

Scotland's flagship indie beer festival returns to Glasgow with hundreds of beers to try

The festival returns to Glasgow for the third year in a row next month. Scotland's largest celebration of independently brewed beer is set to return to Glasgow this September. Indie Beer Scotland will bring more than a hundred locally made beers, ciders and spirits to the Clyde Rooms at Edmiston House. ‌ Running from Friday 5 to Saturday 6, September, 2025, the event marks its third year in Glasgow following a successful debut in Edinburgh in 2022. ‌ Organised by brewers from the Society of Independent Brewers and Associates (SIBA), the not-for-profit group behind the UK-wide Indie Beer campaign, the festival is expected to draw crowds eager to support genuinely independent producers. ‌ This year's festival will be split into three sessions across the weekend, with each offering over 100 different cask and keg beers from across Scotland. Alongside the beer, festivalgoers can enjoy cider and spirits from small-scale Scottish producers, all under one roof. ‌ One of the organisers, Ian McGrath of Beath Brewing, says Glasgow has become a key location in the UK's growing independent beer movement. 'We big have plans for Indie Beer festivals across the UK in 2026 but it all started right here in Scotland," he said. "We are hugely proud to be the flagship event for the Indie Beer campaign and to be the festival that showcases the largest number of Scottish beers from independent breweries available anywhere. ‌ 'No big brands, no faux-craft, just great beer from genuinely independent Scottish brewers.' In addition to championing local producers, Indie Beer Scotland has built a reputation for offering quality drinks at fair prices. ‌ Festival organisers have confirmed that all 2024 pricing will be frozen, with a wide range of beers up to 4.5% ABV available for just £4 a pint. 'We are really proud to offer great value for money and to enable everyone to sample the huge range of cask ales, keg beers and lagers available at Indie Beer Scotland, so have once again frozen our prices, with all beers up to 4.5% available for just £4 a pint,' McGrath added. From crisp lagers and light pale ales to robust scotch ales and rich barrel-aged stouts pushing 10% ABV or more, the selection reflects the diversity of Scotland's independent brewing scene. ‌ The festival promises something for every taste, with both session-strength beers and complex, high-ABV styles on offer. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Indie Beer Scotland is also home to the prestigious Indie Beer Awards 2025, with judging taking place just before the festival opens its doors. ‌ Attendees will be among the first to sample the newly crowned best beers in Scotland, with all winning brews available throughout the three public sessions. With ticket sales already moving quickly, organisers are encouraging fans of independent drink to secure their spots early. For those keen to discover new favourites and support Scottish brewers, this year's Indie Beer Scotland is set to be a highlight of the calendar. ‌ Session Timings: Friday Evening 17.30 – 22.30 Saturday Afternoon 11.30 – 16.30 Saturday Evening 17.30 – 22.30 Beer prices: All beer and cider will be priced at; up to 4.5% = £4 pint/£2 half-pint 4.6% - 6% = £5/£2.50 6.1% - 7.9% = £6/£3 8% or above = £3.50 half

Dozens of countries scramble to cope with latest wave of Trump trade tariffs
Dozens of countries scramble to cope with latest wave of Trump trade tariffs

The Guardian

timea minute ago

  • The Guardian

Dozens of countries scramble to cope with latest wave of Trump trade tariffs

Leaders of more than 60 countries have been plunged into a fresh race to secure trade deals with the US after Donald Trump unleashed global chaos with sweeping new tariff rates. Trump's latest blitz triggered a wave of market jitters and fears for jobs in some of the poorest countries, as tariff rates were signed off ranging from 50% to 10%. There was a minor reprieve that opened the door to further negotiations, after the White House said the updated tariffs would take effect on 7 August, not on Friday, the deadline previously set by Trump. The new rates, which Trump sees as benefiting US exporters, create uncertainty for dozens of countries, including longtime US allies. It has also raised fears of inflation in the US. Rates were set at 25% for India's US-bound exports, 20% for Taiwan and 30% for South Africa. Switzerland faces a rate of 39%. The deadline for a tariff deal with Mexico was extended by another 90 days. Stock markets fell on both sides of the Atlantic, after earlier falls in Asia, amid investors fears about the impact on the global economy. Europe's Stoxx 600 was down nearly 2% while the UK's FTSE 100 was down 0.8%. Wall Street opened lower, with the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and Nasdaq all down more than 1% by late morning in New York. The sell-off was exacerbated by weaker than expected jobs figures in the US. Switzerland and chip powerhouse Taiwan are scrambling to negotiate deals after being hit with a 39% rate, one of the highest in the world, and 20% respectively. Canada's prime minister, Mark Carney, said his government was 'disappointed' by Trump's decision to increase US tariffs on Canadian goods from 25% to 35% – with immediate effect – on the grounds it had failed to crack down on fentanyl and to increase border security. South Africa's president Cyril Ramaphosa said he would use the week to 'negotiate as strongly and as hard as we can' and drive down a crippling 30% duty on goods. Some of the world's poorest and struggling countries were hit with punitive rates, including Syria, which faces a levy of 41%. Laos and Myanmar were hammered with rates of 40%; Libya, 30%; Iraq, 35% and Sri Lanka 20%. Would-be EU member states were left blindsided by punitive rates: Moldova 25%, Serbia 35% and Bosnia and Herzogovina30%. There was some reprieve for Lesotho, a country that Trump described a state that 'nobody has ever heard of' when halting USAid. It was facing 50% tariffs, an existential threat to its textile industry but came out on Friday with a 15% rate. Lesotho's $2bn economy is heavily dependent on duty-free exports to the US. The tiny African country declared a national state of disaster after the 50% rate was declared. The Swiss franc touched its weakest in six week after the country was blindsided with one of the highest tariffs in the world, 39%, while the Canadian dollar was set for a seventh straight weekly loss with tariffs going from 25% to 35% amid Trump's unhappiness with Carney's plans to recognise a Palestinian state. Karin Keller-Sutter, the Swiss president, who was celebrating the country's national day, said that she had spoken with Trump on Thursday but that 'no agreement could be reached'. Pharma accounts for 50% of Swiss exports to the US which may have been Trump's target. Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, said Switzerland got the rough end of Trump's trade war. 'The Swiss rate was a shock, and the Swiss government have said that they plan to keep negotiating with the US to secure a lower levy. Chocolatiers, watchmakers and pharma companies are all under threat,' she said. Conspicuous as the only two trading partners listed at a 10% rate were the UK, the first to get a deal with Trump, and the Falkland Islands. The EU's 15% tariff rate as a single all inclusive rate was confirmed in the executive order. In a set back to the EU, cars were left out in the executive order. They are currently being taxed at 27.5% with many EU car companies resuming deliveries to customers in the US after last Sunday's deal with Trump. The new specific rates will apply seven days after the date of the executive order starting 8 August. For goods already in transit or warehoused for consumption before 8 August, the previous tariff rate (10% + MFN rate) will apply until 5 October 2025. Pharmaceuticals were also conspicuous by their absence, given the White House said it had agreed a 15% rate on Monday, hours after Trump sealed the deal with the EU at his Scottish golf course. Pharma chiefs, who have been in Trump's crosshairs for months, were warned to reduce their prices to US patients by the US president. If they refused to step up, the federal government would 'deploy every tool' in its arsenal to protect American families, the White House said. Brazil's tariff rate was set at 10%, but a previous order placed a 40% tariff on to punish the country for prosecuting its former president, Jair Bolsonaro. Cambodia appeared to be close to reaching a deal after it said it would drop all tariffs on imports from the US and order up to 20 Boeing 737s.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store