H&M Group's Linda Leopold steps down as head of AI strategy after seven years
H&M Group, the Swedish fashion giant known for its global retail footprint and tech-forward initiatives, has announced the departure of Linda Leopold, who served as Head of AI Strategy. After seven years in strategic leadership roles, Leopold is stepping down to focus on consulting, writing, and speaking engagements centered on artificial intelligence and its ethical development across industries.
Leopold joined H&M Group in 2018 and held several key roles within the company's growing AI division. As Head of AI Policy, she played a critical role in launching and expanding the brand's Responsible AI program. Under her guidance, H&M Group established frameworks for digital ethics and adopted strategic approaches to implementing generative AI technologies.
'These years were extraordinary—not only because I had the opportunity to help shape H&M's AI direction, but also because I witnessed AI evolve at lightning speed,' Leopold wrote on LinkedIn. 'I'm particularly proud of building the Responsible AI program from the ground up and contributing to the global conversation on ethical AI.'
Her leadership earned international recognition. In 2022, Forbes named her one of the world's nine most influential women in AI. Before her time at H&M Group, Leopold worked as an innovation strategist bridging fashion and technology and also served as editor-in-chief of the Scandinavian fashion and culture magazine Bon.
'Now it's time for the next chapter,' she added. 'With AI at such a pivotal point, I want to help guide its development across different industries and organizations.'
Leopold's exit comes as H&M Group continues its push into digital innovation. Earlier this month, the brand launched a new denim capsule collection powered by digital twin technology —part of a larger strategy to integrate generative AI into storytelling and customer engagement. According to Chief Creative Officer Jörgen Andersson, the goal is to create emotional connections with consumers without diluting brand identity. The first drop debuted on July 2 via H&M's global online store, with more launches planned this fall.
While investing in new technologies, H&M Group also faces mounting economic pressures. The company reported a 5% year-over-year decline in net sales for the second quarter, falling to SEK 56.7 billion. However, operating profit rose slightly to SEK 5.9 billion—beating analyst forecasts. The group also improved inventory management, though deeper price cuts are expected in the third quarter as customers become more cautious with spending.
'We're seeing greater price sensitivity among customers due to ongoing uncertainty,' Group CEO Daniel Erver said during the latest earnings call.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Google-parent Alphabet earnings shine with help of AI
Alphabet's second-quarter profit of $28.2 billion -- on $96.4 billion in revenue -- came with word that the tech giant will invest more than its previously planned $85 billion on capital expenditure, as it spends heavily on AI infrastructure to meet growing demand for cloud services. "We had a standout quarter, with robust growth across the company," said Alphabet chief executive Sundar Pichai. "AI is positively impacting every part of the business, driving strong momentum." Revenue from search grew double-digits in the quarter, with features such as AI Overviews and the recently launched AI mode "performing well," according to Pichai. Ad revenue at YouTube continues to grow along with the video platform's subscription services, Alphabet reported. Alphabet's cloud computing business is on pace to bring in $50 billion over the course of the year, according to the company. "With this strong and growing demand for our cloud products and services, we are increasing our investment in capital expenditures in 2025 to approximately $85 billion and are excited by the opportunity ahead," Pichai said. Alphabet shares were essentially flat in after-market trades that followed the release of the earnings figures. Investors have been watching closely to see whether the tech giant may be pouring too much money into artificial intelligence and whether AI-generated summaries of search results will translate into fewer opportunities to serve up money-making ads. The internet giant is dabbling with ads in its new AI Mode for online search, a strategic move to fend off competition from ChatGPT while adapting its advertising business for an AI age. The integration of advertising has been a key question accompanying the rise of generative AI chatbots, which have largely avoided interrupting the user experience with marketing messages. However, advertising remains Google's financial bedrock. Google and rivals are spending billions of dollars on data centers and more for AI, while the rise of lower-cost model DeepSeek from China raises questions about how much needs to be spent. Antitrust battles Meanwhile the online ad business that generates the cash Google invests in its future could be neutered due to a defeat in a US antitrust case. During the summer of 2024, Google was found guilty of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington. The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default. District Judge Amit Mehta is considering "remedies" in a decision expected in the coming days or weeks. In another legal battle, a different US judge ruled this year that Google wielded monopoly power in the online ad technology market, another legal blow that could rattle the tech giant's revenue engine. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that Google built an illegal monopoly over ad software and tools used by publishers. Combined, the courtroom defeats have the potential to leave Google split up and its influence curbed. Google said it is appealing both rulings. © 2025 AFP
Fashion Network
5 hours ago
- Fashion Network
M&S ad banned by ASA, but ASOS ad complaint not upheld
M&S has been labelled 'irresponsible' by the UK's advertising watchdog for using an 'unhealthily thin' model to promote clothes on its app. Upholding a complaint, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the model 'appeared unhealthily thin', concluding that the ad was 'irresponsible.' It said: 'The pose of the model and the choice of clothing meant the ad gave the impression that the model was unhealthily thin'. It therefore violated the CAP code, which states'marketing communications must be prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society.' The ASA received four complaints about various M&S images but upheld only one and banned its use in the retail giant's app. M&S said its inclusive womenswear clothing represented a full spectrum of sizes, ranging from eight to 24, adding that it took concerns about the depiction of body image in its ads 'very seriously'. It has since amended the ads and removed the specific images. In a separate complaint about the use of another 'unhealthy model' in an ad, the ASA has cleared online fashion giant ASOS of any wrong-doing. An in-app ad for a dress, seen on 1 April and featuring a model wearing a dress with spaghetti straps and a low V-shaped neckline, received complaints that the image of the model was deemed 'unhealthily thin' and challenging whether the ad was irresponsible. But under the CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.3 (Responsible advertising), the ASA did not find the image was in breach of the rules. ASOS said it 'recognised [its] responsibility to both consumers and society and did not consider the ad to be irresponsible or in breach of the CAP Code'. It said all models booked by ASOS 'were measured according to specific industry standard guidelines during casting. [We] collaborate with reputable model agencies worldwide to ensure that all models were healthy and regularly reviewed a model's measurements to maintain those standards'.
Fashion Network
6 hours ago
- Fashion Network
M&S ad banned by ASA, but ASOS ad complaint not upheld
M&S has been labelled 'irresponsible' by the UK's advertising watchdog for using an 'unhealthily thin' model to promote clothes on its app. Upholding a complaint, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the model 'appeared unhealthily thin', concluding that the ad was 'irresponsible.' It said: 'The pose of the model and the choice of clothing meant the ad gave the impression that the model was unhealthily thin'. It therefore violated the CAP code, which states'marketing communications must be prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society.' The ASA received four complaints about various M&S images but upheld only one and banned its use in the retail giant's app. M&S said its inclusive womenswear clothing represented a full spectrum of sizes, ranging from eight to 24, adding that it took concerns about the depiction of body image in its ads 'very seriously'. It has since amended the ads and removed the specific images. In a separate complaint about the use of another 'unhealthy model' in an ad, the ASA has cleared online fashion giant ASOS of any wrong-doing. An in-app ad for a dress, seen on 1 April and featuring a model wearing a dress with spaghetti straps and a low V-shaped neckline, received complaints that the image of the model was deemed 'unhealthily thin' and challenging whether the ad was irresponsible. But under the CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 1.3 (Responsible advertising), the ASA did not find the image was in breach of the rules. ASOS said it 'recognised [its] responsibility to both consumers and society and did not consider the ad to be irresponsible or in breach of the CAP Code'. It said all models booked by ASOS 'were measured according to specific industry standard guidelines during casting. [We] collaborate with reputable model agencies worldwide to ensure that all models were healthy and regularly reviewed a model's measurements to maintain those standards'.
