Ethiopian fossils reveal new species in human evolutionary lineage
(Reuters) -Researchers have unearthed tooth fossils in Ethiopia dating to about 2.65 million years ago of a previously unknown species in the human evolutionary lineage, one that lived in the same time and place as the earliest-known member of the genus Homo to which our own species belongs.
The scientists discovered in the Ledi-Geraru research project area of northeastern Ethiopia's Afar Region 10 teeth - six molars, two incisors, one premolar and one canine - that they concluded belonged to a new Australopithecus species. The teeth came from two individuals.
Until now, six species of the genus Australopithecus, an important early human ancestor that displayed a mix of ape-like and human-like traits, were known from fossils at various African sites. The researchers said the newly found teeth bore traits indicating they belonged to a seventh species.
A genus is a group of closely related species that share similar characteristics. For example, lions and tigers are from the same genus but represent different species.
The scientists also discovered three other teeth dating to 2.59 million years ago that had traits showing they belonged to the oldest-known species of Homo, one that was first revealed by a jawbone unearthed in the same vicinity in 2013.
Scientists have not yet assigned names to the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by these 13 teeth because of the incomplete nature of the fossil remains. Our species Homo sapiens is the most recent member of the Homo genus, first appearing roughly 300,000 years ago in Africa before later spreading worldwide.
The new dental fossils provide insight into a poorly understood period in human evolution. The close age of the teeth suggests that this newly identified Australopithecus species coexisted in this region with the early Homo species, raising questions about whether they competed for the same resources.
The teeth also indicate that there were four hominins - as species in the human evolutionary lineage are known - that inhabited East Africa at the time. Previous fossils showed that another Australopithecus species and a species of Paranthropus, a hominin possessing a specialized skull adapted for heavy chewing, lived in East Africa during this time. An additional Australopithecus species also inhabited southern Africa, bringing the number of hominins then on the continent to five.
The presence of these contemporaneous hominins illustrates the complicated nature of the human evolutionary process.
"This reinforces the idea that the story of human evolution is not of a single lineage changing slowly through time," said University of Nevada, Las Vegas paleoanthropologist Brian Villmoare, lead author of the research published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.
"Rather, the pattern of human evolution is similar to that of other organisms, repeatedly branching into multiple species throughout the fossil record, many of whom lived at the same time," Villmoare added.
The researchers are seeking clues about the nature of any interaction between the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by the 13 teeth.
"We are currently analyzing teeth to see if we can tell if they ate the same thing," said Arizona State University paleoecologist and project co-director Kaye Reed.
If so, they may have fought over resources, Reed said. Crude stone tools dating to about the same time were previously discovered nearby, Reed said, probably made by the Homo species.
The researchers determined the age of the teeth using a technique that dated feldspar crystals contained in volcanic ash in the sediments where they were discovered based on radioactive decay of the element argon.
The Afar Region, one of Earth's hottest and lowest places, is an arid expanse of badlands. But at the time of these species, rivers flowed across a vegetated landscape into shallow lakes in a landscape populated by a splendid array of animals. These included giraffes, horses, pigs, elephants, hippos and antelopes as well as predators such as saber-toothed cats and hyenas.
Homo is generally thought to have descended from a species of Australopithecus, though the exact species and the timing have been a matter of debate. Australopithecus eventually died out.
Australopithecus includes the famous fossil Lucy, who was a member of the species Australopithecus afarensis who lived approximately 3.18 million years ago. Lucy's remains were discovered in 1974, also in the Afar Region. The newly discovered teeth had characteristics that showed they did not belong to Lucy's species, the researchers said.
"This new Australopithecus species is in no way some 'missing link,' and we actually don't think that it was necessarily ancestral to any known species," Villmoare said.
"Species arose and many went extinct," Reed said. "Each find is a piece of the puzzle that puts human evolution into a twiggy tree, rather than a linear graphic."
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie mum's 340 million-year-old discovery hidden in rural creek
An Aussie woman has shared her excitement after unearthing not one but two astonishing ancient finds in a rural creek bed. Like many loved ones before them, Ashleigh Banks, her young son and nephew wandered down to the water's edge on her aunt's property in NSW's Upper Hunter Region late last month to hunt for treasures. 'We have been finding fossils here for decades,' she told Yahoo News, noting the 'relatively untouched' land has been in her family for eight generations. However, despite their familiarity with the area and its relics, the mum said she's 'always amazed' when she cracks open 'a totally random rock' to find 'something from over 200 million years ago' hidden inside. And that's exactly what happened one recent sunny weekend when Ashleigh took a hammer to two rather plain-looking stones she pulled from the creek bed. While the darker rock had no obvious fossilisation on the outside, the NSW resident told Yahoo it 'cracked perfectly' to reveal an interesting pattern on the inside. 'The lighter rock had fossilisation on the outside and cracked in three to reveal plenty more,' she said, adding her 'enthusiastic' son and nephew were 'so surprised' by the discoveries. Although Ashleigh's passion for fossicking is relatively new, she said several family members have found some 'amazing' relics over the years. 'I recall my grandfather and great uncles telling me there is a treasure trove of fossils on and around the property,' she said. 'I have only recently got into looking for fossils after a trip to Lightning Ridge a few months ago with my partner and children. We really loved fossicking for opals and learning about how they are formed over millions of years from ancient seabeds, similar to the fossils.' What fossils did she find in the creek bed? After reviewing images of Ashleigh's finds, Dr Patrick Smith, Technical Officer Palaeontology at the Australian Museum, told Yahoo the mum had stumbled upon 'some truly classic locals from Australia's deep past'. The shells inside the rocks are strophomenid brachiopods, he said. Specifically, the larger shell is 'most likely from the family schuchertellidae, and quite possibly the genus schuchertella', Dr Smith explained, while the smaller ones belong to another family of brachiopods — productidae, probably the genus marginatia. The two types of fossil shells are 'incredibly common and well-studied', and are most often found in rock layers between Singleton and Muswellbrook, where Ashleigh's aunt's property sits. This means the fossils she found are from the Early Carboniferous Period, more specifically the Viséan Stage, dating them at around 346 to 340-million-years-old, Dr Smith said. 'They were already ancient when the dinosaurs first appeared!' Aussie couple ecstatic after finding $40,000 'clunker' in the outback Renter's 250 million-year-old discovery in inner-city backyard Ancient discovery near popular Aussie camping spot sparks delight During the Carboniferous Period, the Hunter Valley was covered by a shallow sea and appeared very different to how it looks now. 'Imagine coral reefs and marine critters stretching across the region where vineyards and coal mines now sit,' Dr Smith explained. And while brachiopods are often called 'lamp shells' because of their shape, they're not actually related to clams, despite their similar appearance, he added. 'It's great to see interest in these ancient treasures — they're more than just rocks; they're little time capsules from an ocean that existed hundreds of millions of years ago.' Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
You've met 'Lucy.' Now ASU scientists unearth another clue to the origin of humans
Though she works thousands of miles from home, Arizona State University research scientist Kaye Reed is used to 110-degree heat. For days at a time, Reed and her colleagues walk through Ethiopia's baking Awash Valley, scanning the ground with their eyes. It's uncomfortable, Reed said, but it's all worth it when they make the kind of discovery revealed in a paper released on Aug. 13. Reed and a team of international scientists believe they have added a new member to humanity's family tree — a yet undocumented species of hominid, or upright ape, that walked the east African grasslands more than 2.6 million years ago. She and the team made the discovery when they found three collections of ancient primate teeth lying on the ground during fossil searches at the Ledi-Geraru Research Project Area led by ASU. Scientists believe the new species could offer clues about the conditions that produced humanity's ancestors, though this species was likely not a direct predecessor to homo sapiens. The species lived in an area and time at which future humans may have first emerged, according to the fossil record. Scientists know very little about the new species so far, Reed said. A collection of teeth is useful for understanding the animal's diet, but arms, legs, and skulls provide a fuller picture of how it moved around its habitat. Those clues help researchers understand the conditions in which the species survived. 'Evolution doesn't work like that' Those insights could shine light on a critical, but poorly understood, chapter in human evolution. The new species may have been one of the last members of a dying family of human ancestors known as the australopithecus genus, which includes the famous 'Lucy,' whose fossil was unearthed in 1974. As its relatives were dying out, this new species would have watched the rise of humanity's genus, homo, which was the first to commonly use stone tools and eat meat. 'If it's a different species of Australopithecus… that means (Lucy) either went extinct or somehow evolved into this new species,' said Reed, part of the Institute of Human Origins at ASU. 'The fact that it also occurs at roughly the same time as the genus Homo suggests to us that there was a change in the climate and the habitats, which you had to change to survive.' With the new species, Reed believes at least four species of upright apes were living in east Africa at the same time, including two australopithecus, one homo, and a species from an offshoot called paranthropus. Scientists don't know much about the transition from Australopithecus to homo because the fossil record during that period is surprisingly slim, Reed said. But this new discovery makes at least one thing clear: As with much of evolution, this transition was not a straightforward line. The process of human evolution is full of dead ends and overlaps, with multiple species of upright apes evolving alongside each other, some successful and some not. 'Everybody always posts that thing where there's a hunched over ape, and then there's a kind of upright ape, and then something with a bigger brain, and it's just from one to one to one," Reed said. "Evolution doesn't work like that.' Even the distinctions between ancestors and descendants is sometimes unclear. Reed had to grapple with this complexity when she and her colleagues attempted to identify the teeth they had found. The team considered multiple alternatives, including the possibility that the teeth belonged to transitional forms of already known species. While some species distinctions are obvious, Reed said, some are almost a matter of opinion, pointing out that some scientists might have classified the new teeth as a variant of the 'Lucy' species. 'Another scientist that I know might put these teeth into (Lucy's species). He doesn't care about what he would consider the minor differences,' Reed said. A famous discovery: On a November day 50 years ago, a scientist found 'Lucy' and rewrote our origin story Still searching for more clues The appearance of the new species could also help scientists better understand why humanity's closest ancestors, the homo group, emerged when they did. Some scientists have argued that homo species evolved partially as a response to a drier habitat with more grasslands, but this new species shows that an Australopithecus species could also survive in that new, dry environment. 'You have longer dry seasons, so animals are stressed. Many that we see in Lucy's time are eating trees, but then they switch to grass, and in that time period we find the Australopithecus is different from what it was,' Reed said. More clues about the new species' diets will help Reed and other researchers understand how it interacted with other walking apes and whether this was a case where humanity's ancestors had to out-compete their relatives to grab hold of the future. 'If they ate the same thing, it's going to be tough for one of them to survive … and so maybe one of them out-competed the other,' Reed said. 'But maybe they weren't eating the same thing, and that's how they split when it got really dry.' Traces of carbon and nitrogen in ancient teeth can indicate what kinds of plants or meat the animal ate. To discover that an australopithecus was scavenging meat would make it a much more direct competitor with human ancestors, Reed said. Otherwise, scientists have many miles to walk before they can fully understand the new creature they might have brought to light. That will mean many more hours searching for the right sediments and pacing, meticulously, in the east African heat. 'To find this stuff is really exciting,' Reed said. 'We just have to find more information to put the puzzle together.' Austin Corona covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to Environmental coverage on and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: ASU scientists may have found a new species related to humans Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The story of our ancient ancestors began in Africa millions of years ago. But there are considerable gaps between the first and current chapters of that tale, and some anthropologists are looking to Asia to fill in missing information about how humans evolved. "The genus Homo evolved in Africa," Sheela Athreya, a biological anthropologist at Texas A&M University, told Live Science. But as soon as Homo left the continent, "all bets are off because evolution is going to treat every population differently." One bet Athreya is investigating is the notion that there wasn't a single origin of our species, Homo sapiens. Rather, the ancestors of today's humans living in different geographic regions took different evolutionary paths, before eventually coalescing into the human tribe we know today. Once humans left Africa, "you have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens," Athreya said. Key to this story is a different understanding of human evolution in Asia — and the possibility that Denisovans, a group of little-understood extinct human ancestors known from just a handful of fossils, were actually the same as a much earlier member of our family tree: Homo erectus, Athreya argues. Related: Strange, 300,000-year-old jawbone unearthed in China may come from vanished human lineage Early humans in ancient Asia There's a big gap in human evolutionary history. We know Homo evolved in Africa and that a human ancestor, Homo erectus, was already in Asia and parts of Europe by about 1.8 million years ago. But what happened in Asia between that point and the time when Homo sapiens arrived around 50,000 years ago? That picture is much less clear. To help fill it in, Athreya has considered the emergence of our species, Homo sapiens, during the Middle and Late Pleistocene epoch (780,000 to 11,700 years ago). Her "deep-dive" into the human fossil record of Asia has convinced her that there are evolutionary pathways in places like Java, Indonesia, that differ from the Pleistocene patterns seen in Africa and Europe. H. erectus reached Java at least 1.5 million years ago, and the species likely lasted there until 108,000 years ago. But the lack of more recent H. erectus bones doesn't necessarily mean they went extinct, Athreya wrote in a 2024 study with co-author Yousuke Kaifu, an anthropologist at the University of Tokyo. Instead, these Javanese H. erectus could have persisted until H. sapiens appeared in Sumatra as early as 73,000 years ago and interbred with them. The fossil record in China is similarly complicated. Around 300,000 years ago, there was a shift in what H. erectus fossils looked like, Athreya said. Skeletons in the Middle Pleistocene in China became more variable in form, and traits that were common in Western Eurasian groups like H. sapiens and Neanderthals, such as smoother bicuspid teeth, began to appear in these fossils. This means that — instead of completely dying out — H. erectus in China may have made a genetic contribution to populations living today, Athreya said, just as Neanderthals left genetic traces in people with European ancestry and Denisovans contributed DNA to people with Oceania ancestry. The idea isn't impossible, one expert told Live Science. Groups of ancient human relatives could have mated anywhere they met up, Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told Live Science. No matter where they lived, "I just think humans aren't that different" during the Pleistocene. What's more, anthropologists are starting to realize that many of these groups that looked very different could still have interbred. Twenty years ago, scientists would have said "there's no possible way" they could have interbred, Van Arsdale said. "And I just don't think we can assume that anymore." So far, no DNA has been recovered from H. erectus fossils, largely because most of their fossils are too old, so there's no genetic support for this idea. But emerging methods for extracting ancient proteins from fossils may soon make it feasible to identify some H. erectus genes. Another route to understanding the fate of H. erectus in Asia may be to look more closely at the enigmatic Denisovans. RELATED STORIES —Oldest wooden tools unearthed in East Asia show that ancient humans made planned trips to dig up edible plants —Ancient jawbone dredged off Taiwan seafloor belongs to mysterious Denisovan, study finds —140,000 year old bones of our ancient ancestors found on sea floor, revealing secrets of extinct human species Since the only known skull of a Denisovan looks similar, in many ways, to that of H. erectus, those two groups may actually be one and the same. "I don't think that genetics is going to find that Homo erectus was a separate dead-end lineage," Athreya said. "I would expect Denisovans to be Homo erectus." But until more work is done that combines DNA, artifacts and fossil bones in Southeast Asia, the full picture of human evolution cannot yet come into focus the way it has in places like Europe, Athreya said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
