‘Serious tradeoffs': Austin considering I-35 covers versus other city needs
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Tuesday, city leaders are slated to discuss whether or not Austin can afford to build covers over the Texas Department of Transportation's (TxDOT's) I-35 expansion project, connecting east and central Austin.
Those covers are called 'caps and stitches' and may look like deck plazas, walking or biking trails or green spaces running over the wider highway.
'These caps would not only stitch our city back together, they would create new, valuable land in central Austin for parks, civic space, and future development. If we fail to fund the roadway elements now, those caps can never be built,' Austin City Council Member Chito Vela wrote in a message board post.
Austin's full capped I-35 'vision plan' could cost over $1B
But Austin's current proposed Cap and Stitch Vision Plan could cost more than $1.4 billion, city transportation officials have previously explained. That doesn't include the cost of operating and maintaining those spaces.
'That would use up our entire capital budget and so we really have to be careful in the investments we're making both in terms of our annual general fund decisions as well as our capital budget decisions,' Austin City Council Member Mike Siegel said on an episode of Inside Austin's Agenda last week.
Austin leaders need to commit funding to TxDOT to build the roadway elements of the caps and stitches by next month, if all goes according to schedule. That part alone could cost roughly $250 million, transportation staff have previously said.
Austin's vote on I-35 cap and stitch funding delayed again amid federal funding uncertainty
'What I want to get into is whether it's worth it compared to the tradeoffs,' Siegel said. He noted the city's financial department has explained, 'we can only ask for so much in bond dollars before our credit rating goes down and the price of debt goes up, basically. And so every $100 million that we dedicated to cap and stitch is instead of something else that we might need.'
That's where the city's possible 2026 bond election rubs against the cap and stitch project. While the city works through a comprehensive bond package that it may bring to Austin voters next year, the amount of money the city may need to borrow for caps and stitches will play a role.
'If we take that [the bond proposal] to the voters in November of 2026, that will require debt. And if we're issuing debt to deal with the caps that we're talking about, that will impact how much we can do on the comprehensive bond package,' Austin Mayor Kirk Watson explained.
That is likely to be a central point of Tuesday's Austin City Council work session talking about the caps and stitches before council votes on its commitment to TxDOT next month.
Inside Austin's Agenda: City Council Member Mike Siegel
'We have about $10 billion in unmet capital needs, we can only spend $1 billion at most, or ask for 1 billion at most in expenditures and so there's going to be some serious tradeoffs,' Siegel said.
Austin leaders are eying a comprehensive bond package that you could vote on in November 2026.
The 2026 Bond Election Advisory Task Force is working through what may be included in that ask of taxpayers. That task force has two appointees from each council office and the mayor. It meets once every month, starting in January of this year.
Austin working early to address 'budget asteroids'; it may mean a tax rate election
'The city has real needs whether it be parks, whether it be road infrastructure…the council has asked for a comprehensive approach,' Watson said.
While the task force is still in the early stages of figuring out what it might work into that bond package, they're gathering information from city staff on what each department may want to prioritize. The task force's March meeting included briefings from city leaders working on transportation, homelessness and housing.
'In July 2025, staff will present the preliminary ranked needs assessment that will NOT include refined project scoping and cost estimating since that work will not have been initiated at that time,' a memo from city staff said.
You can find a proposed timeline from city staff in that memo here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin mayor ‘disappointed' with cost of some tax rate election proposals
AUSTIN (KXAN) — After Austin city council members laid out their proposals for a tax rate election Thursday, Mayor Kirk Watson told KXAN he doesn't like the cost to taxpayers in some of those plans and will only vote to send a tax rate election to voters if the money will fund core city services. 'I must admit that right now I'm disappointed that the numbers we're talking about are higher than I would feel comfortable voting for,' Watson said. 'There could be something that I would vote for that's higher than what my proposal is, but it would have to be funding core basic services in a way that I felt comfortable with.' Austin leaders lay out tax rate election proposals — how much could it cost you? Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a tax rate election (TRE). That's where the city manager's base budget sits right now — at the 3.5% rate allowed without triggering a TRE — which would still mean a total monthly increase of $18.18 per month or $218.16 annually for the 'average' ratepayer and taxpayer. Some Austin city council members are calling for the overall impact to taxpayers to be much higher than that — at the highest end, $267.20 more annually. That's on top of the base budget and would bring the annual increase for the average homeowner and rate payer to as much as $485.36. Those council members want the city to put money toward homelessness, housing, parks maintenance, wildfire mitigation and other services. You can find a full list of proposals and what they would fund here. 'Absolutely. This is a process and we are looking to see where we can come together, what number that might be,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said when asked if he would be willing to come down on the amount requested from taxpayers. He's one of the council members proposing the most expensive tax rate election. Watson also put forward a proposal that calls for a 3.5-cent tax increase, which would raise the average homeowner's property taxes by $138.54 over the city manager's base proposal. Most of the money in that proposal would go toward fully funding the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. 'What I really want us to prioritize, what I want to see a real emphasis on… is now that we have the plan, let's use that plan, let's fund that plan,' Watson said. All of the proposals on the table, with the exception of one, look to fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office's plan. Wildfire mitigation and parks maintenance also appear to be common themes in those proposals. Austin city council will take up their budget and tax rate starting on Wednesday. 'If I'm going to ask voters to raise their taxes to pay for those services I want to be able to ask them to do it for basic, core services and I'm going to be very stingy about that on their behalf,' Watson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin budget discussions begin, property tax election all but certain
AUSTIN (KXAN) — As early as Wednesday, the Austin City Council could approve its budget for next fiscal year and set a tax rate. All but one member of the dais has indicated they support a rate high enough to trigger a tax rate election (TRE). Because of a 2019 state law, taxing entities cannot raise the property tax rate more than 3.5% from the year prior without triggering a TRE. After City Manager TC Broadnax released his proposed budget, which sat at that 3.5% voter approval rate and would not trigger an election, council members and the mayor started proposing alternatives that cut less services but also add to your property tax bill — so much so, you will likely have to vote on that increase in a November election. 'Nobody enjoys paying more taxes but we do enjoy our parks, we do need to drive on our roads. There are crucial, essential things a city has to do and the cost of doing those things has risen,' Austin City Council Member Ryan Alter said. The body will start discussion Wednesday, but it may take until Friday to officially vote on the budget and tax rate. Proposals on the table Wednesday All of the TRE proposals from council members and the mayor going into the meeting Wednesday sat at 5 cents, which would raise the average homeowner's property tax bill by $302.14 annually, $197.92 of that from the TRE. That does not include rates. Midday Wednesday, financial staff also released a tax rate election proposal that combines a number of those council ideas. 'The attached documents provide a financial analysis of a scenario that includes all items that appear to be supported by at least six City Council Members—which would require an additional 4.60 pennies of additional property tax rate in FY 2026 to be sustainably supported over the medium-term,' staff wrote. That staff proposal includes funding for the Homeless Strategy Office's plan, the housing trust fund, Emergency Medical Services programs, funding for parks, public health, sidewalks and funding for overtime at the Austin Fire Department. 'I wanted to make sure that we have the appropriate overtime for our fire department … my other priorities are involving parks and recreation and we keep coming around to the discussion of who gets to qualify for health benefits if they're city employees,' Council Member Paige Ellis said. City council will now debate that staff proposal, and likely another brought forward by four council members which Alter said would be offered as an early amendment. Here's previous coverage from KXAN to keep you up to date: Aug. 12: Get up to speed with the latest tax rate election proposals Aug. 8: Austin mayor 'disappointed' with some tax rate election proposals Aug. 5: Austin leaders lay out initial tax rate election proposals Aug 1: Texas cities, counties may face new limits on raising property taxes July 15: Austin leaders concerned budget cuts too much from community needs July 12: Austin City Manager TC Broadnax releases proposed $6B+ budget KXAN's Grace Reader is at City Hall covering the vote for you. This story will be updated regularly. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Texas Senate passes bill targeting makers of abortion-inducing drugs
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Senate Bill 6, which aims to 'protect unborn children,' passed the Texas Senate on Tuesday. SB 6 would prohibit the manufacture, distribution, mailing, transporting, delivery and prescribing of abortion-inducing pills, as well as allow private citizens in Texas to file suit against people or companies that manufacture or distribute abortion-inducing pills in the state. Abortion is already almost totally banned in Texas. The bill was filed by Sen. Brian Hughes, R-Tyler. A similar bill passed the Senate during the regular session; however, it died in the House. 'The moms are victims here,' Hughes said. 'What we will go after with SB 6 is the manufacturers and the distributors of these drugs that are making them for the purpose of illegal abortions.' In response to the bill's passage, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said protecting life was a priority of his and the Texas Senate. 'We passed SB 6 … to ensure that abortion-inducing drugs are not distributed in Texas for the purpose of obtaining an illegal abortion,' Patrick said. 'The Texas Senate will continue passing this pro-life protection each legislative session.'