McDonald's hash brown price rise in US? Here's the truth about viral post
All this began when a person on Threads posted that how could McDonald's be charging $4.35 for a hash brown.
So, is McDonald's charging four dollars for a hash brown? Here's the truth.
How much McDonald's charges for hash browns
The post, it turned out, was made by someone in Australia, so when they wrote $4.35, it was Australian dollars (AUD). This translates to around $2.82 in the US.
In the US, McDonald's allows franchisees to set prices depending on local conditions, like rent and labor, Washington Post noted. Thus, there is no fixed single price of hash browns across the country. Typically, areas with higher costs of living will also have higher hash brown prices!
Technomic reported that the average price is $2.38, while ranges vary from $1.99 to $3.99. Washington Post reported that it cost $3.99 in downtown San Francisco and $1.99 in downtown Boston. However, given that hash browns are part of the 'buy one, add one for $1' menu, which is available nationally, the item could be purchased at a much lower price if one were to order multiple things off the menu.
The increasing cost of fast food prices
McDonald's has seen fast food prices rise. The average cost of an item shot up by 40 percent between 2019 and 2024, Washington Post reported.
McDonald's profits have risen in the second quarter behind a rebound in US sales but executives noted that low-income consumers remained under economic stress.
McDonald's Chief Executive Christopher Kempczinski described the US consumer base as "bifurcated," with weakness in low-income consumers a reason for lingering caution on the outlook, he said at the outset of an earnings conference call.
"There's a lot of anxiety and unease with that low-income consumer," Kempczinski said. "I think we could all speculate the reasons for that, probably tariffs and the impact that might have, be questions around the employment situation."
People are either skipping meals like breakfast, "or they're trading down, either within our menu or they're trading down to eating at home," he said.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What Trump team doesn't get about India and Pakistan
In international diplomacy, subtlety, mutual respect and an understanding of geopolitical nuance are key to building lasting partnerships. Under President Donald Trump, however, these principles often take a backseat to a transactional, ego-driven approach. Nowhere is this more evident than in the frayed relationship between the US and India, marked by a breakdown in trust, growing strategic divergences, and a misreading of India's geopolitical red lines. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker At the center of this deterioration is Trump's fixation on projecting himself as a global dealmaker and peacemaker, a strategy driven in part by his not-so-subtle ambition to win the Nobel Peace Prize. This personal aspiration, combined with a heavy-handed use of economic pressure via tariffs, pose a formidable threat to America's ties with its allies as shown in the case of India. Misreading India's strategic autonomy A telling incident reflecting a grave India-US disconnect occurred in New Delhi, as reported by Washington Post, when Trump's top adviser on India, Ricky Gill, was having dinner in New Delhi with former Indian diplomats. "Though he was in town for a global security conference, the conversation turned, inevitably, to Trump's souring relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi , according to two people familiar with the matter. Indian officials were expressing frustration that trade negotiations had been upended; they were also angry that Trump kept claiming credit for resolving the country's recent military confrontation with Pakistan," Washington Post reported. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo "Indian officials were expressing frustration that trade negotiations had been upended; they were also angry that Trump kept claiming credit for resolving the country's recent military confrontation with Pakistan," Washington Post reported. "Gill, the National Security Council's senior director for South and Central Asia, tried to assuage the former diplomats, assuring them Washington still viewed New Delhi as a crucial partner, according to the two people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. But Gill noted there was one thing irritating Trump's team: Why were the Indians still obsessing over how the conflict in May had ended? The diplomats were 'surprised' by the question, the people familiar said. India has made no secret of its long-standing position that issues with Pakistan, its nuclear arch-rival, should be handled bilaterally." Also Read | Trump-Putin meet: Trump's aide warns India of more tariffs if peace bid fails Live Events Trump has repeatedly boasted that it was his intervention that de-escalated the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. This isn't just a case of diplomatic overreach. It is a miscalculation that strikes at the core of India's doctrine on handling Pakistan bilaterally. For decades, India has insisted that it permits no third-party mediation in India-Pakistan affairs. By inserting himself into the narrative, Trump not only ignored this long-held position but also risked undermining India's sovereignty in the eyes of its own population and strategic community. India was livid at Trump equating Pakistan, a perpetrator of terror, with India, a victim of that terror. Trump's narrow personal agenda is ruining India-US relations Parallel to this geopolitical misunderstanding is Trump's habitual use of tariffs to achieve foreign policy aims. For Trump, this is part of his broader strategy of economic coercion, a belief that tariff threats would compel nations to yield to any kind of US demands. However, the assumption of the Trump team that nations and their leaders are driven solely by economic motivations has proved to be wrong as India has refused to flatter Trump by agreeing to his false claim of brokering peace between India and Pakistan. India is not easily bullied. With a long-standing tradition of non-alignment and strategic autonomy, Indian policymakers were deeply offended by the assumption that trade threats could dictate foreign policy shifts. Trump's belief that India could be pressured into acknowledging his version of the Pakistan ceasefire, or into other concessions, with an economic stick only widened the rift. The fallout is real and immediate. Rather than drawing India closer, Trump's approach is pushing it to hedge its bets. India has begun recalibrating its foreign policy, getting even closer to Russia and improving limited coordination with China. These shifts signal a reversal in long efforts that have gone into forging of India-US partnership. Also Read | Why the Trump-Putin Alaska meeting may not ease tensions between India, US, and Russia Moreover, Trump's overtures to Pakistan, culminating in the unprecedented lunch with Pakistan's army chief Asim Munir, sent shockwaves through New Delhi. For Indian officials, this was not just bad optics; it was a betrayal. After years of building a shared Indo-Pacific vision with the US, and deepening military and intelligence cooperation, India saw itself being sidelined in favour of a short-term public relations win. Underlying all of this is Trump's desire to portray himself as a global statesman. His repeated claims of resolving conflicts, from North Korea to the Middle East, often bear little resemblance to reality. In South Asia, the disconnect was especially stark. By claiming he "coerced" India into peace, Trump not only dismissed India's strategic autonomy but also tried to rewrite regional history to serve a narrow personal narrative. Such distortion isn't just diplomatically clumsy, it is also strategically dangerous. It has led Indians to question the reliability of the US as a strategic partner. For a relationship that had taken decades to mature -- spanning defense, intelligence and economic cooperation -- this erosion of trust is a serious setback.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Australia's Telstra reports annual profit jump, unveils $655 million buyback
Australian telecom Telstra on Thursday forecast higher operating earnings for 2026, following strong contributions from its mobile and fixed connectivity units that bolstered 2025 earnings, while also announcing a A$1 billion ($654.60 million) share buyback. Price increases on most postpaid mobile plans, along with a rise in mobile network customers, have strengthened Telstra's margins despite intensified competition from rivals. "We are also increasing the capacity of our subsea cable network to meet customers' increasing bandwidth consumption, growing artificial intelligence usage and data centre demands," Chief Executive Vicki Brady said. The telecom firm's A$1 billion buyback, citing growth in earnings and a strong balance sheet, follows February's share repurchase announcement of A$750 million. Telstra said it expects underlying EBITDA after lease amortisation between A$8.15 billion and A$8.45 billion for fiscal 2026, up from A$8.02 billion reported in fiscal 2025. The company reported a 31% rise in profit to A$2.34 billion for the year ended June 30, up from A$1.79 billion a year earlier, aligning with the Visible Alpha consensus estimate of A$2.34 billion. Telstra's focus on cost management, including the layoff of 550 employees as part of its ongoing restructuring of enterprise business and other organisational changes, has also supported its bottom line. It declared a final dividend of 9.5 Australian cents per share, slightly higher than the 9 Australian cents declared a year ago.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Infosys to buy 75% stake in Telstra's Versent for $153 million for AI-led JV
NEW DELHI: Homegrown IT services firm Infosys would acquire a 75% stake in Versent Group , a wholly-owned unit of Australian telecom group Telstra , for A$233.3 million (~$153 million), to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven cloud joint venture (JV). "Infosys will acquire 75% of the shareholding in Versent Telstra will continue to retain a 25% minority stake in Versent Group, reflecting its confidence in the shared potential for growth and customer value, combining Telstra's connectivity, Versent's local digital engineering expertise, and Infosys' global scale," Infosys said in a regulatory filing Wednesday. "Accelerating Infosys' strategy to help clients navigate their AI journey, this collaboration will propel AI-enabled cloud and digital solutions for Australian businesses," it added. Versent, with over 650 engineers, provides cloud services to Australian organisations in sectors such as finance, energy, utilities, government and education, Infosys said. The IT company said the deal is expected to boost its local presence, and is expected to close by the second half of fiscal 2026, subject to approvals from the Foreign Investment Review Board of Australia and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. In 2024, Infosys entered into a strategic multi-year collaboration with Telstra to accelerate its software engineering and IT transformation journey and enhance customer experience. This year, the IT company collaborated with Telstra International, to advance technology leadership, drive innovation and support Telstra's new Connected Future 30 strategy.
