Holocaust Remembrance Day in Florida bill sent to Gov. DeSantis. What it would mean
The measure is meant to combat a rising trend in antisemitism and attacks on Jewish people.
'Over the past few years, Florida has actually seen over 1,200 reported incidents of antisemitic harassment, propaganda, vandalism, assaults, extremist events, terroristic plots and even murders right here in our Sunshine State,' said Democratic Rep. Debra Tendrich, D-Lake Worth.
Hate crimes against Jews in the United States rose by about 11% in 35 cities in 2024, according to Brian Levin, a research analyst from the Crime and Justice Research Alliance and professor emeritus at California State University, San Bernardino.
In November 2005, the United Nations General Assembly designated that date — which is the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, one of the most infamous Nazi concentration camps — as International Holocast Remembrance Day and urged every member state to honor the 6 million Jewish victims of the Holocaust and millions of other victims of Nazism.
There are currently 27 legal holidays, nine paid holidays and 35 special observances in Florida statutes, according to an analysis of the bill. The most recent new addition was Tuskegee Airmen Commemoration Day, added in 2024 and first observed this year to honor the first Black military aviators in what wasn't yet the U.S. Air Force.
SB 356 says, "In honor of the millions of victims killed in the Holocaust, the Governor shall annually proclaim January 27 to be 'Holocaust Remembrance Day,' which may be observed in the public schools of this state and by public exercise at the State Capitol and elsewhere as the Governor may designate."
Schools are encouraged to provide instruction on that day of "harmful impacts of the Holocaust and anti-Semitism and the positive contributions of the Jewish 41 community to humanity." If the date lands on a weekend, Holocaust Remembrance Day may be observed in public schools on the following school day or another date chosen by each district's school board.
The bill passed unanimously in the Senate on March 27 and in the House on April 29.
While President Donald Trump did not issue a proclamation on Holocaust Remembrance Day in January, he did send a presidential delegation to attend the commemoration of the Auschwitz-Birkenau anniversary in Oświęcim, Poland. On April 23, Trump issued a proclamation on April 23 commemorating Israel's Holocaust Remembrance Day, known as Yom HaShoah.
"On Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day, and during this week of solemn remembrance, we honor the blessed memories of the six million Jewish men, women, and children who were viciously slaughtered by the genocidal Nazi regime and their collaborators — one of the bleakest hours in human history," the proclamation read.
The Trump administration and many Republicans have used antisemitism as the reason for cracking down on pro-Palestinian protests on college and university campuses, and the administrations that don't punish the students enough.
Florida schools already have a Holocaust Education Week, the second week in November, which coincides with the anniversary of Kristallnacht on November 9-10, 1938.
According to the Holocaust Memorial Museum, that was when Nazi leaders unleashed a series of programs against the Jewish population in Germany, including rounding up about 30,000 Jewish men and taking them to concentration camps for no other reason than because they were Jewish. They followed it with a demand for a $1 billion Reichsmark "atonement tax" and many anti-Jewish laws.
Under state statute, Florida educators are required to incorporate lessons on the Holocaust, antisemitism, and the "systematic and state-sponsored annihilation of European Jews."
January is Florida Jewish History Month. Established by former Gov. Jeb Bush in 2003, the month is a time to teach and celebrate the contributions of Floridian Jews to the state.
If signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the bill would take effect July 1, 2025, with the first observance held Jany. 27, 2026.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Florida Holocaust Remembrance Day may include schools instruction
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Severe consequences': Trump warns Putin ahead of Alaska summit
President Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if he determines during Friday's summit with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader is still not serious about ending the war with Ukraine. Trump, who did not specify what those consequences might be, has been reluctant to increase economic sanctions or tariffs on Russia despite his mounting frustration with Putin's intensifying attacks on Ukrainian cities, civilians and indifference to peace talks. Lowering expectations that the sit-down with Putin in Alaska would yield a breakthrough, Trump said that he's hopeful this initial meeting could lead to another that includes Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and, potentially, Trump. 'First, I'll find out where we are,' Trump said. 'If the first [meeting] goes okay, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately.' But, the president cautioned, he won't pursue a trilateral meeting if he doesn't think Putin is acting in good faith. 'There may be no second meeting because if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,' Trump said. Trump's comments came during an appearance at the Kennedy Center and shortly after an hour-long call with European leaders, including Zelenskyy, in preparation for Friday's summit. Trump described the call as 'very good,' and several European leaders were quick to issue statements about the call Wednesday morning to underscore their alignment. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that Trump 'largely shares' Europe's position on peace talks, and French President Emmanuel Macron stated that Trump is indeed pushing for a ceasefire, a top priority for Zelenskyy and NATO. Putin's stubborn refusal to entertain Trump's diplomatic entreaties so far has pushed the president into closer alignment with NATO allies and even Zelenskyy, who he dressed down in the Oval Office less than six months ago. Friday's sit-down with Putin, who many analysts believe is likely to try to repair his personal relationship with Trump in a private meeting while convincing him that Ukraine shares the blame for the prolonged conflict, will put the president's shifting convictions to a serious test. Even as he sought to put the onus on Putin to demonstrate new seriousness about ending the war, Trump downplayed expectations about his own ability to persuade the Russian president to do so. When asked whether he could convince Putin to 'stop targeting civilians in Ukraine,' he demurred. 'I guess the answer to that is probably no,' Trump said.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Demands Thorough Review of Smithsonian Museums so All Exhibits Match Trump's Interpretation of U.S. History
The Trump administration has ordered eight Smithsonian museums to make its exhibits more "unifying" before the nation celebrates its 250th birthday in Washington next yearNEED TO KNOW Donald Trump's White House sent a letter to the Smithsonian this week, directing the institution to ensure its museums align with the president's vision, according to The Wall Street Journal Eight Smithsonian museums have been directed to thoroughly review and update their exhibitions, internal communications, featured artists and more The directive comes with a deadline, as the Trump administration readies its plans for America's 250th anniversary next yearThe White House continued its cultural crackdown on the Smithsonian this week, pressuring the institution to review its exhibits and operations and align them with President Donald Trump's view of American history. On Tuesday, Aug. 12, The Wall Street Journal reported on a letter that was sent by three top White House officials to Smithsonian secretary Lonnie Bunch. According to the outlet, the letter followed up on the directive laid out in Trump's March 27 executive order, titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," which targeted the Smithsonian museums by name. The executive order read, in part, "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology. This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive." The new White House letter offers specifics on how the Smithsonian can achieve "alignment" with the president's vision. Following a thorough review of exhibitions, internal communications, visitor surveys, featured artists, outside partners and more, the museums are then instructed to make updates that replace "divisive or ideologically driven" language with "unifying, historically accurate" content. The directive comes with a deadline, as the Trump administration readies its plans for America's 250th anniversary celebration in Washington next year. The Smithsonian is expected to submit extensive documentation of its review within 30 days before starting to make the expected changes. 'This is about preserving trust in one of our most cherished institutions,' said White House senior associate Lindsay Halligan, one of the officials who signed the letter, in a statement. 'The Smithsonian museums and exhibits should be accurate, patriotic, and enlightening—ensuring they remain places of learning, wonder, and national pride for generations to come.' The Smithsonian was diplomatic in its reply to the White House letter, saying, 'The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history. We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents.' However, The Wall Street Journal spoke with historians who fear that the president's vendetta against so-called "diversity, equity and inclusion" initiatives may have a negative impact on the Smithsonian's ability to give a comprehensive look at U.S. history. 'The Smithsonian museums have never reflected one person's view, or even one administration's view,' Harvard history professor Tiya Miles told the outlet. 'They have reflected the composite research, analysis, discussion, findings of many different people, scholars and researchers.' Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, agreed, telling WSJ, 'If those things are taken out of the hands of historians, the public stands to lose a great deal in having reliable and engaging content that tells a whole and complex story of the American past." Following his March executive order, Trump's White House has already been accused of trying to rewrite history at the Smithsonian. On July 31, The Washington Post reported on a recent change to an exhibit at the National Museum of American History titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden." A section of the display is dedicated to U.S. presidents who have faced impeachment, and includes information about Andrew Jackson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon. (While Jackson and Clinton were successfully impeached, Nixon resigned the presidency before getting to that point.) Since September 2021, the exhibit had featured a temporary label about Trump's historic two impeachments, along with a notice for visitors that read: 'Case under redesign (history happens).' However, the Post reported that the label was removed in July "as part of a content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director." Without no mention of Trump, the exhibit has now reverted back to suggesting that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal,' despite that Trump has more experience with impeachment than any other president. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. A Smithsonian spokesperson told the Post at the time that the Trump label was merely intended to be "a short-term addition to address current events." 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion. Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' Read the original article on People
Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump pledged to move homeless people from Washington. What we know and don't know about his plans
President Donald Trump says homeless people in the nation's capital will be moved far from the city as part of his federal takeover of policing in the District of Columbia and crackdown on crime. With his exact plans unclear, there is concern among advocates and others who say there are better ways to address the issue of homelessness than clearing encampments, as the Republican administration has pledged to do. Washington's status as a congressionally established federal district gives Trump the opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. Here's a look at what we know and what questions remain about how Trump's actions will affect the city's homeless population: How many homeless people are in Washington?It is difficult to obtain accurate counts of homeless populations. On one day at the end of each January, municipal agencies across the United States perform what is called a 'point-in-time' count aimed at capturing the total number of people in emergency shelters, transitional housing or without any housing. The 2025 count in the district put the total at 5,138 adults and children, a 9% decrease compared with the year before, according to Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser. Where will the city's homeless people be taken? It's not entirely clear. Trump wrote on his social media site before Monday's news conference announcing the takeover that 'The homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital.' Asked during a media briefing at the White House on Tuesday where homeless people would be relocated, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said local police and federal agencies would 'enforce the laws that are already on the books,' which, she said, 'have been completely ignored.' Citing a city regulation that she said gives local police 'the authority to take action when it comes to homeless encampments,' Leavitt said homeless people 'will be given the option to leave their encampment, to be taken to a homeless shelter, to be offered addiction or mental health services.' Those who refuse 'will be susceptible to fines or to jail time.' In the past five months, the U.S. Park Police has removed 70 homeless encampments, giving the people living in them the same options, she said. As of Tuesday, Leavitt said only two homeless encampments remained in district parks maintained by the National Park Service and would be removed this week. What are city officials doing for the homeless? District officials said Tuesday they were making additional shelter space available after Trump said federal agents would remove homeless people in the city. Kevin Donahue, the city administrator, said outreach workers were visiting homeless encampments and that the city has a building available that could house as many as 200 people, if needed. Donahue made the comments during a conversation with community advocates and Bowser. The conversation was broadcast on X. He said the outreach would continue through the week with a 'greater level of urgency.' Bowser said that when Trump sees homeless encampments in the city it 'triggers something in him that has him believing our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not.' What are Washington residents saying? Washington residents emphasized reductions in crime in recent years and concerns over the removal of homeless encampments in interviews Tuesday criticizing the federal takeover of the city's police department. Jeraod Tyre, who has lived in the city for 15 years, said 'crime has been slowing down lately' and argued that federal troops would only escalate tensions because they do not have 'relationships with the people in the community' like local police do. Sheiena Taylor, 36, said she is more fearful as a result of the presence of federal forces in the city where she was born and raised. Taylor said she has seen federal officers around her home and on the subway and worries about their targeting of young people and people experiencing homelessness. 'Being homeless isn't a crime,' she said, emphasizing the need for solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime rather than policing. What do we still not know? It's not exactly clear what agents specifically will be tasked with moving homeless people to areas outside the city. There also hasn't been detailed information about how the people will be housed or provided for in new locations. Some advocates have raised constitutional questions about the legality of forcibly removing homeless people from the city. ___ Associated Press writers River Zhang, Christine Fernando, Mike Balsamo and Darlene Superville contributed to this report. ___ Kinnard can be reached at
