logo
Russians struggle to pay for potatoes as war eats up state funds

Russians struggle to pay for potatoes as war eats up state funds

Yahoo13 hours ago
Russia has more potential agricultural area than anywhere else in the world but it has run out of potatoes and onions.
Even President Vladimir Putin conceded there is a problem. "It turns out we are short of potatoes," he recently said, noting the lack of sugar beet and some other vegetables too.
That came after the price of potatoes soared in Russian shops, almost tripling within the last year, according to official figures. Meanwhile the price of onions has doubled.
Cabbage is now 50% more expensive than it was a year ago, says statistics agency Rosstat.
Russians had to pay around $1 for a kilogram of potatoes in June but that is a lot in a place where pre-tax incomes are around $1,150 on average, Rosstat says.
Pensions are just over $230.
Rising food prices are one of the main drivers of inflation in Russia, which is currently 9.6%, says the Economic Development Ministry.
The central bank is trying to keep inflation under control with a high key interest rate, currently at 20%. The reasoning goes, if high interest rates make it more difficult to take out loans, the amount of money in circulation will decrease. Less money means less demand and falling prices.
But that has caused further complications.
Economy minister warns of looming recession
At the recent St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov issued a rare clearly-worded warning of problems facing the domestic economy.
"According to the figures, we are experiencing a slowdown, and according to the current sentiment among entrepreneurs, we are already on the verge of a transition into recession," he said.
The current interest rate level is discouraging entrepreneurs from investing, according to Reshetnikov. He estimates that investments in the third and fourth quarters could fall below last year's levels.
But central bank chief Elvira Nabiullina pushed back the suggestion that her monetary policy is misguided, though she too predicts difficulties.
Despite sanctions imposed in a bid to halt the war on Ukraine, Russia's economy had grown for two years - thanks to Moscow's programmes to replace imports, using money from the wealth fund and capital reserves in the banking system.
"We must understand that many of these resources are indeed depleted, and we must think about a new growth model," says Nabiullina.
The fact that the Russian economy has held up surprisingly well since Putin's attack on Ukraine, despite more than a dozen rounds of Western sanctions, is mainly due to the decisive shift towards war production.
As weapons boom, civilian sectors struggle
Putin confidant Sergei Chemezov, who heads the state-owned defence corporation Rostec, recently boasted of a "tenfold increase in ammunition and weapons compared to 2021."
Critics say Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) growth does not reflect the economy's potential to produce new goods for its citizens or to raise their standard of living.
Rather, it only shows that the budget-funded arms industry is producing more and more drones, missiles and tanks.
Meanwhile, civilian sectors have long been struggling amid high costs, staff shortages and dated technology - a problem that has only been exacerbated by the sanctions.
The construction and real estate sectors are mired in deep crisis.
Car manufacturing has also stalled since Western manufacturers and suppliers turned away from Russia. And while China is selling more cars in Russia, it does not make them locally.
Avtovaz, the Lada producer which is part of Chemezov's empire, has been unable to fill the gap left by Western carmakers.
At the Economic Forum in St Petersburg, the company presented its latest model, the Lada Azimut, due to go into series production next year.
But previous models are still piling up in warehouses due to a lack of demand.
New car sales in Russia have slumped again after a brief upturn in 2024. In the first five months of this year, only around 450,000 vehicles were sold in total, a 26% drop. Avtovaz is also forecasting a 25% market slump for the year as a whole.
The crisis is also affecting agricultural machinery manufacturer Rostselmash. A maker of combine harvesters and tractors, it has imposed compulsory leave on more than 15,000 employees.
That leaves staff unclear whether they will be able to return to work afterwards. The factory had already slashed people's hours in March, and laid of 2,000 workers a month later.
Paradoxically, Rostselmash is also unable to benefit from the widespread withdrawal of Western rivals.
Sales of combine harvesters are stagnating, with the 20% market slump last year followed by a 10% to 15% decline so far this year.
Some 40% of Rostselmash's annual production is gathering dust in warehouses. Farmers lack the cash to buy new technology - pitted against high interest rates and rising production costs.
Shrinking harvests raise food security fears
That in turn is affecting harvests. The year the Kremlin launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, 2022, Putin proudly reported a record grain harvest of 157 million tons. But yields have dropped annually since.
Putin ordered grain harvests to be increased to 170 million tons and exports to 80 million tons by 2030. "But based on the latest trends, the movement in our country is going in the opposite direction," says Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Patrushev, who oversees agriculture. He called for this to be swiftly corrected.
Moscow is now hoping for a better yield than last year as farmers start harvesting potatoes. A jump in supply could cause prices to fall, at least for the time being.
Otherwise, Putin may have to resort to the recipe of his long-time ally, Belarusian ruler Alexander Lukashenko, dubbed the "potato dictator."
Lukashenko - no lightweight himself - recently suggested Belarusians only eat potatoes once or twice a week at most - saying otherwise, they would get too fat.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms
Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms

Bloomberg

time16 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Russia's Frozen $245 Billion Can Pay for Ukraine's Arms

The mood in Kyiv early this year was upbeat. Many hoped a new US president dedicated to 'peace through strength' would produce a more robust American approach to ending Russia's invasion. Few believed Donald Trump would be duped into handing over Ukraine's best negotiating cards by Vladimir Putin's professions of peace. Yet it happened, and the effect on Ukrainian morale has been devastating. Now, finally, there's a glimmer of hope. In his comments from the White House on Monday, Trump made it clear that the worst possible outcome for Ukraine — a US refusal to go on supplying air defense and other critical weapons — has been avoided. But as always with Trump, there are conditions. He will continue sending Kyiv weapons only if other nations pay for them. And although he threatened Russia with 100% secondary tariffs, these would take effect only after 50 days, giving Putin the rest of the summer to press his offensive with impunity.

This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'
This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

This Secret Dividend Formula Crushed Stocks In The ‘Lost Decade'

Lost decade text on Business chart background 3d rendering Tariffs. Inflation. Soaring interest rates. The financial press, of course, blares about all of them—day in and day out. Truth is, they have to do this to get your attention. But it's also unhealthy to your portfolio, as investing based on the headlines leads to traps like trading too much, selling at the bottom and buying at the top. (This is why we focus on high-yield closed-end funds and aim to hold long term. This lets us tune out the headlines and 'automatically' reinvest our 8%+ average payouts in corners of our portfolio that are on sale at any given time. We'll see this strategy in action below.) If you ever need to remind yourself of just how short-term the media's focus can be, I recommend two things: Over the last 32 years, which is the furthest back my charting software goes, stocks have risen about 10.7% annualized. Going back a century doesn't move that figure much, cutting it slightly to 10.4% annualized. In other words, ignoring the headlines and diligently saving and investing pretty much guarantees a strong return if you hold long enough. But What About Downturns? Of course, stocks can, and do, fall in the short term—and 'short term' can sometimes be quite a while. Note in the chart above that the S&P 500 was actually higher in 2000 than it was in 2010. This was the so-called 'lost decade'—the worst 10-year span for US stocks in nearly 100 years. This points to the importance of going beyond stocks, to assets like real estate investment trusts (REITs) and corporate bonds, which can trade opposite stocks and help smooth out some of those down periods. To see what I'm getting at here, consider a 7.9%-paying REIT CEF, the Cohen and Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI), during that 'lost decade.' We hold RFI in CEF Insider because of its strong track record and ability to sustain our income (and portfolio) when stocks fall. Also, note that this happened even with the 2008 subprime-mortgage crisis, which of course hit real estate hard. In part, that's due to RFI's strong management. It's also partly due to the fund's high yield, which let shareholders 'cash out' some of their investment in the form of regular payouts they could then invest elsewhere. This part is key to our strategy and another valuable benefit of diversification: We can periodically take profits (and in the case of CEFs, high dividends) from one investment and put them in another. If both have strong long-term prospects—like US stocks and REITs—we put ourselves in a very good long-term position by doing so. RFI Leads the REIT Pack Strong management and that high yield are why RFI has crushed the popular REIT index fund over the long haul. Now, the natural move here is to buy RFI and then combine it with stocks. Many people would do this by mixing RFI with something like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)—the popular S&P 500 index fund. It's not a bad strategy. But it only gets you a 4.6% average yield between these two funds, since SPY pays so little. That's why we CEF investors look to options like the 8.5%-yielding Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX) and the 7.3%-yielding Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (ASG) instead. This duo gives us exposure to plenty of S&P 500 names, like Microsoft (MSFT), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Visa (V). And, when matched with RFI, we get a 7.9% average dividend yield across all three funds, in addition to REIT diversification. Over the last 25 years these three funds have had similar performance, with ADX closely tracking SPY and ASG significantly outperforming until recently (and bear in mind that with these two CEFs, we're getting much of our return as dividends). ASG's late dip is largely because part of the fund's portfolio is devoted to tech-focused smaller-cap stocks, and those are still recovering from a sharp selloff in 2021. So, over the long term, we can consider both of these CEFs to be good replacements for the S&P 500, with the added bonus of ASG being a bit underpriced now, due to that small-cap tech lag. Over the last 25 years, ADX and ASG have returned 7.2% yearly on average, in the ballpark of the S&P 500's 7.9% (since we're starting in 2000, at the peak of the dot-com bubble, our compounded annualized growth rate is lower than the 10.4% average stocks have had over the last century). RFI's 10.3% annualized return in that time has meant strong outperformance and an offset that both secures our three-fund portfolio's income stream and its total return. This is why our CEF Insider portfolio holds stocks, bonds, REITs, municipal bonds and funds from other sectors and asset classes. By doing so, we can transfer profits and dividends from one to the other when one group is oversold (and there's usually at least one that is at any given time!). That's much better than we're likely to do by putting all of our eggs in one basket with something like SPY. An added bonus? We get to ignore the headlines, too. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none

Trump's missile announcement provides vital relief to Ukraine – but lack of stricter sanctions against Russia stings
Trump's missile announcement provides vital relief to Ukraine – but lack of stricter sanctions against Russia stings

CNN

time25 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's missile announcement provides vital relief to Ukraine – but lack of stricter sanctions against Russia stings

Donald Trump's remarks on Ukraine on Monday were far from the biggest announcement the US president could have made. The good news for Kyiv is familiar. Trump has permitted NATO's other members to buy American arms – a wide range of them, it seems. Included are the urgently needed Patriot interceptor missiles, and the batteries that fire them. Trump even suggested there were 17 hanging around to 'spare' in one NATO nation. Whatever the precise reality of the arms package NATO eventually affords, it is exactly what Trump suggested at the weekend and exactly what Ukraine needs. The nightly barrage of Russian ballistic missiles can only be stopped by US Patriot missiles, and only the White House can authorize their supply. Ukraine was short of these, and other sophisticated American weapons that may not have been referenced by name and may be included in the deal. This is short-term, vital relief. But the sting for Ukraine comes in what was not announced: Immediate secondary sanctions against customers of Russian energy, which could significantly empty Moscow's coffers. The scope of sanctions proposed by a bill in the US Senate – potentially 500% on all trade with those who buy Russian hydrocarbons – would have been devastating. And those sanctions would hit China and India – the US's main rival and key ally respectively – at a time when oil prices are low, but trade turmoil is high. The damage to energy markets would have been palpable, and the US would also have been impacted by likely higher oil prices. But this comes with a significant delay, together with the somewhat toothless threat of sanctions against Russia itself (there is almost no trade to penalize). Fifty days gives Vladimir Putin until September for Trump to change his mind, or for the Russian president's rumored summer offensive to alter the battlefield reality to the point where Putin is happy to seek a freeze in the conflict. It does create a window in which New Delhi and Beijing may seek to decouple from Russian energy – unlikely given their dependency and how complex that would be – or perhaps apply pressure on Moscow to end the war. That too is a tough ask for Beijing, whose officials have recently indicated they cannot see Moscow lose the conflict without risking the United States turning its full attention to its rivalry with China. The deadline also shows Trump has yet to give up on the most elusive figment of his Ukraine policy: that the Kremlin actually wants peace, and has yet to be persuaded adequately into it. Trump again held out a deadline to push Russia into a deal. We have been here before, and Putin has let the ticking clock whizz past his ear. Yet it is important to seize upon Trump's change in tone – mood music being perhaps the more enduring indication of White House policy than the specifics provided. There was a telling moment in which Trump stopped short of calling Putin an assassin, and painted an image of a White House where the first lady often reminds him of how violently Kyiv is hit by Russians drones and missiles. The US president has swung wildly through all the seasons of Putin – his spring of hope that peace was possible, a brief summer of diplomacy in the Gulf and Istanbul, a fall of souring relations, and now, finally, the same winter of discontent that was President Joe Biden's default position. Yet after six months, in which, Russian diplomacy – its synthetic and performative nature, combined with cynical, maximalist demands – has flexed its muscles, Trump has still not given up on talking the Kremlin into voluntarily stopping its existential war of choice. Trump has also shied away from some of the tougher options available to him. No new American money is going to Ukraine, and we heard nothing public about new capabilities being delivered either. Trump's Ukraine policy is transformed in mood, perhaps, but retains key elements from its past. A desire for anyone but the US to foot the bill; deadlines for action, rather than immediate consequences for inaction; and a baffling belief the Kremlin wants peace. Kyiv will be relieved immediately but may also soon feel a familiar sense of disappointment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store