logo
New lead emerges in cold case mass murder mystery: "We don't want to give up"

New lead emerges in cold case mass murder mystery: "We don't want to give up"

CBS News28-01-2025
A decades-old probe into a murderous gang rampage that mystified Belgium could be opened again to chase an unexplored lead, prosecutors said Tuesday.
The cold case known as the "Crazy Killers of Brabant" revolves around two waves of deadly supermarket robberies carried out between 1982 and 1985, killing 28 people including children.
The suspects were reportedly three men who covered themselves in face paint during the raids and became known for their ruthless attacks, the BBC reported. Some of the victims were tortured before being killed.
The gang's members were dubbed the "The Giant," "The Killer" and "The Old Man," the BBC reported.
Theories piled up over the years to explain the crime spree -- with the sums involved tiny, and money an unlikely motive.
One seriously considered thesis was that it was a bid to destabilize the Belgian state by current or former law enforcement officers close to the far right.
Yet the case was never cracked, with prosecutors declaring it closed in June last year.
On Monday, however, an appeals court in the city of Mons sided with a civil party to the case who had asked for two additional witnesses to be heard.
"The court accepted the request for these witnesses to be heard," a spokeswoman for the federal prosecutor's office told AFP, confirming a report in Flemish newspaper Het Nieuwsblad.
On November 9, 1985, when an attack on a grocery store in the Flemish city of Aalst left eight people dead, two brothers claimed to have seen six men in dark clothing fleeing the scene.
The boys -- aged seven and 10 at the time -- said they happened to have jotted down the car's registration number, a hobby of theirs at the time.
Their notebook was handed to investigators and logged in the case file, but the lead was not followed up and the brothers, now 47 and 50, were never questioned.
Although the probe was closed last year, civil parties to the case still had the chance to request additional investigative steps -- which several have since done.
"We don't want to give up," said Kristiaan Vandenbussche, a lawyer for relatives of victims of the Aalst attack who filed for the two brothers to be heard.
No one has ever been convicted in the case despite multiple overlapping investigations, countless fingerprint and DNA searches, dozens of exhumations and even arrests leading to charges.
In 2020, authorities released a new photo of a man who they said could be linked to the case, the BBC reported. In the picture, the unidentified man was seen posing with a shot gun in a wooded area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Korean posts misrepresent Trump's Washington takeover as 'declaration of martial law'
Korean posts misrepresent Trump's Washington takeover as 'declaration of martial law'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Korean posts misrepresent Trump's Washington takeover as 'declaration of martial law'

After Donald Trump announced a federal takeover of the police force in Washington, Korean-language posts shared unrelated photos alongside a false claim that the US president had declared martial law in the capital. Some also drew a comparison to former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol's brief imposition of martial law in December 2024, but several experts told AFP that Trump's actions do not constitute a suspension of civilian rule. "Martial law has been declared in Washington. It is an exclusive presidential authority and an act of governance," reads a Korean-language post shared August 12, 2025 on Threads. The post includes an image of a military convoy crossing a bridge and a picture showing a group of soldiers riding the metro. A cut-out photo of Trump pointing forward is superimposed over the images. It surfaced after Trump said he would place the US capital's Metropolitan Police under federal control, which would be backed up by 800 DC National Guardsmen, to curb violent crime in the city of 700,000 (archived link). In June, Trump similarly deployed National Guard troops and US Marines in Los Angeles -- the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard against the wishes of a state governor. Unlike the 50 states, the District of Columbia operates under a unique relationship with the federal government that limits its autonomy and grants Congress extraordinary control over local matters (archived here and here). The overwhelmingly Democratic city faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. Data from Washington police, however, show significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024 after a post-pandemic surge (archived link). The same images spread elsewhere on Facebook and Instagram. Similar X posts also drew a comparison between Trump's actions and Yoon's, arguing it showed the impeached former South Korean president's martial law declaration did not amount to a crime (archived link). Yoon plunged South Korea into a political crisis when he sought to subvert civilian rule on December 3, sending troops to parliament in a bid to prevent lawmakers from voting down his declaration of martial law. Yoon -- who now faces charges of insurrection and abuse of power -- became the country's first sitting president to be arrested in January 2025. His brief imposition of martial law in South Korea differs from Trump's deployment of military and federal law enforcement to Washington, according to experts in both countries. "The regular civilian laws are in effect in DC," said John Yoo, a law professor at the University of California-Berkeley (archived link). "In fact, there is no federal statute for declaring martial law in DC, not to mention the United States as a whole." He added on August 18: "Someone could think that the use of troops in DC is somehow similar to what happened in Korea. But that would be incorrect as a legal matter." No suspension of civilian rule There is no established definition of martial law in the United States, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, but it "usually refers to a power that, in an emergency, allows the military to take the place of the civilian government and exercise jurisdiction over civilians in a particular area" (archived link). An announcement on the White House website, titled "Restoring Law and Order in the District of Columbia", makes no mention of the military taking the place of Washington's civilian government (archived link). The announcement, signed by Trump, reads: "I must also ensure that all citizens can avail themselves of the right to interact with their elected representatives, and that the Federal Government can properly function, without fear of being subjected to violent, menacing street crime." The District of Columbia filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's moves to install Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as "emergency" police commissioner. District Judge Ana Reyes brokered a deal under which Cole agreed to give directives through the mayor's office (archived link). Legal experts in South Korea dismissed comparisons between Trump's actions and those of former president Yoon. Chung Tae-ho, a constitutional law professor at Kyung Hee University, told AFP that "Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law sought to dismantle the democratic constitutional order by mobilising the military" (archived link). "By contrast, Trump does not appear to have deployed the National Guard to destroy the democratic constitutional order, so the intent itself differs from the outset," he said August 15. Paik Eun-seok, a professor at Handong International Law School and a US-trained lawyer, told AFP there are "clear differences" between Trump and Yoon's actions (archived link). "On December 3, the president not only declared martial law but also sought to restrict or seize control of the functions of the National Assembly, the National Election Commission, and the courts, using military forces -- thus constituting a martial law situation," he said August 15. "While Washington's Metropolitan Police has been placed under federal control, the National Guard has not replaced them, and therefore it can be argued it is not martial law in the usual sense." Misused visuals Reverse image searches on Google also show the photos used in the false posts predate the federal takeover of Washington. The first image of tanks and military vehicles crossing a bridge was taken during a June 14, 2025 parade in Washington to honour the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump hosted the event on his 79th birthday, spurring protests across the country accusing him of acting like a dictator (archived link). "A tank drives past the Lincoln Memorial as other vehicles line up on the Arlington Memorial Bridge during the 250th Anniversary of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration on Saturday June 14, 2025 in Washington, DC," reads the photo's caption on the Getty Images website, which credits The Washington Post (archived link). The second image of soldiers sitting on a train was taken January 20, 2021 ahead of former US president Joe Biden's inauguration. "Soldiers with the North Carolina National Guard ride a Metro train that will get them to the station they will guard for the 59th Presidential Inauguration in Washington on Jan. 20, 2021," reads its caption on the National Guard website (archived link). More than 25,000 National Guard members from across the United States were deployed in the capital before and during the inauguration as part of an unprecedented security response after Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6 following a rally denouncing the election results. AFP has previously debunked other claims related to Yoon's declaration of martial law and the situation in Washington.

What we know about Strictly 'cocaine' scandal as police investigate
What we know about Strictly 'cocaine' scandal as police investigate

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What we know about Strictly 'cocaine' scandal as police investigate

The Met Police and the BBC are investigating after two of the show's stars were accused of taking the class-A drug The Met Police is investigating allegations of drug use on Strictly Come Dancing. It was "widely known" that two stars of the BBC show allegedly took the class A substance, The Sun on Sunday reported. The Met has now said it had "received an allegation about drug-related offences". In a statement, it added: "Police are assessing the information and further enquiries are taking place to establish whether there is evidence of a criminal offence being committed." The drug-taking allegations first emerged in a legal submission to the BBC from law firm Russells on behalf of former celebrity contestant Wynne Evans, according to the newspaper. Evans's own time with Strictly wasn't without controversy; he was forced to quit the tour after he made an "inappropriate and unacceptable" comment during its launch, and consequently, BBC Radio Wales didn't renew his contract. Who are the Strictly stars accused of drug taking? The Sun on Sunday reported that there were two Strictly stars accused of drug taking. Those two stars in question have not been named by the newspaper. It was reported that the two stars will be offered professional support behind the scenes. BBC offered no comment on this. What has the BBC said? BBC News reported that the broadcaster is understood to have enlisted the help of a law firm to support the investigation into the allegations of drug taking. External law firms report back to internal teams in cases like this, Yahoo UK understands. The investigation is being led by the BBC, not the law firm. A BBC spokesperson said: "We have clear protocols and policies in place for dealing with any serious complaint raised with us. We would always encourage people to speak to us if they have concerns. It would not be appropriate for us to comment further." The Sun reported the possibility of random drug tests being implemented into the Strictly tour. However, Yahoo UK understands that there are no plans to introduce further measures at this time. Changes to Strictly Come Dancing BBC made a number of changes to Strictly Come Dancing's welfare last July, behind the scenes. Chaperones now attend every rehearsal room, and there were two new welfare producers appointed as part of the new measures. Additional training is now provided for the dancers, production team and crew. New measures were put in place after allegations were made about some of the professional dancers. Strictly's pro dancers Giovanni Pernice and Graziano Di Prima left the show in the wake of allegations about their behaviour toward their dance partners Amanda Abbington and Zara McDermott. Former dance partner Abbington made allegations of bullying and harassment claims against Pernice, who had denied the claims; some of the complaints were upheld, but not all of them. Strictly Come Dancing will return in the autumn with two new professional dancers and celebrities taking part in the show. Yahoo UK has reached out to the BBC and Wynne Evans' representatives for further comment. Solve the daily Crossword

Police investigating Strictly 'drug use' claims
Police investigating Strictly 'drug use' claims

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Police investigating Strictly 'drug use' claims

The Metropolitan Police has said it is investigating allegations of drug use on Strictly Come Dancing. In a statement, the Met said it had "received an allegation about drug related offences". "Police are assessing the information and further enquiries are taking place to establish whether there is evidence of a criminal offence being committed," it said. The BBC said it had "clear protocols and policies in place" for dealing with any serious complaints raised with it. The Met's involvement comes after the the BBC launched an investigation earlier this month into alleged drug use by two stars of the show, who have not been named. It followed a report in the Sun on Sunday, which said the alleged drug use by the stars was widely talked about on the show. BBC News understands the corporation has hired a law firm to help it carry out the probe. On Sunday, the Sun reported that the BBC had referred the matter to police. A Met spokesperson later confirmed that the force had "received an allegation about drug related offences" on Tuesday 12 August. The BBC said it would not comment on any police investigation. But it highlighted a previous statement which read: "We have clear protocols and policies in place for dealing with any serious complaint raised with us. "We would always encourage people to speak to us if they have concerns. It would not be appropriate for us to comment further." Strictly, which has been airing since 2004, has faced multiple controversies over the past few years relating to the behaviour of some of its professionals and celebrity guests. It is believed, however, that this is the first time the BBC has been in contact with the police over allegations linked to the show.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store