
Quebec language watchdog now says it's OK to use ‘go' to support sports teams
MONTREAL — Quebec's language watchdog has changed its tune on whether it's acceptable to use the word 'go' to cheer on sports teams.
In a new guideline posted in its online dictionary, the Office québécois de la langue française says that while 'allez' is the preferred term, it's now 'partially legitimized' to use the English word to show encouragement.
The flip-flop comes after the office took a hard line with Montreal's transit agency, pressing it for months in 2024 to scrub the word 'go' from the electronic signs on more than 1,000 city buses.
The watchdog confirmed it had changed its position after The Canadian Press obtained a series of emails through access to information legislation, revealing it gave the transit agency a green light to use 'go' in June.
The reversal followed a public outcry on the eve of the Montreal Canadiens' first playoff home game in April, when the Montreal Gazette reported how the transit agency had replaced 'Go! Canadiens Go!' with 'Allez! Canadiens Allez!' to stay on the watchdog's good side.
The revelations prompted French-language Minister Jean-François Roberge to intervene, declaring that the expression 'Go Habs Go' is part of Quebec culture, and that any future complaints about the slogan would be dismissed.
That statement verged on political interference and placed the watchdog in a difficult position, according to one expert.
'The office had to respond to a political order,' said Benoît Melançon, emeritus professor of French literature at Université de Montréal. 'The minister said, 'You will accept this,' so the office had to find a way to accept it.'
The transit agency says it hasn't decided whether it will put the word 'go' back on its bus displays. On Wednesday, a spokesperson said the agency is now 'beginning its reflection on the subject.'
In an April statement, Dominique Malack, the president of the language office, agreed that the slogan 'Go Habs Go' is anchored in Quebec's history. Still, she went on to say that the word 'go' is an anglicism, and that public bodies have an obligation to use 'exemplary' French, which includes using only French words in their signage.
Emails released to The Canadian Press show the transit agency asked the watchdog in May, following the uproar, for authorization to start using 'go' again. A month later, on June 6, the language office directed transit officials to its new entry for the word 'allez' in its online dictionary of terminology, a reference guide for the proper use of French in Quebec.
The page notes how the anglicism 'go' has been used in Quebec since at least the 1980s and is 'well-established' in common parlance. 'It is considered to be partially legitimized,' the entry says.
When asked by The Canadian Press to comment on the newly released email correspondence, the watchdog confirmed it had updated its position.
'The office now considers that a public body can use the interjection go in a context of encouragement … without this compromising the duty of exemplarity incumbent upon it under the Charter of the French Language,' spokesperson Gilles Payer told The Canadian Press in an email.
Payer confirmed the entry was newly published on May 30. 'The media coverage of the case concerning the use of the borrowed word 'go' in a sports context led the office to officially assess the acceptability' of the word, he said.
Melançon, the French literature professor, said the new rationale – especially the term 'partially legitimized' – suggests the office was uneasy with the change.
'This must have given rise to some pretty intense internal debates,' he said. ''Do we take into account what the minister is telling us or do we not take it into account? If we don't take it into account, what are the consequences? If we do, how do we justify changing our minds?''
At least one transit agency official felt dubious about the original complaint, which related to a bus displaying the words 'Go! CF Mtl Go!' in support of Montreal's professional soccer club. She called the issue a 'grey zone' in a June 2024 email to colleagues.
'We've been using the word 'go' for years without a problem,' she wrote. 'Are we going to change everything because of one complaint?'
But by later that month, the agency had decided to scrap the word, which involved manually updating the display on each of more than 1,000 buses over a period of months.
The agency has said no further change will be made before the buses undergo regular maintenance in the fall.
The language office has received at least two other complaints about the word 'go' in the last five years, according to a response to a separate access-to-information request.
In 2023, someone complained about the slogan 'Go Habs Go' appearing on an outdoor billboard. That complaint was dismissed because the expression is a trademark.
A similar complaint in 2021 targeted the hashtag #GoHabsGo that appears in oversized letters outside the Bell Centre in Montreal, the home arena of the Canadiens.
The person who filed the complaint suggested that to comply with Quebec's language rules, the expression 'Allez les Habitants allez' should appear alongside the English slogan, in larger letters. 'And yes, I'm serious, if the law applies, then apply it! :)' the person wrote.
According to the language watchdog, that complaint was resolved following an intervention, though it provided no details. A spokesperson for the hockey team declined to comment.
The #GoHabsGo sign remains in place.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 3, 2025.
Maura Forrest, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
‘Honestly, it's gotten a lot worse': Teen girls on the Hockey Canada trial and life after #MeToo
Eight years ago, at the peak of the #MeToo movement, it seemed, for a brief moment, like progress was imminent. Women from around the world were sharing their extensive – and oftentimes painful – experiences of sexual abuse and violence, and lawmakers and corporations alike were pledging to make change. But in the years since, that progress has been stuttered. Harvey Weinstein, the film mogul whose case served as the rallying cry for the #MeToo movement, saw one of his convictions overturned. Donald Trump, who in 2023 was found liable for rape, was re-elected as President of the United States. And here in Canada, the recent Hockey Canada trial has reignited a conversation around what constitutes consent. The Globe and Mail spoke with a group of five teenaged girls, all of them 12th-graders from Kitchener, Ont., to get their thoughts on the current state of things: what it's like to be a young woman growing up in the post-#MeToo era, what sexual harassment looks like today and what they wish they'd been taught about consent. Have you all been following the Hockey Canada trial? [All of them shaking their heads no] Samira Nur, 17: It wasn't on my radar. But it does sound similar to a lot of stories I've heard, whether it's from people I know, or stories from the news. The case centres around consent – whether the young woman at the centre of it felt pressured and coerced into a situation she couldn't handle. How does that land with all of you? Have any of you had experiences where you felt pressured into uncomfortable situations? Samira: I work at a grocery store, so I encounter a lot of creepy men. There are a lot of older guys who are like, 'Oh, how old are you?' 'Let me take you home.' Or comment on my body while I'm picking something up from the floor. I've had a couple guys follow me home. I had another man ask me my ethnicity. When I said I was Somali, he was like, 'Oh, girls your age are married with kids by now. I'm going to ask your mom for your hand in marriage.' Technically speaking, I'm at work, and under the expectation that I still have to treat these people with kindness, despite the fact that I'm being, like, fully disrespected. Anna De Sousa, 18: I've been working since I was 12 at a bakery. There's this one [older male] customer I encounter every year. He comes in every summer, and asks me my age. And he always says, 'Oh, don't worry, I'll wait until you're 18.' Last year, he was like, 'You're 17 now. Next year, I'll be back. We're gonna go out.' I know he's going to show up this summer. Every time I see his face, my body literally starts shaking. As a teenager in the 1990s, I don't remember learning about consent or body safety in high school. What kind of sexual education were you given? Nishtha Tomer, 18: In Grade 9 health class, I think we only had, like, one or two classes about sex ed, and that's about it. It was mostly just sexual health – pregnancy, STDs and a lot about that. I also heard we learned a lot more than the guys did. A mistrial, jury dismissal, excluded evidence: Key moments in the Hockey Canada trial What about consent? Loyd Gebreselassie, 18: I know that they mentioned briefly things about consent – like what are your personal boundaries? And how do we make sure that's expressed? But it wasn't very in-depth. Samira: I think they used the 'tea' scenario. Like, if you don't want tea, you say you don't want tea. [Everybody laughs] It was like a YouTube video. It wasn't really treated very seriously. What do you wish you'd been taught? Samira: I wish we could have learned more about how much of a grey area consent can be. Consent can be removed. It can be coerced. It can be [the result of] abuse. Consent isn't as simple as yes or no. Not in terms of sexual situations, but I think a lot of us have said yes [to things] because of pressure, and not because we felt freedom or liberation to choose. I think that can apply in a lot of young women's sexual encounters – like because they're scared of losing someone. Anna: That's one thing I wish we explored more at school: Being able to say no in a way where you feel protected, you feel safe, but it's also respectful. So where do you turn to for advice on handling these situations? Shantelle Carrion, 18: I learned more from my mom. But it's kind of scary knowing that my knowledge of consent and relationships – everything comes from my parents. Thankfully, I'm in a very loving family, but that's not the case for everyone. Nishtha: I do have a close relationship with my parents. But it's still a brown household, and an immigrant household [Nishtha's parents are immigrants from India]. So it is a very stigmatized topic. So I mostly learned, like, from my amazing friend group about these things – and online as well. What about the role of alcohol or other substances when it comes to consent? What kinds of conversations are you girls having with your friends and families about that? Shantelle: Underage drinking is so normalized. I've had a personal experience where I went to a party [inebriated] my very first time – my only time. I regret it a lot. Thankfully I had a bunch of my girls with me. I bring this up because this is what happened in the Hockey Canada trial. It gives me chills, imagining the situation I could have gotten into if nobody else was there. It's so scary. We've been talking about it a lot [as friends], because we're going to be freshmen soon – how there's going to be a big party culture at university. As a teenager in the 90s, sexual harassment meant, for the most part, harassment on the street, or at school. What does it look like for you today? Nishtha: Honestly, I think it's gotten worse. With Instagram and Snapchat, it gives guys the ability to be anonymous when they're saying things. It switched from, like, being in the hallways to, like, texting your account, adding you to group chats. They will not say a word to you in real life, but online, it's the meanest things. And what does it look like when you try to have conversations about this stuff with your male peers? Loyd: I think this trend is growing with younger men – this Andrew Tate, red-pill sort of mentality. 'You have to be jacked. Your woman has to be submissive.' All these ideologies they've gathered and almost try to force onto women – and especially teenagers. Samira: It's gotten more hostile with the digital era. A lot of men do take women speaking out about these situations as hatred. I see that a lot. At the height of the #MeToo movement, many of us had hoped that things would be better, and safer for the next generation of young women. Has that been the case? Shantelle: I feel like the #MeToo era was amazing in the sense of spreading awareness, and bringing solidarity between women. More so that than actually really solving anything. Nishtha: It removed a lot of stigmatization, and helped to destigmatize conservations around sexual assault. And it helped remove a lot of shame that women carry. But I feel like legally, or even politically, there hasn't been real recognition or actual change for victims. Women did learn to cope with that together, and did build more of a sense of community. But also, it's something we shouldn't be having to cope with. There should be consequences.


National Post
19 minutes ago
- National Post
Alberta and Ontario environment ministers call for repeal of Trudeau era climate policies in letter
OTTAWA — The environment ministers of two of Canada's biggest provinces are calling on the Liberal government to scrap a host of Trudeau-era environmental and climate policies, saying the policies are holding the country back from meeting its economic potential. Article content Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz and Ontario Environment Minister Todd McCarthy said in a letter to federal counterpart Julie Dabrusin that the new, Mark Carney-led Liberal government will need to ditch Justin Trudeau's net-zero agenda if it hopes to meet its promise to make Canada an energy superpower. Article content 'We are hopeful that (the Carney government) will move away from policies and legislation that undermine competitiveness, delay project development, and disproportionately harm certain (regions) without any quantifiable benefit to the natural environment,' read the letter. Article content 'Canada is poised to become an economic superpower, but achieving that potential depends on strong, constitutionally grounded provincial authority over resource development and environmental management.' Article content Schulz shared a copy of the letter on social media on Wednesday, just as a two-day meeting between federal, provincial and territorial environment ministers kicked off in Yellowknife. Article content The letter calls for a repeal of the federal Impact Assessment Act, as well as a full repeal of the legislation authorizing the consumer carbon tax. Carney set the tax to zero shortly after becoming prime minister in March. The recently passed Bill C-5 allows projects deemed by Ottawa to be in the national interest to bypass some parts of the federal impact assessment process. Article content Article content Alberta has repeatedly called for this process to be either massively streamlined or eliminated altogether. Article content The letter also calls for Ottawa to cede more power to the provinces in the areas of clean electricity, carbon reduction and ecological protection. Article content 'Provinces have proven to be the best stewards of such decisions, as leaders of electrification, industrial innovation, public transit and other low-carbon initiatives,' write Schulz and McCarthy. Article content The two environment ministers also called for the reversal of the incoming federal emissions cap and clean electricity regulations.


CBC
33 minutes ago
- CBC
Aryna Sabalenka, Coco Gauff lead entry list for National Bank Open in Montreal
Aryna Sabalenka and Coco Gauff headline a star-studded women's field for the National Bank Open in Montreal, Tennis Canada announced Thursday. The world No. 1 and No. 2 are scheduled to take centre stage at IGA Stadium in a field that's also set to include two-time defending champion Jessica Pegula. The WTA's top 68 competitors are poised to compete as part of a 96-player main draw — the largest in the event's history — as the annual showcase enters its new 12-day format. Sabalenka, a three-time Grand Slam champion, has posted a 44-8 record so far in 2025, including victories in Miami and Madrid, along with an appearance in the French Open final. Gauff, who defeated Sabalenka at Roland-Garros for her second Grand Slam win, owns a 31-10 record this season. There will be at least three Canadians in the main draw, with Leylah Fernandez (No. 38) of Laval, Que., set to make her sixth NBO appearance. Toronto's Victoria Mboko, who was eliminated in the second round at Wimbledon on Thursday, and Bianca Andreescu of Mississauga, Ont., have both been awarded wild-card berths. Pegula became the first woman to capture back-to-back NBO titles since Martina Hingis in 2000 when she triumphed in Toronto last summer. The world No. 3 has added titles in Charleston, Austin and Bad Homburg to her resume this season, marking the first time she's won three tournaments in a single campaign Iga Swiatek (No. 4), Jasmine Paolini (No. 5), Qinwen Zheng (No. 6), Mirra Andreeva (No. 7), Madison Keys (No. 8), Paula Badosa (No. 9), and Emma Navarro (No. 10) are also scheduled to take part in the Canadian event. Other notable names include past Canadian champions Elina Svitolina (No. 13) and Belinda Bencic (No. 35), along with three Wimbledon winners — Barbora Krejcikova (No. 16), Marketa Vondrousova (No. 73) and Elena Rybakina (No. 11). The first NBO under the new format begins with qualifying July 26. Main-draw play runs July 27 through Aug. 7. The top 32 seeds will receive first-round byes and will begin play July 29 or July 30.