Sinn Féin seeks meeting over Irish language status at Galway university
Mr Ó Snodaigh said the Irish language community is disappointed that a "president with no Irish has been appointed to the country's only bilingual university for the first time since the State was founded".
Last week, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe announced the appointment of Professor David J Burn from Newcastle in England as its 14th president.
He will succeed Professor Peter McHugh, who has been in the position on an interim basis for almost a year.
Prof Ciarán Ó hÓgartaigh had been the university president since 2018.
This is the first time since 1926 that a president who does not speak Irish has been appointed to the university.
Sinn Féin said this is a step backwards "in a university which is meant to be central to the revival of Irish and of the Gaeltacht".
"I wish Professor Burn every success in his new role," said Mr Ó Snodaigh, "but urgent clarity is needed for the Irish-speaking community who are disappointed that a president with no Irish has been appointed to the country's only bilingual university for the first time since the State was founded".
In 2017, the then government ended the statutory obligation which existed since 1926 that the office holder must be fluent and competent to perform their duties in Irish.
Conradh na Gaeilge has also criticised the decision.
Advocacy Manager with Conradh na Gaeilge, Róisín Ní Chinnéide, said that since the stipulation ended in 2017, there is no longer a statutory protection for the Irish language in Ollscoil na Gaillimhe.
"This means that it will now be left to the university itself to demonstrate their commitment to the language. If the staff cannot conduct their business with the offices of the university in the Irish language, then one must ask if the university can continue to claim to be a bilingual one."
Sinn Féin have called on the university to provide a definition of what constitutes a bilingual university.
In a statement to RTÉ, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe said there has been no explicit requirement for a president of the university to be an Irish speaker since 2017.
It said "the university's bilingual status is a key priority and the role of president includes statutory responsibility for providing strong leadership in supporting and promoting commitment to both our language and culture".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
44 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
From one in four to one in 25: Ireland's shrinking farming workforce
The farmers, foresters, and fishers responsible for Ireland's primary production are now only one in 25 of the working population, and about one in 50 of the total population. They are the 108,450 working in "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" in 2024, according to the Central Statistics Office's Labour Force Survey. However, calculating farmers as a percentage of the working population depends on which of the CSO's surveys you follow, as explained by agriculture minister Martin Heydon, when asked for the number of people engaged in the food production industry as part of a parliamentary question before the Dáil broke up for the summer recess. Mr Heydon also gave the results of the CSO's Farm Structure Survey 2023, which indicated that 299,725 people worked on 133,174 farms across Ireland in 2023. The holders of these farms were 86.8% men and 13.2% women. Only 5,791 were aged under 35, while 50,392 were aged over 65. The Farm Structure Survey differs from the Labour Force Survey because it includes all people working on 133,174 farms, including those for whom it is not their main occupation. Mr Heydon added that for the purposes of calculating the agricultural labour force in 2023, 127,976 farm holdings of a defined size were included. Sole full-time Of these, 67,362 of farm holders defined farm work as their sole full-time occupation; 28,886 described farm work as a major occupation; and 31,728 as a subsidiary occupation. Excluding farm holders, 171,749 people worked on farms. Of these, some 132,278 were spouses and other family members, and 39,471 were non-family workers. This figure includes both part-time and full-time workers. Mr Heydon also gave the breakdown of the country's 299,725 people working on farms, both family and non-family workers, by region. Most are in the West, with 66,182; the border area has 56,249; the South-West has 49,814; the Midlands has 28,515; and the Mid-East and Dublin region has 27,704. In his parliamentary question, Dublin Fingal West Labour Party TD Robert O'Donoghue also enquired about age demographics, and the minister's reply included the mean age of farm holder by county and region. Nationally, this averaged 59.4, with relatively little variation, from a low of 58 in Donegal to a high of 60.9 in Galway. The youngest farmers are in the South-West, averaging 58.6. The oldest are in the West, averaging 60.7. Main occupation To complete the Labour Force Survey information, the minister said the 169,300 who worked in the agri-food sector as a main occupation in 2024 (representing 6.1% of total employment in Ireland), included 56,850 in the "manufacture of food and beverages" category, along with the 108,450 in the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" category. Of those people employed in the manufacture of food and beverages, some 50,225 worked in food and 6,625 worked in beverages. Including them, and assuming that 75% of Irish-produced food is exported (it's about 90% for livestock products; however, Ireland also has large food imports), each worker in the Irish agri-food sector can be said to contribute to the nutrition of 30 people in Ireland, plus 90 overseas.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants
The US and Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are to meet at a US air base in Alaska for talks on the Ukraine war. Expectations are high for the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years, but Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. It will be Mr Putin's first trip to a Western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in 10 years. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: Russia For Mr Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the West since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its NATO ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies - something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the "rights and freedoms" of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the "glorification of Nazism". It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukraine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a "personal victory" for Mr Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States Mr Trump promised he would end the war within "24 hours" after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Mr Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book "Trump: The Art of the Deal" said on Wednesday that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it did not halt its offensive. The US leader initially said there would be some "land swapping going on" at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Mr Trump has said he would "like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly". But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a "listening exercise" for the former reality TV star. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Mr Trump said, hinting Mr Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Europe Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. "Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president," French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Mr Trump on Wednesday. Mr Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Banks are making obscene profits – we should tax them to fund cost-of-living package, says Sinn Féin's Pearse Doherty
AIB and Bank of Ireland have made combined profits of €5bn this year but will pay little or nothing in Irish corporation tax on the profits, Sinn Féin finance spokesman Pearse Doherty said. This is because they are allowed to carry forward losses incurred during the banking collapse and set them off against any corporation tax they owe. Mr Doherty called for the law to be changed to stop investors in the banks pocketing billions of euro in dividends. If the profits of the banks were fully taxed, it would fund energy credits for families this winter, he added. 'There is something rotten at the core of our economy when banks can extract €5bn in profits and pay essentially no tax,' Mr Doherty said. The two banks have a combined corporation tax liability of just €39m for 2024. Obscene profits have been made over the last year The Donegal TD said the Government needs to 'stop facilitating the banks to avoid paying taxes on profits' they have made off the back of ordinary workers. 'Obscene profits have been made over the last year as banks heaped more pressure on workers and families during a cost-of-living crisis,' he added. The Government has said it will not be paying out a cost-of-living package, which included energy credits last year, in this October's budget. Mr Doherty said: 'The two big banks in the State, AIB and Bank of Ireland, boasted a combined profit of €5bn in 2024. ADVERTISEMENT 'We know from their financial statements that they now plan to not pay fair taxes on these unjustified profits – profits that are just the result of jacking up mortgage rates and short-changing savers.' Mr Doherty referenced the annual report of Bank of Ireland, which he claimed shows it plans to pay less than 2pc of its profits in tax, just €31m in Irish corporation tax. 'But it gets worse,' he said. 'AIB plans to pay just 0.3pc in corporation tax, or just €8m, to the Irish public on the profits they made in 2024.' He claimed this means Bank of Ireland is avoiding €221m in taxes, and AIB is avoiding paying €319m, even under Ireland's generous corporate tax rate of 12.5pc. 'That's over half a billion euro that could be helping workers and families through the cost-of-living crisis that is being siphoned off into corporate coffers and investors' pockets.' He said AIB and Bank of Ireland avoid paying tax on their bumper profits by carrying forward losses they have incurred in the wake of the financial crash and the subsequent bailout. The bailout is a gift that keeps on giving Mr Doherty said Ireland is an outlier in effectively applying no limitation on corporations carrying forward losses. He said the ability of bailed-out banks to avoid paying tax should end. 'The bailout is a gift that keeps on giving. And the Irish public keeps on paying,' he said. 'Government-sanctioned corporate profiteering needs to end. 'Banks must be made to pay their fair share of taxes.' The Department of Finance said what it called 'loss relief for corporation tax' is a long-standing feature of the Irish corporate tax system and a standard feature of corporation tax systems in all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. 'It recognises the fact that a business cycle runs over several years and that it would be unfair to tax income earned on profits in one year and not allow relief for losses incurred in another,' it said. Loss relief works by allowing a deduction for losses incurred in one accounting period against profits earned in another period. AIB said it is a very long-established part of Irish tax legislation that a business that makes a loss can offset that loss against its profits in later years and that is standard across all sectors. The bank added it adheres to all tax laws and rules and makes a significant tax contribution. 'In 2024, the total amount of taxes and levies paid and collected by AIB was €763m, with €376m of that paid by the group itself and a further €387m collected from employees, customers and shareholders, and paid over to the tax authorities,' it said. It said that as a result of changes announced by the finance minister in the budget in October 2023, AIB's bank levy payment has increased from €37m in 2023 to €94m in 2024, with a further levy of €94m to be paid in 2025. Bank of Ireland said that for last year, it will pay around €116m in Irish corporation taxes and levies made up of €31m in corporation tax and €85m for the bank levy. Since its introduction in 2014, Bank of Ireland has paid €404m for the bank levy. The group also pays taxes on profits generated in other jurisdictions. Bank of Ireland Group said, like any other company, it is allowed under the law and the tax codes to carry forward trading losses and utilise them against future trading profits. Changing the rules risks making Ireland a less attractive location for inward investment.
