logo
Congestion Charge: Calls for TfL to keep electric car exemption

Congestion Charge: Calls for TfL to keep electric car exemption

BBC News15 hours ago
Transport for London (TfL) is facing calls to reconsider removing the electric vehicle exemption to the Congestion Charge.Elly Baker, Labour's City Hall spokesperson for transport, said this would be "counter-productive" and create barriers for Londoners to move away from petrol and diesel.The 100% Cleaner Vehicle Discount is scheduled to end on 25 December and will be replaced by a 25% discount for electric cars and a 50% reduction for larger electric vehicles.TfL say continuing the full discount "would lead to worsening traffic" and make the Congestion Charge less effective.
The plans also include raising the Congestion Charge fee from £15 to £18 from 2 January 2026.This means that people with an electric car would need to pay £13.50 every time they drive into central London, and traders with electric vans would pay £9.These changes are expected to raise an additional £40 million in the first year.
'We should be making it easier'
In a letter to TfL, Ms Baker said: "Businesses need deliveries, as do hospitals and schools. Small businesses such as electricians and plumbers still need to enter the Congestion Charge zone to work."She warned that these plans would lead to small businesses returning to petrol or diesel vehicles.Ms Baker, who also chairs the London Assembly Transport Committee, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "If we want Londoners to switch to cleaner vehicles, we should be making it easier, not harder."
The Conservatives have expressed support for Ms Baker's position.Thomas Turrell, environment spokesperson for the City Hall Conservatives, said: "Forcing electric vehicles to pay the Congestion Charge removes incentives from drivers and businesses from switching to greener vehicles."
Ms Baker's letter also raised the issue of car clubs, saying they should be treated differently from private electric cars.She wrote: "Car clubs are a key tool to reduce need for car ownership and, as a result, reduce car journeys."Congestion charge policies should support car clubs as a tool to reduce unnecessary journeys and support a transition to cleaner vehicles."Car clubs are short-term car rental services which allow members to use locally-parked cars for individual journeys, meaning they can give up their cars whilst allowing for occasional car travel.She said the current proposals risked making it more difficult for these clubs to operate.
A TfL spokesperson said in response: "Without the changes proposed, the Congestion Charge would become less effective, with an estimated additional 2,200 vehicles in the zone on an average weekday."We are proposing a new Cleaner Vehicle Discount for those who do not need to drive so they can still benefit from a discount if they drive an electric vehicle."They added that there will be a greater discount for "journeys that are harder to switch to walking, cycling or public transport", such as commercial vans.It also defended the decision by saying it was announced in December 2018, giving drivers seven years' advance notice.
The Congestion Charge was introduced in central London in 2003, covering the area within the Inner London Ring Road.This includes the City of London and the West End, with 136,000 residents living inside the zone.The most recent increase to the fee was in June 2020, when it was raised from £11.50 to £15.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two-tier justice is a national disgrace
Two-tier justice is a national disgrace

Telegraph

time2 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Two-tier justice is a national disgrace

When Attorney General Richard Hermer told the BBC in June that it was 'disgusting' and 'wrong' to claim that Britain had a two-tier justice system, 'offensive' to the country's 'crown prosecutors' and 'courts', he was attempting to bat away a wave of criticism that sought to make the point that justice in this country is no longer blind. It did not help his point that just a few weeks before, the Sentencing Council for England and Wales had sought to make this implicit bias explicit, suggesting that some offenders should receive more lenient sentences based on their ethnicity. Even this Labour Government felt compelled to pass emergency legislation to block the move. Perhaps the most visible manifestation of two-tier justice is the treatment of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor jailed after posting on social media that people could 'set fire to all the… hotels full of [asylum seekers] for all I care'. This was a stupid and reprehensible remark, fired into the void of social media with little thought as to its potential consequences. Ms Connolly entered a guilty plea, and was sentenced to 31 months' imprisonment. Had she stood her ground, she might well have walked free. Ricky Jones, a Labour councillor who made a seemingly explicit call for violence – telling a large crowd that they needed to 'cut' the 'throats' of 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and 'get rid of them all' – was cleared by a jury yesterday. There is a clear difference between a guilty plea and a jury decision. The clear disparity in outcomes, however, will further fuel criticism of a system that appears to function very differently for those from the correct part of the political spectrum. And for the cynical, there is the question of the pressure placed on Ms Connolly by the prospect of being held on remand for an extended period. This does not help with the 'community tensions' politicians are at pains to minimise. Nor does it help public acceptance of the justice system when visibly absurd outcomes mount up on a near daily basis. As Robert Jenrick has said in his interview with The Telegraph, the perception that judges 'act politically and bring their own personal politics into their job as a judge' has been immensely damaging. His proposals for tighter checks on appointments and a robust system for removals make a great deal of sense. This is particularly so in comparison with what appears to be the preferred outcome of the Government: for critics to shut up and accept that the legal system produces the right outcomes. Not only does this fail to silence criticism, it serves to further undermine faith in the law. Criticism of Britain's two-tier system will continue for as long as we get two-tier outcomes.

Labour-run council ordering removal of St George's and Union Jack flags is too scared to take down Palestine flags without police protection, leaked email reveals
Labour-run council ordering removal of St George's and Union Jack flags is too scared to take down Palestine flags without police protection, leaked email reveals

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour-run council ordering removal of St George's and Union Jack flags is too scared to take down Palestine flags without police protection, leaked email reveals

A Labour-run council has sparked outrage by ordering the removal of British flags from lampposts - while being 'too scared' to take down Palestine flags without police protection. Bankrupt Birmingham City Council said hundreds of Union and St George's flags recently hung around the city 'could put lives at risk' by endangering motorists and pedestrians. The flags had been strung up by a small, organised group of residents to 'show Birmingham and the rest of the country how proud we are of our history, freedoms and achievements'. Their display of patriotism was met with a swift response from the city council, which vowed to immediately begin removing the flags due to 'safety concerns'. The decision was blasted by shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick as 'blatant two-tier bias against the British people', after critics pointed out Palestine flags had been left to fly from lampposts across Birmingham for the past 18 months without the council tearing them down. When the Mail visited the Sparkhill area, where around 80 per cent of the population is Muslim, there were no fewer than seven Palestine flags hanging from lampposts on a mile-long stretch of Stratford Road. It can also be revealed that the crisis-crippled council has privately admitted it is too scared to try to remove the Palestine flags without police protection. In a leaked email obtained by the Mail, council cabinet member Majid Mahmood said of the Palestine flags hanging from lampposts in February: 'We are taking these down, but we need the support of the police due to issues that have cropped (up) when we first tried to take them down.' The backlash has only been intensified by the council simultaneously announcing this week it would light up the city's library in the colours of the Pakistan flag to mark the anniversary of the country's independence, followed by the Indian flag. Mr Mahmood was among those happily posing for pictures this week as the flag of Pakistan was raised outside Council House in the city centre. The council, which declared effective bankruptcy in 2023, is already facing intense criticism for its handling of a bin strike which has now lasted for seven months and seen the city's streets buried under mountains of fetid waste. Mr Jenrick said: 'It is ridiculous that the council are taking down England flags and Union flags while Palestine flags are allowed to remain. It's blatant two-tier bias against the British people. 'Labour-run Birmingham council seem to be ashamed of our country - celebrating everyone other than ourselves. This pathetic self-loathing must end. We must be one country, united under one flag. 'It is a damning indictment of how bad things have become that the council appear too scared to take down unauthorised foreign flags without the police. The authorities cannot allow themselves to be intimidated into submission.' Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'The City Council piles bias and absurdity on top of their utter incompetence. After the chaos of the bin strike, where they can't find anyone to empty the bins, they somehow manage to find people to take down our national flag on the eve of VJ Day when British and Commonwealth soldiers lost their lives for our freedoms. Shameful.' Tory MP Sir John Hayes said: 'Birmingham is a great city, the city of the Chamberlains. Joseph Chamberlain, who was a great patriot and the greatest son of Birmingham, would hang his head in shame.' A group of residents calling themselves the Weoley Warriors began hanging hundreds of flags from lampposts in areas including Weoley Castle, Northfield, Selly Oak and Bartley Green earlier this week. They have not revealed their identities but post pictures of their flags on a Facebook group, which says: 'A proud community is a strong community. No matter your background, race or religion we live side-by-side in this country together, so when you look up (and) see the flags fly, they fly for you.' They have raised more than £4,000 to bankroll their efforts, describing themselves on their online fundraising page as 'a group of proud English men with a common goal'. Many residents were quick to express enthusiasm for the flags. Helen Ingram, a historian who lives in Northfield, said: 'Everyone I've spoken to loves them and there's a buzz in the air, an almost carnival-like atmosphere. 'Northfield was once a tight-knit community and it's heart-warming to get back that strong sense of community pride and unity.' Palestine flags have been prominently displayed in parts of Birmingham with a large proportion of Muslim residents since the start of the recent war in Gaza Yet the council claimed that the extra weight placed on the lampposts by the flags could 'potentially lead to collapse' and posed a possibly fatal risk to the men hanging the flags, as well as motorists and pedestrians - despite the flags being around 25ft above the ground. Dr Ingram said residents had found the council's position particularly frustrating due to the number of Palestinian, Ukrainian and Pride flags which 'fly freely around the city every day without issue'. She added: 'Flying a Union Jack or England flag aligns with this same spirit of being proud of your identity…that is surely a sentiment that a city council should be championing rather than condemning!' One of the organisers of the Weoley Warriors group said: 'This is unfortunate and disappointing - Birmingham City Council cannot afford to take our bins, but can afford to take our flags.' Other residents warned the removal of the flags could potentially lead to riots. The decision was described as 'completely disgraceful' by Cllr Robert Alden, leader of its Conservative opposition. 'Frankly, for the last two years, the council has made little effort to remove Palestine flags and now, suddenly, residents are putting up the Union Jack and St George's Cross and they're saying it's a health and safety risk - it's madness,' he said. 'As a council overall, they are bankrupt. They have got themselves into a complete mess where they're slashing services and putting up council tax - to decide to pick a fight over residents wanting to fly our national flag is just perverse.' A spokesman for Birmingham City Council said it had removed more than 200 attachments from 'street furniture' this year, including Palestinian flags, but some had been replaced after they had removed them. The council was said to be planning to upgrade lampposts which meant they had to remain free from attachments so work can be carried out. The spokesman added: 'People who attach unauthorised items to lampposts could be putting their lives and those of motorists and pedestrians at risk. 'We (are) continuing to do this every week and would ask that staff doing this work are allowed to continue this work unhindered. 'Placing unauthorised attachments on street furniture, particularly tall structures like lampposts, can be dangerous – that is why the council always has to 'stress test' assets around any formal events or celebrations.'

Further 60 Palestine Action supporters to be prosecuted
Further 60 Palestine Action supporters to be prosecuted

Telegraph

time2 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Further 60 Palestine Action supporters to be prosecuted

A further 60 people will be prosecuted for showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action, the Metropolitan Police has confirmed. The force said it followed the arrest of more than 700 people since the group's proscription on July 7, including 522 in central London last Saturday. Stephen Parkinson, the Director of Public Prosecutions, said: 'The decisions that we have announced today are the first significant numbers to come out of the recent protests, and many more can be expected in the next few weeks. 'We are ready to make swift decisions in all cases where arrests have been made.' The Met said: 'We have put arrangements in place that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary.' Palestine Action was proscribed earlier in 2025 after the sabotage of aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Anyone found guilty of supporting or gathering support for a proscribed organisation faces a maximum of six months' imprisonment and a £5,000 fine. Just being arrested is enough to stop someone being allowed into the US or work in education. Supporters of Palestine Action described the ban as a 'gross abuse of power' designed to stifle expressions of support for the Palestinian cause. Mr Parkinson added: 'The public has a democratic right to protest peacefully in this country and I understand the depth of feeling around the horrific scenes in Gaza. 'However, Palestine Action is now a proscribed terrorist organisation, and those who have chosen to break the law will be subject to criminal proceedings under the Terrorism Act.' Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, said: 'To be clear, these arrests and prosecutions do not outlaw people's right to demonstrate in support of Palestine or any other cause. 'They are simply the enforcement of a specific provision under the Terrorism Act in relation to a specific proscribed terrorist organisation, Palestine Action.' The number of arrests on Saturday was among the largest at a protest in decades. A total of 339 people were arrested during the poll tax riots in London on March 31 1990, when protesters fought with police in Trafalgar Square, central London.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store