Christian Horner ‘wants quiet time with Geri' following his ‘shock' axe as Red Bull boss that left him in tears
The now former Red Bull team principal was axed on Wednesday after 20 years in charge, a year on from being accused of sexual harassment and coercive, controlling behaviour by a female employee.
5
Horner denied the accusations throughout the scandal.
He stayed in his position for 16 months and his dismissal was part of a clear-out.
Red Bull have slid down the standings since the accusations, with star driver and four-time world champion Max Verstappen also being linked with a move to Mercedes in the build up to Horner's exit.
Now, according to The Mail, Horner's priority is 'quiet time with Geri and the family for a little while'.
Horner and his wife, former Spice Girl Geri Halliwell-Horner, have been seen together in public as a united front since the scandal last February.
Horner was in tears as he addressed his 'shock' sacking and received a standing ovation at Red Bull HQ in Milton Keynes.
He said: "Yesterday, I was informed by Red Bull that operationally I would no longer be involved with the business or the team moving forward.
"I will still remain employed by the company, but, operationally the baton will be handed over.
"It came as a shock to myself. I've had a chance to reflect over the last 12 hours and wanted to stand in front of all of you to break this news.
"And to express my gratitude to each and every single member of the team that has given so much during the last 20-and-a-half years that I've been here.
Christian Horner 'in tears' during farewell speech to Red Bull employees as sacked boss admits decision came as 'shock'
"When I arrived 20 years ago, with a few less grey hairs, I walked into a team and did not know what to expect but I was immediately welcomed and we started to build what became a powerhouse in F1.
"Watching and being part of this team has been the biggest privilege of my life."
A source told The Sun that the tears during his farewell speech were 'actually about Geri'.
The source said: 'Christian is of course desperately sad that his career has ended this way.
"He also had the shock news about his ex wife's death just a few days before. But the emotion he showed during his teary speech was actually about Geri.
'He fears his sacking is yet another crisis for his marriage to face after an incredibly difficult year.
"Geri has already begun distancing herself by going by Halliwell-Horner when writing her books.
"Although she's still totally invested in her marriage, she wants to focus on herself and protecting her own image."
5
5
5
Geri has previously attempted to dismiss any meaning behind the name change, telling The Sunday Times: 'That's a load of c**p. It's my writing name.
"I haven't legally changed anything — Horner is the name on my passport."
The Mail report also states there is 'doubt [Horner] is done for Formula One forever'.
There are also rumours of a move to Ferrari, which he declined two years ago, allowing Fred Vasseur to be given the top job.
In May, he batted away rumours he would join Ferrari, declaring: "It's always flattering to be associated with other teams, but my commitment is with Red Bull."
Announcing the news of the six-time World Constructers' Championship winner's departure, Red Bull managing director Oliver Mintzlaff said: "We would like to thank Christian Horner for his exceptional work over the last 20 years.
"With his tireless commitment, experience, expertise and innovative thinking, he has been instrumental in establishing Red Bull Racing as one of the most successful and attractive teams in Formula 1.
"Thank you for everything, Christian, and you will forever remain an important part of our team history."
Racing Bulls' Laurent Mekies, head of Red Bull's sister team, has been put in to replace him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain's Moore handed four-year ban after CAS upholds ITIA appeal
July 15 (Reuters) - Britain's Tara Moore, who was previously cleared of an anti-doping rule violation, was handed a four-year ban on Tuesday after the Court of Arbitration for Sport upheld an appeal filed by the International Tennis Integrity Agency. Moore, Britain's former number one-ranked doubles player, was provisionally suspended in June 2022 due to the presence of prohibited anabolic steroids Nandrolone and boldenone. Moore said she had never knowingly taken a banned substance in her career and an independent tribunal determined that contaminated meat consumed by her in the days before sample collection was the source of the prohibited substance. Moore lost 19 months in the process before she was cleared of the ADRV but CAS upheld the ITIA's appeal against the first instance "No Fault or Negligence" ruling with respect to nandrolone. "After reviewing the scientific and legal evidence, the majority of the CAS Panel considered that the player did not succeed in proving that the concentration of nandrolone in her sample was consistent with the ingestion of contaminated meat," CAS said in a statement. "The panel concluded that Ms Moore failed to establish that the ADRV was not intentional. The appeal by the ITIA is therefore upheld and the decision rendered by the Independent Tribunal is set aside." Moore had previously said how she saw her reputation, ranking and livelihood "slowly trickling away" for 19 months during her initial suspension. The 32-year-old had also filed a cross-appeal at CAS "seeking to dismiss the ITIA appeal, dismiss the nandrolone result in the ADRV or alternatively confirm that she bears no fault or negligence". However, CAS said the cross-appeal was declared inadmissible and her four-year period of ineligibility would start from July 15, with credit for any provisional suspension that has already been served. "Our bar for appealing a first instance decision is high, and the decision is not taken lightly," ITIA CEO Karen Moorhouse said in a statement. "In this case, our independent scientific advice was that the player did not adequately explain the high level of nandrolone present in their sample. Today's ruling is consistent with this position."
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Baby killer Constance Marten set to appeal using legal aid, despite case already costing taxpayers £2.8m
Aristocrat Constance Marten is set to appeal her conviction for killing her baby in a case which has already cost taxpayers over £2.8million. The 38-year-old former socialite, who has a £2.4million fortune, plans to claim yet more legal aid to challenge the jury's verdict in her retrial, despite the Court of Appeal rejecting an earlier bid to clear her name. In an extraordinary farce, Marten is expected to appeal on the basis that the trial judge did not warn the jury quickly enough to ignore her own words after she blurted out that her lover Mark Gordon, 51, was a convicted rapist. The Mail understands that her lawyers will contend that the Recorder of London 's handling of Marten's bombshell admission unfairly prejudiced the jury. Gordon is set to follow suit, despite praising the fairness of Judge Mark Lucraft during the trial and promising he would 'waive' his right to appeal. The Old Bailey retrial almost collapsed when Marten revealed that Gordon had spent 22 years in prison for a knifepoint rape in Florida. Judge Lucraft had previously imposed reporting restrictions on Gordon's convictions as a teenager for armed kidnapping, four sexual assaults, armed burglary and aggravated battery. But Marten ignored the ban, claiming that police were out to get them when officers launched a national manhunt to find the couple after they went on the run with their fifth baby Victoria, causing her death in a freezing tent in 2023. Marten told jurors their four older children had already been taken into care, adding: 'Mark has a violent rape conviction and spent 22 years in prison so my fear is they'd immediately scapegoat him which is what they usually do.' The judge condemned Marten's 'deliberate attempt to sabotage the trial', but he decided to continue with the case after Gordon insisted 'I'm not worried about prejudice' and promised not to appeal on the matter. In a ruling which was never made public, Judge Lucraft said: 'Many questions arise. Amongst them I raised the question of what would happen down the line on an appeal if there was a conviction of the first defendant (Gordon) in these circumstances? 'At this point Mr Gordon said he wished to address the Court. 'When he did so he said he would waive any point on any appeal and was quite satisfied that any direction to the jury would be fair and that he wished the trial to continue. 'Mr Gordon spoke about the delay and the cost to the public of another trial.' Yet just moments after being convicted, Gordon went back on his word, vowing that he would appeal the verdict and yelling: 'I'm not surprised by the verdict. It was faulty, it was unlawful. This is not over, it has just begun.' Marten shouted: 'It's a scam', before walking out of the court in fury. The case has already cost taxpayers more than £2.8million, including the £1.2million investigation and £1.6million estimated legal costs. In February, the Court of Appeal rejected the couple's bid to challenge their child cruelty conviction in the first trial, which ended last year with jurors unable to reach a verdict on manslaughter. On Monday, the couple were finally convicted of manslaughter in a retrial and will be sentenced on September 15. The unprecedented case is now the subject of a national child safeguarding review to consider whether new laws should be brought in to protect unborn children. Detective Superintendent Lewis Basford, who led the case, believes that lives could be saved if officers had the power to bring in protection and family contact orders before a baby is born to parents considered at high risk of harming their children. He said: 'At the moment police are powerless to protect that child until a baby draws their first breath. 'If there was a change in the law, we could put contact orders in place to monitor the pregnancy and protection orders could be in place before that child is born so they could immediately be taken into care. 'If you look at cases like Baby P [a 17-month-old British boy who died in London in 2007 after suffering over 50 injuries] this could save lives.' Yesterday a Department for Education spokesman said the review would look at what more could be done to help prevent future tragedies. She said: 'Victoria's life was cut devastatingly short by those who should have been caring for her - and it is right that justice has now been served.'
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Police hunt for man over deliberate car fire in Aberdeen
Police are searching for a man after a car was deliberately set on fire in services were called just before 17:00 over the incident on Morrison Drive, where it is thought that one car was targeted and the fire spread to a second car flames were extinguished by the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service and there were no reports of any are looking for a man in his late teens to early 20s, who is of slim build and was wearing a grey hooded top and purple shorts. Det Insp Kate Coyle said: "Inquiries are ongoing and we are appealing to anyone with any information, particularly anyone who saw a man running in the direction of the old railway line around that time, to contact us."It is believed he may have suffered injuries to his hands during the incident and I would urge anyone who recognises this description to get in touch."
