Charli xcx Jokes She Would've Left George Daniel at the Altar If He Didn't Cry When She Walked Down the Aisle
In a TikTok posted the weekend of their intimate ceremony at Hackney Town Hall in London, Charli confirmed that the 1975 drummer cried at the sight of her in her bridal dress. Showing off her short, satiny gown and veil — which she paired with some very Brat-esque sunglasses — the singer wrote over the clip, 'When george isn't crying when he sees me walking down the aisle.'
More from Billboard
Charli XCX and The 1975's George Daniel Marry in London
Djo Scores First Airplay Chart No. 1 With 'Basic Being Basic'
Druski Announces Coulda Fest Tour Featuring BigXthaPlug, Young M.A & Soulja Boy: See the Dates
In the video, Charli also walks into a room before immediately walking back out, jokingly implying that she would've left Daniel at the altar if he hadn't teared up during her big moment. 'Luckily he did,' she wrote in her caption.
The British pop star and producer had an intimate wedding ceremony on Saturday, reportedly exchanging vows in front of about 20 guests. According to TMZ, all of Daniel's 1975 bandmates were present, except for frontman Matty Healy.
The big day came about three years after Charli and Daniel first started dating. The couple got engaged in July 2023, something the singer announced on Instagram by showing off her ring and writing, 'charli xcx and george daniel f–king for life!!!'
The event also punctuates a major year of career success for Charli, whose 2024 album Brat reached No. 3 on the Billboard 200, her highest placement on the chart to date. Brat also netted three Grammys for the pop star. Just a few weeks prior to their wedding, both the bride and groom performed at Glastonbury 2025, with Charli commanding The Other Stage solo and Daniel joining the rest of The 1975 for a headlining set.
See Charli's wedding day TikTok below.
Best of Billboard
Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1
Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits
H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
I paid less than $200 for a one-star hotel in a top beach destination — here's what I got for my money
How much comfort are you willing to forgo for a cheap vacation? A British tourist spent less than $200 for one night at a one-star hotel in Miami, Florida — and he took viewers along to see what he got for the very low price. Simon Wilson, who regularly shares his travel adventures on social media, posted an Instagram Reel with over 2 million views documenting his stay at the unidentified establishment in the high-end area of South Beach, where rooms regularly rent for upwards of $500 per night. 3 South Beach is notoriously expensive and one of the priciest areas in Miami. miami2you – Wilson walked into the establishment without a reservation and asked the receptionist for a room with one bed. He revealed that he had looked at reviews online, finding that they were all negative. When he asked why the hotel had such poor reviews, the worker replied only with a sly shrug. The cost of the room with one bed for one night was $149 plus tax, which came out to $184.86. On top of that, the hotel charged a $50 deposit that would be refundable at checkout. In total, Wilson had to dish out $234.86 upon arrival at the one-star hotel. The budget lodgings were revealed to have 80 rooms — and only nine of them were occupied the night Wilson showed up. When Wilson asked the receptionist about amenities, he discovered that there were none — no swimming pool, sauna, breakfast or coffee. All he was getting was the room. 'I have no idea what to expect here,' he said as he opened the door to his room on the first floor. 3 Wilson asked the receptionist, a Brazilian man named Celso, about the amenities at the hotel. @simonjwils/Instagram 'This isn't too bad,' he said. He showed viewers around the room, which included a 'lovely' and small dining table with one chair, bedside cabinets and a remote for the TV on the wall. Moving on to the bathroom, he said the shower/bath looked 'fairly clean' and pointed out that there was a decent amount of soap provided. 'The main thing and the most important thing though is the bed,' he said. 'What's this gonna look like?' After inspecting the pillows and sheets, he deemed it suitable for sleeping. 'I think we might have just had a bargain in South Beach, Miami,' Wilson declared. But people in the comments begged to differ. 'Our man was getting rinsed,' one wrote with a laughing emoji. 'Even half that price would be a rip-off,' someone else said. 'That is a hell of an expensive room considering it is very basic and not even a breakfast or a cup of coffee with it !!!!,' a commenter said. 3 'This isn't too bad,' he said as he entered the room. @simonjwils/Instagram However, many people in the comments also reasoned that the hotel seemed pricey because of its location in South Beach. 'Y'all complaining about the price, but it's expensive in Miami. If you're in South Beach, that's about what it's going to cost,' someone said. 'The price is very normal at last minute in Miami, Florida.. You can't find cheaper than that, either one star or 3 stars,' another wrote. South Beach is notoriously expensive and one of the priciest areas in Miami. According to Radical Storage, premium oceanfront hotels could cost anywhere from $400 to $1,000+ per night during high season. However, booking earlier can result in better prices for visitors. Hotel star rankings are widely used to determine a hotel's quality. In the U.S., a one-star hotel typically means there are only basic room options available with basic accommodations and minimal amenities. These hotels are more about functionality and affordability.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stephen Colbert's cancellation is making Democrats furious!
Why is the Democratic Party so furious about Stephen Colbert's cancelation? That's a question I've been asking myself all week, ever since we learned that the late-night host is losing his show, after CBS decided that $40 million in losses each year is too high a price to pay. This really shouldn't come as much of a surprise to people: It's hard out there for large traditional television organizations. They now face all sorts of competition from streaming and social media, from independent people who are, in some cases, a lot funnier than Stephen Colbert and can do what late-night hosts do for a fraction of the cost. I say there's more fun to be had on YouTube, on TikTok, on Substack, on X and elsewhere. That's how more and more people are getting their entertainment and their news — and late night is going to have to catch up. It just doesn't have the same relevancy, or pack the same punch. So ultimately, this was quite clearly a business decision. But try telling them that. Colbert is certainly acting like this is Donald Trump's fault — isn't everything. In fact, he recently swore at Trump on air, and Jon Stewart went further, singing an entire profanity-laden song about how much he hates Trump. I won't play the clip, because my very patient producers are getting sick of having to bleep every video I've requested this week, between this and Hunter Biden. Now look — even Keith Olbermann, perhaps the most relentlessly partisan, anti-Trump, anti-Republican mainstream progressive commentator on the planet, thinks this was probably just a business decision. He wrote on X: 'If they fired him to appease Trump, why are they letting him remain on the air as a lame duck, with nobody to stop him saying whatever he wants, for the next TEN MONTHS? They may have timed it to use it as a sop to Trump but this is like Phil Donahue getting cancelled.' Donahue being another former commentator, one I quite liked, who was eventually put out to pasture for business reasons. When Keith Olbermann is providing you a much-needed sanity check, you should be very, very afraid. Ultimately, I don't really blame the other late-night hosts — Stewart, Kimmel, Fallon, etc. — for showing industry solidarity with Colbert. But why are Democratic politicians also so upset about the cancelation? And trust me, they are furious. Rep. Ted Lieu is actually circulating a petition telling CBS not to cancel Colbert. Doesn't he have more important things to do, possibly on behalf of his constituents? Sen. Bernie Sanders weighed in as well. Bernie writes on X: 'CBS's billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to settle a bogus lawsuit while trying to sell the network to Skydance. Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO.' Again, he has no evidence whatsoever that this was anything other than a business decision. The show was a huge money loser! I know Bernie isn't a huge fan of capitalism, but generally, when you're losing tons of money, the business pivots. Perhaps under democratic socialism, we'd have subsidized terrible political comedy? And of course Sen. Elizabeth Warren is equally outraged. Seriously, she won't stop tweeting about this. Does anyone think for a minute that various Democratic politicians would be furious if a conservative news channel canceled a conservative show? Or even if a show like the one you're watching right now, 'Rising,' got axed? We speak to perspectives all over the place. I doubt it would matter to most Democratic officials, except maybe to a few friends of the program who've enjoyed being interviewed here. No, the reason the end of Colbert is so infuriating is because the Democratic Party likes the content: And the content of Colbert was reliably anti-Trump. It just wasn't very funny.
Elle
an hour ago
- Elle
Where To Shop The Looks From The Devil Wears Prada 2 (So Far)
Every item on this page was chosen by an ELLE editor. We may earn commission on some of the items you choose to buy. It's been a big week for fashion-minded movie fans: after months of waiting, The Devil Wears Prada 2 has officially begun filming in New York City, and that means that we're already catching glimpses of the highly anticipated sequel. Though most of the plot is still under wraps, so far we know that the story supposedly follows Andy, Miranda, and Emily amidst the 2020s media landscape. The stylish looks are already rolling in—several have been papped during filming, and Anne Hathaway has even taken to Instagram and TikTok to tease a few. So far, the movie seems to be leaning into true New York media style: seamlessly mixing high, low, and covetable vintage grails—like Hathaway's 2011 Jean Paul Gaultier pinstripe suit and discontinued Chanel Velcro dad sandals—without hesitation. However, most of Andy's looks so far are currently shoppable. One standout high-fashion moment so far was Andy's on-the-go look while boarding the Hamptons Jitney. In the scene, she sported a spring 2025 Gabriela Hearst Niki maxi dress, a Fendi Basket Forty8 tote, a Jemma Wynne Toggle Necklace, and a Runway garment bag (a hint that she's back at the famed magazine?). In some of her more casual looks, Andy nailed New York City summer dressing. She was seen stepping out in an AGOLDE denim maxi skirt, Toteme white tank top, and a 2022 Re/Done x Ford mechanic's jumpsuit with an unreleased Valentino Garavani Panthea bag. Hathaway wasn't the only person spotted on set so far either. Meryl Streep, Simone Ashley, and Pauline Chalamet have been photographed in initial looks. Miranda Priestly looked as intimidating as ever in a tan trench, brown leather midi skirt, and pumps. Fans can rejoice again, too: the iconic icy-white wig (originally crafted by makeup artist J. Roy Helland) is back. Ashley's and Chalamet's exact roles have yet to be confirmed, but they effortlessly embodied young and chic twentysomething magazine employees. The Bridgerton actress wore a Monse Harness Tapestry dress styled over a white button-up and paired with Giuseppe Zanotti pumps. Chalamet also looked the part in a pair of gray Maison Margiela Tabi heeled boots, which have gone from a cult status symbol to the It shoe of fashion girls in the last five years. From what we can see so far, The Devil Wears Prada 2 is shaping up to be the biggest style movie of recent years. Fans and fashion-philes can't get enough of the photos slowly trickling in—and the good thing about filming on the streets of New York is that there are certainly more to come.
