&w=3840&q=100)
Govt plans to amend refund provision in new Income Tax Bill, 2025
In a relief to taxpayers, the government is likely to amend the controversial refund provision in the new Income Tax (I-T) Bill, 2025, which denies refunds if the I-T return is filed after the due date, according to an official in the finance ministry.
Section 433 of the new I-T Bill states a refund must be claimed by filing a return regardless of whether it is belated.
In contrast, Section 263(1)(a)(ix) specifies that to qualify for a refund, the return must be filed on or before the due date, creating a contradiction.
'Experts and stakeholders have raised concern over the refund provision in the draft Bill. That was a drafting error, which will be rectified,' a government official told Business Standard.
'The provisions related to refund in the new Act will remain the same as in the current law,' the official added.
Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had introduced the new I-T Bill, 2025, on February 13. After that a select committee constituting 31 members of Parliament (MPs) was formed to examine it.
In March, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had invited suggestions from stakeholders and they were to be forwarded to the select committee.
The suggestions were aimed at enhancing clarity and reducing the compliance burden on taxpayers.
According to the official, the select committee will submit its report on the first day of the monsoon session of Parliament.
'The ministry will analyse the recommendations made by the select committee, after which changes will be incorporated in the Bill,' the official added.
Once passed by Parliament, the new I-T law is expected to take effect from April 1, 2026.
An email sent to the ministry remained unanswered till the time of going to press.
The due date for filing I-T returns varies from taxpayer to taxpayer. For most individual taxpayers, including salaried employees and Hindu undivided families (HUFs) not requiring audit, the deadline is typically July 31 of the assessment year. For businesses, professionals, and companies whose accounts are subject to tax audit, the deadline extends to October 31. A belated or revised return may be filed until December 31, though late filing may cause penalties and restrict benefits such as the carry-forward of losses.
'While the CBDT has maintained that there are no policy changes in the provisions related to refunds in the new I-T Bill, 2025, it is a fact that Section 263(1)(a)(ix) requires that returns must be filed within the due date to claim a refund,' said Vivek Jalan, partner, Tax Connect Advisory Services.
'But Section 433 requires a refund be sought only while filing a return, which makes the issue more intriguing. This would compel assessing officers to disallow refunds if the returns are delayed. In the current tax law, even when an individual submits a belated return by December 31 of the assessment year the person can still claim for a refund for any excess tax paid,' Jalan added.
According to Jalan, such provisions will create hardship for taxpayers who miss the due date. The ministry, while finalising the draft I-T Bill, 2025, should tweak this provision so that there is no litigation on this, which will affect taxpayers.
In the same vein, Punit Shah, partner, Dhruva Advisors, said: 'Interplay between Sections 263 and 433 has created confusion in respect of the claim of tax refunds on belated or revised tax returns. This cannot be the intention of the government and appears to be a drafting error. It would be appropriate for the government to amend the relevant provisions to allow refund claims even in the case of belated or revised tax returns.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Residents around Shaniwar Wada stage protest, demand lifting of ban on reconstruction within 100 m of protected monuments
Residents living around the historic Shaniwar Wada on Sunday staged a protest demanding that heritage laws prohibiting reconstruction within 100 metres of protected monuments be repealed. Members of the Shaniwar Wada Heritage Victims' Committee gathered holding placards that read: 'No begging, we want a house of our right', calling current laws unjust and outdated. The protesters demanded that restrictive laws barring reconstruction within 100 metres of protected monuments such as Shaniwar Wada be abolished. They said that families living in the area for generations are now facing displacement due to regulations under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 2010. The law, enacted by Parliament, prohibits redevelopment or new construction within 100 metres of monuments protected by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), including Shaniwar Wada and Pataleshwar. Sunil Tambat, chairman of the committee, said, 'Residents whose families have been here since the time of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and the Peshwas are now forced to live in crumbling structures, with no legal rights to rebuild. Most cannot afford to buy homes elsewhere. These heritage laws have left us trapped.' Sunday's protest was attended by several local residents and activists, including Mayuresh Pawar, Ganesh Nalawade, Sanjay Fengde, Kundan Tambat, Anupama Majumdar, Swapnil Thorve, and others. The committee plans to continue its agitation until the demands of its members are met. In March 2023, the committee had also written to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) seeking permission for total reconstruction of dilapidated houses and a reconsideration of ASI norms. However, there was no response which prompted the Sunday protest. The issue has grown more urgent due to the deteriorating condition of several traditional wadas—historic residential structures—in nearby areas like Kasba Peth, Budhwar Peth, Shaniwar Peth, and Nana Peth. According to a 2022-23 survey conducted by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), 57 such wadas located within 100 metres of Shaniwar Wada were declared dangerous. Of these, 26 structures fall under the C1 category (extremely unsafe and uninhabitable); while 31 fall under the C2 (moderately unsafe) category. Every monsoon, the PMC begins the process of evicting residents from these buildings to prevent accidents. PMC executive engineer Supriya Walse-Patil clarified, 'As per the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations (UDCPR), residents are allowed to repair structures within 100 metres of Shaniwar Wada. However, any redevelopment or new construction still requires approval from the archaeological department, which remains restricted under ASI rules.' Local MLA Hemant Rasane, representing the Kasba Peth constituency, acknowledged the limitations of current laws and the plight of residents. 'The ASI law is the same across India. Changing it requires a central government policy decision. We are following up on the matter with the Centre. In addition to this, redevelopment of wadas poses a separate set of challenges, and I am actively working with the state government to find a solution.'


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
CM Saini by side, Union minister Rao Inderjit slams Haryana govt for neglecting Ahirwal
Gurgaon: Sharing the stage with chief minister Nayab Singh Saini at a rally in Rewari, Union minister Rao Inderjit Singh publicly criticised the BJP-led Haryana govt for neglecting the Ahirwal region and cautioned the party that discontent was brewing. Speaking at Rao Tula Ram stadium, where the CM had just laid the foundation stone for projects worth Rs 288 crore on Sunday, Singh expressed his displeasure about various issues — from lack of civic infrastructure to environmental concerns. "Ahirwal was ignored not once, but twice. Former chief ministers never visited Kosli, and people kept waiting," he said. Addressing Saini on the stage, he added, "Mr chief minister, we formed this govt — fulfilling our demands is our right." The minister, who represents the region in Parliament, highlighted several critical issues plaguing south Haryana. Referring to a water crisis in Ahirwal, Singh said it could lead to a mass migration as people would have little option but to relocate to other places in the absence of adequate supply. He also condemned the poor planning of civic infrastructure, citing the frequently flooded underpass that hampered patients' access to AIIMS Rewari. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video] getfittoday Undo Singh brought attention to environmental concerns as well, pointing out that a dam meant to prevent industrial wastewater from flowing into Rewari during monsoon had been damaged in Rajasthan's Tijara. "We will not tolerate any kind of interference in our developmental efforts," he said. Singh also emphasised Rewari's potential as the next commercial hub, pointing out there were infrastructural challenges in neighbouring Gurgaon. "After Gurgaon, the next decade belongs to Rewari, but only if planning is done right and land is not sold haphazardly," he said. Responding to the criticism, CM Saini attempted to reassure the gathering of his govt's commitment to balanced development. "We are not a govt of any one caste or region. We are here for all 2.7 crore people of Haryana," he said. Saini also referred to various govt schemes, including free dialysis for kidney patients and Ayushman cards for senior citizens. The CM promised to fulfil 90 of 217 manifesto pledges by the end of this year and reiterated plans for establishing India's largest cooperative oil mill and a military museum in Rewari.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Then came Trump & his startling U-turns
US foreign policy under recent presidents has been marked by dramatic shifts, particularly concerning Iran, Pakistan, and India. Trump's approach has been especially unpredictable, reversing established positions and praising authoritarian leaders, contrasting sharply with his predecessors' strategies. This inconsistency raises concerns about the stability and reliability of US relationships on the global stage. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of .) Almost a decade ago, the Barack Obama administration and Iran struck a nuclear pact, but it was overturned soon after Donald Trump became the US President. The fusion was brief. Joe Biden tried to revive it, but he didn't succeed. The US-Iran relationship went from bad to worse. Then came Trump, who was now eyeing nuclear harmony. But suddenly, Israel entered the scene, creating added fission and justifying that two's company, three's a crowd. With Pakistan, the Obama administration maintained strategic ties despite tensions over some terrorist groups and even pumped in billions of dollars in aid. Then came Trump, thundering that Pakistan was lying, deceiving and 'housing…the very terrorists that we are fighting'. The Biden-led US continued with the Trump-I line of thinking — of limited engagement with Pakistan. But, in an out-of-theblue U-turn, Trump started praising Pakistan and hunting for trade across the Radcliffe Line. In fact, a top US general declared that Pakistan was a 'phenomenal counterterrorism partner'.What an incredible change of heart! That too when Pakistani handlers executed the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Closer to home, Obama's tenure strengthened Indo-US relationship and the Trump administration gave it a strategic rotation. Biden's period saw steady progress in ties in spite of a few hiccups. Then Trump reappeared. To say the least, his or his administration's actions have been embarrassing India quite frequently. It appears as if Trump wants to build relationships on shifting sands. Surprisingly, Trump's approach towards not-so democratic landmasses — West Asia, Russia, China, Hungry, North Korea, etc — has been consistent. Just a few days ago, he was seen mollycoddling Syrian interim president, a former Islamist militant with ties to Al Qaeda. Trump's praise for authoritarian leaders and his absolutist ambitions are well-documented. In this context, former US President George W Bush's remark appears so apt: 'If this were a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier... As long as I'm the dictator. Hehehe.