Catfishing destroying people's lives and leaving individuals traumatised
'Catfishing is is calculated, predatory and it can destroy people's lives,' stated Senator Nicole Ryan who said that vulnerable people are being scammed out of thousands of euros and individuals have been left traumatised
Catfishing occurs when an individual assumes a false identity online, often using stolen images or personal details, to deceive others into forming relationships, whether online or in person.
Victims of catfishing can fall into two categories; those who are deceived into thinking they are in a relationship with a non-existent person, and secondly, individuals whose images and personal details are stolen to create fake online identities.
Sinn Féin Senator Nicole Ryan said catfishing at its core is deception. 'Catfishing is when someone steals another person's images or identity to create a fake persona online often to trick, exploit or defraud others. While it began with a messaging or a dating app profile it frequently escalates to financial fraud and emotional manipulation. In some cases even coercive control.'
'This isn't harmless online behaviour,' said Ms Ryan. 'It is calculated, predatory and it can destroy peoples lives. We've seen headlines from high profile GAA players that have been impersonated, vulnerable people being scammed out of thousands of euros and individuals left traumatised after discovering a relationship that they believed was real actually never existed. But behind each headline is a human and some betrayed, humiliated and left sometimes to pick up the pieces.'
The Cork politician appealed for standalone legislation to be enacted which would give more power to An Garda Síochána and the court system to tackle catfishing. 'There is already current legislation that covers some of these aspects through harassment laws, fraud legislation and Coco's Law. While these laws are welcome we can't ignore the fact that catfishing is a distinct and emerging form of harm. It doesn't just fit neatly into the current legislation that we have of victims who are sometimes left without the clear path to justice.
'We believe that there is a strong case here to have this as a standalone offence that sends a clear message that online deception is not just morally wrong, but also legally wrong. It would give An Garda Síochána and the courts the clarity that they need when investigating and prosecuting these offences and it would give victims that they do deserve,' she added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Sinn Féin seeks meeting over Irish language status at Galway university
Sinn Féin's Irish and Gaeltacht spokesperson, Aengus Ó Snodaigh, has requested an urgent meeting with the Ollscoil na Gaillimhe authority to discuss the status of the Irish language at the university. Mr Ó Snodaigh said the Irish language community is disappointed that a "president with no Irish has been appointed to the country's only bilingual university for the first time since the State was founded". Last week, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe announced the appointment of Professor David J Burn from Newcastle in England as its 14th president. He will succeed Professor Peter McHugh, who has been in the position on an interim basis for almost a year. Prof Ciarán Ó hÓgartaigh had been the university president since 2018. This is the first time since 1926 that a president who does not speak Irish has been appointed to the university. Sinn Féin said this is a step backwards "in a university which is meant to be central to the revival of Irish and of the Gaeltacht". "I wish Professor Burn every success in his new role," said Mr Ó Snodaigh, "but urgent clarity is needed for the Irish-speaking community who are disappointed that a president with no Irish has been appointed to the country's only bilingual university for the first time since the State was founded". In 2017, the then government ended the statutory obligation which existed since 1926 that the office holder must be fluent and competent to perform their duties in Irish. Conradh na Gaeilge has also criticised the decision. Advocacy Manager with Conradh na Gaeilge, Róisín Ní Chinnéide, said that since the stipulation ended in 2017, there is no longer a statutory protection for the Irish language in Ollscoil na Gaillimhe. "This means that it will now be left to the university itself to demonstrate their commitment to the language. If the staff cannot conduct their business with the offices of the university in the Irish language, then one must ask if the university can continue to claim to be a bilingual one." Sinn Féin have called on the university to provide a definition of what constitutes a bilingual university. In a statement to RTÉ, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe said there has been no explicit requirement for a president of the university to be an Irish speaker since 2017. It said "the university's bilingual status is a key priority and the role of president includes statutory responsibility for providing strong leadership in supporting and promoting commitment to both our language and culture".
Irish Independent
13 hours ago
- Irish Independent
University of Galway defends new non-Irish speaking president amid Sinn Féin ‘step backwards' claims
Today at 11:42 The University of Galway has defended its newly appointed president after the Sinn Féin spokesperson for Gaeilge said the university had taken a 'step backwards' by hiring a president with no Irish. Sinn Féin spokesperson for Gaeilge Aengus Ó Snodaigh TD wrote to the newly appointed president of University of Galway, Professor David J Burn and the chairperson of Údarás na hOllscoile, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, seeking an urgent meeting to discuss the status of Irish in the university in the wake of the decision.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Arrival of new and unknown candidate in presidential election injects some life into dull race
The arrival of a new and unknown candidate in the presidential election has, for a brief moment, ignited what has been an unmercifully dull race. The high level of coverage garnered by businessman Gareth Sheridan came from a combination of his newness to the public stage, his age and, if we're being frank, a media which wants the race to kick off while it stubbornly refuses. One might think it would be sensible in a personality-driven race to take advantage of the fallow summer months news-wise and be in attendance at every agricultural show or public event you can find, but there is a wariness this time around due to a number of factors. Firstly, the elephant in all of the rooms owned by large political parties — money. While the figure often bandied about for a presidential run is €250,000, one informed source said the real cost to political parties could be anywhere up to three times as much. While none of the major political entities is broke, running three elections last year has drained the coffers somewhat. According to election spending reports published recently, Fianna Fáil had just €470,000 in cash at the end of the year. The party has this year run a "superdraw" raffle, understood to have brought in about €600,000. For Fine Gael, it had €1.7m on hand at the same time. Both parties paled in comparison to Sinn Féin, which finished the year with €4.6m in cash. While the chance to dominate the airwaves and column inches might be tempting, moving a candidate across the country requires time and resources, which teams are loathe to do. Secondly, there is the acknowledgment the campaign itself will be short, but gruelling. Fine Gael's candidate, former European Commissioner Mairead McGuinness acknowledged this in her letter of acceptance for the nomination, when she told supporters: "I do hope that you manage to get to enjoy some down time with family and friends before September." While the race is currently being held at walking pace, it will turn into a full-on sprint come September, and burning out your team, candidate and the public before the real business begins is a short-sighted plan with so much left to play for. Thirdly, the field is not yet clear, so it's not obvious where either of the two confirmed candidates — Ms McGuinness and Galway TD Catherine Connolly — should be pitching themselves. While Sinn Féin is expected to make a decision at some point in August, Fianna Fáil members are not expecting a candidate to be confirmed until its think-in in Cork next month. Unless, of course, the party opts not to run a candidate and allows Mr Sheridan become something of a proxy candidate, similar to how it approached Sean Gallagher's run in 2011. While the idea has been floated online, many in Fianna Fáil were quick to pour cold water on it, saying Mr Sheridan's association with independent senator Sharon Keogan would be one stumbling block, given her frequent criticism of the Government, as would Mr Sheridan's previous low profile and lack of public service. But, beyond that, there is only a handful within the party who do not believe it should have its own candidate. "We're the biggest party in the Oireachtas, we have to compete," said one TD. While some drew a straight line between Mr Sheridan's emergence this week and Fianna Fáil's lack of a candidate, it does not appear that straightforward.
