Feral mums brawled in school playground in front of terrified kids after becoming 'embroiled in love triangle'
TWO feral mums brawled in the school playground in front of terrified kids after becoming embroiled in a love triangle, a court heard.
Mum-of-four Natasha Sherlock, 29, clashed with 28-year-old Samantha Rylance after accusing her of sleeping with her ex.
6
6
A court heard she yelled "do not f**ing talk to my kids" after her daughter waved at Rylance on the playground.
The pair began scrapping - with mum-of-three Rylance slapping her love rival in the face, it was said.
Sherlock then punched Rylance before the fight was eventually broken up - with both women ending up sporting black eyes.
Police were called and CCTV of the attack was handed over by the primary school's headteacher.
Sherlock stood trial for assault by beating but was cleared after insisting she acted in self-defence.
But District Judge Paul Healey, who viewed the CCTV, slammed the mum.
He said: ''This took place on a school playground, with parents and kids around.
"It is a thoroughly unpleasant incident to witness.''
Sefton Magistrates' Court was told the violence erupted on July 10 last year as parents picked their children up from the school in Wallasey.
The pair had previously been friends but fell out after Sherlock claimed Rylance had a one night stand with her ex.
Rylance told the hearing she was coming to pick up her son when Sherlock insulted her from across the playground
She said after collecting her son, she walked over to another playground to meet her partner Callum Roberts, who was picking up their older children.
The mum told the court she saw Sherlock being "aggressive" towards her partner.
She continued: "When she saw me she said 'Yes, f****ing you'. I said 'Leave it, we are on the playground. There are kids around'.
"But she said, 'Come on, come on, let's go outside' and started grabbing my top. She was screaming and shouting.
"She initially knocked my glasses off and as gentleman picked them she was pulling on my top. I knocked her hand away to defend myself but she swung and hit me across the face and that is when it turned into the fight itself.
''After the incident I felt awful. The kids did not want to go to school or let me to take them to school in case I got attacked again."
CCTV showed Sherlock approaching Callum just moments before the fight exploded.
Callum and Sherlock's dad Robert, who had also gone to the school, managed to break the sparring pair up.
In her evidence Sherlock agreed she had fallen out with Rylance and added: "It was quite a bad one.
"On that day she said 'Hi' to my daughter and I said 'Do not talk to my child.' I knew she was trying to wind me up.
"I tried walking off but Samantha carried on screaming stuff. If anyone was attacked it was me and I hit her back. I was only aggressive when she started shouting at me."
In mitigation, Sherlock's lawyer Paul Davison accused Rylance of being the "aggressor".
He said: "If she is scared of the defendant and if she hears the defendant shout words when she has a young child with her, why approach unless you are looking for trouble?
"You just wouldn't but she does."
6
6
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
I was 15 when my nude pics were leaked – grown men sent them around at the football club & everyone blamed ME
LIKE many young girls, Jess Davies wanted to impress her school crush and decided to send him an explicit photo of herself. Little did the 15-year-old know that he would send it around the school and she would become a victim of image abuse. "That image got bluetoothed around my school, and then it got shared around my hometown, which was a small hometown in Wales, everyone knows everyone," she explained on the Should I Delete That podcast. Image-based sexual abuse is a criminal offence, it's when someone takes, shares, or threatens to share sexually explicit images or videos of a person without their knowledge or consent, and with the aim of causing them distress or harm. This can include digitally altered images, also known as 'deepfakes' - something Jess has gone on to lobby the government to include in the Online Harms Safety Bill. Now 32, Jess has opened up about the trauma it caused and more shockingly, how she was blamed for the abuse. She revealed that once the photo had circulated in her hometown, it was then shared to grown adult men on the local football team. Instead of seeing Jess as a victim, whose private photo was shared without her consent, people blamed her. "Everyone knew my age because it was a small town, and yet, the whole narrative was around how it was my fault," Jess added. "That I shouldn't have sent it, what kind of girl are you? "There was never any conversation around why are men in their twenties and thirties passing around a child's image?" Jess was left as a teenage girl worrying about how to navigate the situation, and she decided she had to laugh it off. Vicky Pattison shares deepfake porn clip of herself as she warns of dangers on C4 doc She revealed that boys in year 7 would run up and ask for a hug as they had seen the image as well. "I was laughing but secretly, this was humiliating," she said. In the end, her parents also found out about the image, as her nan was told about it from one of the men on the football team, where the image was being circulated. Now, as Jess has gotten older, she realises that the way people treated her for the image was not okay and that she was held more accountable than the grown men sharing the image. It has now led Jess to become an advocate for female rights and sexual abuse. Her BBC documentary 'Deepfake Porn: Could You Be Next' was used to lobby the UK government to criminalise deepfake porn. Jess also has a new book, No One Wants To See Your Dick, a guide for surviving the digital age to help us understand and tackle online misogyny and question society's understanding of consent.
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The RAC sent us a measly £40 after we waited two days for a rescue that never came: SALLY SORTS IT
We feel unjustly treated by the RAC following a breakdown in a dangerous situation, which involved getting the police to arrange our car to be towed to safety as the RAC could not attend us in time. We spent two days waiting for action from the RAC – which it failed to take. Now it says we have no claim. We paid £409 for cover this year which includes a 'get you home' service. When we complained it sent us a £40 cheque. We haven't cashed it. Please help. P.F., Shrewsbury. Sally Hamilton replies: This was a serious breakdown in your recovery service that landed you with an unexpected £510 bill for recovery, storage and taxis. You felt extra miffed by the rejection of your claim as your husband, aged 92, has been with the RAC since owning his first car in 1972. You have rarely called it out and certainly not in the last five years. The paltry sum offered as an apology riled you further, not helped by the fact it came with no explanation or apology. A letter was only sent to you later after your son intervened on your behalf. In this, the RAC simply stated that its terms say it cannot guarantee attendance times but agreed it 'fell short' in your case, for which it sent you the £40 cheque. While saying it understood this must have been distressing, it did not uphold your complaint about the police having to intervene. It said this can be necessary in dangerous situations. It certainly was dangerous. You described how your breakdown nightmare began one day in late February, when you were driving to your local Tesco. The car lost power, forcing you to pull on to a narrow grass verge with large volumes of traffic roaring past. With no power, your hazard lights didn't work. It must have been frightening. Fortunately, a highways maintenance vehicle came to your aid and offered protection by parking behind your car. Scam Watch Households should beware a scam email that impersonates high-street bank NatWest, consumer website Which? warns. Fraudsters say that your account needs to be 'reauthenticated' by clicking on the link in the email. While it may look genuine, it is sent from a random email address and has nothing to do with the bank. Do not click on the link in the email as it is an attempt to steal your personal and financial information. Instead, forward it to report@ When you phoned the RAC, it said there would be a two-hour delay and so advised you to call the police. They arrived half-an-hour later, put cones up and allowed you to sit in their vehicle while you waited for the RAC. The officer also called the firm but again was told it would take at least two hours. As he couldn't wait, he called a local recovery service to tow the car to a compound 30 miles from where you live. This cost you £192. The officer kindly drove you home. The next day you had to pay the compound a fee in cash to release the car. Luckily you had enough notes between you. You took a taxi costing £50 to the compound. You sat there all day until the facility closed. The RAC did not appear, so you took another taxi home and arranged recovery to a local garage. I was shocked that the RAC didn't take your situation seriously and as you had hit a roadblock with your complaint, I asked it to take a fresh look at your case. I am pleased to say it didn't take long to see the failure of its service to you that day. It made a U-turn and met your £510 claim in full, to which £75 was added as an apology. A spokesman says: 'We've apologised to Mr and Mrs F and reimbursed all their costs and added a gesture of goodwill in recognition of their valued long-standing membership. 'This doesn't reflect the high level of service we provide to the thousands of members we rescue every day, and steps have been taken to ensure this doesn't happen in the future.' Opened standard account thinking it was an Isa I found online what I thought was an excellent 4.25 per cent one-year fixed rate Individual Savings Account (Isa) from MBNA and opened an account with £20,000. I received a text offering me the possibility of further investment into the account. This set off alarm bells as £20,000 is the maximum allowable in an Isa in a tax year. When I queried this, MBNA said I had opened a standard account and that it doesn't offer Isas. I asked if I could cancel the arrangement. But they said the money could not be withdrawn. I.S., Gloucestershire. Sally Hamilton replies: You were annoyed with yourself for the blunder but after doing some research online, believed that under consumer law you would be permitted a cooling off period of at least 14 days, allowing you to change your mind without penalty. And since you had realised your mistake within days, you believed there was plenty of time to get out of the arrangement. But it was not to be. MBNA said it sympathised with your predicament, but its hands were tied. Under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, a cooling off period does apply to many products and services bought online, including certain savings accounts. Variable rate accounts typically offer this benefit but providers are not obliged to provide it for fixed rate deals like the one you accidentally picked. Some do so voluntarily, but not MBNA. There are exceptions to the fixed-rate rule. Cash Isas – even fixed-rate ones – can be cancelled within 14 days if a saver has a change of heart. I felt MBNA could have been more flexible, so I asked them to reconsider. A few days later, it came back with the news that it had decided, as a gesture of goodwill, to let you close the account after all with no penalties. A spokesman says: 'This type of account [opened by Mr S] is not covered by the cooling off period as set out by the Consumer Contracts Regulations. As part of the account opening process, we explain withdrawals can't be made during the fixed one-year term. Appreciating that Mr S made a mistake on this occasion, as a gesture of goodwill, we'll help him move the money to an alternate account.' When we caught up last week, you confirmed the money had been released and that you have opened a cash Isa with another bank. Straight to the point I sold four Decleor products on Vinted for £17.50 and posted it to the buyer. But when they received the parcel Vinted messaged me to say the order was suspended as the buyer reported it was empty. Vinted wants a photograph of the package, which I don't have. The buyer is going to get a refund and I am out of pocket. A.H., Coventry. The money has now been sent to your Vinted account. *** I Bought a John Lewis leather bed frame back in 2013 for £699. But it recently started peeling and shedding. It's clear it's not leather at all but a vinyl surface coating with woven mesh underneath, which an upholsterer has confirmed. John Lewis are taking the side of the supplier which claims it is leather. I know the warranty is up but it seems so morally wrong. C.L., via email. John Lewis says the bed frame is out of warranty and it has limited product information available, but it has given you a gesture of goodwill. *** Last May I bought and moved into a new flat. I have since been receiving letters from a bank addressed to women I don't recognise, which I have been returning. I accidentally opened one as I hold a credit card with the same bank. It said this person held an offset mortgage at my address. The bank won't tell me anything, citing data protection. D.G., West Midlands. The bank says it does not hold a mortgage on your property and the letters have now stopped. They were sent to you due to an administrative mistake by another customer. Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@ — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Deadly African scorpion is found by horrified Brit woman after it ‘crawled past her feet' while she watched TV
A WOMAN has been left terrified after returning home from holiday and discovering a "deadly" scorpion in her home. It is believed the scorpion hitched a ride back in her luggage when she returned from a holiday in Africa. 4 The deadly scorpion was discovered in a Swindon home earlier this month. It was reportedly spotted by the homeowner as she sat watching TV with the scorpion crawling across her carpet right under her nose. The terrified homeowner bravely trapped it under a wine glass before transferring it into a jar where it was safely kept until help arrived. The RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) was called and recommended the woman speak to a specialist. Jonathan Cleverly who provides educational workshops for schools featuring insects, reptiles and invertebrates was eventually scrambled to deal with the African scorpion. Jonathan took the creature away after identifying it as a member of the Buthidae family which several of the most deadly scorpion species in the world are also a part of. After getting the deadly creature home Jonathan made sure to keep it locked up safely before finding it a new home. Jonathan owns several scorpions himself and was well prepared with the proper equipment to transport the deadly animal. He dismissed the idea that the animal was an escaped pet, believing it snuck into the UK in the woman's luggage. The dangerous creatures are commonly found in Africa from where the homeowner had recently returned. The scorpion has since been taken to live with an expert who has a DWA (Dangerous Wild Animals) licence. Moment student finds deadly Chinese SCORPION inside her parcel It was estimated to be around 4cm long with Jonathan calling it the "most dangerous animal" he ever had. Speaking to the BBC Jonathan said: "She'd [the homeowner] done a brilliant job of moving it from a wine glass into a jam jar with a secure lid so it couldn't move and escape. "She put in some lettuce for a bit of moisture. She looked after it brilliantly well. "The scorpion, I would like to say, is absolutely gorgeous - even if it is potentially harmful to humans, it's a very rare thing for these sorts of scorpion to make their way into the UK." 4 4 The six legged creature boasts a pair of fearsome looking claws and a large, venomous stinger on its tail. Coming in at just 4cm the scorpion is small but deadly with the species occasionally causing human fatalities. When fully grown the scorpion can reach a terrifying 12cm, more than twice the size of the one found in Swindon. What are the most poisonous animals in the world? Here are seven of the most deadly creatures... The box jellyfish is widely regarded to be the most posionous animal in the world and contians a toxin that can cause heart attacks Cobras, typically found in the jungles of India and China, can spit a venom which can result in death in a very short space of time and just 7ml of their venom is enough to kill 20 humans The marbled cone snail is a sea creature that can release venom so toxic it can result in vision loss, respiratory failure, muscle paralysis and eventually death and, to make things worse, there is no anti-venom available Posion dart frogs are small and brightly coloured but have glands containing a toxin that blocks nerve signals to muscles, causing paralysis and death Puffer fish are considered to be a dangerous delicacy because some of their anatomy contains a hazardous toxin which, if ingested in a large quantity, can cause convulsions, paralysis, cardiac arrhythmia, and ultimately death The Brazillian wandering spider, also known as the 'banana spider', has venom that is so high in serotonin it can paralyse and kill Death stalker scorpions have a fitting name as enough venom from one can cause a lot of pain and respiratory failure
