logo
‘Promising' new test could detect pancreatic cancer in its early stages

‘Promising' new test could detect pancreatic cancer in its early stages

Independenta day ago

A new blood test designed to detect early signs of pancreatic cancer is being trialled in the UK.
The genomic test analyses blood samples to identify markers of the deadly disease, which often presents with indistinct symptoms and can be fatal within months.
The test is being trialled in patients with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes – a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer.
The trial is focusing on patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Individuals over 50 who develop type 2 diabetes have a higher chance of also being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within three years.
Early data suggests the Avantect test is 68 per cent accurate in picking up people with early stages of the disease, which kills almost 10,000 people every year in the UK, and 97 per cent accurate in ruling out people without pancreatic cancer.
The new clinical trial has been launched at the Cancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit.
Zaed Hamady, a consultant surgeon and pancreatic researcher at the University of Southampton who is leading the trial said there is 'currently no targeted early detection or surveillance test for the disease, meaning patients are often diagnosed late when they become really unwell'.
'If we can develop approaches to detect the cancer sooner, then there are more options we may consider to treat the disease, and patients will have a much better chance of long-term survival.
'Although most people with diabetes will not go on to develop the disease, new-onset diabetes is associated with a six to eight-fold increased risk.
'This patient group gives us a way to test how accurate the new diagnostic blood test is, and that could potentially help thousands of people in the future.'
The test has been validated by biotechnology company ClearNote Health in patients at a high risk for developing pancreatic cancer, including those aged 50 and over, newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and those with a genetic predisposition and/or family history of pancreatic cancer.
According to researchers, newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients often have similar symptoms to a person with early-stage pancreatic cancer.
This is because the cancer destroys the same insulin-producing cells that are also destroyed in diabetes.
Sean Cleghorn's wife, Allison, discovered she had pancreatic cancer at Christmas 2020 but died four weeks later, aged 54.
Mr Cleghorn, a father of three from Kingsclere in Hampshire, said his wife's only symptom was some slight indigestion before she was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the autumn of 2020.
'Allison had always eaten healthily, was active and avoided processed food, so this diagnosis was puzzling for us,' he said.
'When we learned that new-onset type 2 diabetes was a potential risk factor for pancreatic cancer, we asked for further testing and a scan confirmed she had terminal cancer.
'We hoped she could have chemotherapy to prolong her life, but she became too weak and died four weeks later.
'Perhaps if she had been diagnosed sooner with a test like the one that's currently being trialled, we may have had time to make more memories with our three children.'
Angelica Cazaly, senior trial manager for the trial, said people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes who are attending GP surgeries or diabetic clinics were being asked whether they would like to take part in the study.
'Initially, we will collect blood samples from 800 people for testing,' she said.
'The results from the test, together with medical information collected from each patient, will help provide researchers with important information on how best to proceed with the rest of the study that will evaluate how accurate the test is at predicting pancreatic cancer.'
Around 10,500 people in the UK are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer every year and just one in 20 survives the disease for 10 years or more.
Symptoms of pancreatic cancer
NHS
Samuel Levy, chief scientific officer of ClearNote Health, said: 'Our early data demonstrate that our Avantect test can identify pancreatic cancer in stages I and II.
'We are excited to collaborate with the Cancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit and the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust on this transformative study that could redefine how pancreatic cancer is detected and managed for patients at high risk.'
Dr Chris Macdonald, head of research at Pancreatic Cancer UK, said over 80 per cent of people with pancreatic cancer are currently diagnosed too late for treatment.
'This is an exciting time for early detection research, with tests using blood, breath and urine in development which, if shown to be successful in clinical trials, could save thousands of lives every year,' he said.
'Early findings from these tests are very promising, but more research is needed to ensure that they are as accurate as possible before they will be available in the GP surgery.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rise in awareness of nicotine pouches among children, survey suggests
Rise in awareness of nicotine pouches among children, survey suggests

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Rise in awareness of nicotine pouches among children, survey suggests

Young people under the age of 18 are more aware of nicotine pouches, new data to a survey commissioned by charity Action on Smoking and Health (Ash), the percentage of 11-17 year olds who said they knew of the pouches grew from 38% in 2024 to 43% this survey indicates nearly 4% of children in this age group have tried a nicotine pouch, equivalent to 210,000 young is calling on the government to prioritise the passing of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which will ban the marketing of nicotine pouches and their sale to under Department of Health and Social Care said the bill "will stop the next generation from getting hooked on nicotine". The bill is making its way through Parliament and is currently in the House of CEO Hazel Cheeseman said: "There is currently no date for the next phase of the legislation and therefore no clear timeframe for when it will become illegal to sell a 9-year-old a nicotine pouch. "The government must make passing this bill a priority."Nicotine pouches, often sold in cans, are small tea-bag-like rectangles that contain white powder that releases nicotine into the bloodstream when placed between a person's upper lip and gum. They do not contain are less harmful than smoking and some people use them as a way to quit smoking, though they are not recommended by the warns that the lack of limits on the strength of the nicotine put into pouches, along with the absence of age restrictions on their sales, make them a highly addictive nicotine product that anyone can buy, including children. It's 'terrifying' Jasmine Primrose, a teacher at a high school in north London, started a petition calling for greater regulation of nicotine pouches after seeing a 17-year-old pupil being offered a free can of pouches at a corner shop next to their school."They're literally giving nicotine addiction out for free to children and I think that's terrifying. I think there should definitely be an age range on that," she told the said while vapes were still the bigger offender at schools, she had confiscated a number of nicotine pouches from students."A lot of parents aren't aware of the issue, parents don't even know that it's happening most of the time," she said. Ash's survey of 13,000 adults and 2,700 11 to 17-year-olds was carried out by YouGov. It suggests there has been an increase in the number of adults aged between 18 and 34 using the pouches since 2023 - though the overall percentage of the population who uses them remains survey indicates 2.6% of 18-34 year olds reported using pouches in 2025, up from 1.2% in also suggests there is a strong gender divide among nicotine pouch users, with men under 40 three times more likely to use pouches than women of the same 24-year-old man who has recently quit using nicotine pouches is Kofi Bernson."I had them every single day in every social situation, while driving, whilst at work, in a meeting… you could have them anywhere and no-one will know, and that is one of… the most addictive aspects of it", he told the BBC. He said while he found them effective in helping him to quit smoking, quitting nicotine pouches was much harder, and it took him three or four attempts to do said he also experienced side-effects like headaches, heart flutters, sore gums, a decrease in his appetite and feeling is relatively little research into the potential health implications associated with nicotine pouches, but a 2023 review carried out by the British Dental Journal said mouth and throat soreness, mouth ulcers, hiccups and coughing were well-documented side-effects. A study published in 2024 in Germany also found their use can have cardiovascular effects, such as an increased heart rate.A research paper co-published by Ash in 2024 said that for people who smoke, switching to nicotine pouches could have positive health effects. While pouches are less harmful than smoking, they are highly addictive and not recommended for teenagers or non-smokers. Ash CEO, Ms Cheeseman said "the surge in teen awareness and growing levels of use in young adults over the last two years indicates that the industry's marketing strategies are working."Products are highly promoted in shops and on social media with football stars and male influencers used to further raise their profile," she said.A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said the proposed bill would stop nicotine products from being advertised to children."The Bill will place nicotine pouches under the same advertising restrictions as tobacco and provides powers to regulate their nicotine limits, flavours, packaging and how they are displayed."But the Chartered Trading Standards Institute, a professional association which represents trading standards professionals, said there is little that can be done to stop the sale of nicotine pouches to children until the law is changed. "I hear from trading standards teams across the country who are getting reports from concerned citizens who have seen teenagers being sold these products," Tobacco and vapes lead Katie Pike said."However, there is no action we can take until the law is changed as no offence is being committed."

Warning over TikTok filming by hospital patients
Warning over TikTok filming by hospital patients

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Warning over TikTok filming by hospital patients

Patients who film their own medical treatment for TikTok or Instagram could be putting themselves and NHS staff at risk, the Society of Radiographers (SoR) has warned. The trade union's annual conference heard that more patients were videoing their procedures on mobile phones, often without asking permission. This could distract staff or make them feel uncomfortable and anxious, the society material on social media also risks publicising the private medical data of other people who may be in the same room or area of the hospital. "I had one patient whose relative started filming while I was trying to set up," said Ashley d'Aquino, a therapeutic radiographer from London. "It wasn't the right time - I was trying to focus on delivering the treatment."Ms d'Aquino, who is also a local union representative, said she had recently been contacted by other colleagues in a similar situation. "We had a member of staff who agreed to take photos for a patient," she said. "When the patient handed over her phone, the member of staff saw that the patient had also been covertly recording her, to publish on her cancer blog." Most NHS staff wear identity badges and their names and job titles may be visible on videos posted online. The union said another of its members, a department assistant from the south coast of England, was inserting a cannula as part of a cancer procedure, when the patient's 19-year old daughter started filming on her phone. "She thought it would be entertaining on social media but she didn't ask permission," said the member of staff. "I spent the weekend afterwards worrying: did I do my job properly? I know I did, but no-one's perfect all of the time," she added."I don't think I slept for the whole weekend." NHS 'needs policies' Ms d'Aquino said there were valid reasons for patients to record the audio of medical consultations - so they could listen back to the detail, for example. "The difficulty is that our phones have become so much a part of our day-to-day life that recording and sharing has become second nature," she added. Dean Rogers, the director of strategy at the SoR, is calling for NHS trusts to have clear policies in place that stop patients from filming without permission."As healthcare professionals, we need to think: does that recording breach the confidentiality of other patients? Does it breach our ability to deliver care?" he said."There are hospital trusts that have very good policies around patients taking photos and filming procedures but this is something all trusts need to have in place."Prof Meghana Pandit, co-national medical director at NHS England, said it was vital that, if patients want to record any part of NHS care, they discuss it with staff first and it remains for their personal use only."Recording other patients inadvertently and without their permission risks breaching patient confidentiality – the information and treatment provided to other patients on NHS premises should never be recorded, let alone posted to social media," she added.

Enemies could weaponise new weather technologies against UK
Enemies could weaponise new weather technologies against UK

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

Enemies could weaponise new weather technologies against UK

Ministers are examining how technologies designed to combat global warming could be weaponised by hostile foreign powers. The government is working to understand the risks associated with an 'independent or third-party actor' carrying out so-called 'solar geoengineering'. The process, also known as solar radiation modification (SRM), aims to cool the earth artificially by reflecting sunlight away from the planet's surface. • We know how to cool the planet. Is it worth the risk? This can theoretically be achieved using two main techniques. The first involves shooting aerosols into the atmosphere that will bounce the sun's rays back into space. The second involves increasing the reflectivity of clouds over the ocean by spraying tiny droplets of sea water into the air. The UK government has tasked scientists with investigating the impact a large-scale deployment of these 'radical intervention measures'. In a ministerial letter first obtained by the Daily Telegraph, Kerry McCarthy, the climate minister, wrote: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research. The government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor. Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.' • Hope to halt climate change by thickening Arctic sea ice These third-party agents could include countries taking action to lower their carbon emissions, according to experts. However, they could also be hostile nations such as Russia using solar geoengineering techniques to orchestrate environmental disasters against their enemies. Dan Marks, a research fellow in energy security at the Royal United Services Institute, said that worrying about the weaponisation of such technologies before they were fully understood was 'premature', but warned that it could be a factor in the long run. He said: 'If the technology exists, then it would be unusual if you look at a pattern of history of warfare for it not to be [weaponised]. Targeting agriculture and food, logistics infrastructure, water or other natural resources is common. • The new tech that could control Britain's weather 'Almost every country is vulnerable to some type of extreme weather, so if you can make that weather better with the technology, you can likely make it worse by deploying the technology at the opposite time.' Whether or not the technology could be used by combatants with a degree of plausible deniability was another important factor, he said. Marks cautioned that research was in its infancy, adding: 'I don't think this is something that's going to happen tomorrow and it's not clear if it can actually happen.' • The climate radicals who want to cool the planet with space mirrors and clouds He said that policing the initial civilian use of the technology would be a more pressing concern because 'weather systems don't stop at borders'. 'If a country decided to deploy that kind of technology [to mitigate climate change], then there is a real question of how do you treat that legally and diplomatically? 'Equally, what if an Elon Musk or an activist group decided to do it, and decided to do it in the middle of the ocean? How do you govern that?' Matt Ince, the associate director at Dragonfly Intelligence, said that governments had long been concerned about the potential for countries to use 'sun dimming technology' unilaterally to combat the most extreme effects of climate change. He said that the new emerging threat was 'some sort of intentionally orchestrated environmental disaster', which is an 'avenue that Russia may pursue'. 'On the more imaginative end of the spectrum it's feasible it could involve deliberately trying to use solar geoengineering technologies to destabilise the climate within a European state and create chaos and a sense of discord, and force countries to become more inward focused,' he told the Daily Telegraph. Critics of the proposed approaches argue that there are unknown risks and they distract from global efforts to reduce emissions. More than 560 academics have signed an open letter calling for an 'international non-use agreement' on solar geoengineering. The letter states: 'Without effective global and democratic controls, the geopolitics of possible unilateral deployment of solar geoengineering would be frightening and inequitable.' The UK government's position is not to deploy solar radiation modification or any climate cooling approaches, but it has commissioned teams of scientists to research the technology and identify any risks with using it. Aria, the government's advanced research and invention agency, is providing more than £50 million in funding for outdoor field trials, which include 'brightening clouds' to reflect sunshine as a potential way to prevent climate change. Aria said: 'The only long-term solution to climate change is rapid decarbonisation and that must remain the priority. But regardless of emissions cuts, there is growing concern we may pass tipping points in the Earth's system. 'Aria's programme is focused on generating fundamental scientific knowledge about whether any proposed climate cooling approaches could ever be safe or feasible — or whether they should be ruled out entirely.' The government said: 'The government is not in favour of using Solar Radiation Modification, but we support cautious, controlled research aimed at improving our understanding of its risks and impacts. 'The government supports Aria's mission to fund high-risk, high-reward transformational research programmes with long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store