37-year-old with insane superannuation balance reveals two things young Aussies should avoid
When it comes to her financial situation, Julia describes herself as a 'unicorn'; she currently has about as much superannuation as an average 60-year-old, despite being just 37.
Appearing on Tuesday's episode of SBS Insight, Julia revealed she has been 'aggressively' salary sacrificing into her super account since she first started working at 15 years old.
'I come from a migrant family, my parents were refugees to Australia in the early 80s and money was always a talk at the dinner table,' Julia told the program
She bought her first home at 21, straight out of university. Since then, she has gone on to buy several more properties and now holds three university degrees.
The 37-year-old is currently working as an HR professional in Melbourne and is still focused on growing her super balance, recently sacrificing over a quarter of her yearly salary.
If she were to stop topping up her superannuation right now, she would still be projected to have more than 1.6 million to fund her retirement.
Julia's financial position means she is now on track to stop working within the next 10 years, at the very latest.
She has had to work hard to get to where she is now and, when asked by Insight host Kumi Taguchi whether she had any advice for Australians looking to get ahead financially, she shared some, admittedly, controversial thoughts.
'I am here tonight to empower the next gen of women and my advice would be aimed more so towards them,' Julia said.
'It is going to sound super controversial but I would say one thing is, don't get married and, if you do, make sure someone is benefiting from it,' Julia said, explaining that some countries, such as Germany, offer tax savings for married couples.
The Melbourne local went on to suggest another piece of advice, that she noted would likely be 'really controversial', saying, from a financial perspective, people may want to consider 'refraining from having children'.
'Because, by the time that kid leaves your home, it will have cost you as much as a Lamborghini. And you could be driving a Lamborghini or that sum could be sitting in your superannuation growing,' she said.
Her last piece of advice was to not underestimate the power of compounding interest, with the 37-year-old encouraging people to be more focused on their superannuation.
Following this advice has certainly served Julia well financially, with the worker having enough money to own a large yacht, several boats and travel around in her caravan, along with being able to fund dozens of overseas trips.
Speaking to news.com.au, the Melbourne woman said she doesn't want to have to rely on the government pension when she is older and wants to able to retire on her own investments as soon as she wants.
'When I was a teenager, the government was matching I think $1.50 for every dollar you did as salary-sacrifice,' she said.
Julia also holds a lot of concern for people her age and wants to encourage others to think more about their retirement before it is too late.
'I think we're going to have a lot of poor retirees in Australia in my generation – not enough people are contributing to superannuation via salary sacrifice, in my opinion,' she said.
'I think we should be teaching Australian tax systems and superannuation as a subject to Aussie kids in high school.'
Having discussions with older people around her really opened her eyes to the benefits of salary sacrificing from a young age, with Julia branding superannuation is 'Australia's best kept secret' to building financial security.
Tuesday's episode of Insight also highlighted the fact that many Australians feel underprepared and 'underinformed' when it comes to superannuation.
Independent financial adviser and Independent Wealth Advice director Andy Darroch told news.com.au it is easy to get 'analysis paralysis' when it comes to super.
Mr Darroch, who also appeared on the program, likened it to driving a car, saying you don't know everything about engineering and mechanics to operate a vehicle.
'You just need the basic skills and knowledge, and the basic skills and knowledge for super are achievable and can be simple, without sacrificing quality,' he said.
'You don't need to be a financial genius, have a PhD in maths or be a billionaire to ensure your super is working for you.'
Mr Darroch conceded that the financial services industry has a 'vested interest' in people being overwhelmed by the thought of organising their finances, but the adviser said it doesn't have to be that difficult.
'Whilst the industry has evolved to the point where it often involves needless complexity, it doesn't have to, Australia is the only country on earth where it doesn't matter if you're an expert, a billionaire or even financially savvy to have a world class investment portfolio in your personal tax haven,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
27 minutes ago
- ABC News
ACCC to investigate energy plans that promise savings but deliver poor value
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has announced it will investigate whether energy retailers are misleading consumers by advertising energy plans that promise savings yet actually provide poor value. This investigation follows a formal complaint filed by Australian Consumers' Association (CHOICE), which raised concerns that many plans marketed as "savings" deals are far from the cheapest options available. The investigation came after consumer group CHOICE filed its first 'designated complaint' to the ACCC in May. Under a new framework that came into effect in May the previous year, CHOICE is one of three bodies that can file a 'super complaint' directly with the ACCC about issues affecting consumers. Each body can file only one complaint per year. Once it is submitted, the ACCC is required to assess and publicly respond within 90 days. CHOICE decided to use its one complaint to flag concerns that energy retailers use words like 'saver' or 'savings' to promote energy plans that are far from the cheapest available. "At a time when Australians are increasingly worried about being able to afford to keep the lights on, this has had a big financial impact," Andy Kollmorgen, Investigations Editor at CHOICE, said in a statement. CHOICE's complaint points to a major issue with how energy retailers advertise "savings" plans. "In some instances, they were even more expensive than the retailer's standing offer," says Rosie Thomas, CHOICE director of campaigns and communications. "Many consumers rely on these representations as indicators of value to inform their decision-making, but we found that many of these names and descriptions may not reflect genuine value." According to the latest national CHOICE survey, 84 per cent of households are concerned about rising electricity prices. But with so many plans marketed with promises of savings, it's hard for consumers to tell if they're actually getting a better deal. "We are concerned that consumers may be misled or deceived by plan names or descriptions of plans that offer 'savings' that are not genuine, or that consumers may be discouraged from switching to cheaper plans that are available to them," ACCC deputy chair Catriona Lowe said. "It is essential that energy retailers provide clear and accurate information about their energy plans so that consumers can make informed decisions when choosing an energy provider and plan." The confusion doesn't stop at the "savings" labels. Many energy retailers use identical names for plans that come with different rates, leading to further confusion for consumers. This issue is especially prevalent with the "better offer" and "best offer" messages on energy bills, which are meant to alert customers to cheaper plans available within the same provider. Unfortunately, these plans aren't always cheaper. A recent decision from the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) requires retailers to provide extra information under "better offer" messages when reusing plan names. "Consumers are often encouraged to shop around in order to save on their energy bills, but that's impossible to do if the information they receive from retailers is inaccurate, incomplete or designed to overwhelm," says Ms Thomas. The ACCC said that after careful consideration, the issues raised by CHOICE relating to the use of identical plan names in "better offer" and "best offer" messaging, are "most effectively addressed through the review and law reform processes currently underway by the AER and the ESC" and not an ACCC investigation. If the ACCC finds that energy retailers are breaching Australian Consumer Law following its investigation, it may take enforcement action where appropriate. It may also "prepare industry guidance or contribute to policy or law reform initiatives".
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Tension in a tit-for-tat visa cancellation
Australia has cancelled the visa of a Netanyahu government MP. Israel has swiftly retaliated, revoking visas for Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority. What does this latest tit-for-tat mean for the already strained relationship? Meanwhile, Canberra is buzzing as the guest list for the Economic Reform Roundtable arrives. The government's word of the day is 'optimistic' - but what message are they really trying to send as day one kicks off? Patricia Karvelas and Raf Epstein break it all down on Politics Now. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Mel for Question Time at thepartyroom@
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
'Not mentioned': Matt Canavan to hold own productivity forum focusing on energy prices
Nationals senator Matt Canavan has responded to Treasurer Jim Chalmers' productivity roundtable by announcing he will hold an alternative summit at Parliament House, arguing energy prices are a threat to productivity. Announcing the upcoming economic meeting, Canavan was wearing a shirt that read: "Energy prices are the real productivity threat", while he drank from a mug that read "I heart fossil fuels". Former Productivity Commission chair Gary Banks is set to give a speech, while the guest list includes some conservative-leaning economists. Canavan's forum will be open to the public, unlike the government's closed-door meeting, which is underway. The Queensland senator said Treasury's productivity papers didn't mention the cost of electricity. "I'm ready for the prime minister to come down or for Jim [Chalmers] … to explain why they won't explain to the Australian people why power prices have surged under their watch," Canavan said. "Up there at groupthink central, they're not even discussing the issue. No-one is discussing the fact energy prices are the biggest hit to our nation's productivity, the biggest hit to our nation's wealth and prosperity, is the fact we've lost control of our energy market." At the time, AER said wholesale and network costs rose in most jurisdictions between 1 per cent and 11 per cent, and retail costs between 8 per cent and 35 per cent compared with last year. At Chalmers' summit, around 30 leaders from business, unions, and civil society have convened in Canberra for three days. The meeting is a key part of the government's strategy to build national consensus around economic reform. Chalmers has said the ideas discussed at the roundtable will inform "the next three budgets and beyond". A number of topical and controversial ideas for reform are on the table, including major tax reform, deregulating artificial intelligence and a four-day work week. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has promised the government's economic roundtable will deliver long-lasting change through consensus. The first day of the roundtable focuses on building resilience. Following the treasurer and prime minister's opening addresses, Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock delivered a presentation outlining Australia's declining productivity performance. — With reporting by the Australian Associated Press.
