GOP Lawmaker Refuses to Read Their Own 'Tanning Bed Tax Break' Out Loud for Democrat in Congressional Hearing
When asked to read the line item during a public hearing Tuesday, Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) refused.
"So that the American public knows what this bill does... Would you please read page 901, line 20?" New Mexico Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez asked Smith.
"I think it'd be better if you read it," Smith responded.
"Oh, he doesn't want to read it. This is in their bill. They don't want to read a line from their own bill," she said, as the back-and-forth continued. "This is amazing."
Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) eventually read the provision aloud: "Section 11106: Repeal of excise tax on indoor tanning services."
Leger Fernandez contrasted the provision incentivizing tanning bed-ownership with funding cuts to vital services in a critique of GOP priorities. "So if you have a tanning bed, you get a little bit of a tax break," she said. "And if you need a hospital bed in rural America, I'm sorry, you're out of luck."
In a more pointed jab, she alluded to President Donald Trump. "There are certain elected officials who appear to have a certain orange hue about them," she quipped, "maybe they want to make sure tanning beds get a little bit of special credit."
"Really, we are prioritizing tanning beds over hospital beds in rural America," Leger Fernandez emphasized.
The tanning bed tax, originally enacted as part of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, was intended to both raise revenue and discourage use of ultraviolet tanning services due to health risks.
The exchange underscored ongoing Democratic criticism that the Republican-led bill favors narrow interests and tax breaks for the wealthy over essential services like rural health care.
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
In High-stakes Summit, Trump, Not Putin, Budges
Donald Trump wanted to go bold -- a high-pomp, high-stakes summit with Vladimir Putin to test whether the Russian leader would compromise on the Ukraine war. In the end, it looks like it was Trump, not Putin, who budged. Putin, visibly delighted as he stepped foot in the West for the first time since ordering the 2022 invasion, made no apparent concession at the talks at an Alaska air base. In a brief joint media appearance with Trump, who unusually took no questions, Putin again spoke of addressing the "root causes" of the Ukraine war and warned Kyiv and Europeans against disrupting "emerging progress" with the United States, the top defender of Ukraine under Trump's predecessor Joe Biden. Trump, who bills himself as a master negotiator, acknowledged there was "no deal" but said there were "very few" areas of disagreement, although he was vague on what they were. But posting hours later on his Truth Social account, Trump said he wanted Russia and Ukraine to "go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war" and not a ceasefire. Trump's own administration had been pushing a ceasefire for months, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky signing on after intense pressure from Trump. Putin had repeatedly rejected truce offers and kept up attacks on Ukraine, seeking to maximize battlefield advantage. Trump had vowed to be firm with Putin after wide criticism of the US president's cowed appearance before him at a 2018 summit in Helsinki. But Putin again found ways to flatter and trigger Trump, who in his second term constantly speaks unprompted about his many grievances. Putin told Trump before the cameras that there would have been no war -- which Putin himself launched -- if Trump were president in 2022 rather than Biden, a frequent Trump talking point. Trump bemoaned the effect on ties with Putin of what he again called the "hoax" of the findings by US intelligence that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, Trump said that "one of the most interesting things" Putin told him was about... the US voting system. Trump said approvingly that Putin -- who has held power in Russia since 2000 and was declared the winner of elections last year with 88 percent of the vote -- told him of the risks of mail-in ballots and said of Trump's 2020 loss to Biden, "You won that election by so much." US election authorities and experts have found no evidence of wide-scale fraud from mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, which Trump, uniquely in US history, refused to concede. Trump's Democratic rivals voiced outrage that the summit secured no breakthrough and said it only served to normalize Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. "By quite literally rolling out the red carpet, Trump has legitimized Russia's aggression and whitewashed Putin's war crimes. It's shameful," said Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Experts said it was too early to write off the summit completely, as much is not known about what was discussed behind closed doors. Trump will meet Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which backs US restraint, said that Trump's critics have been proven wrong in saying he would "give Ukraine to Putin or force Kyiv to accept surrender." "His focus has been and remains getting Putin to the negotiating table. Mr. Trump deserves credit rather than condemnation for his efforts so far," she said. But Kristine Berzina, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, said an initial read was that "Putin scored a victory by showing up, and Trump's limited words and tense demeanor left Putin to control the narrative." "For a man so attached to showmanship, Trump unusually allowed Putin to be the star of what should have been the Trump show," she said.
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Brazil announces $5.5 bn package to counter Trump's tariffs – DW – 08/14/2025
Brazilian President Lula da Silva said the move is supposed to "create new things" out of the crisis caused by Donald Trump's tariffs. But Lula also said his country is still ready to negotiate. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva announced a plan on Wednesday to support exporters who have been hit by high tariffs of up to 50% imposed by US President Donald Trump on several products from the country. The plan provides credit of 20 billion reais ($5.5 billion; €4.7 billion) to support the embattled exporters. Other measures in the plan include postponing tax charges for businesses affected by the tariffs, while also incentivizing Brazilians to buy locally produced goods that would have otherwise been exported to the US. "We cannot be scared, nervous and anxious when there is a crisis," Lula said. "A crisis is for us to create new things." Lula also said Trump has no good reasons for hitting Brazil with high tariffs. While the Trump administration announced sweeping tariffs on many countries around the world, Brazil was ultimately singled out with some of the highest levies of up to 50%. Trump said the additional tariffs were a reaction to the legal situation of his ally, the far-right populist former president, Jair Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest over allegations that he plotted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential election. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Lula did not hold back on the grounds for the tariffs, saying every time the US decides to "fight with someone," they paint their rivals as the devil. "Now they want to talk about human rights in Brazil… We have to look at what happens in the country that is accusing Brazil," Lula added, hinting at Trump's domestic policies. The US president had cited "human rights abuses" by the left-wing government in support of his ally Bolsonaro. Lula responded to the claims, saying Brazil's judiciary is independent, with the country's Finance Minister Fernando Haddad saying Brazil is being "sanctioned for being more democratic than its aggressor." The Brazilian leader has so far refrained from imposing higher tariffs on American imports, saying he is not interested in "worsening our relations with the US." "We like to negotiate," Lula said. "We don't want conflict. I don't want conflict with Uruguay, Venezuela, or even the US. The only thing we need to demand is that our sovereignty is untouchable, and that no one should have any say in what we should do."
DW
2 days ago
- DW
What did the Alaska talks between Trump and Putin achieve? – DW – 08/16/2025
There was no breakthrough at the meeting between the American and Russian presidents. Now it is up to the embattled Ukrainians to decide. But what exactly? Having made no concessions, Putin can return home satisfied. Donald Trump loves to talk, especially about his supposed successes as a skilled negotiator and shrewd statesman. This time in Alaska, things were different. By his standards, the "deal-maker in chief" kept his appearance before the gathered press remarkably short, lasting only four minutes. After his three-hour meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at a US military base near Anchorage, Trump said only that they had had an "extremely productive meeting." They had agreed on many things, he said, with only "one big thing" remaining. "We haven't done that yet. But there is a very good chance that we will get that done too," Trump said in an effort to sound friendly. The US president did not elaborate further. In fact, Trump made no mention of Ukraine by name. Only once did he refer to Russia's war of aggression. "We will end the deaths of five thousand people a week. President Putin wants that too," he said. Trump also failed to mention that Putin, a former KGB spy, could achieve this goal immediately if he stopped the attacks on Ukraine. The guest from Moscow remained extremely polite and calm. Without batting an eyelid, he suggested that the "situation" in Ukraine was about Russia's security. It may sound strange under the current circumstances, Putin said, but everything that is being done to the "brotherly people of Ukraine is a tragedy for us, a terrible wound. That is why our country is seriously interested in putting an end to it." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Putin gave the impression that Russia was under threat and had to respond to "provocations." This is a reversal of the facts, which he presumably also presented to Donald Trump during their talks in Alaska. Many observers who closely follow the mood swings and erratic pronouncements of the 79-year-old US president believe that Trump picks up on and repeats whatever he last heard. The question is, therefore, how far the Russian narrative will catch on. Last Wednesday, it still seemed as if the US president was on the side of Ukraine, which is under attack. According to Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Donald Trump had "largely" agreed with the West's demands on Russia. Merz had organized a virtual preparatory summit from Berlin and formulated five points for the negotiations in Alaska. These included the demand that Ukraine alone should decide on its territory and the conditions for a ceasefire. Trump did mention this demand in his brief statement. He said that in the end, "they" would have to decide, referring to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the leaders of the major NATO countries. Trump announced that he would call them immediately to inform them about the talks. It is unclear whether he will be able to announce any concrete agreements with Russia during these phone calls. On his way back to Washington, Trump told reporters that it was now up to Zelenskyy to reach an agreement with Moscow. Zelenskyy has since announced that he will travel to Washington on Monday "to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war," he wrote on X. He had had a one-hour telephone conversation with Trump, which was then joined by European heads of state and government. 'We support President Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the USA, and Russia,' Zelenskyy wrote. He continued: "It is important that Europeans are involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America." After the meeting, Donald Trump told reporters he had a "fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir." Before the meeting, he had described the Russian leader as a "smart guy." A few weeks ago, however, he also said that Putin talks a lot of nonsense and does not keep his promises, but instead intensifies his attacks on Ukraine after each of their phone calls. However, during personal meetings with the Russian leader, Trump always seems to hold back. No criticism, not even subtle, was heard from Donald Trump's mouth. He is of course far less restrained with other state guests. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump followed Putin's eight minutes of remarks and excursions into Russian-American history at the joint press conference with a kind of frozen smile. He had already displayed the same expression in Helsinki in 2018. At that time, the two men came together for their first long summit meeting. Trump talked himself into a corner and went so far as to say that he trusted the man from the Kremlin more than his own intelligence services. Putin was not stingy with pleasantries in his remarks, praising the great prospects for cooperation between the US and Russia and politely thanking the Trump administration for its efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine. However, he immediately added that the "roots of the conflict" must be eliminated. By this he meant Ukraine's ties to the West, the membership of Eastern European countries in NATO, and NATO troops on its eastern flank. The bottom line is that few concrete results were made public. There was no mention whatsoever of a ceasefire or steps toward one. Donald Trump had announced that if the Alaska summit was successful, there would be a trilateral meeting between him, Putin and the Ukrainian president. But there was no mention of that following the talks. "We may see each other again soon," the US president said vaguely. The Russian leader then invited the perplexed Trump to Moscow in English. "That could possibly happen," Trump said, even if he would face some criticism for it. If Moscow were the next venue for talks it would make it almost impossible for Volodymyr Zelenskyy to attend. Before the summit, Trump had threatened Russia with "severe consequences" if Putin did not move toward a ceasefire. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Whether these consequences will now follow — meaning new, harsh economic sanctions against Russia's business partners, such as India and China — remains unclear. However, the US president hinted that "after what happened today, higher tariffs against China are unlikely." Unfortunately, he did not elaborate on what had actually happened. However, Trump is likely to be in a hurry to continue talks and efforts to bring peace to Ukraine. After all, the Nobel Committee will decide who will receive the Nobel Peace Prize at the beginning of October, in two months' time. Trump is desperate to win it. He made no secret of this in a recent telephone conversation with Norwegian Finance Minister and former NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, according to Norwegian media reports. The Nobel Peace Prize is traditionally awarded in early December in the Norwegian capital Oslo. Trump has already been nominated several times. Even his former rival in the presidential election campaign, Democrat Hillary Clinton, said she would support him. But only if he achieves a "just peace for Ukraine." After the summit in Alaska, Trump still has a long way to go to achieve that.
