Trump administration blasted for trying to wipe gay rights icon Harvey Milk's name from US naval ship
Leaders in San Francisco are blasting the Trump administration for stripping the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk from a US naval ship − especially during Pride Month, when people gather to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community.
Milk is a revered figure in San Francisco history, a former city supervisor and gay rights advocate who was fatally shot along with Mayor George Moscone in 1978 by disgruntled former supervisor Dan White. Just last month, California marked what would have been Milk's 95 th birthday with proclamations heralding his authenticity, kindness and calls for unity.
Milk served for four years in the Navy during the Korean War, before he was forced out for being gay. He later moved to San Francisco, where he became one of the first out gay politicians in the world with his election to the Board of Supervisors in 1977.
Cleve Jones, a close friend and LGBTQ+ activist, dismissed the renaming as an attempt by the Trump administration to distract the American public from far more serious concerns, including the ongoing war in Gaza and looming cuts to Medicaid and Social Security. "Yes, this is cruel and petty and stupid, and yes, it's an insult to my community," Jones said. "I would be willing to wager a considerable sum that American families sitting around that proverbial kitchen table this evening are not going to be talking about how much safer they feel now that Harvey's name is going to be taken off that ship."
The Pentagon has not confirmed news of the renaming − a highly rare move − but unnamed officials say the change was laid out in an internal memo. It is in keeping with attempts by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the broader Trump administration to purge all programs, policies, books and social media mentions of references to diversity, equity and inclusion. A new name has not yet been selected for the USNS Harvey Milk.
Milk's nephew, Stuart Milk, said in a phone call on Wednesday, June 4, that he and the Harvey Milk Foundation have reached out to the Pentagon, which confirmed there is a proposed name change on the table. "And our hope is that the recommendation is put aside, but if it's not, it will be a rallying cry not just for our community but for all minority communities," said Stuart Milk, who is executive chair of the foundation, adding that his uncle always said that gay rights, and those of other marginalized communities, required constant vigilance.
Elected officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and California Governor Gavin Newsom, called the move a shameful attempt to erase the contributions of LGBTQ+ people and an insult to fundamental American values of honoring veterans and those who worked to build a better country. Pelosi and Newsom are both San Francisco Democrats. Newsom took aim at Hegseth, calling the attempt "A cowardly act from a man desperate to distract us from his inability to lead the Pentagon" on the social platform X.
In a statement, San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said Milk dedicated his life to serving the city and country, and is a role model for all Americans. He did not mention Trump or Hegseth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
30 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU deplores US sanctions on ICC judges, including Slovenian
The European Union has roundly deplored the United States for sanctioning four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC), including one citizen from the bloc, Slovenia's Beti Hohler, further deepening the divide between transatlantic allies. The sanctions, which also target nationals from Benin, Uganda and Peru, were announced on Thursday by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said the decision was based on the court's "baseless and politicised" investigations of war crimes allegedly committed by US forces in Afghanistan and Israel in the Gaza Strip. The second probe led to arrest warrants on Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Natayanhu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. Judge Hohler ruled in favour of the orders. As a result of the measures, the four judges will be unable to access their property and assets on US soil and will be blocked from making transactions with American entities. The bans risk hindering the magistrates' ability to perform their day-to-day work. "We call on our allies to stand with us against this disgraceful attack," Rubio said. Rubio's call was met with the opposite reaction: emphatic support for the Hague-based tribunal and forceful rejection of the sanctions. "The ICC holds perpetrators of the world's gravest crimes to account & gives victims a voice. It must be free to act without pressure," said Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. "We will always stand for global justice & the respect of international law." António Costa, the president of the European Council, voiced a similar message. "The EU strongly supports the International Criminal Court, a cornerstone of international justice," Costa wrote on social media. The ICC "does not stand against nations—it stands against impunity. We must protect its independence and integrity. The rule of law must prevail over the rule of power." The Netherlands, which serves as the host country for the ICC, also expressed strong condemnation, stressing the tribunal's work must remain "as unhindered as possible". "The Netherlands disapproves of the new sanctions against officials of the International Criminal Court," said Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp. "Independent international courts and tribunals must be able to carry out their work without hindrance. We stand firmly behind the Court." Rejecting outside "pressure on judicial institutions", the Slovenian government said it would provide Judge Beti Hohler with "all necessary support in the performance of her mandate in the current situation". The country called on Brussels to immediately activate the so-called blocking statute, a decades-long regulation meant to protect EU individuals and companies from the extraterritorial application of sanctions by non-EU countries. The law was introduced in reaction to the sanctions that Washington introduced in 1996 against Cuba, Iran and Libya, which had ripple effects on European operators that engaged in legitimate trade with the three countries, particularly Cuba. The blocking statute came back to the fore in 2018, when the first Donald Trump administration withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, reintroduced sanctions that had been previously lifted and threatened to punish companies for doing business with Tehran, regardless of their geographic location or ownership. Although Brussels tried to mitigate the damaging impact of these secondary sanctions, many European companies voluntarily cut off relations with Iran out of fear of losing access to America's highly profitable, dollar-based market. Neither von der Leyen nor Costa spoke about the statute in their responses. In a statement, the ICC insisted it would "continue its work undeterred, in strict accordance with the Rome Statute and the principles of fairness and due process". "Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict. It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity," it said. "These sanctions are not only directed at designated individuals, they also target all those who support the Court, including nationals and corporate entities of States Parties. They are aimed against innocent victims in all situations before the Court." The US, which is not a party to the 1998 Rome Statute, has long had tense relations with the ICC, viewing with suspicion its ability to conduct probes into nationals around the world. The arrest warrant against Netanyahu was met with bipartisan condemnation in Washington and prompted a renewed assault by the Trump administration. Earlier this year, Hungary openly defied the ICC by ignoring the warrant and inviting Netanyahu to Budapest. Hungary later announced its intention to withdraw from the Rome Statute, becoming the first member state to do so. Russia launched a large-scale missile and drone attack on Ukrainian cities overnight on Friday, killing at least five people and injuring more than 70. According to Ukraine's Air Force spokesperson Yuri Ihnat, Kyiv forces intercepted 368 out of 407 drones and shot down 36 out of 45 missiles, including four out of six ballistic Iskander missiles launched by Russia. Ukraine's Air Forces activated the air raid alerts in all Ukrainian regions last night, warning people that multiple Russian bombers had taken off for the attack. Many people proceeded to bomb shelters with the warning. Ukraine's capital Kyiv was hit the hardest. The city Mayor Vitali Klitschko said search and rescue operations were under way at several locations. Multiple explosions were heard in Kyiv overnight, where falling debris sparked fires across several districts as air defence systems attempted to intercept incoming targets, said Tymur Tkachenko, head of the Kyiv City Administration. 'Our air defence crews are doing everything possible. But we must protect one another — stay safe,' Tkachenko wrote on Telegram. Authorities reported damage in several districts, and rescue workers were responding at multiple locations. They urged residents to seek shelter. In Solomyanskyi district, a fire broke out on the 11th floor of a 16-story residential building. Emergency services evacuated three people from the apartment, and rescue operations were ongoing. Another fire broke out in a metal warehouse. Tkachenko said the metro tracks between two stations in Kyiv were damaged in the attack, but no fire or injuries occurred. In the northern Chernihiv region, a Shahed drone exploded near an apartment building, shattering windows and doors, according to regional military administration chief Dmytro Bryzhynskyi. He added that explosions from ballistic missiles were also recorded on the outskirts of the city. The nighttime attack came hours after US President Donald Trump said it might be better to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' before pulling them apart and pursuing peace, in comments that were a remarkable detour from Trump's often-stated appeals to stop the three-year war. Trump spoke as he met with Germany's new Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who appealed to him as the 'key person in the world' who could halt the bloodshed by pressuring Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump this week spoke on the phone with Putin, who vowed to respond "very strongly" to Ukraine's daring drone attacks on Russian military airfields that had taken place on Sunday.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
How did the Donald Trump-Musk feud begin? Here is the blow-by-blow
Less than a week after lavishing praise on each other in the Oval Office, US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man, fell out spectacularly and publicly. In a war of words that escalated on Thursday, both men took to their own social media platform to attack the other. Although many political analysts had predicted that their alliance would not last, the speed with which it imploded was nevertheless dramatic. Just last Friday, Trump was celebrating Musk's work as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), overseeing the slashing of billions of dollars in federal spending. The South Africa-born billionaire had decided to step away from his work with the US government to focus on his businesses, which have suffered as a result of his foray into politics. Speaking at his send-off at the White House last Friday, the US president called Musk 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced'. 'He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation and we appreciate it,' Trump said. 'Just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations,' he added. In reply, Musk, who was presented with a golden key featuring the White House insignia, said he would continue to visit Trump as 'a friend and adviser'. Looking around the room at Trump's new golden decorations, the entrepreneur said: 'The Oval Office finally has the majesty that it deserves thanks to the president.' But the sheen of their formerly close relationship has now fully disappeared. After the billionaires' friendship soured this week and their dispute became deeper, questions have been raised about the damage that two of the world's most powerful men could potentially do to one another. While Musk can withhold tens of millions of dollars in promised campaign donations, Trump has threatened to cut billions in government contracts and subsidies to Musk's companies. The public rift between the two men started to open up on Tuesday, when Musk took to X to criticise Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'. The bill, which narrowly passed the House of Representatives last month but faces challenges in the Senate, includes large tax cuts and the raising of the national debt ceiling. Musk, who says the bill undermines all the savings made by DOGE, started to forcefully condemn it this week. The bill is 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination', Musk said. The Tesla CEO also lambasted House Republicans for voting for what he calls the 'big ugly bill', which he claims will increase the US deficit to $2.5 trillion (€2.19 trillion). Despite the strength of Musk's language, it wasn't until Thursday that the feud between him and Trump fully escalated. On Thursday morning, Musk reposted some old Trump social media posts, including one in which the now US president said that 'no member of Congress should be eligible for reelection' unless the country's budget was balanced. 'I couldn't agree more,' Musk wrote, in direct criticism of Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill. At around midday on Thursday, Trump responded in the Oval Office during a visit from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Musk, before expressing doubts about whether their 'great relationship' would continue. The dispute then became more personal, with Musk, who gave the Trump campaign hundreds of millions of dollars last year, saying that the US president would not be in the White House without him. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote on X. 'Such ingratitude,' he concluded. Things came to a head later on Thursday afternoon. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' he added. Musk retaliated by claiming that Trump's name appears in the files of the paedophile and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that this was the 'real reason they have not been made public'. The White House said on Thursday evening that Musk's Epstein claim was an 'unfortunate episode'. The Trump administration has suggested the tech billionaire's criticism of the landmark bill stems from his disappointment that it does not contain policies favourable to him, something Musk has denied. By Thursday evening, it appeared that Musk was open to de-escalating the situation. After Bill Ackman, a Trump ally and hedge-fund billionaire, wrote that the two men 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country', Musk replied that he was 'not wrong'.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
"Racism in France has always been a question of anti-migrant and anti-Muslim bias"
06:17 06/06/2025 LGBTQ community celebrate pride month worldwide 06/06/2025 Israeli PM Netanyahu confirms arming Gaza militia against Hamas Middle East 06/06/2025 President Trump and Elon Musk feud explodes in public Americas 06/06/2025 Israel targets Hezbollah's drone production in southern Beirut Middle East 06/06/2025 Elon Musk and Donald Trump spat hits new high Americas 06/06/2025 Governments scramble to understand new Trump travel bans 06/06/2025 Germany's Merz requests 'more pressure' on Russia from US 06/06/2025 Musk slams Trump's 'ingratitude' as feud worsens
