logo
How Putin could turn off the taps to our cash

How Putin could turn off the taps to our cash

Telegraph15-03-2025

It's easy to take electronic payments for granted. In a world where the casual tap of a phone can buy almost anything, cash is no longer king.
But our reliance on digital transactions has ushered in a new and insidious threat.
Cyber attacks on Britain's banking system by hostile states risk mass disruption for consumers – and the drive to go cashless is making the country more vulnerable.
'If something is 'smart', it's hackable,' says Professor Alan Woodward, a computer security expert at the University of Surrey. 'And we're totally dependent on digital payment infrastructure. A large-scale cyber attack would have a profound effect on daily life. The country would grind to a halt.'
Teams of sophisticated hackers in Russia, China and North Korea are constantly probing for weaknesses in the country's banking system, according to Kevin Curran, professor of cyber security at Ulster University.
These groups are given free rein and vast resources to launch cyber attacks, he says, and can easily claim that the fallout has nothing to do with them.
'Our absolute reliance on electronic payments opens us up to a lot more nightmare scenarios. There is no in between – either the system is up and running as planned or you're back to pen and paper, literally.'
Human weakness
The warning follows a string of high-profile 'payday glitches' affecting high street banks, causing chaos for customers.
In January, Barclays customers were left unable to access app and online banking services following a major outage that lasted three days. Some were left stranded abroad while others did not receive wages and were unable to pay rent. The bank has suffered outages lasting 803 hours over the past two years.
Lloyds, Halifax, Nationwide, TSB, Bank of Scotland and First Direct also experienced IT problems at the end of January.
Banks have blamed these failures on internal malfunctions. Barclays said the latest outage was caused by a 'software problem in a critical module of our UK mainframe operating system'.
Yet Professor Woodward sees these problems as indicative of weaknesses of banks to cyber attack.
'These outages are typically caused by someone [working for the bank] doing a system update, something goes wrong and takes a while to put right,' he says.
'It's a failure of process. The cause is usually human error rather than malicious intent.'
But a state like Russia with huge resources behind it has the capacity to exploit these human weaknesses in the system, by 'socially engineering' people into allowing their identities to be stolen.
Jake Moore, a global cyber security adviser and former cyber crime officer in the police, believes that while banks put a 'huge amount of effort' into protecting their systems from external hacking threats, the biggest challenge is the 'insider threat'.
'Someone might be targeted on LinkedIn, bribed, and asked to put a USB stick in a machine. They get half the money upfront and half when they put it in.'
'It's very difficult to mitigate against this in any industry. The difference in banking is there's far more to lose.'
An added vulnerability is that banks have vast and complex IT networks running on increasingly outdated technology that is difficult to maintain and update.
Professor Woodward says: 'The UK's banking system is quite robust. Banks increasingly have two-man rules, and a lot of partitioning. You have very few people with God-like privileges within the system.
'But behind the scenes, a lot of older computer systems are doing the processing and some parts of the system can be creaky.'
'People would suffer'
Western banks have suffered from a surge in cyber attacks in the past three years. In 2024, 65pc of financial services firms were hit with ransomware attacks, according to cyber security company Sophos. This was up from 34pc in 2021 and marked the third successive annual rise.
Santander confirmed it had been the victim of a cyber attack in May 2024 after a hacking group calling itself ShinyHunters claimed to have gained access to 30 million customers' bank account details.
JP Morgan fell victim to one of the biggest cyber attacks in the banking sector a decade ago when data on the accounts of 76 million households and seven million businesses were compromised.
The recent rise has been blamed in part on Russian hackers acting in response to sanctions placed on the country and its banks following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Artificial intelligence has allowed hackers to increase the number and sophistication of their attacks.
A worst-case scenario cyber attack would be like the payday loan glitch 'times a thousand', Mr Moore says.
'It was a catastrophic day for the Barclays outage to occur. The last Friday of the month and nearing the end of the financial year.
'It lasted three days, but if you were to lengthen the time by days or weeks, you see what a successful attack might look like.'
Hostile states are unlikely to attack multiple banks at once 'like in the movies', according to Professor Curran.
Instead, he worries about 'smaller, politicised strategic moves' against the sector – particularly a highly disruptive 'denial of service' attack which would bring down cloud services and data centres.
'Salaries would not be paid and the high street would be hit hard,' he says. 'People would really suffer.'
Death of cash
Cash usage has dwindled in the past decade. Figures from UK Finance, a trade body representing the financial services sector, show that cash accounted for just 12pc of payments made in Britain in 2023. Around two in five people are living virtually cash-free, according to the survey.
The Treasury ordered no new 1p and 2p coins from the Royal Mint last year, a reflection of the declining use of physical money. De La Rue, the company that prints Britain's banknotes, has said demand for cash around the world is at a 20-year low.
An HM Revenue & Customs report from 2021 found that 25pc of small businesses and 27pc of mid-sized businesses did not accept cash payments.
But the elimination of cash risks inadvertently playing into the hands of Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.
Professor Woodward keeps a little cash at home in case of disruptions to the financial system.
'I'm a professional sceptic because of the industry I work in. If everything collapsed, I'd at least want to be able to buy a loaf of bread.
'There's got to be some contingency if the system fails – the obvious one is to have more cash. But there's no point keeping cash if we get to a stage where people stop accepting it.'
A UK Finance spokesman said: 'The UK's banking sector has very strong protections in place and maintains a continual focus on cyber threats. The industry invests significantly to protect customers and keep systems safe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Squatter haven' former Thetford bank could become flats
'Squatter haven' former Thetford bank could become flats

BBC News

time7 hours ago

  • BBC News

'Squatter haven' former Thetford bank could become flats

A former bank, which became "a haven for squatters and drug use", could be turned into flats along with a restaurant or Barclays in Thetford, Norfolk, has been vacant since it closed in November 2022, after the company said the branch had a lack of customers.A planning application has been submitted to Breckland District Council to bring the building back into use as homes and a retail unit or business serving food.A surveyor's report warned the Grade II listed site has fallen into a poor condition after being broken into following Barclays' departure. The surveyor said: "Since Barclays vacated the building, it was broken into and became a haven for squatters and drug-associated use."Due to this, the building was professionally secured to prevent entry. It has been empty for a while and now has started to deteriorate, many of the features listed have started to rot and fall apart."Upon my survey, I found a great deal of water ingress and one really needs to act quickly to save this building."Under the submitted plans, the building would be turned into nine "luxury" flats along with a business on the ground council will decide on the plans at a later date. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

The City's U-turn on WFH tells you everything you need to know about bad bosses
The City's U-turn on WFH tells you everything you need to know about bad bosses

The Independent

time2 days ago

  • The Independent

The City's U-turn on WFH tells you everything you need to know about bad bosses

Barclays has taken overflow office space in Shoreditch. HSBC, having decided to relocate from Canary Wharf to new headquarters near St Paul's, is looking for extra room, including moving some workers back to Canary Wharf (and has told staff that their bonuses could be cut unless they're back in the office). JPMorgan and BBVA are finding accommodating everyone a tight squeeze. And BlackRock is also struggling to fit in all its staff. Some City firms are using a booking system, which sees those who wish to come to the office having to reserve a slot, such is the demand for desks. After three years, Citigroup has shut its Malaga outpost, billed as providing a better work-life balance for the bank's analysts, and steered its staff to London. What distinguishes all these financial corporations and others is that they claim to only recruit the brightest and the best. They make fortunes from advising the rest of us, along with businesses and governments, how to manage our affairs. On deals, they take command, devise strategy, issue orders and tell those involved how to behave. Yet when it comes to their own internal management, they are all over the place. We've seen it before, of course – the sector is littered with numerous instances of banks and investment houses being penalised huge sums for their poor conduct or for showing a lax attitude to other people's money. Frequently, they've set out on one course only to change direction, usually at a substantial cost in both money and people. Their approach to working from home (WFH) and remote working shows a herd instinct – something of which they are often guilty. If their customers did the same, these companies would be the first to complain and criticise. This is the most stark example of the confusion that rages around hybrid working, certainly in Britain. A recent study by King's College London found that Britain is the remote-working capital of Europe, with UK employees WFH 1.8 days a week on average – a number that is well above the global average of 1.3 days, and the highest in Europe. Globally, only Canadians average more days a week at home, WFH for 1.9 days. Dr Cevat Giray Aksoy, associate professor of economics at King's and lead economist at the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development, says: 'Remote work has moved from being an emergency response to becoming a defining feature of the UK labour market.' Dr Aksoy, who also advises the House of Lords on policy regarding the implications of remote working for productivity and labour markets, adds: 'This shift is forcing businesses, policymakers and city planners to reimagine everything from office space to transport to regional growth.' But is it? While his study may point to Britain being out in front or lagging, depending on how the figures are viewed, growing apocryphal evidence indicates something different. The City, for one, is signalling 'enough'. Stockbroker Panmure Liberum, reports the Financial Times, has joined Deutsche Bank in barring staff from working at home on consecutive Mondays and Fridays. UBS has told its folk they must be in on either Mondays or Fridays or both, as one of their three mandated days in the office. Broker Peel Hunt insists on four days a week in the office, while traders at Man Group are up to five. Santander views five days as the default option. Goldman Sachs regards WFH as an 'aberration'. JPMorgan chief Jamie Dimon, probably the most influential banker on the planet, argues that remote working allows 'bad habits to develop'. Where the City leads, like it or not, the rest of the country, business and organisation-wise, tends to follow. Brightmine, which studies HR practices, claims that 15.1 per cent of UK companies have reduced their WFH hours. Slowly but surely, the TWaTs – those who go in on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays – have begun to retreat. What began as a temporary solution to Covid and morphed into a trend, then a stampede, is coming to an end. Commuter numbers are edging towards their pre-pandemic levels. There will be those who resist, and there are bound to be lingering pockets of refuseniks, but by and large, Britain will fall into line. Maybe not reaching all five days, but the number WFH will be lower than it is currently, and will no longer be an outlier. It was predictable, and the banks for one should have seen what was likely to happen. After all, that is what they do, paying huge sums to smart graduates and deploying state-of-the-art technology to forecast the future. Seemingly no amount of qualifications from Stanford and MIT, no brilliant algorithms or AI, no 'thought leadership' gleaned in sessions at Davos or elsewhere, prepared them. This, too, in spite of the refusal of the mighty Goldman and JPMorgan's Dimon to play ball. If they had only stopped to think, it would have been obvious. Those super-smart hires are also intensely ambitious. How you get ahead, anywhere, is by standing out, making the boss sit up and notice. It's by showing that creative spark, which often results from being in the right spot at the right time. Convenient as they may be, the stultifying environments of Zoom or Teams, or even the sunny delights of Malaga and the Costa del Sol, are not that place. Ours – again, like it or not – is a globally connected world where commerce and trade are concerned. Nowhere more so than in banking. Why should workers in London, or the UK, operate to a different standard from everyone else? It does not make sense. At present, many employers are on the cusp; they are playing a balancing game. They are keen to not dissuade, and some Gen-Z and millennial employees expect to have the option to work from home. For now. But as they see those who spend more time in the office forging closer relationships with the chiefs, and winning promotions and higher salaries, it is surely a matter of when, not if, that changes.

Will interest rates be cut next week? The key factors for the Bank of England and 2025 predictions
Will interest rates be cut next week? The key factors for the Bank of England and 2025 predictions

The Independent

time3 days ago

  • The Independent

Will interest rates be cut next week? The key factors for the Bank of England and 2025 predictions

The Bank of England 's (BoE) next meeting to determine interest rates is on Thursday 19 June, and all eyes will be on the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) and whether its members opt to continue lowering rates. The base rate - currently at 4.25 per cent following cuts in February and May - impacts consumers and taxpayers through everything from their mortgages to savings, so what do experts foresee both next week and beyond? Will interest rates be cut next week? Almost certainly not, is the short answer. While back-to-back cuts were considered possible among economists earlier this year, since then we've had more uncertainty over Donald Trump's tariffs, businesses dealing with higher labour costs coming into force, higher than expected inflation rates and now escalating tensions after Israel's strike on Iran. As such, most analysts expect the MPC's June decision to be a split vote, but overall one to hold rates at 4.25 per cent for now. It's worth remembering that for mortgages in particular, many products are priced using future expectations of the interest rate, so changes in that market can still occur. For savers, while no immediate cut to variable rates is likely, it's always worth checking the best offers on the market to make sure your money is earning as much as it can for you. Influential factors around cuts The MPC has nine members and their votes decide if the base rate is cut, raised or kept the same. Barclays analysts expect a 6-3 split vote this time, but say 'the MPC would need to have substantial conviction that the economy is deteriorating quicker than its May forecast' to have another two voters flip to cutting. Even so, three votes to cut at this stage would be indicative of the direction of travel, paving the way for an August cut. Others have pitched expectations at a 7-2 split this time around. Among the factors MPC members will have been looking at are job and wages data, the level of inflation across the UK and also external factors which can impact the UK economy. While inflation data came in higher than expected for April at 3.5 per cent, though a rise overall was already on the cards with increased labour costs. Higher inflation is a reason to keep interest rates up, as it can discourage businesses from investing in new projects or hiring - which in turn raises earnings and spending power. Meanwhile, last week's key data saw salary growth slowing and unemployment rising - these are factors which can see interest rates decrease. Thomas Pugh, chief economist at audit and tax firm RSM UK, explained that while pay growth remains higher than ideal for the BoE, the drop-off is at a faster rate. 'The labour market is clearly easing more quickly than expected,' he said. 'Payrolls fell in May by the most since 2023 and private sector pay growth [...] slowed to 5.1 per cent in April from 5.5 per cent in March. Admittedly, pay growth is still well above the 3 per cent that is consistent with 2 per cent inflation. But pay growth is now likely to come in significantly below the MPC's forecast of 5.2 per cent, which will help to ease some concerns that sticky wage growth will keep inflation elevated.' What about the rest of 2025? Most analysts still expect two rate cuts between now and the end of 2025, one in August and one in November, to bring the base rate down to 3.75 per cent. Market rates currently price in an 82 per cent chance of an interest rate cut in August, though that has lowered slightly from earlier this week following Israel's missile attack on Iran. Higher oil prices are generally seen as inflationary, though can lead to lower spending power for consumers too. Investment bank UBS, meanwhile, says inflation is still 'uncomfortably' high and predicts the remaining higher interest rate to push the pound even higher against the dollar across the rest of this year. Barclays is sticking with an expectation of another cut beyond that in February, giving a 3.5 per cent rate by early 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store