We know the Sydney Harbour Bridge march against the killing in Gaza was huge – but just how big was it?
But just how many braved the rainy weather to urge the Australian government to do more to pressure Israel to stop the death and destruction in Gaza? That's been a sticking point.
New South Wales police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000. A spokesperson for rally organisers the Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000.
This article includes content provided by Instagram. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'.
Here's what we know.
Just after 5pm on Sunday, the acting deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna said police estimated 90,000 people took part – far more than the 50,000 organisers expected.
He said it was the largest protest he and the assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson had seen in their time in the force. Johnson also said it was the 'most perilous' in his '35 years of policing'.
However organisers estimated it was closer to 300,000.
'It's even bigger than my wildest dreams,' one of the main protest organisers, Josh Lees, said while at the front of the march at the midway point.
Lees later said a number of people had come up with a similar figure after crunching the numbers based on widely shared aerial footage.
Dr Aldo Raineri, a senior CQUniversity lecturer and expert in crowd safety management, estimated the figure to be significantly higher than what police suggested.
Guardian Australia shared drone footage with Raineri that showed the crowd just north of the bridge's midway point, extending back to Wynyard station and Lang Park, where the march began.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The distance from Wynyard station up to where protesters began to be turned back is approximately 2.5km. The roadway along the bridge is 30 metres wide.
Based on these dimensions and what appeared to be an occupancy of three or four people per square metre, he estimated between 225,000 and 300,000 people attended.
However, he noted 'these figures are really rough, given the variation in density'.
Organisers said there were still people at Lang Park, who had not yet started to march, when police sent a message telling protesters to turn back.
Lees said many who had gone to Sunday's protest felt it was on par with past major protests they had been to, including the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003, which saw demonstrators march through the CBD, and the walk for reconciliation march in 2000 which went across the Sydney Harbour Bridge.
According to the National Museum of Australia, about 250,000 people walked across the bridge in a continuous stream lasting nearly six hours during the reconciliation march. NMA called it the 'largest political demonstration ever held in Australia'.
In 2003, police estimated more than 200,000 took part in the anti-Iraq war rally, while organisers put the total at about 300,000, the Sydney Morning Herald reported. The paper said it was 'thought to be the biggest in the country's history'.
In 2023, an estimated 50,000 people took part in a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge as part of WorldPride.
Chris Nash, who attended Sunday's march, said it 'felt much bigger' than the 2000 reconciliation march he also attended.
'That was much more spaced out,' he said.
The former NSW premier Bob Carr marched at the head of the pro-Palestine protest across the bridge. He was the premier during the reconciliation march in 2000.
Asked how the crowd sizes compared, he said: 'All that matters was that it was a big, beautiful success. A success with cheerful police cooperation and good-natured people motivated by the horror of Israel's actions in Gaza.'
At about 3pm on Sunday, NSW police sent out a mass text message throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end of the bridge.
Police sent a second mass text message saying they had consulted with the organisers and were turning everyone around.
'We could not get those people, the number, the significant size of that crowd off that northern egress route without risking crowd crush. We could not allow those numbers to then egress into the northern side, into those train stations without, again, that real risk of crowd crush,' McKenna told reporters. He said there were 1,000 police facilitating the protest.
Raineri said allowing the crowd to amass without effective transport to disperse them would have been unsafe. He said the police went about this the right way by using mass text messages and consultating with protesters.
However, Legal Observers NSW said the 'confusing and unplanned' directions from police were dangerous and could have caused a crowd crush.
'Police had not adequately planned for the initial route to North Sydney and there did not appear to be a plan if crowd numbers exceeded expectations and made entering and leaving North Sydney difficult,' the group's report on the protest said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Absolutely the best ship': Japan wins $10bn contract to grow Australia's war fleet
Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has beaten a German rival in the race to build Australia's new fleet of warships, with the federal government expecting the first to be ready for service by 2030. Australia will spend $10bn over a decade to buy three Mogami-class frigates, part of a wider deal to replace the ageing Anzac-class frigates and give the navy a bigger and more lethal surface combatant fleet. The first three will be built in Japan by 2034, before construction moves to the Henderson naval precinct in Western Australia. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The Mogami operates with about 90 crew, down from about 120 on the current generation of warships. It is currently in service for the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force. The defence minister, Richard Marles, and defence industry minister, Pat Conroy, would not say what the estimated total cost of the program will be, citing upcoming commercial negotiations with Mitsubishi. Marles said geopolitical tensions with China did not play a role in the decision, which was signed off on Monday night by cabinet's national security committee. 'The Mogami is absolutely the best ship and that was very clear in all the advice that we received,' Marles said. 'It is a next-generation vessel. It is stealthy, it has 32 vertical launch cells capable of launching long-range missiles, it has a highly capable radar, it has a highly capable sonar.' German firm TKMS – previously branded as ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems – had been considered for the deal, but its Meko A-200 vessel was considered second best to the Japanese model, including over concerns about the timeline for delivery and putting the ships into service. Japan has not previously manufactured frigates for other nations, while TKMS has sold to navies around the world. Both bids included heavy lobbying of the federal government. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met with his Japanese counterpart, Shigeru Ishiba, on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada in June, as well as with Germany's chancellor, Olaf Scholz. Defence is expected to enter into binding, commercial contracts for the deal by 2026. Marles said Japan beat out the German option based on capability of the new vessels. 'We do have a very close strategic alignment with Japan. There's no other country in the world that is quite as aligned with Australia as Japan.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The Mogami frigate has a range of up to 10,000 nautical miles, is fitted with surface-to-air missiles and anti-ship missiles and comes with sophisticated vertical launch capability. 'In terms of cost, capability and meeting our schedule of delivery, the Mogami-class frigate was the clear winner,' Conroy said. He said the US-made Lockheed Martin combat system and a Japanese-made radar system would be replaced with Australian systems, but no other changes would be permitted without approval of the Defence department boss and chief of the defence force, in consultation with the federal government. 'This is a lesson we've learnt from previous acquisitions and guarantees speed to capability,' Conroy said. This will help make good on our commitment to deliver four times as many warships in the next 10 years, compared to the Coalition's plan.' Marles and Conroy also announced plans for a new strategic shipbuilding agreement with a new arm of the government-controlled shipbuilding company, Austal Defence Shipbuilding Australia Pty Ltd. Based at Fremantle, Austal is the only major shipbuilder with operations in Australia. It will build 18 new medium landing crafts for Defence, as well as eight heavy vessels. That deal is currently being negotiated with the federal government.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Cynical reason why Albo may lower Australia's voting age to 16 - and why it would be a colossal mistake. PETER VAN ONSELEN
The UK's decision to lower the voting age to 16 is being hailed in progressive circles as a democratic leap forward. It isn't. It's a politically convenient move masquerading as civic advancement, and it's one Australia should resist, regardless of how tempted Albo's government might be to follow suit.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Police urged to investigate former Guantanamo prisoner over Palestine Action comments
The police have been urged to investigate a former Guantanamo Bay detainee after he called on Muslims to attend protests to declare their support for Palestine Action. Speaking at a meeting in Birmingham, Moazzam Begg urged members of the Muslim community to take part in a planned mass demonstration this weekend in support of the terror group. Under the plans, first disclosed by The Telegraph, at least 500 people are expected to gather in London and other cities on Saturday with the intention of deliberately flouting terror laws by publicly declaring their support for Palestine Action. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said that 'without a doubt' the police should launch a probe into the comments made by Mr Begg. He told The Telegraph: 'Given the threats we are facing from Palestine Action, if the state does not impose its authority now, it will lose it completely.' He added: 'This is a proscribed organisation, a virtual terrorist organisation. Without a doubt, the police should investigate him [Begg]. 'This sort of organisation with its Islamist agenda is one of the most frightening things I have seen in my life.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Inciting people to support Palestine Action is clearly an offence and the police should investigate and make an arrest where this has happened. 'Palestine Action uses violence instead of debate and argument. 'In this country we decide issues through debate and elections, not mob violence. No one should be advocating support for violence on our streets.' The Metropolitan Police has warned that anyone showing support for the group 'can expect to be arrested'. Under the plans revealed by The Telegraph, organisers are seeking to challenge the Government's proscription of Palestine Action by gathering on such a scale that it overwhelms the police and renders the law unenforceable. The events are being coordinated by the campaign group, Defend Our Juries, with the support of Cage International, for which Mr Begg is a senior director. Speaking at a meeting where the plans were discussed, the 57-year-old father of four, who spent three years in US detention on suspicion of being a member of Al Qaeda, urged Muslims to support the action. He said that Islam placed a responsibility on followers to change what they believed was unjust. adding: 'There is strength in numbers, stop being a coward, cowards never win battles'. He told those attending: 'It reminds me that in Islam we have this concept of 'Fard Kifayah', which means the duty of the many, and the sufficient. 'Rather, if nobody does it, everyone is guilty. but if enough people do it, it lifts the burden from everyone else. And they are leading on this because it is from Islamic principles from whoever sees an evil, let him change it with his hand, that' s a prophetic saying. 'All Palestinians know that if you see an evil change it with your hand, if you are unable to do so speak out against it. Isn't Palestine Action doing that?' Mr Begg went on: 'I would urge everybody to join the action of the 9th of August. That is the first step to take for the resistance.' He later told attendees: 'Dig in, fight for your rights and fight for the rights of people being oppressed.' Mr Begg, who has dual British Pakistani citizenship, was detained by the US authorities In 2002 on suspicion of being a member of Al Qaeda. He spent three years in custody during which he alleged he was tortured and witnessed the murders of other detainees. He was released from US custody in 2005 following pressure from the UK government but later received a settlement after suing the British authorities for alleged complicity in his detention. Following his release he became an author and public speaker and also joined Cage International as a senior director. Publicly declaring support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act 2000, punishable by up to 14-years in prison. Around 200 people have already been arrested for declaring their support for Palestine Action, but organisers of this weekend's protest believe encouraging thousands to follow their lead will effectively overwhelm the police and the criminal justice system. If Mr Begg's call for members of the Muslim community to join the action is heeded, the numbers turning up could swell considerably. In a briefing document issued to those considering taking part organisers say: 'It would be practically and politically difficult for the state to respond to an action on this scale.' But Scotland Yard has stressed that anyone who breaks the law can expect to be arrested. 'Our officers will apply the law' A Met Police spokesman said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. 'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality. 'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' A spokesman for the National Police Chiefs' Council added: 'Policing is committed to upholding and facilitating the right to peaceful protest. Where possible, we will work with event organisers and any other affected groups to facilitate protests and minimise serious disruption to communities. 'We have robust and well-tested proactive plans in place, with the ability to mobilise significant and specialist resources, if necessary. 'Public order response officers will be supported by investigation teams who will gather evidence and ensure those responsible for any acts of criminality, should they occur, are identified and held to account.' Palestine Action was proscribed by Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, on July 5 after a group of its members allegedly entered RAF Brize Norton and damaged two military aircraft. Last week the co-founder of the group won the right to bring a legal challenge against proscription, arguing that the ban breached the right to freedom of expression and protest. A judicial review over the legality of the group is due to be heard in the autumn and could see the ban lifted. Since Palestine Action was proscribed, about 200 people have been arrested on suspicion of supporting the group, but so far, none have been charged. It is thought prosecutors are waiting for the outcome of the legal challenge before they make a decision on whether to press ahead and put people before the courts.
