Tariffs expected to lift underlying US consumer prices in May
WASHINGTON - U.S. consumer prices likely increased moderately in May amid relatively cheaper gasoline, but the Trump administration's import tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods, potentially raising underlying inflation pressures.
The Consumer Price Index report from the Labor Department on Wednesday could show the CPI less the volatile food and energy components rising by the most in four months. Economists said the increase in the so-called core CPI would be attributable to higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties. May would mark the start of tariff-related high inflation readings that could last through year end, they said.
Walmart last month said it would begin raising prices in late May and June. Economists said inflation has been slow to respond to tariffs as most retailers were selling merchandise accumulated before the duties took effect.
"Retailers showed remarkable restraint in April," said Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander U.S. Capital Markets. "May should bring the leading edge of price increases, with the maximum impact coming in June and July."
The CPI likely increased 0.2% last month after advancing by the same margin in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. Gasoline prices were mostly lower in May as concerns over global economic growth curbed crude oil prices.
In the 12-months through May, the CPI was forecast increasing 2.5% after rising 2.3% in April. Some of the rise in the year-on-year CPI would reflect last year's low readings dropping out of the calculation.
Core CPI is forecast to have climbed 0.3%, which would be the biggest gain since January, after rising 0.2% in April. In the 12 months through May, core CPI inflation is estimated to have increased 2.9% after rising 2.8% in April.
The Federal Reserve tracks different inflation measures for its 2% target. The U.S. central bank is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range next Wednesday while policymakers monitor the economic impact of the tariffs.
STAFFING CRUNCH
The CPI data will come under close scrutiny in the months ahead after the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Labor Department's agency that compiles the report and other economic releases including the closely watched employment report, announced last week the suspension of CPI data collection in three cities because of resource constraints.
The BLS like all government agencies has been severely affected by mass firings, voluntary resignations, early retirements and hiring freezes, which are part of an unprecedented campaign by the White House to drastically reduce the size of government and remake it.
The BLS has also announced that it would, effective with the release of the July Producer Price Index data in August, end the calculation and publication of about 350 indexes. That would include data from PPI industry, commodity, final demand-intermediate demand and special index classifications.
Economists said that the BLS had with the CPI data reported a rise in the share of categories for which prices were calculated using a method called different cell imputation, which some viewed as less accurate.
The BLS said on Tuesday its published data met rigorous standards, but did not address staffing issues.
"Data quality is evaluated through measures of variance, bias studies, and assessments of survey methods," the agency said in a statement to Reuters. "BLS continues to evaluate data quality."
A former BLS commissioner told Reuters that staff levels were considerably low at the agency.
"I understand that BLS staffing is down by at least 15% now, that's not reflected in any official numbers yet, because many of them are still being paid," said Erica Groshen. "They are not at work and it is impinging on the agencies. Also the hiring freeze means that they can't be replaced."
Groshen said the CPI report remained reliable, noting an increased shift towards electronic collection of data.
"At a national level, the standard errors aren't really affected very much, and the reliability is still good, but it's really disaggregated at the granular level, where you're starting to see some real losses," she said. "It's just not aiding publication standards, and so they're not putting it out, but they can still use it as input to the national numbers."
Other economists agreed, noting that the collection suspension only affected a small area.
"I don't see that as being a deal breaker," said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. "The problem would be, if they start to have to suppress more of them or drop them out of the survey, then that could be more problematic."
(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani, Editing by Nick Zieminski)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
Most G7 members ready to lower Russian oil price cap without US
Most countries in the Group of Seven nations are prepared to go it alone and lower the G7 price cap on Russian oil even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to opt out, four sources familiar with the matter said. G7 country leaders are due to meet on June 15-17 in Canada where they will discuss the price cap first agreed in late 2022. The cap was designed to allow Russian oil to be sold to third countries using Western insurance services provided the price was no more than $60 a barrel. The European Union and Britain have been pushing to lower the price for weeks after a fall in global oil prices made the current $60 cap nearly irrelevant. The sources, who declined to be named, said the EU and Britain are ready to lead the charge and go it alone, backed by the other European G7 countries and Canada. They said it is still unclear what the U.S. will decide, though the Europeans are pushing for a united decision at the meeting. Japan's position also remains uncertain, they said. "There is a push among European countries to reduce the oil price cap to $45 from $60. There are positive signals from Canada, Britain and possibly the Japanese. We will use the G7 to try to get the U.S. on board," one of the sources said. The White House had no immediate comment. During the G7 finance ministers meeting in the Canadian Rockies last month, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained unconvinced there was a need to lower the cap, according to sources. However some U.S. Senators may endorse the idea, including Lindsay Graham, who in recent weeks told reporters he supports lowering the cap. Graham is pushing a hard-hitting new set of Russia sanctions that could impose steep tariffs on buyers of Russian oil. The EU has proposed lowering the price to $45 a barrel in its latest 18th package of sanctions. The package must have unanimity from member states in order for it to be adopted, which could take several weeks. Russia's largest export grade, Urals, trades at around a $10 a barrel discount to the Dated Brent benchmark out of Baltic ports. Brent futures have been trading below $70 a barrel since early April. Sources said Washington's buy-in was not essential to lower the cap owing to Britain's dominance in global shipping insurance, and the EU's influence on the Western rules-abiding tanker fleet. The U.S., however, does matter when it comes to dollar-denominated payments for oil and its banking system. The EU and its Western allies have been progressively cracking down on Russia's shadow fleet of tankers and related actors, which work to circumvent the cap. The pressure has started to hurt Moscow's revenues and Western allies hope this will push more of the oil trade back under the cap. Russia's state-owned oil producer Rosneft reported a 14.4% slump in profits last year. (Reporting by Julia Payne and John Irish; Additional reporting by Jarrett Renshaw in Washington; Editing by Jan Harvey)
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
Mideast Stocks: Middle Eastern stocks lower on geopolitics
Stock markets in the Middle East ended lower on Thursday with uncertainty looming after the U.S. decided to relocate personnel from the region ahead of nuclear talks with Iran. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place", adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Saudi Arabia's benchmark index declined 1.5%, dragged down by a 1.2% fall in Al Rajhi Bank and a 3.3% decrease in Saudi Arabian Mining Company. The Saudi bourse retreated, erasing all recent recovery gains and pushing the index back towards early June levels. All sectors posted negative performances, indicating a pervasive risk-off sentiment during today's session, said Milad Azar, market analyst at XTB MENA. "While solid fundamentals offer a hopeful outlook, the market's reaction was more heavily influenced by geopolitical tensions," Azar said. "However, this impact may be temporary, and the market could reverse course." Dubai's main share index slid 2.3%, its biggest intraday fall in two months, with blue-chip developer Emaar Properties dropping 3.4%. In Abu Dhabi, the index finished 1.1% higher. The decision by the U.S. to evacuate personnel comes at a volatile moment in the region. Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appear to be deadlocked and U.S. intelligence indicates that Israel has been making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday that if Iran was subjected to strikes it would retaliate by hitting U.S. bases in the region. The Qatari index lost 0.8%, as almost all its constituents were in negative territory including petrochemical maker Industries Qatar, which was down 1.4%. Egypt's blue-chip index was down 1.3%. SAUDI ARABIA fell 1.5% to 10,841 Abu Dhabi lost 2.3% to 5,467 Dubai down 1.1% to 9,694 QATAR dropped 0.8% to 10,627 EGYPT down 1.3% to 32,512 BAHRAIN eased 0.2% to 1,918 OMAN down 1.1% to 4,543 KUWAIT slid 1.4% to 8,918 (Reporting by Ateeq Shariff in Bengaluru, editing by Ed Osmond)
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
US weekly jobless claims steady at higher levels
The number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits was unchanged at higher levels last week as labor market conditions continued to steadily ease. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits held steady at a seasonally adjusted 248,000 for the week ended June 7, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 240,000 claims for the latest week. Claims could remain elevated, with the school year ending this month as some states allow non-teaching staff to collect benefits during the long summer holidays. Though there have been no widespread layoffs as employers hoard workers amid economic uncertainty spawned by President Donald's aggressive tariffs, the labor market is steadily losing steam. An immigration crackdown by the White House is also slowing employment gains. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs in May, down from 193,000 a year ago. A lagging measure of employment, the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), has suggested a much slower pace of job growth between April 2024 and December 2024 than reported in the survey of establishments from which the nonfarm payrolls data is compiled. Economists said this partly reflected reduced labor supply because of immigration restrictions imposed by former President Joe Biden's administration in mid-2024. The QCEW data is derived from reports by employers to the state unemployment insurance programs. Economists said the QCEW data raised the possibility that payrolls could be revised substantially down from April 2024 through May 2025. Much would, however, depend on the QCEW data for the first quarter. "All things considered, we think the 2025 benchmark revision is most likely to revise down job gains from April 2024-March 2025 by 800,000-1.125 million, with the range for August's preliminary benchmark announcement about 200,000 higher," said Jonathan Millar, a senior economist at Barclays. "This would trim monthly payroll gains over the benchmark period by about 65,000-95,000 per month relative to the current estimate of approximately 150,000 per month." The claims report showed the number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 54,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.956 million during the week ending May 31. Recently laid off workers are struggling to find work, though the median duration of unemployment dropped to 9.5 weeks in May after surging to 10.4 weeks in April. (Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)
