logo
A new MP for Runcorn? Bring on Reform, say disillusioned voters

A new MP for Runcorn? Bring on Reform, say disillusioned voters

The Guardian22-03-2025

Spring has finally arrived, and as customers enjoy a drink or two in the sunshine outside Runcorn's branch of Wetherspoon's on a Thursday afternoon, some are sympathetic to the local man in the news who has so dramatically fallen from grace.
'If somebody was mouthing off to me so much, I would have knocked him out myself,' says Jason Baldwin. 'I don't believe he should have lost his job.'
He is referring to Mike Amesbury, who won the Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat for Labour with a thumping majority of almost 15,000 votes in July last year.
That, however, seems an age ago and now the talk of the town is of Amesbury's decision last week to resign, having been handed a suspended prison sentence for punching a constituent. A byelection looms.
'Prescott didn't get sacked,' remarks another Amesbury-supporting drinker, referring to the 2001 incident when then-Labour deputy prime minister John Prescott punched an egg-throwing protester.
'Sometimes you're going to snap,' agreed a member of the group.
'He was somebody that you could trust and go to to get something sorted out,' adds Baldwin.
But support for Amesbury does not translate into backing for the Labour party. Far from it. Ominously for Keir Starmer's party, polls show that Nigel Farage's Reform UK, which came a distant second in the general election here, could cause a sensation and win in this seat when the contest to find Amesbury's successor takes place. That would be a hammer blow to Labour so soon after it won a historic election landslide.
Some of the reasons why opinion is shifting quickly become clear from the pub talk. Baldwin has three children who have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. He fears that this government's planned cuts to benefits, and particularly the tightening of eligibility rules for personal independence payments, will affect his family severely.
'I'd love to have a one on one with each politician and say: 'Come and have a look how hard it is',' he says. 'Most people in Runcorn are thinking about benefit cuts and taxes … This country is going wrong, It needs somebody that can sort this out and look after the people who need looking after. It needs change.'
As Rachel Reeves prepares to announce more cuts to spending for unprotected government departments in her spring statement on Wednesday, these are the kind of raw expressions of anger that Labour MPs are hearing from their constituents all too often.
In their weekly surgeries they confront the human stories. As a result, disquiet is rising on the Labour backbenches, with more and more MPs dismayed that their government seems to be hitting the poorest and most vulnerable hardest in their desperate attempts to balance the books and keep within their self-imposed fiscal rules.
For Labour, the signs are worrying, not only for this byelection but also for wider local elections in May. Nationally, the Tories are now favoured by more people than Labour to run the economy well and 'improve your financial situation', according to the latest Opinium poll for the Observer.
That is a huge turnaround, given the damage Liz Truss inflicted on the Conservatives' reputation for economic management. Local government leaders are warning that, after 15 years of austerity cuts, Reeves may be about to add more misery with further reductions in council budgets, which will feed through to reduced funding for crucial areas, including social care services.
Louise Gittins, chair of the Local Government Association, tells the Observer: 'Local government has made huge savings and efficiencies over the past decade and continues to innovate and transform services to get the best for residents and provide greater value for money. However, without adequate investment, now we risk not being able to deliver crucial services that so many depend on, and our desire to help government fulfil its ambitions for the future are severely hindered.'
Runcorn and Helsby will soon be full of Labour and Reform people canvassing for votes. Amesbury had represented the marginal Weaver Vale seat since gaining it from the Tories in 2017, and won July's general election with 53% of the vote. Reform UK received 18% while the Conservatives came third on 16%. The Green party won 6% and the Liberal Democrats 5%.
In Runcorn's library on Thursday, three friends are meeting for their weekly Scrabble club. They agree things are going wrong in Britain. The debate is already under way as to who would best put things right.
Dave Colleavy, 73, believes that after years of Labour and Conservative control, Reform should be given an opportunity. 'We should give somebody else a chance,' he says. 'We had 14 years of Conservative rule, but nothing's any better, and it's not getting any better at this moment in time.'
His fellow Scrabble player Marian Holt, 70, does not know 'what Reform stands for' but Colleavy insists that the party would be a 'better option than what we have'. 'Why are we just persevering with the same thing?' he asks. 'If it doesn't go well, it doesn't go well, but it's not going well anyway.'
On the other side of the table Rich Bradshaw, 70, also wants change but backed the Green Party as his preferred alternative.
'I think Reform is a worse option,' he says, comparing Farage unfavourably with Donald Trump. 'But it's hard to argue when people say [Labour and the Conservatives] are all the same – it's all soundbites and budget cuts.'
Research on voting intention carried out by Lord Ashcroft Polls last week put Reform ahead of Labour by 42 per cent to 33 per cent among people who said they were certain to vote, and turnout will be key.
During the Observer's visit to Runcorn, all the over-50s spoken to were intending to vote, but younger people interviewed were either unaware of the byelection or said they would not take part.
In Costa, two personal trainers meeting for a coffee are surprised to be told that the local MP has stood down after punching a man. 'It's a waste of time talking about politics, and I don't like politicians,' says one of the friends, who does not want to be named.
'Labour are supposed to be the ones who help us out, and we're worse off with Labour than we were with the Tories.'
The pair want to see more support for young people in Runcorn and the surrounding area, where they say there is little opportunity and 'literally nothing to do'.
'The people who are already rich are all right, but the working man is still getting stung,' says the personal trainer. 'I'm from a Labour through-and-through family, but now Labour are in and there's no benefit.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chancellor Rachel Reeves told to abandon 'austerity' welfare cuts in spending review by the SNP
Chancellor Rachel Reeves told to abandon 'austerity' welfare cuts in spending review by the SNP

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Chancellor Rachel Reeves told to abandon 'austerity' welfare cuts in spending review by the SNP

The SNP says Labour must 'abandon plans to impose more austerity cuts' Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The chancellor is being told to 'scrap the Labour Party's devastating cuts to disabled people' in her spending review later this week. The SNP has written to Rachel Reeves ahead of her statement on Wednesday, urging her to 'abandon plans to impose more austerity cuts' and ensure there are no cuts to affordable housing, policing or the Scottish Government's budget. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivers a speech during a visit to Mellor Bus in Rochdale on June 4, 2025, to announce investments in regional transport (Photo: PETER BYRNE/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) |Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison also told the chancellor to 'change course' and abandon her self-imposed fiscal rules. Yesterday, UK Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Peter Kyle was asked if he could guarantee there would be no cuts to affordable housing and police officer numbers. In response, Mr Kyle said: 'The whole details of the spending review will come out on Wednesday.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dave Doogan MP, the SNP's economy spokesman, has now written to the chancellor calling on her to 'immediately and fully reverse Labour's austerity cuts to disabled people, pensioners and families, and deliver the investment needed to end child poverty, boost public services and grow the economy - instead of swinging the Westminster austerity axe again'. In his letter he also said the chancellor must 'deliver long-overdue funding for Scottish energy projects - including fully and immediately funding the Acorn Scottish carbon capture project, which has faced years of Westminster delays'. Mr Doogan also said Ms Reeves should match the Scottish Government's plan to scrap the two-child benefit cap and the bedroom tax, and introduce a UK-wide version of the Scottish child payment. ​'It's safe to say 2025 has got off to a frantic and varied start. "It is a welcome antidote to get back to the constituency to meet businesses and organisations achieving so much for local people and local economies, in stark contrast to the chaos at Westminster.' He added: 'Instead of choosing more austerity cuts, the Labour government should be choosing to boost economic growth and make fairer choices to help families and properly fund public services. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'At the UK spending review on Wednesday, I urge you to scrap the Labour Party's devastating cuts to disabled people and abandon plans to impose more austerity cuts to public services, including affordable housing and policing, which would hit the most vulnerable and squeeze Scotland's budget.' Over the weekend Mr Kyle said police must 'do their bit' to 'embrace change' as the Home Office and Treasury continue negotiations ahead of the spending review. It is understood Home Office ministers do not believe there is enough cash to recruit the additional police officers Labour promised in its manifesto. He said 'every part of society was struggling' and the chancellor is facing pressure from all sectors - last week Ms Reeves also warned that not every government department will 'get everything they want' and said there were 'good things I've had to say no to'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Peter Kyle | Jonathan Brady/Press Association However Mr Kyle did confirm there would be a boost to spending on schools and scientific research. Over the weekend Ms Robison said the UK and Scottish governments must work together to support shared economic growth and end spending that bypasses devolution. She has called on the chancellor to relax her fiscal rules to enable investment in public services, to fully fund employer National Insurance contribution increases in the Scottish public sector, abandon welfare cuts, and fund the Acorn carbon capture project. Ms Robison said: 'The UK spending review is an opportunity for the UK Government to abandon some of its damaging policies such as cuts to welfare support for disabled people, to scrap the two-child benefit cap and to reinstate a universal winter fuel payment.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She also said she hopes the chancellor will use the spending review to fully fund the increase in employers' National Insurance contributions in the Scottish public sector. Ms Robison added: 'The UK Government should also use the spending review to empower the devolved administrations with more flexible fiscal rules that can enable investment in public services and we need an end to spending that bypasses devolution so we can direct funds to best meet local needs. Finance Secretary Shona Robison presents the Scottish Government's budget at Holyrood | Getty Images 'We called on UK ministers to involve us at an early stage of this process, but since they've refused to provide us with any clarity on their spending priorities it's clear that it's business as usual for Westminster. 'We continue to call on the Treasury to use the spending review to change course, providing the funding we need to deliver for the people of Scotland.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday will confirm how much taxpayers' money will be spent on public services such as the NHS, and how much money the UK Government will be investing in new projects. The chancellor set out department budgets for 2025/26 back in her autumn statement - this week's spending review will see her confirm the departmental spending allocations for the next three to four years. Government borrowing grew to £20.2 billion in April, which is £1bn higher than the same month in 2024 and more than economists had been expecting. Tax revenues also increased due to increases to employer National Insurance contributions - spending also increased due to increases to pensions and other benefits. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government has already previewed some of its spending decisions, such as raising defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 and cutting the overseas aid budget. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has also vowed to reverse the Labour Party's cuts to universal winter fuel payments, but has yet to set out the details on what this will look like.

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot
Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Nigel Farage will pledge to reopen Port Talbot's steel blast furnaces if in power in Wales, as his Reform UK party sets its sights on being the government in the Senedd next year. In a speech in Port Talbot later, Mr Farage will outline how next year's Welsh parliament elections will be the primary focus of his party. The MP for Clacton has already ruled out standing at the Senedd elections next year. It is unclear who will lead the Reform party in Wales. Reindustrialising Wales will be at the centre of his speech. Acknowledging the task at hand won't be quick or easy, Mr Farage is also expected to suggest a return to coal mining, if suitable, as part of Reform's "long-term ambition to reopen Port Talbot steel". A Reform source told Sky News: "We have said and say again that we think it's better to use British coal for British steel than imported coal." Port Talbot was the largest steelmaking plant in the UK until the two blast furnaces were switched off in September 2024, which saw the loss of 2,800 jobs as part of the transition to greener production methods. Electric arc furnaces are replacing both blast furnaces and are set to be operational by early 2028. 2:30 Wales is set to head to the polls in May next year and Reform hopes to end the 26-year Labour government reign in Wales. The Reform source said Mr Farage's speech "will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour". Recent polling by Barn Cymru saw the Labour vote share in Wales collapse to 18%, with Reform second in the polls on 25% behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, whereas the Conservatives who are currently the opposition in the Senedd are on 13%. Reform believes the performance of their party in Scotland confirms they can win in Wales next year. The source told Sky News: "We are the main challenger to Labour in Wales. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour."

Kenny MacAskill: SNP losing by-election was unforgiveable
Kenny MacAskill: SNP losing by-election was unforgiveable

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Kenny MacAskill: SNP losing by-election was unforgiveable

The town's name is seared in Scotland's soul from Winnie Ewing's victory there in the UK Parliament by-election in 1967. I was a child then but was aware of its seismic effect on not just Scottish politics but Scottish society. Many stalwarts told me how a movement viewed as marginal and romantic came alive with that triumph. Scottish politics was changed irrevocably, with independence becoming a possibility, not just a dream. More recently, when I was justice secretary, I worked with Christina McKelvie, an assiduous and popular MSP, as she sought to address knife crime in her community. READ MORE: SNP candidate calls out Tory rival for being in 'lockstep with failed ideology' The seat's loss a bitter blow to the efforts of those stalwarts and countless others. Alba stood aside, calling on supporters to 'max the Yes vote'. Just what the Scottish Greens think they achieved by standing is for them to explain, with their total of votes barely greater than the very small Labour majority. Unionists are now crowing and the impact will be felt by the wider independence movement. It's a tragedy which will require work and change to come back from. It wasn't the fault of the SNP candidate any more than success can be attributed to her spectacularly poor Labour opponent. The polish of New Labour was forsaken, with Davy Russell a throwback to Labour candidates from days of yore when the party reigned across huge swathes of Scotland, its dead hand lying across the land. Under Alex Salmond's leadership, that Tammany Hall power was broken and Scotland was transformed for the better. We cannot allow those dark days to return. Remember that this was also a defeat for what little remains of the Labour left and those who still think Scotland can be transformed within the Union. Last week's result will be taken as an endorsement of Starmerism, legitimation of the austerity agenda and Labour's attacks on the poor and vulnerable. Those who have bravely spoken out will be hounded and party loyalists empowered. Responsibility for the defeat rests with the SNP leadership for both its lamentable by-election strategy, and its actions and failings over recent years. Circumstances had changed from last year and were favourable for SNP. The tidal clamour for change last July, which saw myself and my Alba colleague swept out of the UK Parliament along with numerous SNP MPs, had well and truly ebbed. Starmer's Labour were and are deeply unpopular. At the same time independence was polling well above 50% and even higher when the spectre of Farage and Reform was posed. All good, you'd think, for pushing the case for independence. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action', says Swinney That was what, after all, was done by Winnie Ewing all those years ago and decades before we even had our Parliament restored. She gave a vision of the land Scotland could be, contrasting it with the country it was, as pits and shipyards started to close and emigration continued. But independence wasn't mentioned by the SNP. It was the policy notable only for its absence in literature, on the doorsteps and in debate. Yet it was the unique selling point for the SNP. It was the one thing that carved them out from their principal opponents, Labour and Reform, and, even more than that, was backed by well over half of voters. That failure's not just inexplicable but unforgiveable. Instead, a strategy of 'stop Reform' was pushed. Just what was that meant to express other than avoiding having to answer for failings in their Scottish Government administration is hard to fathom. In politics, saying what you're for is always better than arguing what you're against. It motivates those who share your beliefs and can even earn respect or at least legitimation from opponents. Besides, Reform are not going to take power in Scotland – but only independence can ensure they are not foisted on us by being in the Union. The SNP leadership treated independence supporters in Hamilton with the same arrogance and disdain that they've treated the wider movement over recent years. A simple assumption that they'd have to vote for them and the backing of others could safely be pursued. Do what 'yer telt' and 'wheesht for indy'. But, as in 2017, where there's neither motivation nor articulation of independence, many simply stayed at home. The SNP did not lose support to Reform in Hamilton, instead they saw independence supporters say: 'What's the point of voting?' That compounded growing contempt for their failings in office and their lack of vision for the country. An obsession with gender and identity when what is wanted is an improvement in public services, whether health or housing, jobs or justice. Focusing on individual rights rather than the collective good at a time when communities are struggling. There has to be a coming together of the independence movement but that requires a recognition by SNP that they are only a part, albeit a major part, of it. The growing gap between support for independence and support for SNP tells a story and a bit of humility would go a long way. It also means that Holyrood 2026 has to be a plebiscite election and that to 'Max the Yes', it has to be vote Alba on the list.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store