Woman fatally scalded in 60C bath
Kyah Lucas, 28, who was non-verbal and had multiple disabilities, died in hospital five days after being bathed in scalding water by two workers from National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) provider LiveBetter during a support session in Orange in the NSW Central Tablelands in February 2022.
On Monday, LiveBetter pleaded guilty in the NSW District Court to breaching its primary duty of health and safety regarding Ms Lucas's death.
A second charge of failing to immediately notify the workplace regulator of Ms Lucas's injuries was dismissed. A sentencing hearing will be held at a later date.
The case was brought by SafeWork NSW, which alleged LiveBetter engaged in negligent or reckless conduct by failing to implement basic safety measures, such as auditing the hot water system or checking bath water temperatures with a thermometer.
Regulatory documents said the organisation also failed to properly train staff to safely bathe NDIS clients and to respond appropriately after a burns incident. Kyah Lucas, who was non-verbal and had multiple disabilities, died in hospital five days after being bathed in scalding water by two workers from NDIS provider LiveBetter during a support session in February 2022. Credit: News Corp Australia
Ms Lucas had profound intellectual disabilities, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, was non-verbal, unable to walk independently and struggled to regulate her temperature, vulnerabilities LiveBetter was aware of.
On the day she was injured, LiveBetter staff removed Ms Lucas from the bath with her skin peeling. A temperature control panel revealed the water temperature was 60C, far above the safe limit of 42C.
Ms Lucas died five days later at Concord Repatriation General Hospital in Sydney.
In February, LiveBetter said it was working with regulators and agencies to ensure a safe work environment for both staff and clients.
'LiveBetter continues to mourn the tragic death of Kyah Lucas … and our thoughts remain with her grieving family,' it said at the time.
The criminal case follows separate Federal Court proceedings last year when LiveBetter was fined a record $1.8m after admitting to 17 breaches of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Act. The water temperature in the bath was 60C. Credit: News Corp Australia
The Federal Court was told LiveBetter fundamentally failed in its duty of care to Ms Lucas, including failing to conduct a formal risk assessment of her home, properly train and assess support workers in safe bathing techniques and deliver timely and appropriate care on the day she was burned.
Justice Elizabeth Raper said the tragic case highlighted 'fundamental failures' by LiveBetter to provide quality supports and services as required under the NDIS Act.
She noted LiveBetter staff had learnt 'on the job,' with training assessments limited to an online quiz.
'The specific harm suffered by Ms Lucas was of the most acute kind, so too can it be said of the harm to Ms Lucas's family,' Justice Raper said.
'There are no words to properly express the degree of the harm suffered.
'LiveBetter accepts that the nature and extent of the contraventions causing loss are serious as they ultimately resulted in the death of Ms Lucas.' LiveBetter pleaded guilty in the NSW District Court to breaching its primary duty of health and safety regarding Ms Lucas's death. Credit: News Regional Media
Ms Lucas had been a long-term client of LiveBetter since 2009.
Despite this, the organisation failed to identify the risks associated with her condition and implement proper safety measures, the Federal Court found.
The $1.8m penalty imposed was close to the maximum available under the legislation.
Justice Raper said the penalty reflected the 'tragic and untimely' nature of Ms Lucas's death and reinforced the importance of compliance with the high standards expected of NDIS providers.
Ms Lucas's family did not make a statement to the court, but the judgment acknowledged her vulnerability and the devastating impact of her loss.
Following the 2024 judgment, former NDIS minister Bill Shorten said disability providers had a fundamental responsibility to do everything possible to keep participants safe.
'LiveBetter failed to look after Kyah Lucas. She was a vulnerable woman who needed support, safeguarding and care,' Mr Shorten said.
LiveBetter acknowledged the court's decision and confirmed it accepted the outcome.
'This is a very significant penalty that reflects the seriousness of the circumstance surrounding Kyah's death,' a statement read.
'Kyah's death is a tragedy that has impacted all of us and our deepest sympathies remain with her family.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
19 hours ago
- Perth Now
Reforms of care services needed, commission recommends
Australia's care system could see sweeping reforms that includes a national screening system for care workers, greater collaboration between health services and a major shift towards preventive health investment. The Productivity Commission released its fifth and final interim report on Wednesday, noting an overhaul of the care sector is needed to boost the country's productivity. Commissioner Alison Roberts said care is a rapidly growing sector and proposed reforms will seek to break through government's siloed approach to decision-making. The interim report urges the government to better align quality and safety regulations across the care economy, by reducing the risk of unsafe providers and workers. This includes a streamlined national screen clearance for workers in aged care, NDIS, veterans' care and early childhood education and care sectors. It would make it easier for workers to move between care sectors and cut down on paperwork from providers. "We don't have a joined up system, which means people can move from state to state or within the sector to another (workforce) and avoid detection," Dr Roberts said. "Greater oversight and joined up systems will reduce this risk of occurring." The interim report also recommends the establishment of a national framework to support investment in prevention. This would allow governments the ability to invest in programs that bring long-term benefits to patients and communities. Public Health Association of Australia chief executive Terry Slevin said the recommendation exposes a glaring flaw in the federal budget process which hampers investment in prevention. He said the current rules don't allow for forecasting or consideration of financial and productivity benefits beyond the four-year estimates period. "That means the long-term benefits that come from preventive health measures are excluded from influencing government decision making," he told AAP. "This is nuts." Professor Slevin said the report recognises the importance of preventative health, something that is a forgotten part of the health funding model. "Prevention has an enormous benefit and of course being able to live longer and healthier lives is really the key benefit," he said. "The PC provides that economic lens for us to think again about how we approach investment in making our health better rather than just fixing us when we're crook." The report also calls for integrated and tailored care through collaboration, which would see hospital and primary health networks work together with Aboriginal community controlled health organisations. This will improve the quality of care and promote local autonomy, which could reduce potentially preventable hospitalisations and other gaps in service provision. The commission estimates a 10 per cent drop in preventable hospitalisations through better collaboration could save $600 million annually. Business, union and civil society leaders will come together with experts and government representatives at a three-day economic reform roundtable, which begins on August 19.
Sydney Morning Herald
20 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Dishonest, unethical, negligent but Al Muderis is still working at big hospital
'We can confirm we have asked Macquarie University Hospital, the operator of the hospital, to review and investigate the court's findings, including taking all steps as necessary with the regulators who play the key role in setting standards and policies that all registered health practitioners must meet.' Macquarie University Hospital confirmed that Al Muderis still held positions as an accredited practitioner with the hospital and an honorary clinical professor title with Macquarie University. He does most of his osseointegration work at the Limb Reconstruction Centre at the hospital. 'All affiliations with the hospital are strictly related to defined clinical responsibilities undertaken at the hospital, and within governance and credentialing framework,' the spokesperson said. 'This includes sitting on any committees, which often have fixed terms. 'The hospital notes it has no current complaints about the matters raised in the Federal Court ruling, nor have any issues been raised directly with us by appropriate regulators. 'The hospital continues to deliver safe, high-quality care, attract talented staff, and meet its regulatory obligations. Our priority is – and will remain – delivering safe, high-quality care for every patient.' Loading Macquarie University Hospital confirmed that it has received Medibank's correspondence and welcomed the 'constructive dialogue'. It also distanced itself from Al Muderis' practice. 'Noting the comprehensive nature of the Federal Court's recent judgment, the hospital's understanding is that many of the actions referenced in it relate to an individual's private practice, which operates independently of the hospital,' it said. 'We believe it is important to distinguish between activities undertaken in a private practice setting and those carried out at the hospital, and which remains committed to providing the highest standards of patient care at all times.' It said it worked closely with regulators and any formal investigations, if warranted, would be carried out with respect for due process and fairness. Through lawyers, Al Muderis said he had worked at Macquarie University Hospital since 2010 and claimed patient complaints against his practice had been 'dismissed'. 'He has been cleared of any wrongdoing by all relevant authorities, including AHPRA [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency] and the Medical Council of NSW, and there are no active complaints or investigations against him that he is aware of,' Al Muderis' lawyers said. 'He is of the view that the standard of clinical governance at Macquarie is one of the highest in the world – which he is proud to be part of.' Al Muderis also holds positions at several other hospitals, including East Sydney Private Hospital since November 2020. The Woolloomooloo-based hospital said it could not comment on individual matters but was 'committed to ensuring safe, high-quality, patient-centred care'. 'We are aware of the case and are currently investigating the matter and will follow our established internal processes, ensuring due process and fairness,' East Sydney Private Hospital said. The Health Care Complaints Commission, responsible for investigating practitioners in NSW, did not respond to questions about the judgment. A commission spokesperson said it took all complaints seriously and had a duty to protect the public but would not comment on 'individual complaints or regulatory outcomes'. 'The Federal Court's findings … are of interest to the commission. We will review these findings and determine whether they warrant further consideration or action,' the commission spokesperson said. National healthcare regulator AHPRA, which manages guidelines for all healthcare practitioners, also did not answer detailed questions but said it was considering the 800-page decision as part of its standard processes. Loading Justice Wendy Abraham, in her judgment, found this masthead and 60 Minutes had reasonably criticised AHPRA for its silence on Al Muderis given it is the nation's peak health regulator. 'Nor do I accept, given AHPRA's role and the issues raised with them, that the journalists were required to accept that AHPRA could not relevantly comment,' Abraham found. The AHPRA spokesperson did not respond directly to this finding but said it would consider the judgment and any findings relevant to its role providing guidance to medical practitioners about advertising. This masthead revealed on Wednesday that Amnesty International and Red Cross Australia denied Dr Al Muderis was an ambassador for the charities, despite these claims being made in his affidavit and in court by his barrister, Sue Chrysanthou, SC. Other smaller charities said his involvement was limited and historical. Al Muderis denied any deliberate misrepresentation about his charity associations.
The Age
20 hours ago
- The Age
Dishonest, unethical, negligent but Al Muderis is still working at big hospital
'We can confirm we have asked Macquarie University Hospital, the operator of the hospital, to review and investigate the court's findings, including taking all steps as necessary with the regulators who play the key role in setting standards and policies that all registered health practitioners must meet.' Macquarie University Hospital confirmed that Al Muderis still held positions as an accredited practitioner with the hospital and an honorary clinical professor title with Macquarie University. He does most of his osseointegration work at the Limb Reconstruction Centre at the hospital. 'All affiliations with the hospital are strictly related to defined clinical responsibilities undertaken at the hospital, and within governance and credentialing framework,' the spokesperson said. 'This includes sitting on any committees, which often have fixed terms. 'The hospital notes it has no current complaints about the matters raised in the Federal Court ruling, nor have any issues been raised directly with us by appropriate regulators. 'The hospital continues to deliver safe, high-quality care, attract talented staff, and meet its regulatory obligations. Our priority is – and will remain – delivering safe, high-quality care for every patient.' Loading Macquarie University Hospital confirmed that it has received Medibank's correspondence and welcomed the 'constructive dialogue'. It also distanced itself from Al Muderis' practice. 'Noting the comprehensive nature of the Federal Court's recent judgment, the hospital's understanding is that many of the actions referenced in it relate to an individual's private practice, which operates independently of the hospital,' it said. 'We believe it is important to distinguish between activities undertaken in a private practice setting and those carried out at the hospital, and which remains committed to providing the highest standards of patient care at all times.' It said it worked closely with regulators and any formal investigations, if warranted, would be carried out with respect for due process and fairness. Through lawyers, Al Muderis said he had worked at Macquarie University Hospital since 2010 and claimed patient complaints against his practice had been 'dismissed'. 'He has been cleared of any wrongdoing by all relevant authorities, including AHPRA [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency] and the Medical Council of NSW, and there are no active complaints or investigations against him that he is aware of,' Al Muderis' lawyers said. 'He is of the view that the standard of clinical governance at Macquarie is one of the highest in the world – which he is proud to be part of.' Al Muderis also holds positions at several other hospitals, including East Sydney Private Hospital since November 2020. The Woolloomooloo-based hospital said it could not comment on individual matters but was 'committed to ensuring safe, high-quality, patient-centred care'. 'We are aware of the case and are currently investigating the matter and will follow our established internal processes, ensuring due process and fairness,' East Sydney Private Hospital said. The Health Care Complaints Commission, responsible for investigating practitioners in NSW, did not respond to questions about the judgment. A commission spokesperson said it took all complaints seriously and had a duty to protect the public but would not comment on 'individual complaints or regulatory outcomes'. 'The Federal Court's findings … are of interest to the commission. We will review these findings and determine whether they warrant further consideration or action,' the commission spokesperson said. National healthcare regulator AHPRA, which manages guidelines for all healthcare practitioners, also did not answer detailed questions but said it was considering the 800-page decision as part of its standard processes. Loading Justice Wendy Abraham, in her judgment, found this masthead and 60 Minutes had reasonably criticised AHPRA for its silence on Al Muderis given it is the nation's peak health regulator. 'Nor do I accept, given AHPRA's role and the issues raised with them, that the journalists were required to accept that AHPRA could not relevantly comment,' Abraham found. The AHPRA spokesperson did not respond directly to this finding but said it would consider the judgment and any findings relevant to its role providing guidance to medical practitioners about advertising. This masthead revealed on Wednesday that Amnesty International and Red Cross Australia denied Dr Al Muderis was an ambassador for the charities, despite these claims being made in his affidavit and in court by his barrister, Sue Chrysanthou, SC. Other smaller charities said his involvement was limited and historical. Al Muderis denied any deliberate misrepresentation about his charity associations.
