
'Sweatshop' scandals have left Leicester's once-thriving clothing industry in existential crisis
In the wake of the recurrent scandals over "sweatshop" conditions in Leicester, the majority of major brands have now abandoned the city, triggering an implosion in production in the place that once boasted that it "clothed the world".
And now Leicester faces a further existential double-threat: competition from Chinese companies like Shein and Temu, and the impending arrival of cheap imports from India, following the recent trade deal signed with the UK. Many worry it could spell an end for the city's fashion business altogether.
Gauging the scale of the recent collapse is challenging because many of the textile and apparel factories in Leicester are small operations that can start up and shut down rapidly, but according to data provided to Sky News by SP&KO, a consultancy founded by fashion sector veterans Kathy O'Driscoll and Simon Platts, the number has fallen from 1,500 in 2017 to just 96 this year. This 94% collapse comes amid growing concerns that British clothes-making more broadly is facing an existential crisis.
In an in-depth investigation carried out over recent months, Sky News has visited sites in the city shut down in the face of a collapse of demand. Thousands of fashion workers are understood to have lost their jobs. Many factories lie empty, their machines gathering dust.
The vast majority of high street and fast fashion brands that once sourced their clothes in Leicester have now shifted their supply chains to North Africa and South Asia.
And a new report from UKFT - Britain's fashion and textiles lobby group - has found that a staggering 95% of clothes companies have either trimmed or completely eliminated clothes manufacturing in the UK. Some 58% of brands, by turnover, now have an explicit policy not to source clothes from the UK.
Jenny Holloway, chair of the Apparel & Textile Manufacturers Association, said: "We know of factories that were asked to become a potential supplier [to high street brands], got so far down the line, invested on sampling, invested time and money, policies, and then it's like: 'oh, sorry, we can't use you, because Leicester is embargoed.'"
Tejas Shah, a third-generation manufacturer whose family company Shahtex used to make materials for Marks & Spencer, said: "I've spoken to brands in the past who, if I moved my factory 15 miles north into Loughborough, would be happy to work with me. But because I have an LE1, LE4 postcode, they don't want to work for me."
Threat of Chinese brands Shein and Temu
That pain has been exacerbated by a new phenomenon: the rise of Chinese fast fashion brands Shein and Temu.
They offer consumers ultra-cheap clothes and goods, made in Chinese factories and flown direct to UK households. And, thanks to a customs loophole known as "de minimis", those goods don't even incur tariffs when they arrive in the country.
According to Satvir Singh, who runs Our Fashion, one of the last remaining knitwear producers in the city, this threat could prove the final straw for Leicester's garments sector.
"It is having an impact on our production - and I think the whole retail sector, at least for clothing, are feeling that pinch."
While Donald Trump has threatened to abolish the loophole in the US, the UK has only announced a review with no timeline.
"If we look at what Trump's done, he's just thinking more about his local economy because he can see the long-term effects," said Mr Singh. "I think [abolishing de minimis exceptions] will make a huge difference. I think ultimately it's about a level playing field."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will a ‘war on newts' get Britain building again?
Get ready for a new environmental battle royale. To kickstart our flagging economy, Rachel Reeves is said to be preparing an onslaught against protected species in order to accelerate infrastructure building. The chancellor is going beyond what has previously been proposed, in pursuit of her 'further and faster' economic growth agenda. She wants to tear up European regulations which developers blame for slowing construction projects. Already, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is wending its way through Parliament, will allow builders to bypass existing controls by paying into a nature restoration fund to improve habitats on other sites. While the full ramifications of that draft legislation have not sunk in – cue protests as campaigners argue that one habitat is being sacrificed while another benefits, and that the net result is reduced wildlife and fauna – her latest move will also provoke anger. Among the changes reportedly being mooted by Reeves are plans for a smaller, UK-only, list of safeguarded species. The new shortened line-up would afford more weight to creatures viewed as relatively rare in Europe but common in Britain. Another is the abolition of the EU 'precautionary principle' that requires constructors to show their projects will have no impact on protected natural sites. It would be replaced with a new test based on the risks and benefits of building. Also in Reeves' sights is said to be imposing limits on the legal challenges that can be brought by environmentalists. She has previously indicated as to where her thinking was heading. Speaking to the House of Lords economic affairs committee last month, Reeves said: 'The reason that HS2 is not coming to my city of Leeds anymore anytime soon, is because, I'm afraid, as a country, we've cared more about the bats than we have about the commuter times for people in Leeds and West Yorkshire, and we've got to change that. Because I care more about a young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails, and I care more about my energy bills and my constituents than I do about the views of people from their windows.' Strongly put – but also disingenuous. It is the case that HS2 did have to incur a £100m extra bill for a 'bat tunnel' to guarantee the wellbeing of bats on one section of the line in Buckinghamshire – but that is not the reason the fast-railway is not venturing to Leeds. It has more to do with the spiralling cost of the new service. If it had gone the distance to West Yorkshire, the final tally for that leg alone would have been £36bn. In that context, £100m on some bats is neither here nor there. The bats were also in the south, and had nothing to do with the Yorkshire extension. The fact is that these issues when they arise make ideal media fodder; they are a headline-writer's dream. So it is with the 'fish disco' at Hinckley Point C nuclear plant which plays sound to dissuade fish from entering the cooling system. Again, the expense is tiny, versus the overall price of a nuclear power station. It is true there are repeated problems for developers coming up against bats, newts and the like, and not just regarding large-scale national projects but on housing sites. Often, though, it's the time taken in deciding how to proceed that causes the issue. If Reeves could do something about that, rather than drive a bulldozer through the regulations which were introduced for a purpose, she might find it less controversial and that progress is smoother. It is also a distraction for another reason. While it sounds good and emotive to blame people for wishing to preserve the views from their windows, that is not, in the main, why so few young families are failing to get on the housing ladder. It's a contributory factor, but it is one of several, of which others are more significant – not least the sheer difficulty in obtaining a mortgage for first-time buyers, whatever the local council expects in offset, the need for roads and services, the provision of car parking, the pollution it will cause. These are just some, there are more.


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Record £210 million National Lottery jackpot could be won tomorrow
A single EuroMillions player could win a record-making £210 million jackpot on Tuesday. Should a single player secure the prize on Tuesday, it will be the most someone has ever won on the UK National Lottery. The EuroMillions jackpot is capped once it has reached 250 million Euros – an estimated £210 million. If there are no winners on Tuesday, it will now stay at 250 million Euros for a further four draws until it must be won in the fifth draw. In the 'Must Be Won' draw, if no ticket matches all five main numbers and two Lucky Stars, the jackpot prize will roll down into the prize tier where there is at least one winner – likely to be five main numbers and one Lucky Star. A single UK winner would instantly become the nation's largest-ever National Lottery winner. They would knock into second place the anonymous winner of a £195 million prize in 2022. It follows an Irish family syndicate claiming a EuroMillions jackpot worth 250 million euros (£216 million) on June 17. The jackpot had reached the maximum amount on June 6 after rolling over several times. Andy Carter, senior winners' advisor at Allwyn, said: 'Tuesday's jackpot has the ability to transform not just the winner's life, but the life of the friends and family around them. 'So, make sure you get a ticket to be in with a chance of banking Britain's biggest ever win.' Players should get their EuroMillions tickets – either in store or online – before 7.30pm on Tuesday.


Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury among environmental groups as Rachel Reeves 'looks to strip back protections for bats and newts' in Labour's scramble for growth
is facing a backlash among green groups following claims she is ready to strip back environmental protections in a bid to speed up infrastructure projects. The Chancellor is said to be considering further planning reforms that would make it harder for concerns about nature to stop development. She has previously outlined action to reduce requirements on developers by saying they should 'focus on getting things built, and stop worrying about bats and newts'. According to The Times, the Treasury has begun preparing for another planning reform bill and is considering tearing up key parts of EU-derived environmental rules. It comes amid Ms Reeves' scramble to fire up the sluggish UK economy, with recent official figures having shown growth slowed in the second quarter of this year. The plans being considered by the Treasury are reported to include a smaller UK-only list of protected species. This would place less weight on wildlife, including types of newt, that is rare elsewhere in Europe but more common in Britain. Developers would also no longer have to prove that projects would have no impact on protected natural sites through the scrapping of the 'precautionary principle'. A new test would instead look at risks and benefits of potential projects, the newspaper reported. Ms Reeves is also said to be considering further curbs to judicial review in order to stop key projects being delayed by legal challenges from environmentalists. Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, who stood down as a Government minister in May, suggested Labur's Planning and Infrastructure Bill - which is currently going through Parliament - was 'insufficient' for speeding up major infrastructure projects. 'While I think the planning bill will work for housing, I don't think it is sufficiently focused on the major infrastructure projects,' the Labour peer said. 'So it is encouraging that the Treasury is going to have another look at whether we've really got this right. 'The Government has to face up to the tensions in the Habitat Regulations which are making it hard to build essential infrastructure and the reality is that at some point someone needs to make a hard decision and say 'on some things, you just have to press ahead'.' But Paul Miner, of the countryside charity CPRE, said watering down environmental rules would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery'. 'We urge the Government to drop the worn-out 'builders versus blockers' narrative which wrongly frames climate and nature as being in conflict with economic growth,' he added. Becky Pullinger, of the Wildlife Trusts, said maintaining environmental standards was 'essential if we are to achieve targets to protect and restore the natural world which is suffering huge declines'. John Flesher, deputy director of the Conservative Environment Network, said: 'The planning system in the UK is currently failing to restore nature and to build the housing and infrastructure that we desperately need. 'Poorly designed and implemented regulations are holding back our economic potential, delaying major infrastructure projects and costing taxpayers, without protecting nature as intended. 'We don't need to choose between building more housing and infrastructure and restoring nature - we must do both. 'But this will require more fundamental reforms of legacy EU red tape than the government has pursued so far. 'Labour's approach so far will fail nature and growth. The government needs to stop tinkering around the edges and end its reliance on top-down solutions. 'We must harness our Brexit freedoms to deliver a new system, which empowers farmers and the private sector, gets Britain building, and properly protects our green and pleasant land.' Downing Street said the Government was focused on delivering the current 'radical' planning reforms. But the Prime Minister's official spokesman added: 'We'll always keep under review the measures needed to deliver our housing pledges and deliver on the infrastructure this country needs.'