Ford forced to shutter factories amid worrying parts shortages: 'Hand-to-mouth right now'
China's trade leverage temporarily shuttered one of Detroit's biggest brands.
Ford's CEO, Jim Farley, said his company doesn't have enough rare-earth magnets, forcing the automaker to halt some production lines.
'It's day to day,' the top boss said in a Friday interview with Bloomberg News. 'We have had to shut down factories. It's hand-to-mouth right now.'
Ford's production struggles are part of the ongoing tit-for-tat trade escalation between Washington and Beijing. But the company is expecting relief in the coming weeks.
In April, Chinese officials stopped the flow of magnets into the US — a critical component found in nearly every modern car's brake pads, seats, windshield wipers, and batteries.
The pause came in response to President Donald Trump's then-145 percent tariffs on all Chinese imports.
The throttled magnet trade threatened to strangle production plants and empty car dealership lots, sending automakers and industry groups into a tizzy.
In May, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation — which represents major US automakers — sent a letter to President Trump warning that China's response could paralyze car production.
'Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components,' the letter, signed by the group's president, John Bozzella, said.
'In severe cases, this could include the need for reduced production volumes or even a shutdown of vehicle assembly lines.'
Later that month, workers at Ford's Chicago plant, where the company builds the popular Explorer SUV, were told to go home due to the magnet shortage.
But as Ford continues to scramble for parts, the company is now expecting a reopening of the supply spigot.
American and Chinese trade negotiators have announced a tentative agreement that lowers tariff rates and resumes magnet exports.
The deal includes temporary export licenses for rare-earth suppliers. Those licenses will allow magnet shipments to resume to the top three US automakers — including Ford — as soon as this month.
China's President Xi Jinping has not officially signed the deal, but President Trump posted on Truth Social that the agreement was 'done.'
Industry analysts confirmed to DailyMail.com that rare-earth magnets will likely be exempt from American tariffs under the new deal.
A standard gas-powered vehicle requires around a half-pound of rare earth magnets
CEO Jim Farley confirmed that Ford had temporarily shuttered some of its plants because of China's magnet pause
Ford produces over 80 percent of its SUVs and trucks for the US market in American plants
Still, as the pipeline starts back up, Farley's announcement underscores China's current leverage over American manufacturing.
The US once refined its own rare-earth magnets for vehicle assembly, with facilities operating across dozens of Midwestern states.
But 20 years ago, the last domestic refinement plant — located in Indiana — shut down.
China, which now controls more than 90 percent of global rare-earth processing capacity, filled the gap.
American automakers are now looking elsewhere for supply, including Australia, Canada, and Saudi Arabia.
'Should the US-China trade deal be upheld by both sides, US automakers should be able to secure enough rare earths to continue their production as scheduled,' Seth Goldstein, a vehicle analyst at Morningstar, told DailyMail.com.
'I would guess all US automakers are looking to secure alternate rare earths supply outside of China as a way to protect themselves from the potential that China may halt exports again in the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Fix our woeful rollout of EV charging to rescue our car industry
Cyclists can drive motorists round the bend. Small wonder then that car bosses were peeved when Rachel Reeves gave them £400 million to build electric vehicle chargers in last week's spending review, compared to the £616 million grant to maintain cycle lanes. To be fair, once you add in benefits across other ongoing government schemes, a total of £1.4 billion has been earmarked to support uptake of zero-emission vehicles. Not that this stopped the car industry complaining. Senior figures in the industry were quick to demand 'more substantive measures to incentivise private consumer demand' if our EV targets are to be met. The obvious complaint is that a shortage of subsidies is holding back motorists' full-throttle embrace of electric vehicles. Yes, Britain's car industry is in the grip of a net-zero-infused crisis. Production is languishing at 70-year lows — with the exception of the Covid paralysis in 2020 — and the blame has been placed squarely at EV production quotas. So what's the answer? How about a return to lavish incentives to jumpstart demand, as the likes of Ford and Nissan have advocated? The government has resisted thus far — and rightly so. There has been much debate over the decision to outlaw the sale of most new petrol or diesel-powered cars at the end of the decade. Boris Johnson introduced the 2030 ban; Rishi Sunak pushed it back to 2035; Sir Keir Starmer has dragged it forward to 2030 again. But the time for flip-flopping is over. Britain has charted its course for EVs. Now we must stick to it. Achieving this goal — five years ahead of the EU, we should remember — rightly requires carrots and sticks. In terms of carrots, the primary incentive is that workers buying a company car benefit from tax incentives through a salary-sacrifice scheme that is so generous, it accounts for the lion's share of new EV registrations. As for sticks, supply is being forced up by the government's controversial Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate. Under this, car manufacturers must sell a certain percentage of EVs each year. This started at 22 per cent in 2024, and will be 28 per cent this year, ratcheting up to 80 per cent in 2030 and 100 per cent by 2035. Manufacturers will be allowed to sell new hybrid vehicles from 2030-35. Until recently, failing to hit the quota would have resulted in carmakers being slapped with a £15,000-per-car penalty. They escaped these fines last year by discounting heavily to stimulate demand, costing them an estimated £4 billion. Some might argue that the scheme is working perfectly, then. Nevertheless, Starmer has now agreed to reduce the per-car penalty to £12,000, alongside other flexible measures that could mean the fines are reduced further or negated completely. The introduction of grants to subsidise new EVs beyond company car schemes might, on the face of it, make sense, however. The No 1 barrier to purchasing an EV is that they are more expensive than petrol or diesel-powered alternatives, according to polling by YouGov from last August. Crucially, though, we may not be so far from parity. An EV was 51 per cent costlier than a petrol or diesel equivalent in 2018; this fell to 18 per cent in 2024, according to analysis by JATO Dynamics. That gap could soon disappear as a tidal wave of cheaper Chinese EVs floods the UK market. We will need to park the geopolitics of this, but it's hard to see how this isn't good for consumers from a purely financial perspective. Which brings us to what we should be concentrating on: charging points. That same YouGov poll — in which, by the way, 49 per cent of respondents said they would never buy an EV — revealed that the second-biggest barrier to going electric was a 'lack of charging infrastructure'. Yes, there are roughly 80,000 EV chargers in the UK, but the pace at which they are being installed is slowing. The compound growth rate between 2021 and 2024 was 37.5 per cent; in the first five months of this year, the number has increased by only 10 per cent. The slowdown counted its first casualty last week. Pod Point, which listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2021 at a £350 million valuation, was rescued by French energy firm EDF in a deal worth little more than £10 million. The £400 million that Reeves has set aside in the Comprehensive Spending Review for charging is an important first step. But money alone is not the answer. State aid might be best reserved for funding chargers in locations where the operation is wholly uneconomic. Yet talk to those in the EV charging industry and they will tell you that receiving timely planning permission and access to the electricity grid capacity are as important, if not more important than taxpayer handouts. One senior executive recently recounted the tale of a company behind a prospective charging site near Gatwick airport, which was told by officials that it would not be hooked up to the grid until 2037. 'We don't want grants — we want certainty,' said another. Then there is the inverse relationship between wealth and the cost of running an EV. An estimated 40 per cent of Britons live in a home without off-street parking, forcing them to charge their car at public chargers, which attract VAT at a rate of 20 per cent. Those with off-street parking, likely to be better off, can charge using their home supply, upon which VAT is levied at 5 per cent. For a Labour government seeking to champion 'working people', this discrepancy seems bonkers — but the Treasury may not see it that way. Crucial to driving the car industry out of its current malaise is a renewed focus on charging. Otherwise, the danger is that drivers will be running out of power left, right and centre. Which might anger them more than cyclists. Oliver Shah is away
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Sir Chris Hoy competes in Le Mans race – 20 months after life-changing cancer diagnosis
SIR Chris Hoy competed in the Mustang Challenge Invitational at Le Mans, despite his stage four cancer diagnosis. The Scottish sporting legend was diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer in 2023, but hasn't let the illness deter him from living life to the fullest. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Sir Chris Hoy and teammate Chris Harris 2 Action shot of Sir Chris' car He has previously competed in Le Mans proper in 2016, but wanted to show this year that his diagnosis doesn't define him. One of the ways he has done this is by taking part in an invitational race at the iconic event this weekend. Sir Chris said on Instagram: "What a few days at LeMans.. after my cancer diagnosis 20 months ago I never imagined I'd be back racing here again, so when the opportunity arose courtesy of Ford performance and Jay Ward to take part in the Mustang Challenge Invitational I grabbed it with both hands. "The circuit de la sarthe is a special place and the magic never fades, it really is a privilege to drive on this historic track. "As my team mate for the week Chris Harris said, you never turn down the chance to drive at LeMans. "Speaking of Chris Harris it was a blast to hang out, talk cars and learn from him, what a job he did in Race 2, P12 from 31st on the grid, making 11 places in lap one amidst the carnage and bringing the Tour de 4 liveried #77 home in style! "I managed P20 from the same grid position in race 1, very happy to have had some awesome battles throughout the 45 minute race and get a proper hit out after frustrations in qualifying. "Massive thanks to Academy Motorsport team for all their hard work and support, what a great bunch they are. "And finally, best of luck to all the drivers in the 24 heures du mans, I wish you a safe and successful race." The six-time gold medal winning star's car featured the 'Tour de four' logo, which is a charity bike ride the cycling hero has organised for later this year. Fernando Alonso drives to victory at the 24 hours of Le Mans in 2018 Hoy told TNT Sports before racing in France: "This is the Tour De Four, which is a mass participation charity bike ride which I'm organising in September, September 7th. "It's to try and raise £1million for cancer charities across the UK and also try and change perceptions of stage four cancer, because I was diagnosed with stage four cancer almost two years ago now and it shocked me, it rocked my world, it changed everything. "In one sentence you're told its not curable, but its treatable and suddenly you have this death sentence and it is terrifying but I'm here to show that life goes on for many people in that situation. "So the bike ride is to try and get as many people together as possible, not just people suffering with cancer, but anybody, to show that, you know, we can keep on living and make the most of every day and live in the present, because that's all any of us have." Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Walmart and Amazon plot astonishing move that would upend the whole banking system
Retail giants including Walmart and Amazon are reportedly exploring a bold plan to bypass traditional banks — by creating their own currency. The move to create their a so-capped stablecoin would allow the companies to handle payments with a form of cryptocurrency pegged to the US dollar. Walmart and Amazon could then cut out middlemen like Visa, Mastercard, and major financial institutions. The shift could save retailers billions of dollars annually in card processing and interchange fees — but experts warn it could trigger a crisis for the banking system. 'Big retailers moving away from traditional payment systems would be a huge blow for banks and payment providers,' Neil Saunders, managing director of retail at GlobalData, told the Daily Mail. 'Banks and credit card providers make huge profits from things like interchange fees. That is the reason for the interest from retailers – they want to reduce these costs.' Other companies are looking at a stablecoin too, including Expedia and airlines, according to the report by The Wall Street Journal. Any innovation currently depends on a bill, called the Genius Act, which would establish a regulatory framework for stablecoin. The cryptocurrency legislation wouldn't just enable companies to launch stablecoins — it's also key to convincing consumers the new payment system is safe. There is a level of skepticism around the safety of digital assets and currencies, including stablecoin. The bill still needs to clear the Senate and the House if any major changes are to become a reality. Stablecoins could allow retailers to avoid traditional payment systems which cost them billions of dollars in fees every year, including interchange fees which they pay when shoppers make purchases using their debit or credit card. They could also offer merchants a quicker process for receiving proceeds from sales. Currently, payments can sometimes take days to settle. It would offer an alternative to the card-based system which is dominated by Visa and Mastercard. Interchange fees, or 'swipe' fees, for Visa and Mastercard totaled $111.2 billion in 2024, up from $100 billion the year before, according to the Merchants Payments Coalition. The group of retailers has been meeting with lawmakers in recent months to push for the Genius Act to be made law. They believe that a regulatory framework for stablecoin could help end the 'duopoly' of Visa and Mastercard. 'Big retailers moving away from traditional payment systems would be a huge blow for banks and payment providers,' said Neil Saunders, managing director of retail at GlobalData Interchange fees, or 'swipe' fees, for Visa and Mastercard totaled $111.2 billion in 2024, up from $100 billion the year before, according to the Merchants Payments Coalition 'More choice and more innovation is a good thing,' Doug Kantor, member of the Merchants Payments Coalition's executive committee, told the Daily Mail. 'There has been no innovation in 40 years.' For Kantor, stablecoins are a positive step as they mean more competition for Visa and Mastercard, and they could make payments more efficient and more convenient for merchants and customers. However he notes that there are many things that need to happen before stablecoin payments could become a reality in stores across the US. Not only is regulation needed for consumers so they can see it is a safe payment method, but Visa or Mastercard could potentially take control of or kill any stablecoin venture in order to maintain their dominance, he said. 'They have an incentive to stop innovation,' Kantor explained. There could also be difficulties in convincing consumers to adopt new technology, or traditional banks could simply adapt to the changes, said Bankrate financial analyst Stephen Kates. 'A large shift from the traditional banking and payment systems would create a huge crisis for the mainstays of the industry, such as JPMorgan Chase or Bank of America in banking, or Visa and Mastercard in payments,' he told the Daily Mail. 'However, at this early stage, it is easy to assume that the banks and payment processors could shift their businesses to accommodate the changes in merchant and consumer behavior. 'However, it is not yet clear how big of a move there would truly be. The introduction of pay-by-bank options at retailers has not meaningfully reduced credit card volumes, given the entrenched use of cards and the ease and comfort of the swipe.' 'More choice and more innovation is a good thing,' Doug Kantor, member of the Merchants Payments Coalition's executive committee, told the Daily Mail Amazon's efforts to integrate stablecoins are still in the early stages, a person familiar with the discussions told The Wall Street Journal He said if retailers made a forcible move towards card alternatives, such as a store-brand or third-party issued stablecoin, it would most likely be used primarily online, where there are already many competing payment options, such as PayPal or Buy-Now-Pay-Later. 'Credit card companies and banks aren't yet challenged by these new entrants and would most likely not be immediately challenged by stablecoins either,' he continued. Whether or not these changes would be good for the consumer remains to be seen, Kates added. Third-party institutions like Visa or Mastercard offer proven security and muscle for consumers who are victims of fraud, he said, but stablecoins offer none of this. 'While companies like Walmart or Amazon have the financial resources to stand behind any future branded stablecoins, there are open questions about how stablecoin use or misuse might impact the stability of the broader financial system. 'Stablecoins, similar to other non-bank, non-FDIC insured products like money markets, are susceptible to runs, which can become panic-inducing for consumers and financial institutions when they occur.' Plus, it is unlikely to mean that lower costs from reduced interchange fees are passed down to the consumer. 'It's possible that the overall cost of goods might fall slightly, but it is more likely that there would be a discount for consumers who use it similar to the cash discount seen at certain retailers,' said Kates. Amazon's efforts to integrate stablecoins are still in the early stages, a person familiar with the discussions told The Wall Street Journal, and some of the talks have centered on having the company's own coin for online purchases. Walmart has lobbied for adding a separate amendment to the Genius Act, people familiar with the matter told the outlet. It would introduce more competition in the credit-card sector.
